Abstract: Adverse outcomes of viral respiratory tract infections (RTI) have been reported in recipients of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. Using a laboratory-developed multiparameter PCR in a consecutive series of 242 patients, we found the highest incidence of viral RTI in the pre-engraftment phase. The occurrence of multiple episodes of viral RTI or viral pneumonia was significantly associated with a higher hazard of non-relapse mortality in the first year after transplantation. We observed a 90-day mortality of 19.7% after viral RTI, which was significantly different between patient groups stratified according to the ISI score.

Abstract: Introduction : High total metabolic tumor volume (TMTV) measured on 18F-FDG PET/CT before R-CHOP has been shown to be significantly associated with worse progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL; Cottereau et al. Clin Cancer Res. 2016;22:3801-9) . The REMARC study (NCT01122472) is an international, multicenter, double-blind, randomized phase III trial that assessed lenalidomide (LEN) maintenance therapy versus placebo (PBO) in 650 patients responding to R-CHOP. With a median follow-up of ~40 months, independent review demonstrated that 2 years of LEN maintenance therapy significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS); median was not reached in the LEN arm vs 58.9 months in the PBO arm (HR=0.71 [95% CI, 0.54-0.93]; p=0.0135; Thieblemont et al. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35:2473-81). Methods: For these analyses, patients enrolled in the REMARC trial who had baseline PET/CT before R-CHOP (not mandatory per study protocol) with available fused images and end of treatment PET/CT were included. Total metabolic tumor volume (TMTV, defined as the sum of the regions of the local tumors with FDG uptake) was measured on baseline PET/CT with the 41% SUVmax thresholding method using the free semiautomatic software Beth Israel Fiji20 (http://petctviewer.org). The optimal TMTV cut-off to PFS (per FDA censoring rule) and overall survival (OS) was determined by Receiver Operating Curve (ROC) curves and X-tile analyses. Survival was estimated using Kaplan Meier (KM) curves. Multivariable analysis were performed with descending Cox model including TMTV, IPIaa, treatment arm and PET/CT response evaluated by Deauville criteria. Analyses were performed on the evaluable population and separate arms Results: 228 of 650 REMARC patients had TMTV data available for analysis, including n=108 in the PBO arm and n=120 in the LEN arm. Clinical characteristics were similar to the overall population. The median baseline TMTV was 295 cm3 (Q1-Q3, 99-702). After a median follow-up of 51.6 mo, 4y-PFS was 73% and 4y-OS was 85%. The optimal TMTV cut-off determined by ROC was 300 cm3 for PFS and OS. Patients with TMTV 〉 300 vs ≤300 cm3 presented with worse ECOG performance status (ECOG ≥2: 19% vs 9%, p=0.034), higher Ann Arbor stage (stage III-IV: 95% vs 86%, p=0.042), more extra-nodal sites ( 〉 1: 65% vs 38%, p 〈 0.001), more frequently elevated LDH (76% vs 43%, p 〈 0.001), higher IPI (IPI 3-5: 87% vs 51%, p 〈 0.001), and higher aaIPI (aaIPI 2-3: 76% vs 34%, p 〈 0.001). In all evaluated patients, a significant impact of TMTV for cut-offs of 〉 300 vs ≤300 cm3 was observed for PFS (HR=2.09; 95% CI, 1.22-3.69) and OS (HR=2.99; 95% CI, 1.44-6.18). Patients with high TMTV 〉 300 cm3 vs low TMTV ≤300 cm3, respectively, had a 4-year PFS of 57% vs 73% and OS of 70% vs 88%. These results were more disparate when a higher TMTV cut-off of 〉 1000 was applied. In multivariate analysis, only TMTV maintained an independent prognostic value. The prognostic impact of TMTV 〉 300 vs ≤300 cm3 on PFS (HR=2.4; 95% CI, 1.1-5.22) and OS (HR=5.0; 95% CI, 1.4-17.) was maintained in the PBO arm (Figure 1A). In contrast, when the analysis was focused on patients in LEN arm, TMTV 〉 300 vs ≤300 cm3 lost its prognostic impact on PFS and OS. In the LEN arm, 4-year PFS and OS did not differ significantly between patients with high and low TMTV (Figure 1B). Conclusion: TMTV measured on baseline PET/CT is a strong prognosticator of outcome in DLBCL, even in patients in response after R-CHOP. High TMTV at baseline was significantly associated with worse PFS and OS in patients receiving PBO following a response to R-CHOP in the REMARC study. Interestingly, LEN maintenance reduces the negative impact of high baseline TMTV on survival in patients with DLBCL Disclosures Casasnovas: takeda: Consultancy; merck: Consultancy; MSD: Consultancy; Roche: Consultancy; Gilead Sciences: Research Funding; Roche: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria; Merck: Honoraria; Gilead Sciences: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; MSD: Honoraria; Roche: Research Funding; Gilead Sciences: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy. Tilly:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Honoraria; Karyopharm: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astra-Zeneca: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Feugier:Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Ribrag:Infinity: Consultancy, Honoraria; Servier: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Research Funding; Roche: Honoraria, Other: travel; MSD: Honoraria; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel; epizyme: Consultancy, Honoraria; NanoString Technologies: Consultancy, Honoraria; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria; argenX: Research Funding; pharmamar: Other: travel; Incyte Corporation: Consultancy. Macro:Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Financial support for congress; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Financial support for congress; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Financial support for congress; Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Financial support for congress. Morschhauser:Gilead: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Epizyme: Consultancy; Janssen: Other: Scientific Lectures; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Trotman:Janssen: Other: Unremunerated member of Ad Board, Research Funding; F. Hoffman-La Roche: Other: Travel to meeting, Unremunerated member of Ad Board, Research Funding; Takeda: Other: Unremunerated member of Ad Board; Celgene: Other: Unremunerated member of Ad Board, Research Funding; PCYC: Research Funding; Beigene: Research Funding. Godmer:CELGENE: Other: Invitation to congress. Salles:Servier: Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Morphosys: Honoraria; Servier: Honoraria, Other: Advisory Board; Celgene: Honoraria, Other: Advisory Board, Research Funding; Acerta: Honoraria; Merck: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria, Other: Advisory Board; Pfizer: Honoraria; Epizyme: Honoraria; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Gilead: Honoraria, Other: Advisory Board; BMS: Honoraria, Other: Advisory Board; Takeda: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Abbvie: Honoraria. Coiffier:CELGENE: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; MUNDIPHARMA: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; CELLTRION: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; MORPHOSYS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; NOVARTIS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Meignan:F. Hoffman-La Roche Ltd: Honoraria.

Abstract: Early identification of ultra-risk diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients is needed to aid stratification to innovative treatment. Previous studies suggested high baseline total metabolic tumor volume (TMTV) negatively impacts survival of DLBCL patients. We analyzed the prognostic impact of TMTV and prognostic indices in DLBCL patients, aged 60 to 80 years, from the phase 3 REMARC study that randomized responding patients to R-CHOP (rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone) into maintenance lenalidomide or placebo. TMTV was computed on baseline positron emission tomography/computed tomography using the 41% maximum standardized uptake value method; the optimal TMTV cutoff for progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) was determined and confirmed by a training validation method. There were 301 out of 650 evaluable patients, including 192 patients classified as germinal center B-cell–like (GCB)/non-GCB and MYC/BCL2 expressor. Median baseline TMTV was 238 cm3; optimal TMTV cutoff was 220 cm3. Patients with high vs low TMTV showed worse/higher Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) ≥2, stage III or IV disease, & gt;1 extranodal site, elevated lactate dehydrogenase, International Prognostic Index (IPI) 3-5, and age-adjusted IPI 2-3. High vs low TMTV significantly impacted PFS and OS, independent of maintenance treatment. Although the GCB/non-GCB profile and MYC expression did not correlate with TMTV/survival, BCL2 & gt;70% impacted PFS and could be stratified by TMTV. Multivariate analysis identified baseline TMTV and ECOG PS as independently associated with PFS and OS. Even in responding patients, after R-CHOP, high baseline TMTV was a strong prognosticator of inferior PFS and OS. Moreover, TMTV combined with ECOG PS may identify an ultra-risk DLBCL population. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT01122472.

Abstract: 7523 Background: Outcomes of pts with newly diagnosed DLBCL with high/poor risk according to the revised International Prognostic Index (IPI) treated with immunochemotherapy (IC) remain suboptimal, with a 4-year survival rate of 55% (Sehn et al, Blood 2007). SC epco is a well-tolerated bispecific antibody with single-agent activity in the relapsed/refractory (R/R) aggressive B-cell NHL setting. The mechanism of action and safety profile of epco are distinct from IC, and epco is well suited for use in combinations and in earlier lines of therapy. Addition of a novel agent to standard of care IC may overcome the adverse prognosis of high-risk pts. Presented here are updated results of epco + rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP) in previously untreated DLBCL pts with IPI 3–5 (EPCORE NHL-2 arm 1; NCT04663347). Methods: Adults with previously untreated CD20 + DLBCL and IPI ≥3 received SC epco (every week, cycle [C] 1–4; every 3 weeks, C5–6) + R-CHOP for 6 cycles (21 d) followed by single-agent epco every 4 weeks up to 1 y (in cycles of 28 d). To mitigate CRS, epco step-up dosing and corticosteroid prophylaxis were required. Response was assessed by PET-CT with contrast per Lugano 2014 criteria. Results: As of Dec 1, 2021, 33 pts (median age, 66 y; range, 19–82) received epco + R-CHOP (epco 24 mg, n = 4; 48 mg, n = 29). Median time from diagnosis to first dose was 25 d (range, 5–70). All pts had IPI ≥3 and ≥24% had double- or triple-hit DLBCL. Median follow-up was 3 mo (range, 0–9.7); median number of total cycles initiated was 5 (1–13). Overall, 94% of pts (31/33) remained on Tx. Tx-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) in ≥30% of pts were neutropenia (48%; febrile neutropenia in 9% of all pts), CRS (45%), infections (42%), anemia (39%), injection -site reactions (36%), nausea (33%), constipation (30%), and pyrexia (30%). No TEAEs led to epco discontinuation. AEs of special interest included CRS (42% grade [G] 1/2, 3% G3) and ICANS (3% G2); 1 pt had tumor lysis syndrome (3% G3). Most CRS events occurred in C1 and resolved after a median of 2 days (1–11); 4 pts with CRS received tocilizumab. No fatal TEAEs were reported. In efficacy-evaluable pts, the overall response rate (ORR) was 96% (24/25); 68% (17/25) had complete metabolic response (CMR). For the 10 pts who received 6 cycles of R-CHOP and had a subsequent response assessment, the ORR and CMR rate were 100% and 90%, respectively. As of the data cutoff, all of these 10 pts remained in response, with the longest duration of response 7.1+ mo and ongoing. Updated data will be presented. Conclusions: Epco is the first SC bispecific antibody assessed in combination with standard of care in previously untreated DLBCL. The safety profile of epco + R-CHOP is manageable. CRS events were mostly of low grade and did not lead to Tx discontinuation. ORR and CMR rate were high with no relapses as of the data cutoff date. Clinical trial information: NCT04663347.

Abstract: Breast-implant associated (BIA) lymphoma is an infrequent type of cancer occurring in the fluid and fibrous capsule around a textured breast implant. Recently, both the 2022 WHO 5th edition classification of Haematological tumours (WHO HAEM5) and 2022 International Consensus Classification of Mature Lymphoid Neoplasms (22ICC), recognized breast implant-associated Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma (BIA-ALCL) as a definitive entity, defined as a mature CD30-positive T-cell lymphoma, confined by a fibrous capsule, in a breast implant setting. Only few B-cell lymphomas have been reported in the literature to be associated with breast implants. Here we report two EBV-positive Diffuse Large B-cell lymphomas (EBV + DLBCL) in relation to a breast implant, both expressing CD30 as well as EBV latency type 3. Both lesions were considered as DLBCL associated with chronic inflammation (CI-DLBCL), but one presented as a 7 cm solid mass, while the other presented as a fibrin-associated DLBCL (FA-DLBCL) in an HIV patient. Clinically, both are in complete remission 6 months or longer after capsulectomy and graft removal, without additional chemotherapy. Such cases, characterized by large CD30-positive cells, can easily be misdiagnosed as BIA-ALCL if the cell of origin is not further established. Therefore, a diagnostic panel including lineage-specific B-and T-cell markers and EBER in situ hybridization is essential to recognize this rare entity, to understand lymphomagenesis, to predict outcome and to define clinical approach.

Abstract: In humans, high Notch activation promotes γδ T cell development, whereas lower levels promote αβ-lineage differentiation. How these different Notch signals are generated has remained unclear. We show that differential Notch receptor–ligand interactions mediate this process. Whereas Delta-like 4 supports both TCR-αβ and -γδ development, Jagged1 induces mainly αβ-lineage differentiation. In contrast, Jagged2-mediated Notch activation primarily results in γδ T cell development and represses αβ-lineage differentiation by inhibiting TCR-β formation. Consistently, TCR-αβ T cell development is rescued through transduction of a TCR-β transgene. Jagged2 induces the strongest Notch signal through interactions with both Notch1 and Notch3, whereas Delta-like 4 primarily binds Notch1. In agreement, Notch3 is a stronger Notch activator and only supports γδ T cell development, whereas Notch1 is a weaker activator supporting both TCR-αβ and -γδ development. Fetal thymus organ cultures in JAG2-deficient thymic lobes or with Notch3-blocking antibodies confirm the importance of Jagged2/Notch3 signaling in human TCR-γδ differentiation. Our findings reveal that differential Notch receptor–ligand interactions mediate human TCR-αβ and -γδ T cell differentiation and provide a mechanistic insight into the high Notch dependency of human γδ T cell development.