GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
Material
Language
  • 1
    In: Journal of Therapeutic Ultrasound, Springer Science and Business Media LLC, Vol. 5, No. S1 ( 2017-4)
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 2050-5736
    Language: English
    Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
    Publication Date: 2017
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2714301-6
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    In: Circulation, Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health), Vol. 144, No. 23 ( 2021-12-07), p. 1845-1855
    Abstract: Despite advances in surgery and pharmacotherapy, there remains significant residual ischemic risk after coronary artery bypass grafting surgery. Methods: In REDUCE-IT (Reduction of Cardiovascular Events With Icosapent Ethyl–Intervention Trial), a multicenter, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial, statin-treated patients with controlled low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and mild to moderate hypertriglyceridemia were randomized to 4 g daily of icosapent ethyl or placebo. They experienced a 25% reduction in risk of a primary efficacy end point (composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, coronary revascularization, or hospitalization for unstable angina) and a 26% reduction in risk of a key secondary efficacy end point (composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke) when compared with placebo. The current analysis reports on the subgroup of patients from the trial with a history of coronary artery bypass grafting. Results: Of the 8179 patients randomized in REDUCE-IT, a total of 1837 (22.5%) had a history of coronary artery bypass grafting, with 897 patients randomized to icosapent ethyl and 940 to placebo. Baseline characteristics were similar between treatment groups. Randomization to icosapent ethyl was associated with a significant reduction in the primary end point (hazard ratio [HR], 0.76 [95% CI, 0.63–0.92] ; P =0.004), in the key secondary end point (HR, 0.69 [95% CI, 0.56–0.87]; P =0.001), and in total (first plus subsequent or recurrent) ischemic events (rate ratio, 0.64 [95% CI, 0.50–0.81]; P =0.0002) compared with placebo. This yielded an absolute risk reduction of 6.2% (95% CI, 2.3%–10.2%) in first events, with a number needed to treat of 16 (95% CI, 10–44) during a median follow-up time of 4.8 years. Safety findings were similar to the overall study: beyond an increased rate of atrial fibrillation/flutter requiring hospitalization for at least 24 hours (5.0% vs 3.1%; P =0.03) and a nonsignificant increase in bleeding, occurrences of adverse events were comparable between groups. Conclusions: In REDUCE-IT patients with a history of coronary artery bypass grafting, treatment with icosapent ethyl was associated with significant reductions in first and recurrent ischemic events. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT01492361.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0009-7322 , 1524-4539
    Language: English
    Publisher: Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
    Publication Date: 2021
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1466401-X
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    In: Nature, Springer Science and Business Media LLC, Vol. 600, No. 7889 ( 2021-12-16), p. 472-477
    Abstract: The genetic make-up of an individual contributes to the susceptibility and response to viral infection. Although environmental, clinical and social factors have a role in the chance of exposure to SARS-CoV-2 and the severity of COVID-19 1,2 , host genetics may also be important. Identifying host-specific genetic factors may reveal biological mechanisms of therapeutic relevance and clarify causal relationships of modifiable environmental risk factors for SARS-CoV-2 infection and outcomes. We formed a global network of researchers to investigate the role of human genetics in SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 severity. Here we describe the results of three genome-wide association meta-analyses that consist of up to 49,562 patients with COVID-19 from 46 studies across 19 countries. We report 13 genome-wide significant loci that are associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection or severe manifestations of COVID-19. Several of these loci correspond to previously documented associations to lung or autoimmune and inflammatory diseases 3–7 . They also represent potentially actionable mechanisms in response to infection. Mendelian randomization analyses support a causal role for smoking and body-mass index for severe COVID-19 although not for type II diabetes. The identification of novel host genetic factors associated with COVID-19 was made possible by the community of human genetics researchers coming together to prioritize the sharing of data, results, resources and analytical frameworks. This working model of international collaboration underscores what is possible for future genetic discoveries in emerging pandemics, or indeed for any complex human disease.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0028-0836 , 1476-4687
    RVK:
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
    Publication Date: 2021
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 120714-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1413423-8
    SSG: 11
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 112, No. 11 ( 2008-11-16), p. 911-911
    Abstract: Background: VHR patients eligible for COG AALL0031 had an expected 5-year EFS ≤ 40% and consisted of those with Ph+ ALL, severe hypodiploidy ( 〈 44 chromosomes), and induction failure (IF) with 〉 25% blasts at the end of standard induction therapy. Patients with hypodiploidy and IF are the subject of this report. Ph+ patients were reported previously (Blood Schultz KR, et. al. Blood2006; 108:87a.). Methods: Between 10/14/02 and 10/20/06, 63 evaluable patients (41 hypodiploidy and 22 IF) were enrolled in AALL0031 after completion of a 3- or 4-drug induction, and begun on an intensive chemotherapy regimen. Induction failure patients not entering complete remission (CR) after the first two chemotherapy cycles, ifosfamide and etoposide (cycle 1) and IV cyclophosphamide, IV etoposide) followed by high dose methotrexate and high dose cytarabine (cycle 2), were removed from study. Remission patients were assigned to 8 cycles of standard maintenance. All patients received triple intrathecal chemotherapy followed by cranial irradiation. An HLA-identical blood and marrow transplantation (BMT), by donor availability or to an intensive ~2.2 year chemotherapy regimen. The intensive chemotherapy regimen included a reinduction block (daunomycin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, L-asparaginase, dexamethasone), intensification block [IV methotrexate (Mtx), etoposide, cyclophosphamide, high dose cytarabine, L-asparaginase], with each block repeated followed by 4 cycles of intensive maintenance (high dose Mtx, PO Mtx, IV vincristine, PO 6-MP). Unrelated donor BMT was not an option on AALL0031. Results: Twenty-one of 22 (95%) IF patients achieved CR after two cycles of therapy. Of these, 12 continued chemotherapy, 2 underwent BMT, and 7 were taken off protocol for an unrelated donor BMT. At 2-years, the EFS for IF patients was chemotherapy (46±17%) or related/unrelated donor BMT (67±17%; p = 0.50). Twenty-eight hypodiploidy patients continued chemotherapy, 12 underwent related donor BMT and 1 was taken off protocol for an unrelated donor BMT. For hypodiploid patients, the 2 year EFS was 57±10% for those receiving chemotherapy compared to related/unrelated donor BMT (67±14%, p=0.74). These outcomes compared favorably with COG historical controls (n=16, 44±12%; p=0.30). We lack a COG historical control for a comparison with IF patients. We examined minimal residual disease (MRD) at the end of cycle 2 in patients undergoing related/unrelated BMT and those receiving chemotherapy. With MRD 〉 0.01% (n=9) and 〈 0.01% (n=6), 2-year EFS was 56±19% and 83±15% (p=0.27), respectively. Chemotherapy groups showed a 2 year EFS for 〉 0.01% of 57±22% (N = 7) compared to 53±12% for ≤ 0.01% (N=19; p =0.83). Conclusions: The AALL0031 regimen attained a very high CR (95%) for IF patients. Small number severely limited statistical power. We found better outcomes for AALL0031 versus historical data, for allogeneic BMT versus chemotherapy, and MRD negativity versus positivity in BMT patients, although none were statistically significant. Future strategies focused on inducing lower MRD early in therapy may improve outcomes for both chemotherapy and BMT. International collaborations to allow for higher patient accrual should be considered.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2008
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 5
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 27, No. 31 ( 2009-11-01), p. 5175-5181
    Abstract: Imatinib mesylate is a targeted agent that may be used against Philadelphia chromosome–positive (Ph+) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), one of the highest risk pediatric ALL groups. Patients and Methods We evaluated whether imatinib (340 mg/m 2 /d) with an intensive chemotherapy regimen improved outcome in children ages 1 to 21 years with Ph+ ALL (N = 92) and compared toxicities to Ph− ALL patients (N = 65) given the same chemotherapy without imatinib. Exposure to imatinib was increased progressively in five patient cohorts that received imatinib from 42 (cohort 1; n = 7) to 280 continuous days (cohort 5; n = 50) before maintenance therapy. Patients with human leukocyte antigen (HLA) –identical sibling donors underwent blood and marrow transplantation (BMT) with imatinib given for 6 months following BMT. Results Continuous imatinib exposure improved outcome in cohort 5 patients with a 3-year event-free survival (EFS) of 80% ± 11% (95% CI, 64% to 90%), more than twice historical controls (35% ± 4%; P 〈 .0001). Three-year EFS was similar for patients in cohort 5 treated with chemotherapy plus imatinib (88% ± 11%; 95% CI, 66% to 96%) or sibling donor BMT (57% ± 22%; 95% CI, 30.4% to 76.1%). There were no significant toxicities associated with adding imatinib to intensive chemotherapy. The higher imatinib dosing in cohort 5 appears to improve survival by having an impact on the outcome of children with a higher burden of minimal residual disease after induction. Conclusion Imatinib plus intensive chemotherapy improved 3-year EFS in children and adolescents with Ph+ ALL, with no appreciable increase in toxicity. BMT plus imatinib offered no advantage over BMT alone. Additional follow-up is required to determine the impact of this treatment on long-term EFS and determine whether chemotherapy plus imatinib can replace BMT.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2009
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 6
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) ; 2017
    In:  Journal of Clinical Oncology Vol. 35, No. 15_suppl ( 2017-05-20), p. e19048-e19048
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 35, No. 15_suppl ( 2017-05-20), p. e19048-e19048
    Abstract: e19048 Background: The outcome and prognostic factors of post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) varies in currently reported literature. We present one of the largest single institution retrospective analysis from University of Florida. Methods: Patient population was identified from EMR and charts were reviewed to collect data. Primary outcome was Overall survival (OS) and secondary outcome was identification of prognostic factors. Results: We identified 138 patients with PTLD from Sept 1994 to Feb 2016 (liver 34%, Kidney 23%, heart 21%, lungs 12%, kidney-pancreas 2% and BMT 6%). After survival analysis, 131 patients were further followed for secondary outcomes. 36% (n = 47) were less than 18 years of age, 60% (n = 83) were males. The median age of PTLD diagnosis was 44 years and the median duration from transplant to PTLD was 4.4 years. Pathology was early lesion 6% (n = 8), polymorphic 17% (n = 23), Monomorphic 71% (n = 93), Hodgkin/like 4.5% (n = 6). Extra-nodal site involvement was 61% (n = 80), most common being GI tract. Ann-Arbor stage distribution was stage I/II 50% (n = 65), stage III/IV 46% (n = 60). Initial treatment was immunosuppression (IS) reduction alone in 24% (n = 31), Rituximab (R) 24% (n = 31), chemotherapy (+/- R) 46% (n = 60). Most common chemo regimen was CHOP (+/-R) 27% (N = 36). After first line, 48% patients had complete remission (CR), 18% partial remission (PR) and 15% progressive disease (PD). Second line treatment was required in 33% (n = 44) and 10% (n = 13) patients required 3 rd line treatment. Final analysis showed 61% (n = 80) achieved CR, 17% (n = 22) had PD, 56% (n = 74) patients were alive and 49% (n = 64) are alive without PTLD. Median OS was 14.99 years. Multivariate analysis identified transplant age, organ transplant recipients, PTLD diagnosis age, performance status, IPI score, graft rejection, history of malignancy and recipient EBV status as prognostic factors (p 〈 .05). Conclusions: This study from a leading regional transplant center shows notable OS which is likely from improved immunosuppressive regimens, treatment modalities and large pediatric population. We identified various prognostic factors affecting survival and propose validation to generate prognostic score.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2017
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 7
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 108, No. 11 ( 2006-11-16), p. 283-283
    Abstract: We tested whether imatinib mesylate, the first Bcr/Abl tyrosine kinase inhibitor, can be given safely in combination with chemotherapy for children with Ph+ ALL in an effort to improve outcome. Imatinib alone has a number of known side effects, including peripheral edema as well as cardiac and hepatic toxicities. Little is known about toxicities that may occur when imatinib is given with different chemotherapeutic agents, particularly in high dosages and in children. The COG study, AALL0031, evaluated whether imatinib mesylate could be administered in conjunction with chemotherapy in children (1–21 years) with Ph+ ALL. AALL0031 accrued 160 very high risk ALL patients (Ph+, induction failure, hypodiploidy, MLL with slow early response) from 10/02 to 5/06, including 94 Ph+ ALL patients eligible to receive imatinib. Patients entered the study after induction and received an intensive multidrug chemotherapy backbone with stepwise introduction of imatinib (340 mg/m2/day for 21 days) into an increasing number of treatment blocks in the first 4 cohorts (44 pts), followed by continuous dosing in the final patient cohort (50 pts). Patients that had an HLA-identical family donor underwent hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) after the first 2 cycles of therapy. A number of patients received identical chemotherapy without imatinib, including different blocks of therapy within Ph+ ALL cohorts 1–3 (32 pts) and 66 Ph-neg pts, allowing for an evaluation of the impact of imatinib on a common chemotherapy backbone. Targeted toxicities were hemorrhage, hepatic toxicities (bilirubin, AST, ALT) and coagulation abnormalities (PTT and PT). Patients receiving imatinib had a higher incidence of ALT elevation (but not bilirubin or AST) in Consolidation 1 (10/65 versus 4/69; p = 0.07), Maintenance cycle 2 (6/23 versus 0/16; p = 0.06) and maintenance cycle 6 (8/12 versus 0/7; p = 0.01). Maintenance was the first time that 6-MP and imatinib were given together. An amendment shortening imatinib dosing from 21 to 14 days duration in maintenance cycles 5 – 12 resulted in a significant decrease in ALT grade 〉 =3 toxicity from 54% (17/31) to 28% (11/40) (p = 0.01) as well as for AST (p = 0.02) but not bilirubin (p = 0.11). Additional toxicity comparisons (hemoglobin, neutropenia, platelets) in selected phases showed no differences between patients receiving imatinib versus no imatinib. Patients receiving imatinib had fewer RBC transfusions in consolidation 1 than the no Imatinib group (p = 0.0008). Patients receiving imatinib had a significantly lower incidence of infection with grade 3/4 neutropenia in intensification 1 (0/29) compared to patients not receiving imatinib (16%, 7/48, p = 0.04) with a similar trend in intensification 2 (p = 0.06). Intensification 1 and 2 contain methotrexate, etoposide, cyclophosphamide, cytarabine and L-asparaginase. In conclusion, imatinib mesylate at 340 mg/m2 given in a continuous dosing schedule can be used in combination with very intensive chemotherapy blocks with no additional toxicity in children with Ph+ ALL.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2006
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 8
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 120, No. 21 ( 2012-11-16), p. 137-137
    Abstract: Abstract 137 COG AALL0031 generated an outstanding 80% 3 yr event free survival for children with Ph+ ALL treated with imatinib plus intensive chemotherapy. We hypothesized that the 2nd generation BCR-ABL1/SRC kinase inhibitor dasatinib would improve Ph+ ALL outcomes compared to imatinib due to increased potency, better CNS penetration, and activity against many imatinib-resistant BCR-ABL1 point mutations. AALL0622 tested the safety and feasibility of adding dasatinib to AALL0031 chemotherapy in newly diagnosed children and young adults (1–30 years) with Ph+ ALL. Safety and feasibility were defined as 〉 5 out of 6 patients (pts) completing 23 weeks of treatment through Intensification Block 1 without having a protocol-defined dose limiting toxicity (DLT). In Cohort 1, dasatinib (60 mg/m2 once/day) was given discontinuously (the 1st 2 weeks of every 3–4 week block) starting on Induction day 15. Enrollment in Cohort 1 continued until 6 evaluable pts completed Intensification 1 (23 weeks of therapy) and were assessed for toxicity. Two of the first 6 pts experienced DLTs (treatment delays) following the 2nd high dose methotrexate (HD MTX) given on day 15 of Intensification 1. Amendment 2 removed day 15 HD MTX in Intensification 1 and 2. After this, discontinuous dasatinib (60 mg/m2) was found to be safe and feasible, and pts were then enrolled on Cohort 2 to test continuous dasatinib. The first 6 evaluable Cohort 2 pts who completed therapy through Intensification 1 with continuous dasatinib (60 mg/m2) had no significant treatment delays, but one pt experienced a DLT (grade 4 sensory neuropathy) during Consolidation 1. No induction deaths occurred in either cohort. The safety phase, completed in 10/2011, established the safety and feasibility of continuous dasatinib (60 mg/m2) integrated with the intensive phases of the modified AALL0031 backbone. After the Cohort 1 safety phase was completed, a patient developed leukoencephalopathy, transient speech impairment, motor weakness and gait disturbance after receiving HD MTX during Intensification 2. The gait and motor impairment persisted suggesting that it could be attributed to an interaction between dasatinib and HD MTX. Subsequently, no Cohort 2 pts experienced leukoencephalopathy in 70 treatment blocks containing HD MTX. Transient neurotoxicity (including ≥ grade 2 seizure, encephalopathy, cognitive disturbance, or altered level of consciousness) was seen in 8/34 (24%) Cohort 1 pts, who completed Consolidation 1 prior to Amendment 5, after receiving ifosfamide, etoposide, and triple intrathecal therapy (ITT). Because of the temporal relationship with ifosfamide and ITT, and the intensified CNS prophylaxis on AAL0622 relative to AALL0031 at the beginning of Consolidation 1, these events were attributed to the chemotherapy backbone and not dasatinib. After Amendment 5 which omitted day 1 Consolidation ITT and substituted IT MTX for ITT on Induction day 29, only 4% (1/25 pts including 4 remaining Cohort 1 and 21 Cohort 2 pts), experienced neurotoxicity (grade 2 seizure). Non-hematological Grade 4 toxicities included a Cohort 1 pt who developed Grade 4 prolonged QTc interval with adenovirus associated diarrhea, hypokalemia and hypophosphatemia during Maintenance 2. Dasatinib was held and prolonged QTc resolved. Another Cohort 1 pt developed grade 4 jaundice during Maintenance 6 that also resolved after holding 6-MP, MTX and dasatinib. Both of these pts continued therapy without recurrent toxicity. Twelve Cohort 1 pts have completed 2 1/2 years of protocol therapy and tolerated discontinuous dose dasatinib well during Maintenance. No pts have had effusions, heart failure, or pulmonary hypertension. AALL0622 enrolled 60 eligible pts (39 on Cohort 1; 21 on Cohort 2). Importantly, we recently reported that early introduction of TKI on day 15 of induction and substitution of dasatinib for imatinib on AALL0622 led to improved induction remission rates from 89% to 98% compared to all Ph+ pts on AALL0031, end induction negative minimal residual disease (MRD) rates ( 〈 0.01% by flow) from 25% to 59%, and end Consolidation 2 negative MRD rates from 71% to 89% when comparing AALL0031 Cohorts 3–5 to AALL0622 Cohorts 1 and 2. Based on the promising early response and safety data and concerns about long-term toxicity of the AALL0031 backbone, a joint COG/EsPhALL trial is underway testing the efficacy and safety of continuous dasatinib (60mg/m2) on a less intensive EsPhALL backbone. Disclosures: Off Label Use: Dasatinib is indicated for newly diagnosed adults with Philadelphia chromosome-positive (Ph+) chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) in chronic phase. The effectiveness of SPRYCEL in these patients is based on a study that measured two types of response to treatment (cytogenetic and molecular) by 1 year. The study is ongoing to find out how dasatinib works over a longer period of time Dasatinib is also indicated for Ph+ CML patients who are no longer benefitting from, or did not tolerate, other treatment including Gleevec® (imatinib mesylate). Loh:Bristol Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Hunger:Bristol Meyer Squibb: Consultancy, Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2012
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 9
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 35, No. 15_suppl ( 2017-05-20), p. e19047-e19047
    Abstract: e19047 Background: Post transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) is a rare, but potentially fatal complication of transplantation and therapeutic immunosuppression (IS). The cornerstone of PTLD management is reduction of IS, which carries the risk of allograft rejection. Methods: Retrospective analysis of patients diagnosed with PTLD after solid organ (SOT) or allogeneic stem cell transplant (HSCT) at the University of Florida were identified through a review of individual EMR charts. This analysis focused on rates of allograft rejection and graft failure with RI. Results: Of 138 patients diagnosed with PTLD between 1994 and 2016, 15% (n = 20) experienced allograft rejection during PTLD treatment. The primary organ of transplant and rejection included liver (35%), lung (25%), heart (10%), HSCT (15%) and kidney (15%). Median age at PTLD diagnosis was 14.5 years (range 2-59), males (50%) and median time from transplant to PTLD diagnosis was 25 months (range 0-173). RI was a documented as a component of initial PTLD treatment in 19/20 (95%) patients, with 2/20 (10%) undergoing complete withdrawal of immunosuppression, 13/20 (65%) partial RI (withdraw of one or more drugs) and 3/20 (10%) dose reductions of their established IS regimen. One lung recipient (5%) was transitioned to an alternative agent, and one patient had no documented records of IS adjustment. Treatment for acute rejection included observation 2/20 (10%), pulse steroids 11/29 (55%) or IS increase 12/20 (60%). 7/20 (35%) received combination steroids and increased IS. Allograft failure developed in 5/20 (25%) (1 kidney, 1 lung, 1 heart, 1 liver, 1 BMT). Allograft failure was not shown to correlate with RPI score at diagnosis, organ transplanted, induction therapy at transplant or 3-year OS. Of note 5/5 (100%) of patients received Rituximab as part of initial treatment, versus 5/15 patients whose grafts survived. Conclusions: RI for PTLD is associated with moderate rates of response, however acute graft rejection is common and is associated with high rates of graft failure. PTLD may still have favorable outcomes when combining partial RI with chemotherapy and Rituximab.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2017
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 10
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 110, No. 11 ( 2007-11-16), p. 4-4
    Abstract: Ph+ ALL remains one of the highest risk subsets of childhood ALL. The COG AALL0031 protocol (open 2002 – 2006) gave imatinib at 340 mg/m2 for an increasing number of days in combination with an intensive chemotherapy backbone. Cohorts received 42 days of imatinib exposure (Cohort 1 N= 8), 63 days (Cohort 2 N=12), 84 days (Cohort 3 N=11), 126 days (Cohort 4 N=12) and 280 continuous days (Cohort 5 N=50) prior to maintenance therapy. If an HLA-identical sibling donor was available, a BMT was performed after the first two cycles of therapy post induction otherwise chemotherapy was continued. BMT patients received imatinib starting 4 – 6 months post BMT for a 6 month duration. Ninety-three patients were treated, 10 of whom had failed induction (induction failures were removed from the following analyses). We observed that MRD positivity ( 〈 0.01%) was significantly lower (p = 0.0002) after consolidation block 1 and after consolidation block 2 (p = 0.007) in Cohorts 3 – 5 (imatinib in consolidation blocks 1 & 2) versus Cohorts 1/2 combined (no imatinib in consolidation blocks 1 & 2). Early EFS improved with increasing imatinib exposure with a 1 year EFS of 70.6±11.1% for Cohorts 1 & 2, 90.9±6.4% for Cohorts 3 & 4, and 95.3±3.6% for Cohort 5 (p = 0.02). The 1 year EFS for Cohort 5 was significantly higher than for historical controls from previous COG studies (N=56; 1 year EFS 65.7±6,4%; p = 0.006). Twenty-one patients had matched sibling transplants (8 of 43 in Cohorts 1 – 4 and 13 of 44 in Cohort 5). Eleven of 83 (13%) patients were removed from protocol by treating institutions for alternative donor BMT. Intent-to-treat analysis does not show a statistically significant difference in early outcome between those patients in Cohort 5 treated without sibling donor BMT compared to patients who received a matched sibling donor BMT (p = 0.26). The related donor BMT group treated with 6 months of Imatinib post BMT had a higher 1 year EFS compared to a comparable historical BMT group receiving no Imatinib on prior pediatric cooperative group protocol with a 1 year EFS 78%. Cohort 5 chemotherapy treatment group outcomes were not significantly affected after removal of patients receiving off protocol BMT. We conclude that imatinib given in combination with intensive chemotherapy resulted in a significant improvement in early EFS and reduction in early MRD. Post BMT imatinib also improved early outcome in related donor BMT. Intensive imatinib with intensive chemotherapy gives equivalent early EFS to patients treated with allogeniec related or alternative donor BMT. Longer observation will be required to see if this results in a difference in long term EFS. Outcome in patients on COG protocol, AALL0031 Therapy given N 1 year EFS SE Intent-to-treat analysis - Cohort 5 Chemotherapy with continuous dosing imatinib (includes 6 patients removed from study for alternative donor BMT) 31 96.7% 3.5% Intent-to-treat analysis - Sibling BMT (all Cohorts) 21 95.0% 5.3% Cohort 5 (with removal of alternative donor BMT patients) 25 95.8% 4.3% Off protocol alternative donor BMT (all cohorts) 11 81.8% 12.3%
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2007
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...