Abstract: Patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT) spend many weeks of treatment in an isolated environment with little room for exercise. Feasibility of a daily-performed, unassisted fascia-training program and its effects on back and foot pain, back flexibility, and quality of life were investigated. Methods Eighteen patients receiving alloHCT were randomized to an intervention (IG: n  = 9; 60.7 ± 9.2 years) or control group (CG: n  = 9; 54.0 ± 15.5 years) and assessed from 1 week before to 3 weeks after transplantation (t0–t3). CG received standard care physical therapy, IG performed additionally fascia training for the back and feet twice daily. Back and foot pain, back flexibility, muscle tone, and quality of life were assessed for both IG and CG at baseline and three timepoints after alloHCT. Results Fascia-training program was well accepted. No increase in hematoma formation was observed. IG reported a trend towards reduction in back pain from pre- to post-intervention ( p  = .074), whereas CG showed a slight increase in back pain at t3 ( p  = .257). IG also improved back flexibility (− 1.79 ± 5.5 cm; p  = .397) while CG declined (+ 2.71 ± 5.6 cm; p  = .167). No differences between groups were found for muscle tone and no significant improvements in quality of life were reported at t3. Conclusion Unassisted fascia training is feasible and safe for patients undergoing alloHCT. This pilot study suggests that fascia training has the potential to improve back flexibility and reduce back pain, and might be a valuable component for physical therapy in patients receiving alloHCT.

Abstract: Introduction: Current studies indicate a contribution of germline predisposition in the development of approximately 8.5% of childhood cancers (Zhang J. et al., N Engl J Med, 2015), although their apparent rate is estimated to be much higher. Understanding tumor evolution based on a predisposed cell can open unknown doors for prevention and therapy of childhood cancer e.g., leukemia. Here we present a novel rare (MAF & lt;0.1%) germline POT1 variant (Q199*) predisposing to acute myeloid leukemia (AML). POT1 as part of the telomeric shelterin complex is known to play an important role in DNA damage protection, telomere length maintenance and chromosomal stability (Calvete O. et al., Nat. Commun., 2015). POT1 variants are associated with a broad range of cancer, including myeloid and lymphoid neoplasms in adults (Lim T.L. et al., Leukemia, 2021), but not yet described for myeloid malignancies in childhood. Methods: Whole exome sequencing (WES) was implemented to identify germline variants. To assess the effect of POT1 p.Q199*, patient's fibroblast and stably transfected HEK293T cells were used as cell models. The variant's functional impact was experimentally tested performing yH2AX and 53BP1 immunofluorescence assays for DNA damage detection, qRT-PCR for telomere length measurement and telomere FISH to assess chromosomal instability. Results: Utilizing WES to detect variants within shelterin complex genes we analyzed genomic data of an unselected German parent-child cohort of children with cancer (n=60, TRIO-DD), as well as a recently published parent-child pediatric cancer cohort (n=158, TRIO-D) (Wagener R. et al., Eur. J. Hum. Genet, 2021). Here, we identified a novel germline POT1 variant in a boy affected with Myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and secondary AML (7q-). This novel germline variant constitutes a stop-gain mutation causing a substitution of the amino acid Glutamine by a stop codon (p.Q199*). QRT-PCR analysis within the patient's fibroblasts showed a significant (student's t-test p=0.0037) reduction of POT1 mRNA expression to ≈0.5 compared to POT1 wildtype. Western Blot analysis revealed reduced POT1 levels, confirming the loss of one POT1 allele mediated by p.Q199*. Thereupon, POT1 p.Q199* cloning and stable transfection into Hek293T cells was performed to test the variant's cooperative functionality in a controlled environment. Subsequently, POT1 p.Q199* lead to a drastically significant (student's t-test p= & lt;0.001) increase of DNA double strand breaks in transfected Hek293T cells determined by yH2AX and 53BP1 immunofluorescence assays, which is in line with a deregulated DNA damage response and inappropriate repair by non-homologous end joining. In addition, we detected dysregulation of telomere length maintenance. Here, relative telomere length measurement by means of qRT-PCR indicated significant (student's t-test p=0.019) telomere elongation in POT1 p.Q199* fibroblast cells. Furthermore telomere FISH on metaphase chromosomes was performed to analyse chromosomal stability. In POT1 p.Q199* Hek293T cells we identified a significant (student's t-test p=0.002) increase in telomere fragility compared to POT1 WT cells. Conclusion: Taken together, we present the functional effects of POT1 p.Q199* leading to a significant increase of DNA damage, telomere length and chromosomal instability. Our results on functional dysregulation strengthen a potential genetic predisposition to childhood AML mediated by germline POT1 variants. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Abstract: While the shelterin complex guards and coordinates the mechanism of telomere regulation, deregulation of this process is tightly linked to malignant transformation and cancer. Here, we present the novel finding of a germline stop-gain variant (p.Q199*) in the shelterin complex gene POT1, which was identified in a child with acute myeloid leukemia. We show that the cells overexpressing the mutated POT1 display increased DNA damage and chromosomal instabilities compared to the wildtype counterpart. Protein and mRNA expression analyses in the primary patient cells further confirm that, physiologically, the variant leads to a nonfunctional POT1 allele in the patient. Subsequent telomere length measurements in the primary cells carrying heterozygous POT1 p.Q199* as well as POT1 knockdown AML cells revealed telomeric elongation as the main functional effect. These results show a connection between POT1 p.Q199* and telomeric dysregulation and highlight POT1 germline deficiency as a predisposition to myeloid malignancies in childhood.

Abstract: To investigate the efficacy and toxicities of CPX-351 outside a clinical trial, we analyzed 188 patients (median age 65 years, range 26–80) treated for therapy-related acute myeloid leukemia (t-AML, 29%) or AML with myelodysplasia-related changes (AML-MRC, 70%). Eighty-six percent received one, 14% two induction cycles, and 10% received consolidation (representing 22% of patients with CR/CRi) with CPX-351. Following induction, CR/CRi rate was 47% including 64% of patients with available information achieving measurable residual disease (MRD) negativity ( 〈 10 −3 ) as measured by flow cytometry. After a median follow-up of 9.3 months, median overall survival (OS) was 21 months and 1-year OS rate 64%. In multivariate analysis, complex karyotype predicted lower response ( p  = 0.0001), while pretreatment with hypomethylating agents ( p  = 0.02) and adverse European LeukemiaNet 2017 genetic risk ( p   〈  0.0001) were associated with lower OS. Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) was performed in 116 patients (62%) resulting in promising outcome (median survival not reached, 1-year OS 73%), especially in MRD-negative patients ( p  = 0.048). With 69% of patients developing grade III/IV non-hematologic toxicity following induction and a day 30-mortality of 8% the safety profile was consistent with previous findings. These real-world data confirm CPX-351 as efficient treatment for these high-risk AML patients facilitating allo-HCT in many patients with promising outcome after transplantation.

Abstract: Introduction: Cytogenetic testing is routinely performed in newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) for risk stratification. Elaborate risk classifications based on karyotyping are provided by both the European Leukemia Net (ELN) and the Medical Research Council (MRC). Complex aberrant, monosomal and abnl(17p) karyotypes confer a poor prognosis. In cytogenetic studies, chromosome aberrations that cannot be identified due to gross rearrangement, thereby preventing the allocation to a specific chromosome, are designated as "Marker Chromosomes" (MC). The significance of MC as prognostic factor for AML has remained elusive so far. In this study we have assessed frequency, cytogenetic characteristics and prognostic impact of MC as well as their underlying biological origin. Given the gross structural chromosomal damage inherent to MC we speculated that they may arise from chromothripsis, a recently described phenomenon of chromosome fragmentation in a single catastrophic event. Patients and Methods: Patients recruited intwo large consecutive, prospective, randomized, multicenter clinical trials for newly diagnosed non-M3 AML patients from the German Study Alliance Leukemia (SAL) were analyzed (AML96, NCT00180115; AML2003, NCT00180102). All karyotypes were retrospectively screened for MC. For the detection of chromothripsis array-CGH was used. For each sample 50 ng of DNA were hybridized to an Affymetrix® CytoScan HD Oligo/SNP-array and scanned with the Affymetrix GeneChip® Scanner 3000 7G. Chromothripsis was defined according to the criteria of Rausch et al., which require at least 10 switches in segmental copy number involving two or three distinct copy number states on a single chromosome. Results: MC were detectable in 165/1026 (16.1%) of aberrant non-CBF karyotype cases. Adverse-risk karyotypes displayed a higher frequency of MC (40.3% in complex aberrant, 26.5% in adverse-risk as defined by MRC criteria and 41.2% in abnl(17p) karyotypes, p 〈 .001 each). MC were associated with a poorer prognosis compared to other non-CBF aberrant karyotypes as well as with lower remission rates (CR+CRi; 36.0% vs. 55.8% in AML96 ≤60 years, p=0.01; 14.3% vs. 44.1% in AML2003, p 〈 0.001), inferior event-free survival (2.24 vs. 6.54 months, p 〈 0.001; 3.45 vs. 8.03 months, p 〈 0.001) and overall survival (5.72 vs. 11.87 months, p 〈 0.001; 8.68 vs. 20.78, p=0.01). In multivariate analysis with co-variables age, prior MDS, therapy-related AML and adverse-risk cytogenetics according to MRC criteria, MC independently predicted poor prognosis in AML96 ≤60 years but not in AML2003 with its higher allogeneic transplantation rate. As detected by array-CGH, in about one third of MC karyotypes (18/49, 36.7%, including 3 cases with 8 or 9 copy number switches) MC had arisen from chromothripsis, whereas this phenomenon was virtually undetectable in a control group of complex aberrant karyotypes without MC (1/34) (p 〈 0.001). Chromothripsis in MC karyotypes typically involved one single chromosome (n=11), with two or three chromosomes affected in 5 and 2 patients, respectively. There was no predilection for a particular chromosome. MC karyotypes positive for chromothripsis were characterized by a particularly high degree of karyotype complexity as compared to those that were negative for chromothripsis (complex aberrant 100% vs. 64.5% p 〈 0.01; abnl(17p) 50.0% vs. 16.1%, p=0.01). In 12/18 (66.7%) cases, at least one of the chromothriptic chromosomes was reported as loss in the karyotype formula, suggesting that the grouping of a chromothriptic chromosome as a marker is paralleled by a putative loss of the affected chromosome. The chromothripsis positive MC karyotype subgroup had a particularly dismal prognosis with a combined CR+CRi rate of 2/16 vs. 10/31 (p=0.14). It also displayed inferior event-free and overall survival, though statistical significance was not reached for either endpoint, likely due to the already poor prognosis of the entire MC positive group. Conclusion: This is the first study showing that MC are a frequent finding predominantly in adverse-risk AML and associated with particularly poor prognosis. Our data provide evidence that a substantial portion of MC arise from chromothripsis. Disclosures Thiede: AgenDix: Employment, Other: Ownership.

Abstract: Background: Core binding factor acute myeloid leukemia (CBF-AML) is defined by the presence of either t(8;21)(q22;q22) or inv(16)(p13.1q22)/t(16;16)(p13.1;q22) and is associated with a favorable outcome, particularly if treated with repetitive cycles of high-dose cytarabine as post-remission therapy. Long-time 10-year overall survival (OS) rate was reported of 58% in FLT3-ITD negative patients (pts; Allen et al. Leukemia 2013). Nevertheless, 30-40% CBF-AML pts experience relapse. FLT3-ITD mutations occur in roughly 5-10% of adult CBF-AML. However, their prognostic relevance is still controversial. Aims: To characterize CBF-AML with FLT3-ITD and compare outcomes according to their genetic background. Methods: We retrospectively studied 65 AML pts with CBF-AML and FLT3-ITD (median age at diagnosis, 54 years; range, 22-81 years) diagnosed between 1996 and 2018 within seven study groups/institutions of the US and Europe. Results: Thirty-two (49%) of the 65 pts harbored t(8;21). Median white blood cell and platelet counts at diagnosis of patients with t(8;21) and inv(16) were 18.3/nl (range, 1.8-202/nl) and 31/nl (range, 7-372/nl), respectively. AML diagnoses were de novo in 61 (94%) and therapy-related in 4 (6%) of the pts. Thirty (46%) pts were female. Cytogenetic analysis revealed additional abnormalities (abn) in 38 (58%) pts, most frequently loss of X or Y (n=13; n=12 associated with t(8;21)), complex karyotype (≥3 abn; n=12; n=7 occurring in t(8;21)), trisomy 22 (n=7, all associated with inv(16)) or trisomy 8 (overall n=6, n=5 occurring in inv(16)). Four pts were positive for both mutations, FLT3-ITD as well as FLT3-TKD. Median ITD allelic ratio were 0.44 (range, 0.003-50) and median ITD size 60 bp (range, 3-120 bp). Three older pts (median age, 75.5 years) were treated with either azacitidine + sorafenib, azacitidine + venetoclax or with etoposide + tipifarnib. All three patients receiving non-intensive therapy died within one year and were excluded from further analysis. Complete remission (CR) after anthracycline-based induction therapy was achieved in 98% (n=61/62) of patients fit for intensive treatment including two pts treated with 7+3 ± midostaurin within the RATIFY trial. One patient died during induction. Fifteen (24%) pts underwent allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. Of those, 10 pts were transplanted in 1st and 5 pts in 2nd CR. Median follow-up for the entire cohort was 4.43 years (95%-CI, 3.35-8.97 years). Median and 4-year relapse-free survival (RFS) rates were 3.41 years (95%-CI, 1.26 years - not reached) and 44.9% (95%-CI, 32.9-61.4%). Median and 4-year overall survival rates (OS) were 4.48 years (95%-CI, 2.26 years - not reached) and 51.8% (95%-CI, 39.6.2-67.9%). Neither type of CBF-AML (p=0.60), nor additional chromosomal abn (p=0.80), nor presence of a complex karyotype (p=0.50) had a prognostic impact on OS. Higher age (≥60 years) was an in trend negative prognostic factor on RFS and OS (p=0.07, each). High allelic ratio (≥0.5) had no impact on RFS (p=0.3), but in trend on OS (p=0.10). Conclusions: Despite a high remission rate pts with FLT3-ITD had an inferior outcome as compared to previously published data on CBF-AML without FLT3-ITD. Thus, CBF-AML with FLT3-ITD should not be classified within the low-risk category. CBF pts with FLT3-ITD warrants further study and should be included in FLT3-inhibitor trials. Disclosures Brunner: Astra Zeneca: Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Forty Seven Inc: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz Pharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Research Funding. Novak:Roche: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel,Accommodations; Takeda: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Other: Travel,Accommodations; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Stoelzel:Neovii: Other: Travel funding; Shire: Consultancy, Other: Travel funding; JAZZ Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy. Thiede:Daiichi Sankyo: Honoraria; AgenDix GmbH: Employment, Equity Ownership; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Diaceutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Platzbecker:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria. Levis:Agios: Consultancy, Honoraria; Astellas: Consultancy, Research Funding; FUJIFILM: Consultancy, Research Funding; Menarini: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo Inc: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria.

Abstract: Background In newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML), the general recommendation is to start treatment immediately after the diagnosis has been made. This paradigm is based both on the observation that untreated acute leukemia has a poor prognosis and on retrospective analyses demonstrating a shorter survival in younger AML patients (pts) in whom treatment was delayed by more than 5 days (Sekeres et al., 2009). A more recent single-center analysis came to a different conclusion, showing no prognostic effect for the time from diagnosis to treatment (TDT; Bertoli et al., 2013). We explored the relationship between TDT and prognosis on a large set of real-world data from the AML registry of the Study Alliance Leukemia (SAL) and compared it to the published cohorts. Methods The SAL runs a transregional AML registry in 46 treatment centers across Germany (NCT03188874). All registered patients with an intensive induction treatment, a minimum follow-up time of 12 months and no acute promyelocytic leukemia were selected (n=2,200). Treatment start was defined by the first day of cytarabine, whereas single agent hydroxyurea (HU) was labeled as pretreatment. We analyzed the influence of TDT on complete remission (CR), early death (ED) and overall survival (OS) in univariable analyses for each day of treatment delay, in groups of 0-5, 6-10, 11-15 and & gt;15 days of TDT, and by using the restricted cubic spline (RCS) method for data modelling. In order to adjust for the influence of established prognostic variables on the outcomes, we used multivariable regression models and propensity score weighting. The influence of HU pretreatment on outcomes was investigated by introducing an interaction term between TDT and the presence of HU pretreatment. Results The median age was 59 years (y) (IQR 50-68), the proportion of pts with favorable, intermediate and adverse genetic risk according to ELN was 27%, 53%, and 20%; & gt;95% of pts received induction treatment with standard 7+3. HU pretreatment was administered in 4% of pts. The median TDT was 3 days (IQR 2-6). Descriptive statistics after grouping of pts showed the highest median age and the lowest proportion of NPM1 mutated and favorable risk in the TDT group 11-15. Of all pts, 79% achieved a CR/CRi; unadjusted CR rates for the patient groups with TDT of 0-5, 6-10, 11-15 and & gt;15 days were 80%, 77%, 74% and 76%, respectively (p=0.317). In multivariable analysis accounting for the influence of ELN risk, age, WBC, LDH, de novo versus secondary AML and ECOG, the OR for each additional day of TDT was 0.99 (95%-CI, 0.97-1.00; p=0.124). Four percent of pts died within the first 30 days from treatment start. The respective rates in the four TDT categories were 4.0%, 3.8%, 5.1% and 4.1% (p=0.960). In multivariable analysis, the OR for TDT was 1.01 (95%-CI, 0.98-1.05; p=0.549). After a median follow-up of 40 months, the 2-y OS of all pts was 51%. The unadjusted 2-y OS rates stratified by TDT of 0-5, 6-10, 11-15, & gt;15 days were 52, 49, 46, and 51% (see Table 1 and Figure 1). The hazard ratio (HR) for each day of treatment delay was 1.00 (95%-CI; 0.99-1.01; p=0.317). In multivariable Cox regression analysis, the HR for TDT as continuous variable was 1.00 (95%-CI, 0.99-1.01; p=0.689). When OS was analyzed separately stratified for age ≤60 and & gt;60 ys and for high versus lower initial WBC defined by a threshold of 50 x 109/L, no significant differences between TDT groups were observed. Multivariable models using TDT as a grouped variable or with RCS did not provide evidence for a significant influence of TDT on outcomes. Propensity score matching of pts in the four TDT groups did not reveal an influence on outcomes. The use of HU was not associated with CR, ED nor OS. Conclusion Our study on 2,200 newly diagnosed registry pts receiving consistent intensive induction with standard-dose cytarabine plus daunorubicin (7+3) suggests that TDT is not related to response or survival, neither in younger nor in older pts. Despite multivariable analyses, a bias towards longer TDT intervals in pts judged to be clinically stable by the treating physician cannot be excluded entirely. As treatment stratification in intensive first-line treatment of AML evolves, the TDT data suggests that it may be a safe and reasonable approach to wait for genetic and other laboratory test results in order to assign clinically stable pts to the best available treatment option before the start of intensive treatment. Disclosures Krämer: Daiichi-Sankyo: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bayer: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Hänel:Roche: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Celgene: Other: advisory board; Novartis: Honoraria; Takeda: Other: advisory board. Jost:Daiichi: Honoraria; Sanofi: Honoraria; Gilead: Other: travel grants; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria. Brümmendorf:Merck: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; University Hospital of the RWTH Aachen: Employment; Ariad: Consultancy. Krause:Siemens: Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria; MSD: Honoraria; Gilead: Other: travel; Celgene Corporation: Other: Travel. Scholl:Novartis: Other: Project funding; Pfizer: Other: Advisory boards; Gilead: Other: Project funding; Daiichi Sankyo: Other: Advisory boards; AbbVie: Other: Advisory boards. Hochhaus:Pfizer: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; MSD: Research Funding. Kiani:Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Middeke:Sanofi: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Speakers Bureau; AbbVie: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; MSD: Consultancy. Thiede:AgenDix GmbH: Employment, Equity Ownership; Novartis: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bayer: Research Funding; Daiichi-Sankyo: Speakers Bureau. Stoelzel:JAZZ Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Neovii: Other: Travel funding; Shire: Consultancy, Other: Travel funding. Platzbecker:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding.

Abstract: Background In a recent phase-III trial CPX-351 (Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Palo Alto, CA), a liposomal encapsulation of cytarabine and daunorubicin, has shown higher remission rates and longer overall survival (OS) in patients aged 60 to 75 years with AML with myelodysplasia-related changes (AML-MRC) or therapy-related AML (t-AML) in comparison to conventional 7+3 regimen. Based on this CPX-351 has been approved in the USA 2017 and in Europe 2018 for adult patients with newly-diagnosed AML-MRC or t-AML. Still, several issues such as age ( & lt;60 years), measurable residual disease (MRD), molecular subgroups and outcome after allo-HCT were not addressed in the phase-III trial. Aiming to investigate these open aspects and to provide more clinical experience with CPX-351, we performed a real-world analysis of patients with AML treated with CPX-351 as first-line therapy. Design/Methods: For this retrospective analysis, we collected data on baseline characteristics, treatment details including allo-HCT and outcome from patients with newly-diagnosed AML-MRC or t-AML, who were treated with CPX-351 according to the EMA label between 2018 and 2020 in 25 German centers participating in the Study Alliance Leukemia (SAL), German Cooperative Transplant Study Group and the AML Study Group (AMLSG). Results: A total of 188 patients (median age 65 years, range 26 to 80) with t-AML (29%) or AML-MRC (70%) including 46 patients (24%) & lt;60 years could be analyzed. Eigthy-six percent received one, 14% two induction cycles and 10% received consolidation with CPX-351. Following induction, CR/CRi rate was 47% including 64% of patients with available information achieving measurable residual disease (MRD) negativity ( & lt;10-3) as measured by flow cytometry at local laboratories. Additionally, 35 patients were categorized as MLFS at first remission control, which achieved CRi (n=16) or CR (n=10) in the further course without additional therapy. After median follow-up of 9.3 months, median overall survival (OS) was 21 months and 1-year OS rate was 64%. In multivariate analysis, complex karyotype predicted lower response (p=.0001), and pretreatment with hypomethylating agents (p=.02) and adverse European LeukemiaNet 2017 genetic risk (p & lt;.0001) were associated with lower OS. Allo-HCT was performed in 116 patients (62%) including 101 of these patients with CR prior transplant and resulted in 1-year OS of 73% (median survival not reached), especially in MRD negative patients (p=.048). With 69% of patients developing grade III/IV non-hematologic toxicity following induction and a day 30-mortality of 8% the safety profile was consistent with previous findings. Conclusion: The results from this real-world analysis confirm CPX-351 as an efficient treatment for these high-risk AML patients bridging to facilitating allo-HCT in many patients with encouraging outcome after transplantation. Disclosures Röllig: AbbVie: Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria; Bristol-Meyer-Squibb: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria; Jazz: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding; Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding. Stelljes: Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Medac: Speakers Bureau; Celgene/BMS: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; MSD: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Kite/Gilead: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Gaidzik: Janssen: Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Unglaub: Novartis: Consultancy, Other: travel costs/ conference fee; JazzPharma: Consultancy, Other: travel costs/ conference fee. Thol: Abbvie: Honoraria; Astellas: Honoraria; BMS/Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Jazz: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria. Krause: Siemens: Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; art-tempi: Honoraria; Kosmas: Honoraria; Gilead: Other: travel support; Abbvie: Other: travel support. Haenel: Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bayer Vital: Honoraria; Jazz: Consultancy, Honoraria; GSK: Consultancy. Vucinic: Novartis: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria, Other: Travel Sponsoring; Abbvie: Honoraria, Other: Travel Sponsoring; Gilead: Honoraria, Other: Travel Sponsoring; MSD: Honoraria. Fransecky: Novartis: Honoraria; Medac: Honoraria; Abbvie: Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria. Holtick: Celgene: Honoraria; Sanofi: Honoraria. Kobbe: Celgene: Research Funding. Holderried: Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; GSK: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Speakers Bureau; Gilead Sciences: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; MSD: Speakers Bureau; Daiichi Sankyo: Other: travel support; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Therakos: Other: Travel support; Janssen: Other: Travel support; Abbvie: Other: Travel support; Eurocept Pharmaceuticals: Other: Travel support; Medac: Other: Travel support. Heuser: Astellas: Research Funding; Bayer AG: Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS/Celgene: Research Funding; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Research Funding; BergenBio: Research Funding; Daichi Sankyo: Honoraria, Research Funding; Karyopharm: Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; Tolremo: Honoraria; AbbVie: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria. Sauer: Pfizer: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Matterhorn Biosciences AG: Consultancy, Other: DSMB/SAB Member; Takeda: Consultancy, Other: DSMB/SAB Member. Goetze: Abbvie: Other: Advisory Board; BMS/Celgene: Other: Advisory Board, Research Funding. Döhner: Jazz Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria; Agios and Astex: Research Funding; Astellas: Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria, Other: Advisory Board; Daiichi Sankyo: Honoraria, Other: Advisory Board; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene/BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Döhner: Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Research Funding; Agios: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Research Funding; Abbvie: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Gilead: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Helsinn: Honoraria; GEMoaB: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Astellas: Honoraria, Research Funding; Astex Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria; AstraZeneca: Honoraria; Berlin-Chemie: Honoraria; Oxford Biomedica: Honoraria; Roche: Honoraria. Schliemann: Philogen S.p.A.: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy, Other: travel grants; Astellas: Consultancy; AstraZeneca: Consultancy; Boehringer-Ingelheim: Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Other: travel grants; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy; Roche: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy. Schetelig: Roche: Honoraria, Other: lecture fees; Novartis: Honoraria, Other: lecture fees; BMS: Honoraria, Other: lecture fees; Abbvie: Honoraria, Other: lecture fees; AstraZeneca: Honoraria, Other: lecture fees; Gilead: Honoraria, Other: lecture fees; Janssen: Honoraria, Other: lecture fees . Germing: Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Other: advisory activity, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria. Schroeder: JAZZ: Honoraria, Research Funding.

Abstract: Introduction Acute and chronic graft vs. host disease (a/cGVHD) are major causes of treatment failure and non-relapse mortality (NRM) in multiple myeloma (MM) patients (pts) undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT). Use of post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) is now an established method for GVHD prophylaxis after HLA haplo-identical (haplo)-HCT. We previously reported data in MM pts undergoing haplo-HCT (EBMT/CIBMTR) and showed that PTCy was associated with promising overall survival (OS) (Sahebi et al., BBMT 2019). However, data using PTCy for GVHD prophylaxis in other donor types are very limited in MM. Methods We evaluated PTCy as GVHD prophylaxis in MM pts who underwent a first allo-HCT using matched related (MRD), matched unrelated (MUD), mismatched related or unrelated (MMRD/MMUD, one antigen), and haplo donors within EBMT centers. OS and progression free survival (PFS) were determined by means of the Kaplan-Meier estimator. Neutrophil and platelet engraftment, relapse and NRM, and a/cGVHD were analyzed individually in a competing risks framework with relapse and death as competing events. Cox proportional hazards regression was used in the multivariable analyses. All estimates include 95% confidence intervals. All included covariates are listed in the Table. Patient Characteristics Between 2012-2018, a total of 295 MM pts received PTCy as GVHD prophylaxis. Median age at transplant was 55 yrs. Allo-HCT was given at a median interval of 34.9 mo from MM diagnosis. The conditioning regimen included reduced intensity (RIC, 193, 65.4%) and myeloablative (MAC, 102, 34.6%). All pts except 10 (3.4%) had prior autologous HCT; all of these 10 pts received a haplo-HCT. GVHD prophylaxis included PTCy + cyclosporine A or tacrolimus +/- mycophenolate mofetil in the majority of patients (239, 81%), and this combination was used in nearly every patient with haplo-HCT. Overall, peripheral blood was used as the stem cell source in about 80% of pts, but bone marrow was used in nearly 40% of haplo-HCTs. Results (Median and 95% confidence interval are provided)1) Median time to neutrophil engraftment was 19 d (18-19 d) with no apparent difference among donor types.2) Median time to platelet engraftment was 23 d (21-26 d), whereas haplo-HCT engraftments were longer (27 d (25-33 d)).3) NRM at 1 yr was 18% (12-22%) and at 2 yrs was 19% (14-24%), with no significant difference among different donor types. Age & lt; 50 yrs significantly decreased NRM to 9% (2-16%, p=0.027) at 2 yrs.4) Cumulative incidence of grade II-IV aGVHD at +100 d was 30% (25-36%), and 1 yr cGVHD was 27% (21-32%), with no apparent difference among donor types.5) OS was 63% (57-69%) at 1 yr and 51% (45-58%) at 2 yrs for the whole group, with no statistical difference among different donor types after a median follow-up of 26.1 mo. Disease status at transplant & lt; PR significantly decreased OS to 35% (22-47%, p=0.005) at 2 yrs.6) PFS was 42% (36-49%) at 1 yr and 26% (20-32%) at 2 yrs for the whole group without apparent significant difference among donor types. Disease status at transplant & lt; PR significantly decreased PFS to 16% (6-26%, p=0.028) at 2 yrs.7) However, in multivariable analyses, donor type using haplo, HR 1.65 (0.56-1.67, p=0.03), was associated with increased mortality in addition to disease status at allo-HCT & lt; PR, HR 1.93 (1.25-2.97, p=0.003). Finally, MUD was associated with an improved PFS, HR=0.63 (0.4-0.99, p=0.04). Disease status & lt; PR, HR=1.85 (1.24-2.74, p=0.002) was again associated with inferior PFS. Summary PTCy in MM patients undergoing allo-HCT throughout donor types resulted in a low incidence of aGVHD grade II-IV of 30% and cGVHD of 27%, with OS of 51% and PFS of 26% at 2 yr. Our first donor comparison using PTCy revealed improved survival in matched (MRD and MUD) versus haplo allo-HCT after adjusting for other risk factors. Disclosures Blaise: Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria. Tarella:TG-therapeutics: Research Funding; ImmunoGen: Research Funding; ADC Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. McDonald:venetoclax advisory board in South Africa (in CLL context): Consultancy; Alberts Cellular Therapy: Current Employment. Milpied:Roche: Honoraria, Other: Travel support; Astellas: Honoraria; Gilead Sciences: Other: consultancy or advisory role; Celgene: Other: Travel support; Sandoz: Honoraria, Other: consultancy or advisory role; Janssen: Honoraria. Yakoub-Agha:Celgene: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Gilead/Kite: Honoraria, Other: travel support; Janssen: Honoraria; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria. Schonland:Janssen: Honoraria, Other: travel support to meetings, Research Funding; Prothena: Honoraria, Other: travel support to meetings, Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria, Other: travel support to meetings, Research Funding.