GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

X

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Palbociclib plus exemestane with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist versus capecitabine in premenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer (KCSG-BR15-10): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 2 trial
    Elsevier BV ; 2019
    In:  The Lancet Oncology Vol. 20, No. 12 ( 2019-12), p. 1750-1759
    Details
    In: The Lancet Oncology, Elsevier BV, Vol. 20, No. 12 ( 2019-12), p. 1750-1759
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1470-2045
    URL: Article
    DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30565-0
    Language: English
    Publisher: Elsevier BV
    Publication Date: 2019
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2049730-1
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
    Online Resource
  • 2
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Retrospective study to estimate the prevalence of HER2-low breast cancer (BC) and describe its clinicopathological characteristics.
    American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) ; 2022
    In:  Journal of Clinical Oncology Vol. 40, No. 16_suppl ( 2022-06-01), p. 1087-1087
    Details
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 40, No. 16_suppl ( 2022-06-01), p. 1087-1087
    Abstract: 1087 Background: Approximately 50% of BCs traditionally categorized as HER2 negative (HER2-neg) express low levels of HER2 (IHC 1+ or IHC 2+/ISH-; Miglietta, NPJ Breast Cancer 2021). HER2-targeted therapies for HER2-low metastatic BC (mBC) are under investigation (eg, T-DXd in the phase 3 DESTINY-Breast04 study; NCT03734029), but HER2 assays currently used to select patients (pts) for approved anti-HER2 therapies are optimized for high HER2 expression and are not validated for HER2-low detection. A recent study found relatively poor agreement ( 〈 70% interrater agreement) in evaluation of IHC scores of 0 and 1+ using current HER2 assays (Fernandez, JAMA Oncol 2022). Our objectives were to assess the prevalence of HER2-low among HER2-neg based on rescored HER2 IHC slides after training on low-end expression scoring and to describe pt characteristics of HER2-low vs HER2 IHC 0 mBC. Preliminary results are reported for 233 of 1000 planned pts. Methods: This multicenter, retrospective study (NCT04807595) included pts with confirmed HER2-neg unresectable/mBC diagnosed between 2015 and 2017. Local laboratories, blinded to historical HER2 scores, rescored HER2 IHC-stained slides. HER2 was assessed using Ventana 4B5 and other assays. BCs were categorized as HER2-low or HER2 IHC 0. The prevalence of HER2-low BC among pts originally scored as HER2-neg was measured. Demographics (eg, age, country, race) and clinicopathological characteristics were examined via medical charts/electronic health records. Concordance between historical HER2 scores and rescores was assessed. Results: HER2 rescores were obtained for 233 pts (mean age, 54 y). HER2-low prevalence was 63.2% overall and numerically greater in hormone receptor (HR)–positive vs HR-negative subgroups (66.1% vs 54.8%; Table). No notable differences in prevalence were seen among different HER2 assays or in demographic/baseline disease characteristics between the HER2-low and HER2 IHC 0 groups. Concordance rate between historical and rescored slides for HER2-status classification was 82.3%. The presentation will include an expanded data set (≈400 pts) with additional results. Conclusions: Data on HER2-low prevalence in BC is limited. Preliminary data from this study of mBC samples suggest a somewhat higher prevalence estimate (≈63%) than a previous study of primary BC samples (≈50%). Concordance was 82%; ongoing analyses with updated data will clarify the concordance between rescored and historical HER2 slides. These data can support development of best practices for identifying pts with HER2-low expression who may benefit from HER2-targeted therapies. Clinical trial information: NCT04807595. [Table: see text]
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    URL: Article
    DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2022.40.16_suppl.1087
    RVK:
    XA 52760
    RVK:
    XA 10000
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2022
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
    Online Resource
  • 3
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Subgroup analysis of patients with no prior chemotherapy in EMERALD: A phase 3 trial evaluating elacestrant, an oral selective estrogen receptor degrader (SERD), versus investigator’s choice of endocrine monotherapy for ER+/HER2-advanced/metastatic breast cancer (mBC).
    American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) ; 2022
    In:  Journal of Clinical Oncology Vol. 40, No. 16_suppl ( 2022-06-01), p. 1100-1100
    Details
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 40, No. 16_suppl ( 2022-06-01), p. 1100-1100
    Abstract: 1100 Background: EMERALD demonstrated significantly prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) and a manageable toxicity profile for elacestrant vs standard of care endocrine therapy (SOC) in patients with ER+/HER2- mBC following progression on prior endocrine and CDK4/6 inhibitor therapy. Benefit was observed in the overall study population and in patients with ESR1 mutations (mESR1). Here, we report a subgroup analysis from EMERALD in patients with no prior chemotherapy. Methods: EMERALD (NCT03778931) is a randomized, open-label, phase 3 trial that enrolled patients with ER+/HER2− mBC who had 1–2 lines of endocrine therapy, mandatory pretreatment with a CDK4/6 inhibitor, and ≤1 chemotherapy. Patients were randomized 1:1 to elacestrant (400 mg orally daily) or SOC (investigator’s choice of fulvestrant or aromatase inhibitor). Primary endpoints were PFS in all patients and patients with mESR1. In this analysis, we compared PFS between elacestrant and SOC in patients without prior chemotherapy. Results: Among the 477 patients enrolled in the trial, 77.8% (n = 371) had not received prior chemotherapy for mBC (median age = 64). Among patients without prior chemotherapy, treatment with elacestrant was associated with significantly prolonged PFS compared to SOC in both the overall population (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.68 [95% CI, 0.52-0.89] P = 0.004; median PFS 3.7 vs 2.0; 6-mo PFS 38% vs 23%; 12-mo PFS 27% vs 12%), and patients with mESR1 (HR = 0.54 [95% CI, 0.36-0.80] P = 0.002; median PFS 5.3 vs 1.9; 6-mo PFS 44% vs 24%; 12-mo PFS 31% vs 12%). Key treatment-related adverse events (AEs) in the no prior chemotherapy elacestrant group were nausea (25.9%), fatigue (12.7%), and hot flush (11.1%). There were no treatment-related deaths in either group. Conclusions: Among patients with ER+/HER2− mBC without prior chemotherapy, elacestrant significantly prolonged PFS compared to SOC endocrine therapy and showed favorable outcomes in this subgroup. Clinical trial information: NCT03778931.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    URL: Article
    DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2022.40.16_suppl.1100
    RVK:
    XA 52760
    RVK:
    XA 10000
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2022
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
    Online Resource
  • 4
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    KEYNOTE-B49: A phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy in patients with HR+/HER2- locally recurrent inoperable or metastatic breast cancer.
    American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) ; 2022
    In:  Journal of Clinical Oncology Vol. 40, No. 16_suppl ( 2022-06-01), p. TPS1118-TPS1118
    Details
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 40, No. 16_suppl ( 2022-06-01), p. TPS1118-TPS1118
    Abstract: TPS1118 Background: HR+/HER2− advanced breast cancer that progresses on endocrine therapy is treated with chemotherapy (chemo). The phase 1b KEYNOTE-028 trial showed durable activity with pembrolizumab (pembro) monotherapy in previously treated HR+/HER2−, PD-L1–positive (combined positive score [CPS] ≥1) advanced breast cancer. KEYNOTE-B49 (NCT04895358) is a phase 3, randomized, double-blind study of pembro + chemo vs placebo (pbo) + chemo in centrally assessed PD-L1–positive, HR+/HER2− locally recurrent inoperable or metastatic breast cancer (mBC) after progression on prior endocrine therapy. Methods: ∼800 patients (pts) with HR+/HER2− locally recurrent inoperable or mBC who are candidates for chemo (no prior chemo for metastatic disease) with PD-L1 CPS ≥1 and documented progression on prior endocrine therapy will be enrolled. Prior endocrine therapy comprises ≥2 lines (≥1 in combination with a CDK4/6 inhibitor) in the metastatic setting or 1 line with CDK4/6 inhibitor treatment for mBC in pts who had a relapse within 24 mo of primary surgery. Pts without prior CDK4/6 inhibitor treatment may enroll if they had progressed within 6 mo of starting endocrine therapy for metastatic disease and had previously relapsed within 24 mo of primary tumor surgery while on adjuvant endocrine therapy. Pts are randomized 1:1 to receive pembro 200 mg IV or pbo Q3W, each in combination with investigator’s choice of chemo: paclitaxel 90 mg/m 2 IV on days 1, 8, and 15 Q4W; nab-paclitaxel 100 mg/m 2 IV on days 1, 8, and 15 Q4W; liposomal doxorubicin 50 mg/m 2 IV on day 1 Q4W; or capecitabine 1000 mg/m 2 PO BID on days 1–14 Q3W. Randomization is stratified by tumor PD-L1 (CPS 1–9 vs ≥10), presence of visceral metastases (yes vs no), and chemo on-study (taxanes vs liposomal doxorubicin vs capecitabine). Treatment is continued until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal, or, for pembro/pbo, completion of 35 cycles (̃2 years); chemo can be continued per investigator discretion. Tumor PD-L1 status is determined centrally using the PD-L1 IHC 22C3 pharmDx assay (Agilent Technologies; Carpinteria, CA, USA). Radiologic assessments are performed Q9W for 54 wk and then Q12W thereafter. AEs occurring from randomization until 30 d after treatment discontinuation (90 d for serious AEs) are graded per NCI-CTCAE v 5.0. Primary endpoints are PFS per RECIST v1.1 by BICR and OS in pts with PD-L1 CPS ≥10 and ≥1 tumors, separately. Enrollment is ongoing at 204 international sites. Clinical trial information: NCT04895358.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    URL: Article
    DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2022.40.16_suppl.TPS1118
    RVK:
    XA 52760
    RVK:
    XA 10000
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2022
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
    Online Resource
  • 5
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    A randomized phase II clinical trial of talazoparib maintenance therapy in patients with triple-negative breast cancer who showed platinum-sensitivity on first- or second-line platinum-based chemotherapy: KCSG BR21-10.
    American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) ; 2023
    In:  Journal of Clinical Oncology Vol. 41, No. 16_suppl ( 2023-06-01), p. TPS1132-TPS1132
    Details
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 41, No. 16_suppl ( 2023-06-01), p. TPS1132-TPS1132
    Abstract: TPS1132 Background: A potent PARP inhibitor, talazoparib, demonstrated superior clinical activity compared to standard chemotherapy in germline BRCA1/2-mutant advanced breast cancer patients. However, the role of talazoparib treatment in BRCA1/2 wild-type triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients remains undefined, although high incidence of homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) is one of the major characteristics of the TNBC. Previous studies indicated clinical responsiveness to platinum agents is a useful surrogate for HRD that may predict favorable PARP inhibitor response. Here, we present a phase II study to test talazoparib maintenance therapy in germline BRCA1/2 mutation unselected advanced TNBC patients after platinum-based chemotherapy. Methods: The KCSG BR21-10 study (NCT04755868) is a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled phase II clinical trial of talazoparib maintenance therapy in metastatic TNBC patients whose tumor showed platinum-sensitivity to first- or second-line platinum-based chemotherapy. The criteria for platinum-sensitivity were set as follows: remaining complete response (CR), partial response (PR), or stable disease (SD) after 6 to 9 tri-weekly doses or 18 to 27 weekly doses of platinum-based chemotherapy. The eligible TNBC patients are enrolled to the trial after completion of platinum-based therapy and 1:1 randomized to receive talazoparib (once daily 1.0 mg) or placebo maintenance therapy. The patient with any germline BRCA1/2 mutation status is eligible, and randomization stratification factors include line of platinum-based chemotherapy, response to platinum-based chemotherapy, and germline BRCA1/2 mutation status. The talazoparib/placebo maintenance treatment is initiated within 8 weeks after the last platinum chemotherapy. At the time of progression of disease, unblinding can be performed and patients in placebo arm may be eligible for crossover to talazoparib single treatment. The primary endpoint is progression-free survival (PFS) after randomization by RECIST 1.1, and the key secondary endpoints are overall survival, PFS2, objective response rate, adverse events by CTCAE 5.0 criteria, and quality of life. We also planned exploratory study to find predictive biomarker by tumor tissue and blood analysis. The median PFS from the randomization is expected to be 3 months in the placebo maintenance arm and we expect that talazoparib maintenance will improve PFS with hazard ratio of 0.65. It is predicted that a total of 206 patients (103 patients in each arm) are required with the α of 0.05 and power of 0.8 (1-β) by two-sided test, considering monthly 3% dropout rate. Currently, 23 of planned 206 patients have been enrolled. Clinical trial information: NCT04755868 .
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    URL: Article
    DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2023.41.16_suppl.TPS1132
    RVK:
    XA 52760
    RVK:
    XA 10000
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2023
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
    Online Resource
  • 6
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Phase III MONALEESA-7 trial of premenopausal patients with HR+/HER2− advanced breast cancer (ABC) treated with endocrine therapy ± ribociclib: Overall survival (OS) results.
    American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) ; 2019
    In:  Journal of Clinical Oncology Vol. 37, No. 18_suppl ( 2019-06-20), p. LBA1008-LBA1008
    Details
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 37, No. 18_suppl ( 2019-06-20), p. LBA1008-LBA1008
    Abstract: LBA1008 Background: The phase III MONALEESA-7 study (NCT02278120) is the first dedicated trial of endocrine therapy (ET) ± a cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 (CDK4/6) inhibitor in premenopausal patients (pts) with hormone receptor–positive (HR+)/HER2− ABC. The study met its primary endpoint of significantly longer progression-free survival (PFS) with ribociclib (RIB; a CDK4/6 inhibitor) + ET vs placebo (PBO) + ET (median, 23.8 vs 13.0 mo; HR, 0.55; P 〈 0.0001; Tripathy D, et al. Lancet Oncol. 2018). Methods: Premenopausal pts (N=672) with HR+/HER2− ABC were treated with RIB or PBO + goserelin and either a nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor (NSAI; letrozole or anastrozole) or tamoxifen. This is the 2nd of 3 protocol-specified OS analyses (scheduled to occur after ≈ 189 deaths [75% of the planned total events]). OS was evaluated by Kaplan-Meier methods, and statistical comparison was made by 1-sided stratified log-rank test, with a protocol-defined Lan-DeMets (O’Brien-Fleming) stopping boundary of p 〈 0.01018 for superior efficacy. Results: The data cutoff for this prespecified interim analysis was Nov 30, 2018, and the median follow-up was 34.6 mo (min, 28.0 mo). At cutoff, 173 pts were continuing study treatment (RIB, n=116; PBO, n=57), and OS was evaluated after 192 deaths (RIB, n=83; PBO, n=109). RIB + ET demonstrated a significantly longer OS than PBO + ET (median, not reached vs 40.9 mo [95% CI, 37.80 mo-not evaluable] ; HR, 0.712 [95% CI, 0.54-0.95]; p = 0.00973). The result crossed the prespecified stopping boundary for superior efficacy. Estimated OS rates with RIB + ET vs PBO + ET at 42 mo were 70.2% vs 46.0%, respectively. In pts who received an NSAI (n=495), RIB + ET demonstrated a consistent OS improvement vs PBO + ET (HR, 0.699 [95% CI, 0.50-0.98] ). Posttreatment therapy use was balanced between treatment arms (RIB, 68.9%; PBO, 73.2%). Conclusions: RIB + ET demonstrated a clinically and statistically significant longer OS than ET alone in premenopausal pts with HR+/HER2− ABC. This is the first time that a CDK4/6 inhibitor or any targeted agent + ET has demonstrated significantly longer OS vs ET alone as initial endocrine-based therapy. Clinical trial information: NCT02278120.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    URL: Article
    DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2019.37.18_suppl.LBA1008
    RVK:
    XA 52760
    RVK:
    XA 10000
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2019
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
    Online Resource
  • 7
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    MONARCH 3: Abemaciclib As Initial Therapy for Advanced Breast Cancer
    American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) ; 2017
    In:  Journal of Clinical Oncology Vol. 35, No. 32 ( 2017-11-10), p. 3638-3646
    Details
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 35, No. 32 ( 2017-11-10), p. 3638-3646
    Abstract: Abemaciclib, a cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 inhibitor, demonstrated efficacy as monotherapy and in combination with fulvestrant in women with hormone receptor (HR)–positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)–negative advanced breast cancer previously treated with endocrine therapy. Methods MONARCH 3 is a double-blind, randomized phase III study of abemaciclib or placebo plus a nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor in 493 postmenopausal women with HR-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer who had no prior systemic therapy in the advanced setting. Patients received abemaciclib or placebo (150 mg twice daily continuous schedule) plus either 1 mg anastrozole or 2.5 mg letrozole, daily. The primary objective was investigator-assessed progression-free survival. Secondary objectives included response evaluation and safety. A planned interim analysis occurred after 189 events. Results Median progression-free survival was significantly prolonged in the abemaciclib arm (hazard ratio, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.41 to 0.72; P = .000021; median: not reached in the abemaciclib arm, 14.7 months in the placebo arm). In patients with measurable disease, the objective response rate was 59% in the abemaciclib arm and 44% in the placebo arm ( P = .004). In the abemaciclib arm, diarrhea was the most frequent adverse effect (81.3%) but was mainly grade 1 (44.6%). Comparing abemaciclib and placebo, the most frequent grade 3 or 4 adverse events were neutropenia (21.1% v 1.2%), diarrhea (9.5% v 1.2%), and leukopenia (7.6% v 0.6%). Conclusion Abemaciclib plus a nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor was effective as initial therapy, significantly improving progression-free survival and objective response rate and demonstrating a tolerable safety profile in women with HR-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    URL: Article
    DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2017.75.6155
    RVK:
    XA 52760
    RVK:
    XA 10000
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2017
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
    Online Resource
  • 8
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in MONARCH 2: Abemaciclib plus fulvestrant in women with HR+, HER2- advanced breast cancer (ABC) who progressed on endocrine therapy.
    American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) ; 2018
    In:  Journal of Clinical Oncology Vol. 36, No. 15_suppl ( 2018-05-20), p. 1049-1049
    Details
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 36, No. 15_suppl ( 2018-05-20), p. 1049-1049
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    URL: Article
    DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2018.36.15_suppl.1049
    RVK:
    XA 52760
    RVK:
    XA 10000
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2018
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
    Online Resource
  • 9
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    MONARCH 2: Subgroup analysis of patients receiving abemaciclib + fulvestrant as first- and second-line therapy for HR+, HER2- advanced breast cancer.
    American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) ; 2020
    In:  Journal of Clinical Oncology Vol. 38, No. 15_suppl ( 2020-05-20), p. 1061-1061
    Details
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 38, No. 15_suppl ( 2020-05-20), p. 1061-1061
    Abstract: 1061 Background: In MONARCH 2 (M2), abemaciclib (A), an oral selective cyclin dependent kinase 4 & 6 inhibitor, + fulvestrant (F) demonstrated statistically significant improvements in progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) compared to placebo (P) + F in hormone receptor positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative (HER2-) advanced breast cancer (ABC). Numerically more pronounced PFS & OS improvement was noted in subgroups (Sub) with visceral (V) disease and primary endocrine resistance. Here we report efficacy data for M2 with respect to 1L and 2L Sub (last line of endocrine therapy [ET] in (neo)adjuvant and metastatic setting, respectively). Methods: M2 (NCT02107703) was a global, randomized, double-blind Phase 3 trial of A+ F (N = 446) or P + F (N = 223) in women with ET resistant (ETR) HR+, HER2- ABC regardless of menopausal status. Patients (pts) were stratified by site of metastasis (V, bone-only, or other) and resistance to prior ET (primary vs secondary). Exploratory Sub analyses of PFS and OS were conducted among pts in the ITT population with 1L vs 2L. Hazard ratios (HR) were estimated using Cox models with a test of interactions of Sub with treatment performed. Results: At data cut-off (June 20 th , 2019), the effect of A + F vs P + F was consistent across 1L (N = 265/133) and 2L (N = 170/86) Sub, with no statistically significant interaction for PFS (p = 0.341) or OS (p = 0.265). For 1L pts, improvements in PFS (HR: 0.57; 95% CI:0.45, 0.73) and OS (HR: 0.85; 95% CI:0.64, 1.14) were observed. Similar efficacy results were observed for 2L pts (PFS: HR: 0.48; [95% CI: 0.36, 0.64]; OS HR: 0.66 [95% CI: 0.46, 0.94] ). The numerically largest effects in the 1L population were noted in pts with less favorable prognostic factors such as primary ETR (PFS: HR 0.40 [95% CI: 0.26, 0.63]; OS: HR 0.58 [95% CI:0.35, 0.97] ) and V disease (PFS: HR 0.54 [95% CI: 0.39, 0.73]; OS: HR 0.82 [95% CI: 0.57, 1.17] ). Conclusions: The statistically significant benefit observed in the M2 study was observed across 1L and 2L patients. In 1L patients (A+F Arm), improvements were observed for PFS and OS with the most pronounced effects noted in patients with less favorable prognostic factors. Clinical trial information: NCT02107703 .
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    URL: Article
    DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2020.38.15_suppl.1061
    RVK:
    XA 52760
    RVK:
    XA 10000
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2020
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
    Online Resource
  • 10
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    A phase I dose-escalation and expansion study of JPI-547, a dual inhibitor of PARP/tankyrase in patients with advanced solid tumors.
    American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) ; 2021
    In:  Journal of Clinical Oncology Vol. 39, No. 15_suppl ( 2021-05-20), p. 3113-3113
    Details
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 39, No. 15_suppl ( 2021-05-20), p. 3113-3113
    Abstract: 3113 Background: JPI-547 is an oral inhibitor of PARP 1/2 and Tankyrase 1/2. JPI-547 demonstrated anti-tumor activity in BRCA-deficient xenograft models as a single-agent and in combination with chemotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors. Methods: This is the first in human (FIH) phase I study of JPI-547 in patients (pts) with advanced solid tumors. For the dose escalation phase, a 3+3 design was used with 4 doses from 50 to 200 mg QD on 21-day cycles. Primary objectives were to assess safety and tolerability to determine RP2D, and secondary objectives included pharmacokinetics and preliminary antitumor activities. DLT monitoring period was 21 days. Pharmacodynamics and information of HRR mutation were also explored. For the dose expansion phase, pts with documented pathogenic germline or somatic BRCA/HRR mutations were enrolled to assess the preliminary efficacy and safety. Tumor response (RECIST 1.1) was evaluated every 6 weeks. Centralized germline BRCA testing was conducted to confirm pathogenic gBRCA mutations. Results available at the cut-off date of 31-Dec-2020 are presented. Results: For dose escalation phase, 22 pts were enrolled. JPI-547 was well absorbed with T max of 0.25-8 h post-dose and apparent half-life of 18-31 h. Mean C max and AUC increased proportionally (within the dose range of 50-200 mg). PAR level measured from PBMC was 53% inhibited at C max . One DLTs was observed at 100 mg (elevated ALT, G3) and 200 mg (elevated ALT/AST, G3) respectively. MTD was determined as 200 mg after considering DLTs and myelosuppression observed from cycle 2. RP2D was determined to be 150 mg based on the pharmacokinetic data and safety. Thirteen pts (59.1%) had at least one grade 3/4 TRAE and 12 had dose interruption/reduction due to TRAE. The most common ( 〉 20%) TRAE were anemia, thrombocytopenia and neutropenia. In dose expansion phase, 40 pts were enrolled, and response was evaluable in 39 pts. The best overall responses were 11 confirmed PR (cPR) and 15 SD with ORR of 28.2% (11/39) and DCR of 64.1 % (25/39). The mPFS was 3.5 mos and mDoR was 3.4 mos. At the time of data cut-off, three pts were ongoing as following response and cancer types: cPR (breast, ATMm, 9.0 mos), cPR (NSCLC, gBRCA2m, 3.8 mos) and SD (breast, gBRCAm, 9.3 mos). Five pts (2 ovarian, 3 breast) previously treated with olaparib and discontinued due to progressive disease were enrolled in this JPI-547 trial and one ovarian cancer pt showed cPR with 37% tumor shrinkage. Conclusions: These results demonstrate that JPI-547 is adequately absorbed with acceptable safety profile. Preliminary efficacy results suggest that JPI-547 monotherapy is effective in pts with BRCA/HRR mutation. Further investigation is warranted in pts with solid tumor including PARP inhibitor resistant cases. Clinical trial information: NCT04335604.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    URL: Article
    DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2021.39.15_suppl.3113
    RVK:
    XA 52760
    RVK:
    XA 10000
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2021
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
    Online Resource
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...