In:
PLOS Medicine, Public Library of Science (PLoS), Vol. 20, No. 4 ( 2023-4-27), p. e1004214-
Abstract:
Home working has increased since the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic’s onset with concerns that it may have adverse health implications. We assessed the association between home working and social and mental wellbeing among the employed population aged 16 to 66 through harmonised analyses of 7 UK longitudinal studies. Methods and findings We estimated associations between home working and measures of psychological distress, low life satisfaction, poor self-rated health, low social contact, and loneliness across 3 different stages of the pandemic (T1 = April to June 2020 –first lockdown, T2 = July to October 2020 –eased restrictions, T3 = November 2020 to March 2021 –second lockdown) using modified Poisson regression and meta-analyses to pool results across studies. We successively adjusted the model for sociodemographic characteristics (e.g., age, sex), job characteristics (e.g., sector of activity, pre-pandemic home working propensities), and pre-pandemic health. Among respectively 10,367, 11,585, and 12,179 participants at T1, T2, and T3, we found higher rates of home working at T1 and T3 compared with T2, reflecting lockdown periods. Home working was not associated with psychological distress at T1 (RR = 0.92, 95% CI = 0.79 to 1.08) or T2 (RR = 0.99, 95% CI = 0.88 to 1.11), but a detrimental association was found with psychological distress at T3 (RR = 1.17, 95% CI = 1.05 to 1.30). Study limitations include the fact that pre-pandemic home working propensities were derived from external sources, no information was collected on home working dosage and possible reverse association between change in wellbeing and home working likelihood. Conclusions No clear evidence of an association between home working and mental wellbeing was found, apart from greater risk of psychological distress during the second lockdown, but differences across subgroups (e.g., by sex or level of education) may exist. Longer term shifts to home working might not have adverse impacts on population wellbeing in the absence of pandemic restrictions but further monitoring of health inequalities is required.
Type of Medium:
Online Resource
ISSN:
1549-1676
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pmed.1004214
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pmed.1004214.g001
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pmed.1004214.g002
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pmed.1004214.g003
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pmed.1004214.g004
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pmed.1004214.g005
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pmed.1004214.t001
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pmed.1004214.s001
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pmed.1004214.s002
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pmed.1004214.s003
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pmed.1004214.s004
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pmed.1004214.s005
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pmed.1004214.s006
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pmed.1004214.s007
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pmed.1004214.s008
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pmed.1004214.s009
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pmed.1004214.s010
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pmed.1004214.s011
Language:
English
Publisher:
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Publication Date:
2023
detail.hit.zdb_id:
2164823-2
Permalink