Abstract: Introduction Elderly non-transplant eligible newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (nte-NDMM) patients also benefit from novel therapies, however, overall survival (OS) is inferior in unfit and frail compared to fit patients as defined by the International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) frailty index. This is caused by a high discontinuation rate due to toxicity. Therefore, a less toxic effective treatment for unfit and frail patients is needed. In view of the favorable safety profile of ixazomib (Ixa) and daratumumab (Dara), we investigated the efficacy and feasibility of treatment with Ixa and Dara plus low dose dexamethasone (Ixa-Dara-dex) in unfit and frail patients. This trial was registered at www.trialregister.nlwww.trialregister.nl as NTR6297. Methods In this prospective multicenter phase II trial, treatment consisted of nine 28 day-induction cycles consisting of Ixa 4 mg (days 1, 8, 15), Dara 16 mg/kg (cycle 1-2: days 1, 8, 15, 22; cycle 3-6: days 1, 15; cycle 7-9: day 1) and dex (in combination with Dara; cycle 1-2: 20 mg; subsequent cycles 10 mg) followed by maintenance therapy with Ixa (days 1, 8, 15, 29, 36, 43) and Dara (day 1) of 8-week cycles, until progression for a maximum of 2 years. A pre-specified efficacy analysis was planned for the first eligible 23 unfit and 23 frail patients separately at the time the data of the first 9 cycles induction therapy was available. Inclusion criteria were unfit or frail NDMM patients according to the IMWG frailty index. Main exclusion criteria were severe cardiac dysfunction, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with an FEV1 & lt;50% of expected and a creatinine clearance of & lt;20 ml/minute. We here report the overall response rate (ORR) on induction treatment, progression free survival (PFS) and OS, treatment discontinuation and toxicity of the first 23/65 eligible unfit and 23/65 frail patients during induction therapy. In addition, we present the mortality rate for all patients who were included in the study (65 unfit, 67 frail), with data cut-off June 18, 2019. Results The demographics of the first 23 unfit and 23 frail patients are described in Table 1. Median follow-up of these first 23 unfit and 23 frail patients is 12.7 months (range 9.1-18.3) and 13.4 months (range 9.2-17.7), respectively. ORR during induction was 87% in unfit (48% partial response [PR] and 39% very good partial response [VGPR] ) and 78% in frail (48% PR, 26% VGPR, 4% stringent complete response). Nine months PFS rates were 78% (95% Confidence Interval [CI] 55-90) and 61% (95% CI 38-77), respectively. Nine months OS rates were 100% and 83% (95% CI 60-93), respectively. Sixteen/23 (70%) unfit and 14/23 (61%) frail patients completed induction treatment with Ixa-Dara-dex. Reasons for treatment discontinuation were progressive disease (PD, n=5), toxicity (n=1) and incompliance (n=1) in unfit and intercurrent death (n=3, all within 3 cycles), PD (n=2), incompliance (n=2) and other reasons (n=2) in frail. The median and inter-quartile range of relative dose intensity (RDI) for respectively unfit and frail were 0.96 and 0.91 for Ixa, 0.98 and 0.96 for Dara and 1.0 and 0.99 for dex. Toxicity is described in Table 2. Hematological toxicity was limited, being mainly neutropenia (in unfit both 4% grade 3 and 4; in frail 4% grade 3 and 13% grade 4) and thrombocytopenia occurring only in frail (17% grade 3, 4% grade 4). Non-hematological toxicity was manageable, with grade 3 infections occurring in 9% of both unfit and frail patients. In both arms, there were no infusion related reactions and only 4% grade 3 neuropathy was reported. Additionally, we investigated the mortality rate of all included 65 unfit and 67 frail patients, with a limited follow-up of 7.1 months (range 1-18.3) and 8.8 months (range 0.4-17.7), respectively. The mortality rate was only 2% in unfit (1/65 due to PD). Thirteen/67 (19%) of frail patients died, which was caused by infections (n=6; 3 pneumonia, 1 influenza B, 1 erysipelas), sudden death (n=2), organ dysfunction (n=2), incompliance (n=1) and PD (n=2). Early death rate (≤3 months of registration) was 0% in unfit and 8/67 (12%) in frail. Conclusion Ixa-Dara-dex is an effective therapeutic regimen in unfit patients with limited toxicity, not giving rise to (early) mortality. Additionally, in the majority of frail patients this regimen is active and feasible. However, better identification and support of those patients is warranted, as we observed early mortality due to vulnerability and infections. Disclosures Van De Donk: Janssen Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; AMGEN: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Bayer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Servier: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Sonneveld:SkylineDx: Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria, Research Funding; Karyopharm: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding. Levin:Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Educational grant ; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Educational Grant; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Educational Grant; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Educational Grant; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Educational grant . Zweegman:Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

Abstract: Current strategies for diagnosing pulmonary embolism (PE) include a clinical decision rule (CDR), followed by a D-dimer assay in patients with an unlikely clinical probability. We assessed the implementation of the current guidelines for the diagnosis of PE. A first questionnaire was sent to internists and pulmonologists to assess the proportion of physicians that adequately applied the guidelines. Two versions of a second questionnaire were sent presenting five hypothetical cases of which in two cases with an intermediate clinical probability an abnormal D-dimer test result was added to one version. We assessed the variation of the CDR and compared the proportions of a likely clinical probability between the two versions. A total of 65 physicians responded to the first questionnaire (response rate 75%). Half of the physicians (N=29; 46%) indicated that they use a CDR in all patients and 22 physicians (45%) indicated that they review the D-dimer result after they examined patients. Sixty-two physicians responded on the second questionnaire (response rate 36%). A shift was observed from an unlikely to a likely probability when an abnormal D-dimer test result was added to the clinical information (22% to 41%; p=0.22 and 26% to 50%; p 〈 0.05). Our findings indicate that physicians do not use the guidelines for diagnosis of PE consistently. Furthermore, the knowledge of an abnormal D-dimer test result before seeing the patient leads to a higher CDR score. Physicians should therefore first examine patients before taking note of the D-dimer test result.

Abstract: Introduction Non-transplant eligible newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NTE-NDMM) patients have a heterogeneous clinical outcome, which can be partly explained by differences in frailty level. Accordingly, intermediate-fit patients, according to the IMWG frailty index, have an inferior survival and higher rates of treatment discontinuation as compared to fit NTE-NDMM patients. The aim of this study was to prospectively investigate the efficacy and tolerability of the novel regimen ixazomib-daratumumab-low dose dexamethasone in intermediate-fit NTE-NDMM patients. This trail is registered at www.trialregister.nl as NTR6297. Methods In the phase II HOVON 143 study, intermediate-fit NTE-NDMM patients were treated with nine 28-day induction cycles, consisting of ixazomib 4mg (day 1, 8, 15), daratumumab 16mg/kg (cycle 1-2 on day 1, 8, 15, 22; cycle 3-6 on day 1, 15; cycle 7-9 on day 1) and dexamethasone (on days of daratumumab; cycle 1-2 20mg, subsequent cycles 10mg), followed by maintenance therapy of 8-week cycles with ixazomib (days 1, 8, 15, 29, 36, 43), and daratumumab (day 1), of maximum 2 years or until earlier progression. Inclusion criteria were NTE-NDMM patients who were intermediate-fit according to the IMWG frailty index. Main exclusion criteria were severe cardiac dysfunction, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with an FEV1 & lt;50% of expected and a creatinine clearance of & lt;20 ml/minute. The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR) after nine induction cycles, defined by having at least a partial response (≥PR). Secondary endpoints were PFS, OS, event free survival (EFS, defined as either treatment discontinuation, progressive disease (PD), death, hematological adverse events (AE) grade 4 or non-hematological AE grade 3/4), and health-related quality of life (using the EORTC-QLQ C30 and -MY20). Results Sixty-five NTE-NDMM patients were included in the study of whom the demographics are described in Table 1. Median age was 76 years (range 65-80), 14% had a WHO≥2, 18% had ISS3 and 14% had high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities. The ORR was 71% (95% CI 63-73), including 23 (35%) patients with a very good partial response and 1 (2%) with a complete response. After a median follow-up time of 18.1 months (range 9.5-27.8), the median PFS was 17.4 months (95% CI 10.4-22.6), the median OS was not reached and 12-month OS was 92% (95% CI 82-97)(Figure 1). Eight patients died, 3/65 (5%) due to relapse and 5/65 (8%) due to other reasons, including one early death (≤60 days from registration). The median EFS was 5.3 months (95% CI 2.8-8.3). EFS defining events were non-hematological AEs grade 3/4 in 31 (48%), PD in 15 (23%), hematological AEs grade 4 in 2 (3%), treatment discontinuation in 2 (3%) and death in 1 (2%) patients (Figure 1). Thirty/65 (46%) patients did not proceed to maintenance therapy, due to PD (19/65 (29%)), toxicity (4/65 (6%)), incompliance (3/65 (5%)), sudden death (1/65 (2%)) or other reasons (3/65 (5%)). In addition, 7/65 (11%) patients had to discontinue ixazomib-only, all 7 due to PNP. Cumulative grade 3 or higher hematological AEs occurred in 8/65 (12%), mainly neutropenia (6%), whereas grade ≥3 non-hematological AEs were reported in 33/65 (51%) patients. Most common non-hematological grade ≥3 AEs were gastro-intestinal (14%), central nervous system AEs (11%) or infections (9%). Of 27/65 (42%) patients experiencing PNP, 4 (8%) had PNP grade 3. During induction, patients experienced a statistically and clinically (reaching minimal important difference thresholds) significant improvement in GHS/QoL, role functioning, and future perspective. In contrast, PNP worsened over time. Conclusion In intermediate-fit patients, ixazomib, daratumumab and dexamethasone is an effective and feasible regime, which improves QoL. However, treatment discontinuation due to toxicity (either the whole regimen (6%), but especially ixazomib only (11%)) or incompliance, which negatively affects PFS, remains a concern. This underscores the need to investigate novel monoclonal antibody-based treatment combinations with a higher efficacy to tolerability balance for intermediate-fit patients with NDMM. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Vekemans: Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. van de Donk: Janssen Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Cellectis: Research Funding; Servier: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bayer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Timmers: Gilead Sciences: Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses; Daiichi Sankyo Ned: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Servier: Speakers Bureau; Janssen-Cilag: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Speakers Bureau. Sonneveld: Karyopharm: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene/BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; SkylineDx: Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. van der Spek: Amgen: Other. De Waal: Celgene: Speakers Bureau; Roche: Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses. Nijhof: Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene/Bristol Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Levin: Roche, Janssen, Abbvie: Other: Travel Expenses, Ad-Board. Zweegman: Oncopeptides: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.