GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 30, No. 15_suppl ( 2012-05-20), p. 3009-3009
    Abstract: 3009 Background: Aurora kinases A, B, and, C play essential roles in regulating cell division. Overexpression of aurora A and B in human tumors is associated with high proliferation rates and poor prognosis. AMG 900 is an investigational, orally administered, highly selective inhibitor of aurora A, B, and C that demonstrated activity in drug-resistant cell lines and human tumor xenografts. This study evaluated the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), and pharmacodynamics of AMG 900. Methods: Key eligibility criteria: ≥ 18 years old, advanced solid tumors, measurable disease, ECOG ≤ 2, and adequate organ function. AMG 900 was administered orally daily for 4 consecutive days (D) every 2 weeks (Q2W). In the dose-escalation phase, the starting dose was 1 mg and was escalated by 100% in subsequent cohorts (1 pt/cohort) until dose limiting toxicity (DLT) or grade 2 (G2) AMG 900-related toxicity occurred in the first 28 D. Dose escalation continued in a standard 3+3 design at ≤ 25% if DLT occurred or ≤ 50% if G2 related toxicity occurred. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was determined without prophylactic G-CSF support. Results: As of OCT 2011, 19 pts (1 pt at 1, 2, 4, and 8 mg; 3 pts at 16 mg; and 6 pts at 24 and 30 mg) had received ≥ 1 dose of AMG 900. Demographics were 58% women, median age 60 (32-77) years, and ECOG 0/1, 63%/37%. There were 4 DLTs: G4 neutropenia 〉 7 days at 24 mg (n=1) and 30 mg (n=1); G4 neutropenia 〉 7 days + G4 thrombocytopenia at 30 mg (n=1); and febrile neutropenia (FN) at 30 mg (n=1). MTD without G-CSF support was 24 mg. 89% of pts had treatment-related adverse events (AEs). G≥3 treatment-related AEs were neutropenia, 8 (42%); leukopenia, 4 (21%); anemia, 2 (11%); thrombocytopenia, 1 (5%); and FN, 1 (5%). Preliminary PK showed no obvious departures from dose-proportionality with a half-life of ~16 h. Tumor-response data were available for 17 pts: stable disease, 13 pts (range 0.4 to 43.7 wks); progressive disease, 4 pts. One pt (16 mg cohort) with recurrent ovarian cancer had 16% tumor shrinkage and 45% decrease in CA-125 (SD 〉 6 months). Conclusions: AMG 900 administered at 24 mg daily for 4D Q2W is the recommended dose for phase 2 trials. Dose escalation is now ongoing to determine the MTD with prophylactic G-CSF.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2012
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    In: Clinical Cancer Research, American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), Vol. 16, No. 9 ( 2010-05-01), p. 2677-2687
    Abstract: Purpose: This phase Ib study evaluated the safety, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and antitumor activity of AMG 102, a fully human monoclonal antibody against hepatocyte growth factor/scatter factor (HGF/SF), in combination with bevacizumab or motesanib in patients with advanced solid tumors. Experimental Design: Patients with treatment-refractory advanced solid tumors were sequentially enrolled into four cohorts (3, 10, or 20 mg/kg AMG 102 plus 10 mg/kg bevacizumab i.v. every 2 weeks, or 3 mg/kg AMG 102 i.v. every 2 weeks plus 75 mg motesanib orally once daily). Results: Fourteen patients were enrolled and received AMG 102. The combination of AMG 102 with bevacizumab (n = 12) seemed to have acceptable toxicity. The number of patients (n = 2) who received AMG 102 plus motesanib was insufficient to adequately assess safety. No dose-limiting toxicities were reported. Enrollment in the motesanib cohort was suspended because of reports of cholecystitis in other motesanib studies. Treatment-emergent adverse events among patients receiving AMG 102 plus bevacizumab were generally mild and included fatigue (75%), nausea (58%), constipation (42%), and peripheral edema (42%). No anti-AMG 102 antibodies were detected. Bevacizumab did not seem to affect AMG 102 pharmacokinetics. Circulating total HGF/SF increased from baseline throughout the study. Eight of 10 evaluable patients had reductions in tumor dimensions, and stable disease at ≥8, ≥16, and ≥24 weeks occurred in 9, 7, and 4 patients, respectively. Progression-free survival ranged from 7.9 to 121.9 weeks. Conclusions: AMG 102 in combination with bevacizumab was well tolerated. Further evaluation of AMG 102 in combination with antiangiogenic agents is warranted. Clin Cancer Res; 16(9); 2677–87. ©2010 AACR.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1078-0432 , 1557-3265
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
    Publication Date: 2010
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1225457-5
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2036787-9
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    In: Clinical Cancer Research, American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), Vol. 18, No. 12 ( 2012-06-15), p. 3414-3427
    Abstract: Purpose: This phase 1b dose-escalation study assessed safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of ganitumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody against the insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF1) receptor, combined with targeted agents or cytotoxic chemotherapy in patients with advanced solid tumors. Experimental Design: Patients with treatment-refractory advanced solid tumors were sequentially enrolled at 2 ganitumab dose levels (6 or 12 mg/kg i.v. every 2 weeks) combined with either sorafenib 400 mg twice daily, panitumumab 6 mg/kg every 2 weeks, erlotinib 150 mg once daily, or gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, and 15 of each 4-week cycle. The primary end points were safety and pharmacokinetics of ganitumab. Results: Ganitumab up to 12 mg/kg appeared well tolerated combined with sorafenib, panitumumab, erlotinib, or gemcitabine. Treatment-emergent adverse events were generally mild and included fatigue, nausea, vomiting, and chills. Three patients had dose-limiting toxicities: grade 3 hyperglycemia (ganitumab 6 mg/kg and panitumumab), grade 4 neutropenia (ganitumab 6 mg/kg and gemcitabine), and grade 4 thrombocytopenia (ganitumab 12 mg/kg and erlotinib). Ganitumab-binding and panitumumab-binding antibodies were detected in 5 and 2 patients, respectively; neutralizing antibodies were not detected. The pharmacokinetics of ganitumab and each cotherapy did not appear affected by coadministration. Circulating total IGF1 and IGF binding protein 3 increased from baseline following treatment. Four patients (9%) had partial responses. Conclusions: Ganitumab up to 12 mg/kg was well tolerated, without adverse effects on pharmacokinetics in combination with either sorafenib, panitumumab, erlotinib, or gemcitabine. Ganitumab is currently under investigation in combination with some of these and other agents. Clin Cancer Res; 18(12); 3414–27. ©2012 AACR.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1078-0432 , 1557-3265
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
    Publication Date: 2012
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1225457-5
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2036787-9
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 31, No. 6_suppl ( 2013-02-20), p. 41-41
    Abstract: 41 Background: AMG 208 is a small molecule MET inhibitor that suppresses proliferation and induces apoptosis in human tumor xenografts. This first-in-human study evaluated the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of AMG 208. We report data from the dose escalation part of the study. Methods: Key eligibility criteria: ≥ 18 yr, advanced solid tumors, ECOG ≤ 2, and evaluable/measurable disease. Using a modified Fibonacci design, 3–9 pts were enrolled into 1 of 7 sequential dose cohorts (25, 50, 100, 150, 200, 300, and 400 mg) of AMG 208. Pts received AMG 208 orally on days 1 and 4–28 once daily. If no dose limiting toxicity (DLT) was seen on days 1–28, pts received AMG 208 once daily starting at day 36 provided pts showed no evident disease progression. In cohorts 1–3, a standard 3+3 design was followed. In cohorts 4–7, a modified 3+3+3 design was followed. Results: As of July 16 2012, 54 pts (25 mg [n=6], 50 mg [n=4] , 100 mg [n=4], 150 mg [n=3] , 200 mg [n=16], 300 mg [n=10] , and 400 mg [n =11]) had received ≥ 1 dose of AMG 208. 67% were men; 19% had prostate cancer (PC). Median (range) age: 61 (39–80) yr. ECOG 0/1: 52%/48%. 6 DLTs were seen: a grade (G) 3 increased AST (200 mg), a G3 thrombocytopenia (200 mg), a G4 acute myocardial infarction (300 mg), a G3 prolonged QT (300 mg), and two G3 hypertensions (400 mg). The maximum tolerated dose was not reached. 83% of pts had tx-related adverse events (AE). Tx-related AE occurring in 〉 10 pts: fatigue (n=24), nausea (n=18), hypertension (n=12), and diarrhea (n=11). 24% of pts had grade ≥ 3 tx-related AE. AMG 208 was orally bioavailable with a 30–35 hr mean half-life in plasma. Exposure increased linearly with dose; accumulation at day 28 was 2.7-fold across cohorts. Of the 42 pts with available tumor response data for site reads, 1 had complete response on bone scan (PC 300 mg) while 2 had partial responses (PR; PC 400 mg and kidney cancer 200 mg; both had -33% tumor shrinkage), and 29 had stable disease (SD); 1 other PC pt had PR after data cutoff. Of the 35 pts with available tumor response data for central reads, 26 had SD. FLT and biomarker data will be presented. Conclusions: AMG 208 up to 400 mg daily had manageable toxicities and showed evidence of antitumor activity, especially in prostate cancer. Clinical trial information: NCT00813384.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2013
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...