Abstract: Treatment of Burkitt lymphoma ( BL ) with intensive, multi‐agent chemotherapy with aggressive central nervous system ( CNS ) prophylaxis results in high cure rates, although no regimen is standard of care. We examined population‐based survival outcomes of adults with BL treated with a modified combination of cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin, prednisone and systemic high‐dose methotrexate ( MTX ) ( CODOX ‐M) with IVAC (ifosfamide, mesna, etoposide, cytarabine and intrathecal MTX ) ( CODOX ‐M/ IVAC ) ± rituximab over a 15‐year period in British Columbia. For the 81 patients identified (including 8 with CNS involvement and 18 with human immunodeficiency virus‐associated BL ), 5‐year progression‐free survival ( PFS ) and overall survival ( OS ) were 75% [95% confidence interval ( CI ): 63–83%] and 77% (95% CI : 66–85%), respectively, with no treatment‐related deaths. Those who completed the regimen per protocol ( n  = 38) had significantly improved 5‐year PFS 86% ( P  = 0·04) and OS 92% ( P  = 0·008), as did those under 60 years with 5‐year PFS 82% ( P  = 0·005) and OS 86% ( P  = 0·002), which remained significant in multivariate analysis [ PFS : hazard ratio ( HR ) 3·36, P  = 0·018; OS HR 4·03, P  = 0·012]. Incorporation of high‐dose systemic methotrexate also significantly affected multivariate survival outcomes ( OS HR 0·28, P  = 0·025). Stem cell transplant in first remission had no effect on OS or PFS . This large, real‐world analysis of BL patients treated with CODOX ‐M/ IVAC ± rituximab demonstrates excellent survival outcomes comparable to clinical trials. These results help to serve as a benchmark when comparing curative therapies for BL patients as novel regimens are incorporated into clinical practice.

Abstract: Background: Once multiple myeloma (MM) becomes refractory to αCD38 mAb, pts have limited effective treatment options and poor prognoses. With standard therapies, overall response rate (ORR) to the first regimen after refractoriness to an αCD38 mAb is 31%, median progression-free survival (PFS) - 3.4 months and median overall survival (OS) - 9.3 months (Gandhi et al, Leukemia, 2019). Exportin 1 (XPO1) mediates the nuclear export and functional inactivation of tumor suppressor proteins. XPO1 is required for MM cell growth, is associated with poor prognosis and mediates resistance to standard MM and other anticancer therapies. Selinexor (SEL) is a first-in-class, oral selective inhibitor of nuclear export (SINE) compound approved for patients (pts) with previously treated MM as well as DLBCL. The doublet SEL-dexamethasone (Xd) achieved ORR ~26% in triple-class (Immunomodulatory drug [IMiD] , proteosome inhibitor [PI], αCD38 mAb) refractory MM and improved OS over matched cohorts in community (Richardson et al, eJHaem, 2021) and academic (Cornell et al, AJH, 2020) settings. Hence, SEL-based triplets could be more effective in this triple class-treated population. We analyzed the efficacy and safety of SEL-containing triplets in pts in the STOMP study who were previously treated with regimens containing αCD38 mAb. Methods: STOMP is a multi-arm, open-label, Phase 1b/2 study evaluating SEL in various combinations (NCT02343042). Here, we analyzed ORR, clinical benefit rate (CBR), duration of response (DOR), PFS, OS, and treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) of pts who received Xd plus pomalidomide (XPd, n=23) or carfilzomib (XKd, n=23) after prior therapy with αCD38 mAb. Results: Among 46 pts treated, median age was 64 yrs (XPd), 70 yrs (XKd), females 57% (XPd) and 39% (XKd), median time from diagnosis was 5 yrs, and median number of prior regimens 4 (range, 2-10). All pts were previously treated with a PI and IMiD and αCD38 mAb; 78% (XPd) and 52% (XKd) had triple refractory MM. Prior treatment with αCD38 mAb included daratumumab (XPd: 91%, XKd: 100%) and isatuximab (XPd: 9%); 52% (XPd) and 74% (XKd) had αCD38 mAb in their most recent prior regimen. Refractoriness to daratumumab was documented in 87% (XPd) and 96% (XKd); isatuximab in 9% (XPd). Median durations from end of most recent αCD38 mAb therapy to first dose of study treatment were 8 weeks (XPd), 4 weeks (XKd). Among evaluable pts, ORR and CBR were 52% and 76%, respectively in the XPd arm (n=21; 2 pts were not efficacy evaluable) and 65% and 74%, respectively in the XKd arm. In the XPd arm median PFS was 8.7 months (95% CI: 7.6, NE), median DOR was 7.9 months (95% CI: 3.9, NE), and median OS was 21.8 months (95% CI: 8, NE). In the XKd arm median PFS was 15 months (95% CI: 12.0, NE), median DOR was 13.1 months (95% CI: 10.2, NE), and median OS was 33.0 months (95% CI: 20.4, NE). Among the evaluable pts, response to SEL-containing triplets compared favorably to the prior αCD38 mAb-containing regimen used at least 1 line earlier: XPd arm (n=21), ORR 52% vs 58% for prior regimen, CBR 76% vs 58%, median PFS 8.7 months (95% CI: 7.6, NE) vs 10.2 months (95% CI: 5.2, 20.5); XKd arm (n=23), ORR 65% vs 52%, CBR 74% vs 57%, median PFS 15.0 months (95% CI: 12.0, NE) vs 8.5 months (95% CI: 5.9, 17.3). The most common hematological TEAEs (total; grade≥3) were thrombocytopenia (XPd: 35%; 30%; XKd: 78%; 39%), anemia (XPd: 57%; 39%; XKd: 57%; 22%), and neutropenia (XPd: 57%; 48%; XKd: 35%; 4%). Other common TEAEs (total; grade≥3) were nausea (XPd: 74%; 0; XKd: 74%; 4%), fatigue (XPd: 61%; 4%; XKd: 52%; 4%) and decreased appetite (XPd: 48%; 4%; XKd: 48%; 4%). No cases of severe bleeding with thrombocytopenia occurred. Three pts (13%, all XPd) had febrile neutropenia (the outcome of which was fatal in 1 pt, deemed related to SEL and pomalidomide). TEAEs were managed with standard supportive care and dose modifications. Summary/Conclusion: XPd and XKd administered to pts with heavily pretreated MM, including prior αCD38 mAb therapy, exhibit tolerability and comparable effectiveness to that of the prior αCD38 mAb-containing regimen. These results suggest that the use of SEL-containing triplets, implementing the novel XPO1 inhibition mechanism, can provide prolonged disease control with good tolerability rather than recycling previously utilized drugs/mechanisms. The all oral XPd regimen will be evaluated in Study EMN29 against elotuzumab-Pd in patients who have received lenalidomide, a PI and an αCD38 mAb. Disclosures Lentzsch: Janssen: Consultancy; AbbVie: Consultancy; Celularity: Consultancy; GSK: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Karyopharm: Consultancy, Research Funding; Sanofi: Consultancy, Research Funding; Oncopeptides: Consultancy; Caelum Biosciences: Consultancy, Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company; Ossium Health: Consultancy; Magenta Therapeutics: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Kadmon: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Lipe: Seagen Inc.: Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; sanofi: Consultancy; GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy; amgen: Research Funding; Cellectar: Research Funding; Karyopharm: Research Funding; Harpoon: Research Funding. Tuchman: Karyopharm: Research Funding; Shattuck Labs: Consultancy; Sanofi / Genzyme: Consultancy, Research Funding; Caelum: Consultancy, Research Funding; Oncopeptides: Consultancy. Bahlis: Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Genentech: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; BMS/Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Karyopharm: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria; GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy, Honoraria; Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria. Bensinger: BMS, Janssen, Poseida, Regeneron, Trillium: Research Funding; Amgen, BMS, Janssen, Sanofi: Speakers Bureau. Sebag: Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol Myers-Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Karyopharm Therapeutics: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Research Funding. Sutherland: Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; GSK: Research Funding; Karyopharm: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy. Monge: Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Karyopharm Therapeutics: Research Funding. Gasparetto: Karyopharm Therapeutics Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES, Speakers Bureau; Oncopeptite: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; GSK: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Consultancy; Connect Registry: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Baljevic: Exelixis: Research Funding; Karyopharm: Other: Advisory Board; BMS/Celgene: Other: Advisory Board; Janssen Research: Other: Advisory Board; Oncopeptides: Other: Advisory Board; BMS/Celgene: Consultancy; Amgen: Research Funding. Venner: Janssen: Honoraria; Sanofi: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria; GSK: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria. White: Amgen, Antengene, BMS/Celgene, Forus, GSK, Janssen, Karyopharm, Sanofi, Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria. Kotb: Takeda: Honoraria; Karyopharm: Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company; Amgen: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Sanofi: Honoraria, Research Funding; Merck: Honoraria, Research Funding; Akcea: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria. Chen: BMS: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astrazeneca: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Beigene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Consultancy. Schiller: Celator: Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Mateon: Research Funding; Stemline Therapeutics, Inc.: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Tolero: Research Funding; Constellation Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Abbvie: Research Funding; Sangamo: Research Funding; Trovagene: Research Funding; Johnson & Johnson: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Cyclacel: Research Funding; Bluebird Bio: Research Funding; Boehringer-Ingleheim: Research Funding; Forma: Research Funding; Daiichi-Sankyo: Research Funding; Bio: Research Funding; Ono-UK: Consultancy, Research Funding; Incyte: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Delta-Fly: Research Funding; FujiFilm: Research Funding; Deciphera: Research Funding; Arog: Research Funding; Kite/Gilead: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; PrECOG: Research Funding; Pfizer: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Research Funding; Onconova: Research Funding; Astellas: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Karyopharm: Research Funding; Agios: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Regimmune: Research Funding; Ono: Consultancy; Samus: Research Funding; BMS/Celgene: Consultancy, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Actuate: Research Funding; Actinium Pharmaceuticals, Inc: Research Funding; Geron: Research Funding; Genentech-Roche: Research Funding; Gamida Cell Ltd.: Research Funding; Jazz: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Elevate: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Sanofi: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Pharma: Consultancy; Biomed Valley Discoveries: Research Funding; Eli Lilly: Research Funding; ASH foundation: Other: Chair-unpaid; Sellas: Research Funding; Incyte: Consultancy; Ariad: Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Consultancy; Kaiser Permanente: Consultancy; MedImmune: Research Funding; Ambit: Research Funding; Leukemia & Lymphoma Society: Research Funding; Cellerant: Research Funding; CTI Biopharma: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Kura Oncology: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Millennium: Research Funding; National Marrow Donor Program: Research Funding; NIH: Research Funding; Onyx: Research Funding; Pharmamar: Research Funding; UC Davis: Research Funding; UCSD: Research Funding; Evidera: Consultancy; NCI: Consultancy; Novartis: Speakers Bureau. Madan: Karyopharm: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; GSK: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Sanofi: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Speakers Bureau. Leblanc: Sanofi Canada: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen Canada: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen Canada: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS/Celgene Canada: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene/BMS: Research Funding; Takeda Canada: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. DeCastro: Karyopharm: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Bentur: Karyopharm Therapeutics: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Shah: Karyopharm Therapeutics Inc.: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Van Domelen: Karyopharm: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Kauffman: Karyopharm Therapeutics Inc.: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Shacham: Karyopharm: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Patents & Royalties: (8999996, 9079865, 9714226, PCT/US12/048319, and I574957) on hydrazide containing nuclear transport modulators and uses, and pending patents PCT/US12/048319, 499/2012, PI20102724, and 2012000928) .

Abstract: The effect of prior exposure to rituximab (ritux) on relapse (REL) and survival following stem cell transplantation (SCT) in patients (pts) with REL composite low and intermediate grade non-Hodgkin lymphoma (L/I-NHL) is unknown. Fifty-four pts with REL L/I-NHL underwent high-dose chemotherapy (CT) and SCT Jan ’89 to June ’05. Follow-up is complete to April ’6 with a median of 32 mo. Ritux was added to CT regimens since 2001 and given at 375 mg/m2. Eighteen pts received ritux at initial diagnosis of NHL or after REL with salvage CT prior to SCT. Pts proceeded to high dose CT with allogeneic (allo) (n=12) or autologous (auto) SCT (n=6). This group was compared with a group of pts not receiving ritux pre-SCT (n=36)(Table 1). Eleven pts (61%) are alive in the ritux group compared with 11 pts (31%) in the non-ritux group. The 2 and 4-y OS for pts who received ritux were 52% and 52%, vs 36% and 24% (p=.12, RR=.52) for pts who did not receive ritux. The EFS were significantly different with 2 and 4-y EFS for the ritux group 56% and 56% vs 24% and 18% (P=.038, RR=.42) for the non-ritux group (figure 1). No effect was seen on TRM. The risk of REL post SCT was significantly lower in the ritux group (p=.017)(figure 2). Two of 18 pts (11%) had NHL REL in the ritux vs 18 of 36 (50%) in the non-ritux group. The hazard rate of REL in pts who received ritux was 20% that of pts in the non-ritux group. Significance maintained in multivariate analysis (p=.016). No impact was seen on graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). Fifty percent and 61% of pts developed acute GVHD grades 2–4 and 50% and 64% of pts developed chronic GVHD in the ritux and non-ritux groups respectively. In conclusion, prior treatment with ritux in pts with relapsed composite L/I-NHL undergoing SCT was associated with reduced risk of REL and improved survival without associated increase in toxicity. Further analysis is underway to clarify the nature of this important finding. Table 1: Clinicopathological characteristics of ritux and non-ritux groups Parameter$ Rituximab group, n=18 (%) Non-rituximab group, n=36 (%) $ all p values are 〉 0.1. *at diagnosis Median age at SCT 48 y 44 y M:F 2.6:1 1.6:1 Allo-SCT 12(67) 28(78) BM involvement* 10(56) 22(61) B symptoms* 7(39) 10(28) Prior purine analogue therapy 8(44) 11(31) Residual disease prior to SCT 9(50) 14(39) TBI in conditioning 13(72) 30(83) Figure Figure Figure Figure

Abstract: Background: Overexpression of the nuclear export protein exportin 1 (XPO1) mediates the functional inactivation of tumor suppressor proteins (TSPs), facilitates the export of oncogene mRNA thus facilitating oncoprotein expression, is associated with poor prognosis in multiple myeloma (MM), and contributes to immunomodulatory drug (IMiD) resistance. Selinexor is an oral, first-in-class, selective inhibitor of nuclear export (SINE) compound that by blocking XPO1 forces the nuclear retention and activation of TSPs and nuclear retention and inactivation of oncoproteins. 1 Selinexor is approved with low-dose dexamethasone ± bortezomib for patients with previously treated MM. Pomalidomide plus dexamethasone (Pd) has an overall response rate (ORR) of ~30% and median PFS (mPFS) of ~4 months in patients with MM refractory to bortezomib and lenalidomide. We hypothesized that selinexor could be safely combined with Pd (XPd) and would improve the combination's efficacy. Methods: In the XPd arm of the multi-arm Phase 1b/2 STOMP study, selinexor was evaluated at 60, 80, or 100 mg in combination with Pd. Study objectives were to determine the maximum tolerated dose and recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D) and to assess the safety and activity of the XPd regimen. The dose of selinexor 60 mg once weekly (QW), pomalidomide 4 mg once daily (days 1-21), dexamethasone 40 mg QW (XPd-60) was the lowest evaluated dose of selinexor in combination with the approved dose of Pd, and in light of the marked efficacy of that dose (ORR 65%), Phase 2 cohorts at a lower (40 mg weekly) dose of selinexor (XPd-40), were evaluated. Of the 19 patients enrolled at XPd-40 and evaluable for efficacy, 12 patients were enrolled into STOMP and 7 patients were enrolled at the same dose level and similar inclusion criteria into a parallel study XPORT-MM-028. Results: As of 14 July 2021, 39 patients were enrolled into the 60 (N=20) and 40 (N=19) mg selinexor dose levels in combination with Pd: 19 males, median age 66.0 years (range 37-85 years), median number of prior lines of therapy 2 (range 1-9). 85% of patients had MM refractory to a proteasome inhibitor (PI; bortezomib or carfilzomib or ixazomib), 79% to an IMiD (thalidomide or lenalidomide or pomalidomide), 33% to an anti-CD38 mAb (daratumumab or isatuximab); 26% had triple class refractory disease. Common hematologic, treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) consisted of (all grades, grade ≥3) neutropenia (72%, 59%; and two cases of grade 3 [G3] febrile neutropenia one in each of the dose levels), and anemia (51%, 15% all G3). Non-hematologic TEAEs were reversible and included fatigue (56%, 10% all G3) and nausea (49%, 0%). On XPd-60, the RP2D (N=20), ORR was 65% (1 stringent complete response [sCR] , 5 very good partial responses [VGPR], 7 PR); mPFS was 8.9 months (95% CI, 7.6 - NE, median follow-up 8.3 months). In patients treated at XPd-40 (N=19), ORR was 42% (3 VGPR, 5 PR); mPFS was not reached (95% CI, 5.7 - NE, median follow-up 2.8 months). Among patients who had received anti-CD38 mAb, the ORR was 64% overall and 100% at the RP2D (1 sCR, 2 VGPR, 3 PR). All patients who had MM refractory to pomalidomide (N=3; all at the 60 mg dose level) responded with 1 VGPR and 2 PR. For the 21 responders across both dose levels, median time to response was 1.0 months (95% CI 1.0 - 2.0) and median duration of response was not reached (95% CI: 8.0, NE). Conclusions: Selinexor, once weekly, can be safely combined with Pd in patients with relapsed MM. The all-oral combination of XPd is highly active with an ORR of 65% at XPd-60, the RP2D, and an ORR of 42% at XPd-40 dose level (compared to expected ORR ~30% for Pd). The high ORR that was achieved at the RP2D, including in patients previously treated with anti-CD38 mAb, supports XPd-60 as a promising therapy with no significant cross-resistance to anti-CD38, PIs or lenalidomide. No new safety signals were identified. The most common TEAE, neutropenia, is a common AE of Pd and was managed effectively with standard G-CSF. The regimen leverages the concept of mechanism switching from an anti-CD38 mAb-based regimen to a selinexor-based regimen. These data support the new Phase 3 study (XPORT-MM-031) with an all-oral combination of XPd vs elotuzumab-Pd in patients who have been previously treated with lenalidomide, a PI, and an anti-CD38 mAb. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures White: Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Antengene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Forus: Consultancy, Honoraria; GSK: Consultancy, Honoraria; Karyopharm Therapeutics Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria. Chen: Astrazeneca: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Beigene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Consultancy. Baljevic: BMS/Celgene: Consultancy; Exelixis: Research Funding; Karyopharm: Other: Advisory Board; BMS/Celgene: Other: Advisory Board; Amgen: Research Funding; Janssen Research: Other: Advisory Board; Oncopeptides: Other: Advisory Board. Tuchman: Caelum: Consultancy, Research Funding; Sanofi / Genzyme: Consultancy, Research Funding; Shattuck Labs: Consultancy; Karyopharm: Research Funding; Oncopeptides: Consultancy. Bahlis: Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria; BMS/Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Karyopharm: Consultancy, Honoraria; Genentech: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria; GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy, Honoraria. Schiller: Eli Lilly: Research Funding; Jazz: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Ambit: Research Funding; MedImmune: Research Funding; Cyclacel: Research Funding; Geron: Research Funding; Genentech-Roche: Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Agios: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Trovagene: Research Funding; Gamida Cell Ltd.: Research Funding; Bio: Research Funding; Pfizer: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Research Funding; Forma: Research Funding; Deciphera: Research Funding; Regimmune: Research Funding; Delta-Fly: Research Funding; FujiFilm: Research Funding; Tolero: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Consultancy; Kaiser Permanente: Consultancy; Daiichi-Sankyo: Research Funding; Celator: Research Funding; Arog: Research Funding; Actuate: Research Funding; Actinium Pharmaceuticals, Inc: Research Funding; Karyopharm: Research Funding; Incyte: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Elevate: Research Funding; Samus: Research Funding; PrECOG: Research Funding; Constellation Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Onconova: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Ono-UK: Consultancy, Research Funding; Astellas: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; BMS/Celgene: Consultancy, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Sangamo: Research Funding; Stemline Therapeutics, Inc.: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Research Funding; Kite/Gilead: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Mateon: Research Funding; Pharma: Consultancy; Sanofi: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Johnson & Johnson: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Biomed Valley Discoveries: Research Funding; ASH foundation: Other: Chair-unpaid; Sellas: Research Funding; Ono: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy; Ariad: Research Funding; Leukemia & Lymphoma Society: Research Funding; Bluebird Bio: Research Funding; Boehringer-Ingleheim: Research Funding; Cellerant: Research Funding; CTI Biopharma: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Kura Oncology: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Millennium: Research Funding; National Marrow Donor Program: Research Funding; NIH: Research Funding; Onyx: Research Funding; Pharmamar: Research Funding; UC Davis: Research Funding; UCSD: Research Funding; Evidera: Consultancy; NCI: Consultancy; Novartis: Speakers Bureau. Lipe: Seagen Inc.: Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; sanofi: Consultancy; GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy; amgen: Research Funding; Cellectar: Research Funding; Karyopharm: Research Funding; Harpoon: Research Funding. Kotb: Akcea: Honoraria; Karyopharm: Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company; Amgen: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Merck: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Sanofi: Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria. Sutherland: Celgene: Consultancy; Karyopharm: Research Funding; GSK: Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy. Bensinger: Amgen, BMS, Janssen, Sanofi: Speakers Bureau; BMS, Janssen, Poseida, Regeneron, Trillium: Research Funding. Madan: Amgen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Karyopharm: Consultancy, Research Funding; GSK: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Sanofi: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Speakers Bureau. Sebag: Janssen: Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol Myers-Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Karyopharm Therapeutics: Consultancy, Honoraria; Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria. Venner: GSK: Honoraria; Sanofi: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria. Leblanc: BMS/Celgene Canada: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen Canada: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen Canada: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi Canada: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda Canada: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene/BMS: Research Funding. Monge: Karyopharm Therapeutics: Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy. Tadmor: Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. DeCastro: Karyopharm: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Van Domelen: Karyopharm: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Zhang: Karyopharm Therapeutics Inc.: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Mishal: Karyopharm Therapeutics Inc.: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Bentur: Karyopharm Therapeutics: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Shah: Karyopharm Therapeutics Inc.: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Shacham: Karyopharm: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Patents & Royalties: (8999996, 9079865, 9714226, PCT/US12/048319, and I574957) on hydrazide containing nuclear transport modulators and uses, and pending patents PCT/US12/048319, 499/2012, PI20102724, and 2012000928) . Kauffman: Karyopharm Therapeutics Inc.: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Gasparetto: Karyopharm Therapeutics Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES, Speakers Bureau; GSK: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Consultancy; Oncopeptite: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Connect Registry: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Abstract: Patients (pts) with relapsed (REL) transformed non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) have poor outcome with conventional therapies. Although the role of autologous (auto) stem cell transplantation (SCT) has been previously described, there is scarce literature about allogeneic (allo) SCT in this setting. Forty pts with REL composite low/intermediate (L/I) NHL (25 transformed, 8 composite (same site) and 7 discordant (different sites)) underwent allo-SCT Jan ’89 to June ’05. Fifteen pts (38%) received stem cells from unrelated donors (UD) (12 matched and 3 with one antigen mis-match [1AgMM]). Six of 15 pts (40%) in the UD group are alive including one pt post 1AgMM SCT. 25 pts (62%) had matched sibling allo-SCT and 5 (20%) pts are still alive. Twenty-nine of 40 pts (73%) died, with REL NHL (n=15, 38%) or treatment related mortality (TRM) (n=14, 35%). The 2 and 5-year probability of OS were 39% [95% CI: 26–58%] and 23% [10–49%] respectively; of EFS 36% [24–55%] and 23% [11–46%] . Univariate analysis (UVA) showed presence of residual (res) NHL prior to allo-SCT as a poor prognostic factor for OS and EFS with p value of 0.029 (HR=2.2) and 0.011 (HR=2.5) respectively. No survival difference was seen between patients treated with related or UD stem cells. On multivariate analysis (MVA), development of aGVHD grades 2–4 had a significantly negative impact on both OS and EFS (for OS: p=0.006, HR=1.46, for EFS: p=0.01, HR=1.37) as did res disease prior to SCT (for OS: p=0.04, HR=2.2, for EFS: p=0.02, HR=2.4). Age 〉 46 years was a significant risk factor for TRM on UVA (p=0.02, HR=3.3) and MVA (p=0.07, HR=2.9). MVA also showed development of cGVHD as a significant risk factor for TRM (p=0.001, HR=1.8). No difference in TRM was seen between related and UD SCT. Pts with res NHL at SCT had a higher risk of REL NHL (p=0.008, HR=5), as did pts who were chemotherapy resistant (no change in the tumor mass) pre-SCT (p=0.002, HR=3.9). Inclusion of TBI in the conditioning regimen significantly reduced the risk of REL NHL (p=0.01, RR=0.22). Prior rituximab therapy was associated with reduced REL risk, although this was not statistically significant (p=0.06, HR=0.82). CGVHD was significantly protective against REL in MVA (p=0.03, HR= 0.8), and res NHL at SCT was associated with increased REL (p=0.003, HR= 7). Stem cell dose (mononuclear cells) 〉 3X108/kg was the only significant risk factor for development of cGVHD in UVA (p=0.04, HR=0.4) and MVA (p=0.05, HR=0.4). In conclusion, this is the largest report on the utility of allo-SCT (inculding UD-SCT) in patients with REL composite L/I-NHL. Survival was similar in pts receiving stem cells from related and unrelated donors. UVA and MVA analysis revealed multiple significant risk factors for survival, TRM, development of cGVHD and relapse which should be taken into consideration for future allo SCT pts. Development of chronic, but not acute GVHD was protective for NHL relapse, supporting the action of a graft vs lymphoma effect in this population.

Abstract: Double-hit (DHIT) lymphoma is a heterogeneous group of non-Hodgkin lymphomas characterized by concurrent translocations involving MYC and BCL2 and typified by aggressive behavior and poor prognosis with only rare long-term survivors. There is no established treatment for DHIT lymphoma. Since 2003, the British Columbia Cancer Agency (BCCA) has adopted the use of intensive chemotherapy CODOX-M/IVAC combined with rituximab (R) followed by high-dose chemotherapy and hematopoietic cell transplantation (HSCT) as definitive treatment for DHIT lymphoma. In younger patients, an ablative matched sibling donor allotransplant (AlloSCT) is preferred over an autotransplant (AutoSCT). For all patients over the age of 60 years only AutoSCT is offered. Total Body Irradiation (TBI) is used as a part of the conditioning regimen for patients younger than 60 years of age. Here we report our provincial experience with this strategy, focusing on the ability to deliver this treatment and survival outcomes. Methods The Leukemia/BMT Program of British Columbia database and the BCCA Lymphoid Cancer Database were searched to identify all patients diagnosed with non-Hodgkin lymphomas with concurrent translocation of MYC and BCL2 (DHIT lymphoma) diagnosed between January 2003-September 2012. Results 27 cases of DHIT lymphoma were identified with the following characteristics: median age at diagnosis was 55.8 years (range 35.5-70.9 years); 19 (70%) were male; 26 (96%) patients had stage 3/4 disease; 16 (59%) had bone marrow involvement. All cases were HIV negative. Histological diagnosis based on the WHO 2008 classification were: diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) n=8 (30%); B-cell lymphoma, unclassifiable, with features intermediate between DLBCL and Burkitt lymphoma (BCL-U) n=17 (63%); B-cell acute lymphoblastic lymphoma (ALL) n=1; high-grade B-cell lymphoma, not otherwise specified (NOS) n=1. 13 cases (48%) were transformed from an underlying indolent B-cell lymphoma (12 follicular lymphoma, 1 low-grade B-cell lymphoma NOS). CODOX-M/IVAC + R was administered in 20 patients (74%). 7 patients received alternative chemotherapy regimen (5 R-CHOP, 1 R-CVP, 1 R-ICE) due to patient and/or physician preference. 14 patients (52%) underwent HSCT (7 AutoSCT, 7 AlloSCT), including 11 patients treated CODOX-M/IVAC + R pre-transplant, and 3 patients who received other therapy. 13 patients did not undergo HSCT: primary refractory disease n=7; patient preference n=2; deconditioning n=1; age 〉 65 and poor performance status n=3. The clinical status at time of transplantation was CR in 5 patients (19%), PR in 8 (30%), progressive disease in 1 (4%). The conditioning regimens included: cyclophosphamide/TBI n=6, VP-16/cyclophosphamide/TBI n=4, BEAM n=3, busulfan/cyclophosphamide n=1. At last follow-up, 15 (56%) patients have died, 14 from disease progression and 1 from complications of AlloSCT. 10 (37%) patients are alive and in remission and 2 patients are alive but have relapsed. 8 of 14 HSCT recipients (6 AutoSCT, 2 AlloSCT) remain alive and free of disease compared with 2 of 13 patients who did not receive HSCT; both disease free survivors received CODOX-M/IVAC + R. Median follow-up for living patients was 31 months (range 6.5-67.3 months). 2-year EFS and OS from the diagnosis of all DHIT lymphoma patients were 35% (95% CI 16%-54%) and 45% (95% CI 20%-65%), respectively. For patients who received CODOX-M/IVAC + R, the 2-year EFS was 37%. For patients who received CODOX-M/IVAC + R followed by SCT, the 2-year EFS was 43%. Patients with BCLU/ALL/High-grade lymphoma NOS had a 2-year EFS of 27% and patients with DLBL had a 2 –year EFS of 50%. Conclusion Patients with DHIT lymphoma treated with CODOX-M/IVAC + R followed by SCT can have durable remissions. Regardless, progression during initial therapy prior to SCT remains a significant problem. Patients with DLBCL histology may have a more favorable outcome than those with BCLU. Disclosures: Savage: Eli-Lilly: Consultancy. Toze:Roche Canada: Research Funding; F Hoffmann-La Roche: Research Funding. Sehn:F Hoffmann-La Roche: Research Funding; Roche Canada: Research Funding. Connors:F Hoffmann-La Roche: Research Funding; Roche Canada: Research Funding. Gerrie:F Hoffmann-La Roche: Research Funding; Roche Canada: Research Funding. Sutherland:Celgene: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria. Villa:Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding; Lundbeck: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria. Song:Roche: Research Funding.

Abstract: Steroid refractory aGVHD following allogeneic stem cell transplant (SCT) is associated with a long-term event-free survival (EFS) of less than 20%. Daclizumab is a humanised monoclonal antibody specific for the Tac subunit of the Interleukin-2 (IL-2) receptor. It inhibits IL-2 binding and is thought to be more specific for alloreactive lymphocytes than pan-T cell antibodies. Limited phase II trials using daclizumab for steroid refractory aGVHD have demonstrated 50–60% complete response (CR) rates, though its safety and efficacy as primary aGVHD treatment has recently been questioned. We examined the Vancouver experience with daclizumab in the management of steroid refractory aGVHD. Between 8/00 and 2/04, 35 patients with steroid refractory aGVHD were treated with daclizumab. Male:female ratio was 1.7:1. Median age was 42 years (17–53). Pretransplant diagnoses were AML (n=7), ALL (n=6), CML (n=6), MDS (n=5), NHL (n=6), MM (n=4) and Myelofibrosis (n=1). One patient with relapsed AML post-SCT developed aGVHD following DLI. Stem cell source was matched unrelated bone marrow (BM) (n=11) or peripheral blood (PB) (n=8), mismatched unrelated BM (n=6) or PB (n=3), matched related BM (n=2) or PB (n=4), and mismatched related BM (n=1). Twenty eight pts were conditioned with Cyclophosphamide/TBI. CSP/MTX aGVHD prophylaxis was used in all pts and initial aGVHD therapy consisted of Methylprednisolone 2 mg/kg IV. Grade I-II aGVHD developed in 18/35 (51%) pts and grade III-IV in 17/35 (49%) pts. Median onset of aGVHD was 18 (6–49) days post transplant. Steroid refractory pts received daclizumab 1 mg/kg IV (maximum dose 100mg) on days 1, 4, 8, 15 and 22 at a median of 40 (18–94) days post transplant. Daclizumab response was assessed at day 42 following its initiation. A CR was defined as a return to stage/grade 0 aGVHD and a PR as a reduction of ≥ 1 aGVHD stage/grade without need for additional therapy. There were no significant infusional complications. One patient died during the response assessment period (regimen related pulmonary toxicity). Overall response rate (ORR) was 25/35 (73%), with 15/25 (44%) achieving a CR and 10/25 (29%) a PR. Response was most likely in pts with skin involvement. ORGAN ORR CR PR NR SKIN 25/33 (76%) 18/33 (55%) 7/33 (21%) 8/33 (24%) GUT 15/23 (65%) 7/23 (30%) 8/23 (35%) 8/23 (35%) LIVER 8/14 (57%) 3/14 (21%) 5/14 (36%) 6/14 (23%) SKIN ALONE 9/11 (82%) 8/11 (73%) 1/11 (9%) 2/11 (18%) Twenty four (68%) pts developed limited (n=8) or extensive (n=15) chronic GVHD. The 3-year OS and EFS rates were 35% (95% CI 17–53%) and 28% (95% CI 12–47%), respectively. Female patients had a significantly poorer OS (p=0.0064) and EFS (p=0.0112) as did those pts receiving SCT from female donors (p=.0333 / 0.0456). Eleven patients (31%) received antithymocyte globulin (ATG) in addition to daclizumab. In this subgroup, aGVHD response was more likely but ATG treated patients had increased CMV antigenemia rates during the treatment response period (p=0.01), and a significantly lower EFS (p=0.0064) and OS (p=0.0123). Daclizumab is an effective agent for steroid refractory aGVHD especially if limted to the skin. Long-term survival appears to be superior in pts treated with this agent although its use along with ATG may compromise pt outcome.

Abstract: Background: Peripheral T-cell lymphomas (PTCL) are a rare and heterogeneous group of non-Hodgkin lymphomas (NHLs) that accounts for approximately 10% of all aggressive NHLs in Western countries. The optimal management remains unclear, however, given the poor outcome, allogeneic transplant (allo-SCT) has been integrated into the front-line treatment for some rare extranodal subtypes as well in relapsed/refractory setting. We report our provincial experience of the outcome of patients with PTCL who have undergone allo-SCT at the British Columbia Cancer Agency (BCCA). Methods: The Leukemia/BMT Program of British Columbia database and the BCCA Lymphoid Cancer Database were searched to identify all patients diagnosed with PTCL who have undergone allo-SCT between November 1990 and January 2016. Overall survival and relapse free survival were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: We identified 36 cases of PTCL patients who have undergone allogeneic transplant from a median time of 11 months from primary diagnosis (range 4-64) with the following clinical features: median age at transplant was 45 years (range 16-58 years); 24 (67%) were male; 32 (89%) patients had advanced stage disease; 22 (61%) had B-symptoms at diagnosis. Bone marrow involvement detected in 13/34 (38%) patients. Histological diagnosis based on the WHO 2008 classification were: Peripheral T-cell lymphoma not otherwise specified (PTCL-NOS) n=15 (42%); anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL) n=7 (19%) out of which three were ALK positive, angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma (AITL) n=6 (17%), hepatosplenic T-cell lymphoma n=5 (14%), enteropathy associated T-cell lymphoma type I n=1, advanced primary cutaneous gamma-delta T-cell lymphoma n=1 and Sezary syndrome n=1. Ten patients (28%) underwent allo-SCT as part of planned primary therapy after achieving their first remission [6 were in complete remission 1 (CR1) and 4 were in partial remission 1 (PR1)] , whereas 26 patients (72%) underwent allo-SCT for relapsed/refractory disease. CHOP was administered in 19 patients (53%) as the primary therapy. 17 (47%) patients received alternative chemotherapy regimen due to patient and/or physician preference. The clinical status at the time of transplantation was CR in 12 patients (33%), relapsed sensitive disease n=10 (28%), relapsed untreated n=5 (14%), partial remission (PR) in 5 (14%), primary progressive disease n=3 (8%) and relapsed resistant disease n=1 (3%). Thirty two patients (89%) underwent myeloablative conditioning, 4 (11%) underwent reduced intensity conditioning (RIC). The conditioning regimens included: cyclophosphamide/TBI n=24 (67%), busulfan/cyclophosphamide n=5 (14%), fludarabine containing reduced intensity n=4 (11%), and other regimens n= 3 (8%). With a median follow-up of alive patients from the time of allo-SCT of 69 months (range 1-186 months). At last follow-up, 17 (47%) patients have died, 6 from disease relapse, 5 from graft vs host disease (GVHD), 2 from regimen related toxicity and 4 from other causes. Nineteen patients (53%) still alive at last follow up post-transplant of which 14 (39%) still in remission. The 5-year event free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) from the time of allo-SCT of all patients were 43% and 63%, respectively. For PTCL-NOS the 5-year EFS and OS were 52% and 69%, respectively. Table 1 summarizes the patients' characteristics. Figures 1 and 2 shows the Kaplan-Meier curves for OS and EFS respectively. Conclusion: Allo-SCT can be effective strategy in select patients with relapsed/refractory PTCL and those with high risk histologies in the upfront setting PTCL with an acceptable toxicity. Disclosures Toze: Roche Canada: Research Funding. Sehn:roche/genentech: Consultancy, Honoraria; amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; seattle genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria; abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria; TG therapeutics: Consultancy, Honoraria; celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; lundbeck: Consultancy, Honoraria; janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria. Scott:NanoString Technologies: Patents & Royalties: named inventor on a patent for molecular subtyping of DLBCL that has been licensed to NanoString Technologies. Villa:Lundbeck: Honoraria; Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria. Connors:NanoString Technologies: Research Funding; F Hoffmann-La Roche: Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squib: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Millennium Takeda: Research Funding. Song:Janssen: Honoraria; Otsuka: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding.