GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Cambridge University Press (CUP) ; 2021
    In:  Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology Vol. 42, No. 1 ( 2021-01), p. 93-95
    In: Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology, Cambridge University Press (CUP), Vol. 42, No. 1 ( 2021-01), p. 93-95
    Abstract: A cross-sectional survey study of inpatient prescribers in a university health system was performed to assess the importance they place on different clinical risk factors when making empiric antibiotic decisions. Our findings show that these clinical risk factors were weighted differently based on the clinical scenario and the type of prescriber.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0899-823X , 1559-6834
    Language: English
    Publisher: Cambridge University Press (CUP)
    Publication Date: 2021
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 639378-0
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2106319-9
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    In: Open Forum Infectious Diseases, Oxford University Press (OUP), Vol. 6, No. Supplement_2 ( 2019-10-23), p. S376-S376
    Abstract: Despite advances in rapid organism identification, clinicians must make empiric antibiotic decisions prior to knowing the causative organism. Though many risk factors and patient characteristics have been studied and incorporated into predictive clinical decision support tools for empiric antibiotic prescription, little evidence exists on the relative importance of these factors in clinician judgment. The purpose of this study was to establish how providers evaluate patient and clinical risk factors when making empiric antimicrobial decisions. Methods An anonymous survey tool was distributed in February 2019 to medical providers who routinely prescribe antibiotics in 4 acute care hospitals throughout the University of Pennsylvania Health System. Providers were asked to rank the importance of 12 clinical factors using a 5-point scale from not important at all (1) to extremely important (5) in 3 unique clinical scenarios: uncomplicated cystitis, septic shock of unknown etiology, and uncomplicated pneumonia. Results Response rate was 30% (217/732). The importance of each factor varied among different clinical scenarios except for prior antibiotic exposure, local resistance patterns, drug-drug interactions, and treatment guidelines. However, the absolute difference varied by the factor and clinical scenario. Presence of indwelling catheter(s) had the largest absolute variation (median difference of 2 between septic shock and pneumonia, P 〈 0.001), and it was one of the top 5 most important factors for septic shock, but the least important factor for pneumonia. Conclusion The importance of clinicians place on clinical factors varies in different clinical scenarios. A better understanding of clinical decision-making in empiric antibiotic prescribing has the potential to guide stewardship efforts and clinical decision support. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 2328-8957
    Language: English
    Publisher: Oxford University Press (OUP)
    Publication Date: 2019
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2757767-3
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Elsevier BV ; 2012
    In:  The Lancet Infectious Diseases Vol. 12, No. 10 ( 2012-10), p. 808-815
    In: The Lancet Infectious Diseases, Elsevier BV, Vol. 12, No. 10 ( 2012-10), p. 808-815
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1473-3099
    Language: English
    Publisher: Elsevier BV
    Publication Date: 2012
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2061641-7
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Elsevier BV ; 2008
    In:  The American Journal of Medicine Vol. 121, No. 7 ( 2008-07), p. 583-585
    In: The American Journal of Medicine, Elsevier BV, Vol. 121, No. 7 ( 2008-07), p. 583-585
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0002-9343
    Language: English
    Publisher: Elsevier BV
    Publication Date: 2008
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80015-6
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 5
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Oxford University Press (OUP) ; 2019
    In:  Open Forum Infectious Diseases Vol. 6, No. Supplement_2 ( 2019-10-23), p. S380-S381
    In: Open Forum Infectious Diseases, Oxford University Press (OUP), Vol. 6, No. Supplement_2 ( 2019-10-23), p. S380-S381
    Abstract: Adverse drug events are associated with an increase in hospital stay and cost. Risks from these events are minimized by adjusting a medication’s dose or frequency, and changes in renal function may necessitate adjustments. Currently, there is no formal procedure for a prospective audit of renal function over the weekend at our institution. This pharmacist-driven initiative will evaluate if a prospective review identified by real-time clinical decision support alerts over the weekend will reduce the time from change in renal function to dose adjustment of select antimicrobials and/or anticoagulants. Methods This monitoring initiative is comprised of a pre- and post-cohort population. The pre-cohort population included patients admitted to Penn Presbyterian Medical Center (PPMC) from January to March of 2018 on select antimicrobials and/or anticoagulants, who were identified to have a change in renal function (serum creatinine change of 0.3 mg/dL or greater) over the weekend. The post-cohort population was identified with a clinical decision support system (ILÚM Health Solutions, Kenilworth, NJ) and included patients admitted to PPMC from January to March of 2019. A pharmacy resident reviewed alerts in the clinical decision support system over the weekend and contacted providers with dose adjustment recommendations. The Mann–Whitney U test was used to analyze the primary endpoint while descriptive statistics were used for the secondary endpoints Results Eighteen interventions were completed within the 3-month post-cohort intervention period, with a time to dose adjustment between the pre/post-cohort being reduced by 50 hours (P = 0.0001) resulting in a median time to change of 11 hours in the post-cohort. All pharmacy recommendations were accepted by the provider, and 94% of medication adjustments were antimicrobials. Conclusion The application of this prospective weekend initiative utilizing a clinical decision support system demonstrated a clinically and statistically significant reduction in the time to dose adjustments for antimicrobials and/or anticoagulants. Implementation of this initiative will further establish a role for pharmacist-led evaluations and could potentially be expanded to other clinical areas. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 2328-8957
    Language: English
    Publisher: Oxford University Press (OUP)
    Publication Date: 2019
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2757767-3
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 6
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Oxford University Press (OUP) ; 2022
    In:  Open Forum Infectious Diseases Vol. 9, No. Supplement_2 ( 2022-12-15)
    In: Open Forum Infectious Diseases, Oxford University Press (OUP), Vol. 9, No. Supplement_2 ( 2022-12-15)
    Abstract: The reliability of piperacillin-tazobactam (TZP) and cefepime (FEP) breakpoints for extended spectrum β-lactamase Enterobacterales (ESBL-E) isolates remains controversial. The Infectious Diseases Society of America recommends against the use of TZP and FEP for the treatment of bloodstream infections (BSIs) caused by ESBL-E, even when in-vitro susceptibility is demonstrated. The University of Pennsylvania Health System microbiology laboratory suppresses TZP susceptibilities on Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae blood isolates nonsusceptible to ceftriaxone (CRO) or ceftazidime (CAZ) and specifies the presence of a multidrug resistant organism. However, FEP susceptibilities are reported. The objective of this study was to assess appropriate antimicrobial prescribing for the treatment of FEP-susceptible ESBL-E BSIs with our institution’s current susceptibility reporting practices. Methods This multicenter retrospective observational study included patients with blood cultures positive for E. coli, K. oxytoca, K. pneumoniae, and Proteus mirabilis nonsusceptible to CRO or CAZ but susceptible to FEP from August 1, 2018 through August 1, 2021. Patients with a concominant gram-negative infection or true beta-lactam allergy were excluded. Patients were assessed for appropriate therapy (demonstrated susceptibility to and administration of carbapenems fluoroquinolones, novel beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitors, or sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim) within 24 h following the availability of susceptibility results. Results During the study period 38 patients were included. Of the 38 patients, 52.6% (n=20) received appropriate therapy with an average time to appropriate therapy of 3.7 (SD 2.1) h. Among patients receiving inappropriate therapy (n=18), 50% (n=9) were changed to appropriate therapy & gt;24 h after susceptibility results, with an average time to appropriate therapy of 46.5 (SD 44.4) h. The remaining 9 patients (23.7%) did not receive appropriate therapy beyond 24 h. Conclusion Reporting FEP susceptibility results on ESBL-E blood isolates may contribute to the prescribing of FEP for the treatment of ESBL-E BSIs and delay appropriate antimicrobial therapy. Given these findings, cefepime will now be suppressed on ESBL-E blood isolates. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 2328-8957
    Language: English
    Publisher: Oxford University Press (OUP)
    Publication Date: 2022
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2757767-3
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 7
    In: Open Forum Infectious Diseases, Oxford University Press (OUP), Vol. 6, No. Supplement_2 ( 2019-10-23), p. S270-S270
    Abstract: CHG bathing is used to suppress patients’ microbial skin colonization, in order to prevent infections and transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms. Prior work has suggested that microbial growth is inhibited when CHG skin concentrations exceed threshold levels. Methods We conducted 6 single-day surveys from January 2018 to February 2019 in 7 academic hospital MICUs with established CHG patient bathing. Adult patients were eligible to have skin swabbed from adjacent 25 cm2 areas on the neck, axilla, and inguinal region for culture and CHG concentration determination. CHG skin concentrations were measured by a semi-quantitative colorimetric assay. Selective media were used to isolate targeted microorganisms (Table 1). Species were confirmed by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry; antibiotic susceptibility was determined by MicroScan (Beckman Coulter). We modeled the relationship between CHG skin concentrations (log2-transformed) and microorganism recovery (yes/no as primary outcome) using multilevel models controlling for clustering of body sites within patients and within ICUs, assessing slope and threshold effects. Results We enrolled 736/759 (97%) patients and sampled 2176 skin sites. Gram-positive bacteria were detected most frequently (Table 1). The adjusted odds of identifying gram-positive organisms decreased linearly as CHG skin levels increased (Figure 1a), without evidence of a threshold effect. We also found significant negative linear slopes without evidence of threshold effects for other pathogens tested (Table 2; Figure 1), with the exception of gram-negative bacteria and vancomycin-resistant enterococci. When modeling quantitative culture results (colony-forming units) for gram-positive organisms as a continuous outcome variable, a similar relationship was found. Conclusion Higher concentrations of CHG were associated with less frequent recovery of gram-positive bacteria and Candida species on the skin of MICU patients who were bathed routinely with CHG. For microbial inhibition, we did not identify a threshold concentration of CHG on the skin; rather, increasing CHG skin concentrations led to additional gains in inhibition. For infection prevention, aiming for high CHG skin levels may be beneficial. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 2328-8957
    Language: English
    Publisher: Oxford University Press (OUP)
    Publication Date: 2019
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2757767-3
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 8
    In: Open Forum Infectious Diseases, Oxford University Press (OUP), Vol. 10, No. 8 ( 2023-08-01)
    Abstract: The Penn Medicine COVID-19 Therapeutics Committee—an interspecialty, clinician-pharmacist, and specialist–front line primary care collaboration—has served as a forum for rapid evidence review and the production of dynamic practice recommendations during the 3-year coronavirus disease 2019 public health emergency. We describe the process by which the committee went about its work and how it navigated specific challenging scenarios. Our target audiences are clinicians, hospital leaders, public health officials, and researchers invested in preparedness for inevitable future threats. Our objectives are to discuss the logistics and challenges of forming an effective committee, undertaking a rapid evidence review process, aligning evidence-based guidelines with operational realities, and iteratively revising recommendations in response to changing pandemic data. We specifically discuss the arc of evidence for corticosteroids; the noble beginnings and dangerous misinformation end of hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin; monoclonal antibodies and emerging viral variants; and patient screening and safety processes for tocilizumab, baricitinib, and nirmatrelvir-ritonavir.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 2328-8957
    Language: English
    Publisher: Oxford University Press (OUP)
    Publication Date: 2023
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2757767-3
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 9
    In: Open Forum Infectious Diseases, Oxford University Press (OUP), Vol. 9, No. Supplement_2 ( 2022-12-15)
    Abstract: Tocilizumab (TCZ) was approved by the Food and Drug Administration under emergency use authorization for treatment of COVID-19 in patients requiring supplemental oxygen, non-invasive or invasive mechanical ventilation, or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Despite multiple clinical trials, there remain unanswered questions surrounding TCZ use. Methods This multi-hospital retrospective cohort study included patients who received TCZ for COVID-19 between January 29th, 2021 and June 30th, 2021 at five University of Pennsylvania Health System (UPHS) hospitals. Patients were eligible for TCZ per UPHS criteria if they scored ≥ 5 on the World Health Organization (WHO) ordinal scale for ≤ 24 hours and experienced & lt; 14 days of acute COVID-19 symptoms. Descriptive statistics were performed to characterize usage within the health system. Results This study evaluated 134 patients who received TCZ for the treatment of COVID-19. TCZ was ordered a median of 22 hours (interquartile range [IQR], 13.2 – 41.5) after hospital admission. A majority of patients (76.1%) were admitted to the intensive care unit and a small portion (12.7%) had a WHO ordinal scale that was & gt;5 at time of TCZ order entry. All patients received concomitant dexamethasone therapy at a total prednisone equivalent of 400 mg (IQR, 335.6 – 480). Overall 33.6% of patients experienced an adverse event (ADE) within 30 days of TCZ administration (Table 1). Most common ADEs included bacterial infection (29.9%), hepatitis (6.7%), and fungal infection (3%); other etiologies of ADEs were not accounted for. All-cause mortality (Table 2) at day 30 occurred in 20.9% of patients and median time from TCZ administration to mortality was 12.5 days (IQR 5 – 18.3). Ninety-six patients in the cohort (71.6%) were discharged by day 30. Of the subgroup discharged by day 30, the majority (70.8%) were discharged to home. Conclusion Patients who received TCZ for severe COVID-19 experienced 20.9% mortality; mortality was higher among those with higher ordinal scale at the time of TCZ dosing. A large portion of patients (70.8%) were discharged to home within 30 days. One third of patients experienced an adverse event, primarily bacterial or fungal infection. Our experience may be useful in counseling patients about anticipated effects of TCZ. Disclosures George L Anesi, MD, MSCE, AHRQ, NHLBI, UpToDate: Advisor/Consultant|AHRQ, NHLBI, UpToDate: Grant/Research Support Kathleen Degnan, MD, Gilead: Grant/Research Support.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 2328-8957
    Language: English
    Publisher: Oxford University Press (OUP)
    Publication Date: 2022
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2757767-3
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 10
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Elsevier BV ; 2007
    In:  The American Journal of the Medical Sciences Vol. 334, No. 2 ( 2007-08), p. 142-144
    In: The American Journal of the Medical Sciences, Elsevier BV, Vol. 334, No. 2 ( 2007-08), p. 142-144
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0002-9629
    Language: English
    Publisher: Elsevier BV
    Publication Date: 2007
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 82078-7
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...