In:
Implementation Science, Springer Science and Business Media LLC, Vol. 15, No. 1 ( 2020-12)
Abstract:
Low-value care initiatives are rapidly growing; however, it is not clear how members of the public should be involved. The objective of this scoping review was to systematically examine the literature describing public involvement in initatives to reduce low-value care. Methods Evidence sources included MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CINAHL databases from inception to November 26, 2019, grey literature (CADTH Tool), reference lists of included articles, and expert consultation. Citations were screened in duplicate and included if they referred to the public’s perception and/or involvement in reducing low-value care. Public included patients or citizens without any advanced healthcare knowledge. Low-value care included medical tests or treatments that lack efficacy, have risks that exceed benefit, or are not cost-effective. Extracted data pertained to study characteristics, low-value practice, clinical setting, and level of public involvement (i.e., patient-clinician interaction, research, or policy-making). Results The 218 included citations were predominantly original research ( n = 138, 63%), published since 2010 ( n = 192, 88%), originating from North America ( n = 146, 67%). Most citations focused on patient engagement within the patient-clinician interaction ( n = 156, 72%), using tools that included shared decision-making ( n = 66, 42%) and patient-targeted educational materials ( n = 72, 46%), and reported both reductions in low-value care and improved patient perceptions regarding low-value care. Fewer citations examined public involvement in low-value care policy-making ( n = 33, 15%). Among citations that examined perspectives regarding public involvement in initiatives to reduce low-value care ( n = 10, 5%), there was consistent support for the utility of tools applied within the patient-clinician interaction and less consistent support for involvement in policy-making. Conclusions Efforts examining public involvement in low-value care concentrate within the patient-clinician interaction, wherein patient-oriented educational materials and shared decision-making tools have been commonly studied and are associated with reductions in low-value care. This contrasts with inclusion of the public in low-value care policy decisions wherein tools to promote engagement are less well-developed and involvement not consistently viewed as valuable. Trial registration Open Science Framework ( https://osf.io/6fsxm )
Type of Medium:
Online Resource
ISSN:
1748-5908
DOI:
10.1186/s13012-020-00986-0
Language:
English
Publisher:
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Publication Date:
2020
detail.hit.zdb_id:
2225822-X
Permalink
