In:
British Journal of Health Psychology, Wiley, Vol. 19, No. 2 ( 2014-05), p. 425-441
Abstract:
During last two decades, within the process of transition, the socio‐economic reforms in Republic of Macedonia reflected on the national health care system. The objective of this article was to identify workplace stressors and factors that influence quality of care, from the perspective of health professionals ( HP s), and to understand how they were linked in the context of such social circumstances. Methods A qualitative research based on focus group ( FG ) methodology was conducted in a general teaching hospital. Two main topics were the subjects of discussion in FG s: workplace stressors and factors that influence quality of care, from the HP s perspective. Six FG s were conducted with a total of 56 HP s (doctors, nurses, interns, and residents) divided into two sets of three FG s for each topic separately. Two sets of data were processed with thematic analysis, and the obtained results were compared with each other. Results By processing the data, we identified themes relating to factors that generate stress among HP s and factors that influence quality of care, from HP s' perspective. By comparing the two sets of themes, we found that many of them were identical, which means factors that increase workplace stress at the same time reduce quality of care. Conclusions Implementation of specific organizational interventions in the hospital setting can lead to the prevention of work‐related stress and improvement in quality of care. Our research suggests that the prevention of work‐related stress will impact positively on the quality of care, which may contribute to establish criteria and recommendations for the improvement in organizational culture and climate in hospitals. Statement of contribution What is already known on this subject? Psychosocial stress at work among health professionals is often present and well studied, but relations between job stress and quality of care were rarely examined. Job demands‐resources model by Demerouti, Bakker, Nachreiner and Schaufeli (2001), for assessment of job stress includes job demands (working environment, work overload, time pressures, recipient contact, shift work) and job resources (feedback, rewards, job control, participation, job security, supervisor support) was applied in different studies. There is scientific evidence that burned‐out physicians have shown depersonalization from their patients, they have withdrawn from patients, demonstrated sub‐optimal care, and sometimes burnout has been related to serious mistakes and patient death. Different research has shown that some workplace factors contributed to the development of work‐related stress and burnout among HP s whereas others contributed protectively. What does this study add? Similar and overlapping workplace factors in hospital setting produce stress in health professionals and influence quality of care. Impact of specific socioeconomic environment in Macedonia as a country in transition and EU candidate country on job stress among health professionals and quality of care. Development of criteria and recommendations for the job stress prevention and improvement of the organizational culture and climate in hospital settings.
Type of Medium:
Online Resource
ISSN:
1359-107X
,
2044-8287
DOI:
10.1111/bjhp.2014.19.issue-2
Language:
English
Publisher:
Wiley
Publication Date:
2014
detail.hit.zdb_id:
2026500-1
SSG:
5,2
Permalink
