GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) ; 2007
    In:  Operative Neurosurgery Vol. 60, No. 4 ( 2007-04), p. 305-309
    In: Operative Neurosurgery, Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health), Vol. 60, No. 4 ( 2007-04), p. 305-309
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 2332-4252
    Language: English
    Publisher: Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
    Publication Date: 2007
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2886024-X
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    In: Biomaterials, Elsevier BV, Vol. 123 ( 2017-04), p. 63-76
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0142-9612
    Language: English
    Publisher: Elsevier BV
    Publication Date: 2017
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2004010-6
    SSG: 12
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    In: Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, Journal of Neurosurgery Publishing Group (JNSPG), ( 2023-02-01), p. 1-9
    Abstract: Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) have become the standard means to measure surgical outcomes. Insurers and policy makers are also increasingly utilizing PROs to assess the value of care and measure different aspects of a patient’s condition. For cervical myelopathy, it is currently unclear which outcome measure best reflects patient satisfaction. In this investigation, the authors evaluated patients treated for cervical myelopathy to determine which outcome questionnaires best correlate with patient satisfaction. METHODS The Quality Outcomes Database (QOD), a prospectively collected multi-institutional database, was used to retrospectively analyze patients undergoing surgery for cervical myelopathy. The North American Spine Society (NASS) satisfaction index, Neck Disability Index (NDI), numeric rating scales for neck pain (NP-NRS) and arm pain (AP-NRS), EQ-5D, and modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association (mJOA) scale were evaluated. RESULTS The analysis included 1141 patients diagnosed with myelopathy, of whom 1099 had an NASS satisfaction index recorded at any of the follow-up time points. Concomitant radiculopathy was an indication for surgery in 368 (33.5%) patients, and severe neck pain (NP-NRS ≥ 7) was present in 471 (42.8%) patients. At the 3-month follow-up, NASS patient satisfaction index scores were positively correlated with scores for the NP-NRS (r = 0.30), AP-NRS (r = 0.32), and NDI (r = 0.36) and negatively correlated with EQ-5D (r = −0.38) and mJOA (r = −0.29) scores (all p 〈 0.001). At the 12-month follow-up, scores for the NASS index were positively correlated with scores for the NP-NRS (r = 0.44), AP-NRS (r = 0.38), and NDI (r = 0.46) and negatively correlated with scores for the EQ-5D (r = −0.40) and mJOA (r = −0.36) (all p 〈 0.001). At the 24-month follow-up, NASS index scores were positively correlated with NP-NRS (r = 0.49), AP-NRS (r = 0.36), and NDI (r = 0.49) scores and negatively correlated with EQ-5D (r = −0.44) and mJOA (r = −0.38) scores (all p 〈 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Neck pain was highly prevalent in patients with myelopathy. Notably, improvement in neck pain–associated disability rather than improvement in myelopathy was the most prominent PRO factor for patients. This finding may reflect greater patient concern for active pain symptoms than for neurological symptoms caused by myelopathy. As commercial payers begin to examine novel remuneration strategies for surgical interventions, thoughtful analysis of PRO measurements will have increasing relevance.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1547-5654
    RVK:
    Language: Unknown
    Publisher: Journal of Neurosurgery Publishing Group (JNSPG)
    Publication Date: 2023
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    In: Clinical Spine Surgery: A Spine Publication, Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health), Vol. 36, No. 3 ( 2023-04), p. 112-119
    Abstract: Prospective observational study, level of evidence 1 for prognostic investigations. Objectives: To evaluate the prevalence of sleep impairment and predictors of improved sleep quality 24 months postoperatively in cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) using the quality outcomes database. Summary of Background Data: Sleep disturbances are a common yet understudied symptom in CSM. Materials and Methods: The quality outcomes database was queried for patients with CSM, and sleep quality was assessed through the neck disability index sleep component at baseline and 24 months postoperatively. Multivariable logistic regressions were performed to identify risk factors of failure to improve sleep impairment and symptoms causing lingering sleep dysfunction 24 months after surgery. Results: Among 1135 patients with CSM, 904 (79.5%) had some degree of sleep dysfunction at baseline. At 24 months postoperatively, 72.8% of the patients with baseline sleep symptoms experienced improvement, with 42.5% reporting complete resolution. Patients who did not improve were more like to be smokers [adjusted odds ratio (aOR): 1.85] , have osteoarthritis (aOR: 1.72), report baseline radicular paresthesia (aOR: 1.51), and have neck pain of ≥4/10 on a numeric rating scale. Patients with improved sleep noted higher satisfaction with surgery (88.8% vs 72.9%, aOR: 1.66) independent of improvement in other functional areas. In a multivariable analysis including pain scores and several myelopathy-related symptoms, lingering sleep dysfunction at 24 months was associated with neck pain (aOR: 1.47) and upper (aOR: 1.45) and lower (aOR: 1.52) extremity paresthesias. Conclusion: The majority of patients presenting with CSM have associated sleep disturbances. Most patients experience sustained improvement after surgery, with almost half reporting complete resolution. Smoking, osteoarthritis, radicular paresthesia, and neck pain ≥4/10 numeric rating scale score are baseline risk factors of failure to improve sleep dysfunction. Improvement in sleep symptoms is a major driver of patient-reported satisfaction. Incomplete resolution of sleep impairment is likely due to neck pain and extremity paresthesia.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 2380-0186
    Language: English
    Publisher: Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
    Publication Date: 2023
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2849652-8
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 5
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Journal of Neurosurgery Publishing Group (JNSPG) ; 2006
    In:  Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics Vol. 105, No. 6 ( 2006-12), p. 490-495
    In: Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics, Journal of Neurosurgery Publishing Group (JNSPG), Vol. 105, No. 6 ( 2006-12), p. 490-495
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1933-0707
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: Journal of Neurosurgery Publishing Group (JNSPG)
    Publication Date: 2006
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 6
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Hindawi Limited ; 2009
    In:  Case Reports in Medicine Vol. 2009 ( 2009), p. 1-3
    In: Case Reports in Medicine, Hindawi Limited, Vol. 2009 ( 2009), p. 1-3
    Abstract: Background . In today's fast-paced and high-acuity emergency departments, clinicians are often compelled to triage cases so rapidly that a differential diagnosis consistent with the history and physical examination is not comprehensive. Case Report . This case report describes the unexpected finding of a cystic ovarian neoplasm in a young female with an abdominal mass and a ventriculoperitoneal shunt, initially diagnosed as a cerebrospinal fluid pseudocyst. We use this case to illustrate that the astute clinician must always synthesize a diagnosis from all data sources and not to rely on initial radiographic evaluations. Conclusions . This remarkable case demonstrates that all differential diagnoses must be entertained in order to rapidly and accurately diagnose a patient with a cystic abdominal mass.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1687-9627 , 1687-9635
    Language: English
    Publisher: Hindawi Limited
    Publication Date: 2009
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2502642-2
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 7
    In: Journal of Neurosurgery, Journal of Neurosurgery Publishing Group (JNSPG), ( 2023-05-01), p. 1-19
    Abstract: The Quality Outcomes Database (QOD) was established in 2012 by the NeuroPoint Alliance, a nonprofit organization supported by the American Association of Neurological Surgeons. Currently, the QOD has launched six different modules to cover a broad spectrum of neurosurgical practice—namely lumbar spine surgery, cervical spine surgery, brain tumor, stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), functional neurosurgery for Parkinson’s disease, and cerebrovascular surgery. This investigation aims to summarize research efforts and evidence yielded through QOD research endeavors. METHODS The authors identified all publications from January 1, 2012, to February 18, 2023, that were produced by using data collected prospectively in a QOD module without a prespecified research purpose in the context of quality surveillance and improvement. Citations were compiled and presented along with comprehensive documentation of the main study objective and take-home message. RESULTS A total of 94 studies have been produced through QOD efforts during the past decade. QOD-derived literature has been predominantly dedicated to spinal surgical outcomes, with 59 and 22 studies focusing on lumbar and cervical spine surgery, respectively, and 6 studies focusing on both. More specifically, the QOD Study Group—a research collaborative between 16 high-enrolling sites—has yielded 24 studies on lumbar grade 1 spondylolisthesis and 13 studies on cervical spondylotic myelopathy, using two focused data sets with high data accuracy and long-term follow-up. The more recent neuro-oncological QOD efforts, i.e., the Tumor QOD and the SRS Quality Registry, have contributed 5 studies, providing insights into the real-world neuro-oncological practice and the role of patient-reported outcomes. CONCLUSIONS Prospective quality registries are an important resource for observational research, yielding clinical evidence to guide decision-making across neurosurgical subspecialties. Future directions of the QOD efforts include the development of research efforts within the neuro-oncological registries and the American Spine Registry—which has now replaced the inactive spinal modules of the QOD—and the focused research on high-grade lumbar spondylolisthesis and cervical radiculopathy.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0022-3085 , 1933-0693
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: Unknown
    Publisher: Journal of Neurosurgery Publishing Group (JNSPG)
    Publication Date: 2023
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2026156-1
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 8
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Elsevier BV ; 2007
    In:  Neurosurgery Clinics of North America Vol. 18, No. 4 ( 2007-10), p. 659-667
    In: Neurosurgery Clinics of North America, Elsevier BV, Vol. 18, No. 4 ( 2007-10), p. 659-667
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1042-3680
    Language: English
    Publisher: Elsevier BV
    Publication Date: 2007
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 9
    In: Neurosurgical Focus, Journal of Neurosurgery Publishing Group (JNSPG), Vol. 44, No. 1 ( 2018-01), p. E2-
    Abstract: Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) play a pivotal role in defining the value of surgical interventions for spinal disease. The concept of minimum clinically important difference (MCID) is considered the new standard for determining the effectiveness of a given treatment and describing patient satisfaction in response to that treatment. The purpose of this study was to determine the MCID associated with surgical treatment for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis. METHODS The authors queried the Quality Outcomes Database registry from July 2014 through December 2015 for patients who underwent posterior lumbar surgery for grade I degenerative spondylolisthesis. Recorded PROs included scores on the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), EQ-5D, and numeric rating scale (NRS) for leg pain (NRS-LP) and back pain (NRS-BP). Anchor-based (using the North American Spine Society satisfaction scale) and distribution-based (half a standard deviation, small Cohen’s effect size, standard error of measurement, and minimum detectable change [MDC]) methods were used to calculate the MCID for each PRO. RESULTS A total of 441 patients (80 who underwent laminectomies alone and 361 who underwent fusion procedures) from 11 participating sites were included in the analysis. The changes in functional outcome scores between baseline and the 1-year postoperative evaluation were as follows: 23.5 ± 17.4 points for ODI, 0.24 ± 0.23 for EQ-5D, 4.1 ± 3.5 for NRS-LP, and 3.7 ± 3.2 for NRS-BP. The different calculation methods generated a range of MCID values for each PRO: 3.3–26.5 points for ODI, 0.04–0.3 points for EQ-5D, 0.6–4.5 points for NRS-LP, and 0.5–4.2 points for NRS-BP. The MDC approach appeared to be the most appropriate for calculating MCID because it provided a threshold greater than the measurement error and was closest to the average change difference between the satisfied and not-satisfied patients. On subgroup analysis, the MCID thresholds for laminectomy-alone patients were comparable to those for the patients who underwent arthrodesis as well as for the entire cohort. CONCLUSIONS The MCID for PROs was highly variable depending on the calculation technique. The MDC seems to be a statistically and clinically sound method for defining the appropriate MCID value for patients with grade I degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis. Based on this method, the MCID values are 14.3 points for ODI, 0.2 points for EQ-5D, 1.7 points for NRS-LP, and 1.6 points for NRS-BP.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1092-0684
    Language: Unknown
    Publisher: Journal of Neurosurgery Publishing Group (JNSPG)
    Publication Date: 2018
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2026589-X
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 10
    In: Journal of Neurosurgery, Journal of Neurosurgery Publishing Group (JNSPG), ( 2022-12-01), p. 1-11
    Abstract: Titanium plates and screws (TPS) are the current standard of care for fixation of cranial bone flaps. These materials have been used for decades but have known potential complications, including flap migration, bone resorption/incomplete osseous union, hardware protrusion, cosmetic deformity, wound infection/dehiscence, and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage. This study evaluated the efficacy of a novel mineral-organic bone adhesive (Tetranite) for cranial bone flap fixation. METHODS Craniotomy bone flaps created in human cadaveric skulls were tested under quasistatic and impact loading in the following conditions: 1) uncut skull; 2) bone flaps fixated with TPS alone; and 3) bone flaps fixated with bone adhesive alone. All fixative surgical procedures were performed by a group of 16 neurosurgeons in a simulated surgical environment. The position of adhesive-fixated cranial bone flaps was measured using computed tomography and compared with their original native location. The resistance of adhesive-fixated cranial bone flaps to simulated CSF leakage was also evaluated. Because there was a gap around the circumference of the TPS-fixated specimens that was visible to the naked eye, pressurized CSF leak testing was not attempted on them. RESULTS Adhesive-fixated bone flaps showed significantly stiffer and stronger quasistatic responses than TPS-fixated specimens. The strength and stiffness of the adhesive-fixated specimens were not significantly different from those of the uncut native skulls. Total and plastic deflections under 6-J impact were significantly less for adhesive-fixed bone flaps than TPS. There were no significant differences in any subthreshold impact metrics between the adhesive-fixed and native specimens at both 6-J and 12-J impact levels, with 1 exception. Plastic deflection at 6-J impact was significantly less in adhesive-fixated bone flaps than in native specimens. The energy to failure of the adhesive-fixated specimens was not significantly different from that of the native specimens. Time since fixation (20 minutes vs 10 days) did not significantly affect the impact failure properties of the adhesive-fixated specimens. Of the 16 adhesive-fixated craniotomy specimens tested, 14 did not leak at pressures as high as 40 mm Hg. CONCLUSIONS The neurosurgeons in this study had no prior exposure or experience with the bone adhesive. Despite this, improved resistance to CSF egress, superior mechanical properties, and better cosmetic outcomes were demonstrated with bone adhesive compared with TPS.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0022-3085 , 1933-0693
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: Unknown
    Publisher: Journal of Neurosurgery Publishing Group (JNSPG)
    Publication Date: 2022
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2026156-1
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...