GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    In: European Radiology, Springer Science and Business Media LLC, Vol. 32, No. 3 ( 2022-03), p. 1611-1623
    Abstract: Preoperative breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can inform surgical planning but might cause overtreatment by increasing the mastectomy rate. The Multicenter International Prospective Analysis (MIPA) study investigated this controversial issue. Methods This observational study enrolled women aged 18–80 years with biopsy-proven breast cancer, who underwent MRI in addition to conventional imaging (mammography and/or breast ultrasonography) or conventional imaging alone before surgery as routine practice at 27 centers. Exclusion criteria included planned neoadjuvant therapy, pregnancy, personal history of any cancer, and distant metastases. Results Of 5896 analyzed patients, 2763 (46.9%) had conventional imaging only (noMRI group), and 3133 (53.1%) underwent MRI that was performed for diagnosis, screening, or unknown purposes in 692/3133 women (22.1%), with preoperative intent in 2441/3133 women (77.9%, MRI group). Patients in the MRI group were younger, had denser breasts, more cancers ≥ 20 mm, and a higher rate of invasive lobular histology than patients who underwent conventional imaging alone ( p   〈  0.001 for all comparisons). Mastectomy was planned based on conventional imaging in 22.4% (MRI group) versus 14.4% (noMRI group) ( p   〈  0.001). The additional planned mastectomy rate in the MRI group was 11.3%. The overall performed first- plus second-line mastectomy rate was 36.3% (MRI group) versus 18.0% (noMRI group) ( p   〈  0.001). In women receiving conserving surgery, MRI group had a significantly lower reoperation rate (8.5% versus 11.7%, p   〈  0.001). Conclusions Clinicians requested breast MRI for women with a higher a priori probability of receiving mastectomy. MRI was associated with 11.3% more mastectomies, and with 3.2% fewer reoperations in the breast conservation subgroup. Key Points • In 19% of patients of the MIPA study, breast MRI was performed for screening or diagnostic purposes. • The current patient selection to preoperative breast MRI implies an 11% increase in mastectomies, counterbalanced by a 3% reduction of the reoperation rate. • Data from the MIPA study can support discussion in tumor boards when preoperative MRI is under consideration and should be shared with patients to achieve informed decision-making.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0938-7994 , 1432-1084
    Language: English
    Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
    Publication Date: 2022
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1472718-3
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    In: Academic Radiology, Elsevier BV, Vol. 24, No. 7 ( 2017-07), p. 795-801
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1076-6332
    Language: English
    Publisher: Elsevier BV
    Publication Date: 2017
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    In: European Radiology, Springer Science and Business Media LLC
    Abstract: To investigate the influence of preoperative breast MRI on mastectomy and reoperation rates in patients with pure ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). Methods The MIPA observational study database (7245 patients) was searched for patients aged 18–80 years with pure unilateral DCIS diagnosed at core needle or vacuum-assisted biopsy (CNB/VAB) and planned for primary surgery. Patients who underwent preoperative MRI (MRI group) were matched (1:1) to those who did not receive MRI (noMRI group) according to 8 confounding covariates that drive referral to MRI (age; hormonal status; familial risk; posterior-to-nipple diameter; BI-RADS category; lesion diameter; lesion presentation; surgical planning at conventional imaging). Surgical outcomes were compared between the matched groups with nonparametric statistics after calculating odds ratios (ORs). Results Of 1005 women with pure unilateral DCIS at CNB/VAB (507 MRI group, 498 noMRI group), 309 remained in each group after matching. First-line mastectomy rate in the MRI group was 20.1% (62/309 patients, OR 2.03) compared to 11.0% in the noMRI group (34/309 patients, p = 0.003). The reoperation rate was 10.0% in the MRI group (31/309, OR for reoperation 0.40) and 22.0% in the noMRI group (68/309, p 〈 0.001), with a 2.53 OR of avoiding reoperation in the MRI group. The overall mastectomy rate was 23.3% in the MRI group (72/309, OR 1.40) and 17.8% in the noMRI group (55/309, p = 0.111). Conclusions Compared to those going directly to surgery, patients with pure DCIS at CNB/VAB who underwent preoperative MRI had a higher OR for first-line mastectomy but a substantially lower OR for reoperation. Clinical relevance statement When confounding factors behind MRI referral are accounted for in the comparison of patients with CNB/VAB-diagnosed pure unilateral DCIS, preoperative MRI yields a reduction of reoperations that is more than twice as high as the increase in overall mastectomies. Key Points • Confounding factors cause imbalance when investigating the influence of preoperative MRI on surgical outcomes of pure DCIS. • When patient matching is applied to women with pure unilateral DCIS, reoperation rates are significantly reduced in women who underwent preoperative MRI. • The reduction of reoperations brought about by preoperative MRI is more than double the increase in overall mastectomies.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1432-1084
    Language: English
    Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
    Publication Date: 2023
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1472718-3
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Elsevier BV ; 2015
    In:  Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology Vol. 26, No. 8 ( 2015-08), p. 1183-
    In: Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Elsevier BV, Vol. 26, No. 8 ( 2015-08), p. 1183-
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1051-0443
    Language: English
    Publisher: Elsevier BV
    Publication Date: 2015
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2041331-2
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 5
    In: Tumori Journal, SAGE Publications, Vol. 108, No. 6 ( 2022-12), p. 563-571
    Abstract: To compare the reproducibility between contrast-enhanced digital mammography (CEDM) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with the postsurgical pathologic examination. In addition, the applicability of the Breast Imaging–Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) lexicon of MRI to CEDM was evaluated for mass lesions. Methods: A total of 62 patients with a histologically proven diagnosis of breast cancer were included in this study, for a total of 67 lesions. Fifty-nine patients underwent both methods. The reproducibility between MRI vs CEDM and the reference standard (postoperative pathology) was assessed by considering the lesion and breast size as pivotal variables. Reproducibility was evaluated by computing the concordance correlation coefficient (CCC). Bland-Altman plots were used to depict the observed pattern of agreement as well as to estimate the associated bias. Furthermore, the pattern of agreement between the investigated methods with regard to the breast lesion characterization (i.e. mass/nonmass; shape; margins; internal enhanced characteristics) was assessed by computing the Cohen kappa and its 95% confidence interval (CI). Results: The reproducibility between MRI and the reference standard and between CEDM and the reference standard showed substantial agreement, with a CCC value of 0.956 (95% CI, 0.931–0.972) and 0.950 (95% CI, 0.920–0.969), respectively. By looking at the Bland-Altman analysis, bias values of 2.344 and 1.875 mm were observed for MRI and CEDM vs reference evaluation, respectively. The agreement between MRI and CEDM is substantial with a CCC value of 0.969 (95% CI, 0.949–0.981). The Bland-Altman analysis showed bias values of −0.469 mm when comparing CEDM vs MRI. Following the Landis and Koch classification criteria, moderate agreement was observed between the two methods in describing BI-RADS descriptors of mass lesions. Conclusion: CEDM is able to measure and describe tumor masses comparably to MRI and can be used for surgical planning.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0300-8916 , 2038-2529
    Language: English
    Publisher: SAGE Publications
    Publication Date: 2022
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 280962-X
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2267832-3
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 6
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    SAGE Publications ; 2015
    In:  Tumori Journal Vol. 101, No. 3 ( 2015-05), p. e107-e109
    In: Tumori Journal, SAGE Publications, Vol. 101, No. 3 ( 2015-05), p. e107-e109
    Abstract: Breast metastases are very uncommon, either from solid tumors or malignant melanoma. Case report We present the case of a 42-year-old woman with a history of cutaneous melanoma of the shoulder excised 21 years ago. She presented with a palpable lump in the upper outer quadrant of the right breast. Ultrasound demonstrated a solid mass within a cystic lesion. A core biopsy was taken and first histology reported a poorly differentiated primary breast cancer suspected to be triple negative. MRI detected a satellite lesion in the same breast, a focus of suspected enhancement in the other breast, and the extramammary finding of an enhancing pulmonary lesion. Staging computed tomography detected widespread metastases to the lungs, brain, subcutaneous left shoulder, liver, pancreas, and hepatorenal recess. A core biopsy was taken from the left breast lesion and the previous slides were reviewed; histopathology and immunohistochemistry were in keeping with metastasis from melanoma. Conclusions The possibility of a metastatic lesion to the breast should be taken into account in any patient presenting with a breast lump and a previous history of melanoma. Breast involvement cannot be considered an isolated finding, as it might be the first manifestation of widespread disease.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0300-8916 , 2038-2529
    Language: English
    Publisher: SAGE Publications
    Publication Date: 2015
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 280962-X
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2267832-3
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 7
    In: Tumori Journal, SAGE Publications, Vol. 108, No. 4 ( 2022-08), p. 326-330
    Abstract: To compare the performance of prone digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT)–vacuum-assisted biopsy (VAB) with prone stereotactic-guided VAB (sVAB), focusing on time of procedure, number of expositions, average glandular dose, and complications. Methods: The institutional review board approved this retrospective study and informed consent was waived. From July 2015 to January 2017, 306 patients with 306 suspicious mammographic findings (BI-RADS ⩾4) underwent mammography-guided biopsy, prone sVAB, or prone DBT-VAB. Student t test, chi-square, and multivariate regression statistics were used. Results: During the study period, 155 prone sVAB procedures in 155 patients (mean age, 56 years; age range, 39–84 years) and 151 DBT-VABs in 151 patients (mean age, 57 years; age range, 33–84 years) were performed. Mean procedure time was shorter with DBT-VAB versus sVAB (14.5 versus 17.4 minutes, respectively; p 〈 0.001), and fewer images were acquired with DBT-VAB versus sVAB (8 vs 11, respectively; p 〈 0.001); the average glandular dose was significantly lower in DBT-VAB versus sVAB (11.8 mGy versus 18 mGy, respectively; p 〈 0.001). There were no differences in the distribution of histologic results ( p = 0.74) or breast density ( p = 0.09) between the two groups. No major complications were observed in either group. Conclusion: Performance of prone DBT-VAB was superior to prone sVAB because it allowed a faster procedure with fewer radiologic expositions and lower radiation dose.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0300-8916 , 2038-2529
    Language: English
    Publisher: SAGE Publications
    Publication Date: 2022
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 280962-X
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2267832-3
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 8
    In: Cancer Research, American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), Vol. 82, No. 4_Supplement ( 2022-02-15), p. P3-01-12-P3-01-12
    Abstract: Background - Physical distancing for COVID-19 led to decreased in-person patient follow up assessments and delayed imaging appointments. Herein we describe for the first time the impact of delays in diagnostic investigations of patients with an history of early-stage breast cancer (BC) in the largest public cancer center of Lombardy, the Italian region most affected by the pandemic. Methods - This single-institution retrospective study included three observational periods. The first pandemic peak period (March-April 2020) corresponding to the interruption of follow up imaging; the post-peak period (May-December 2020); the pre-pandemic period represented by the five previous years (January 2015- December 2019) as control. The flow of diagnostic activities was compared among the different years. Moreover, the number and characteristics of recurrent BC cases (rBC) diagnosed in the post-peak period were compared to the figures observed in pre-pandemic years, when imaging was regularly carried out, using descriptive statistics. A further comparison was performed between the characteristics of scheduled and delayed rBC diagnosed after the first peak. Results - During the first pandemic peak, diagnostic investigations declined by 81.2% (from 1032 in January-February to 194 in March-April), a drop which was not identified in the same period of the pre-pandemic years, before rebounding to 1065 in May-June, 832 July-August (reflecting the summer physiological drop), 1334 September-October, and 879 November-December. The average number of rBC cases of 16 (range 12-25) in March-April of the pre-pandemic period declined to a value as low as 4 during the first pandemic peak. Thereafter, the number of rBC cases began a steady increase, until reaching a total of 27 in September-October 2020, almost doubling the mean of 14.8 (range 11-21) achieved in the corresponding months of 2015-2019. As a result, the absolute number of rBC cases was 76 in 2020 and on average 78.4 (range 70 - 95) in pre-pandemic years, and the rBC proportion of 1.42% (76/5336; 95% exact confidence interval, CI: 1.12-1.78%) in 2020 was slightly higher than the average proportion of 1.26% of the five previous years, though the latter being well included in the CI of the 2020 proportion. No difference in primary tumor presentation and age at initial diagnosis was found among recurrent patients before and after the pandemic. Of the rBC cases reported during 2020, 10 were from 513 patients with postponed follow up who were finally diagnosed between September-December. As compared to patients on schedule, delayed rBC cases did not present with ductal carcinoma in situ, and reported a median tumor size of 18 mm (range 4.3-90 mm), which was 20% higher than the median of 15 mm (3.1-34) observed for scheduled patients. Distribution of luminal-like, triple negative and HER2-overexpressing BC subtypes among evaluable rBC cases was 75%, 12.5%, 12.5% in scheduled and 66%, 11% and 22% in delayed cases, respectively. Conclusions - Our data showed a slight decrease in the absolute number of rBC during 2020 despite a rebound of examinations, and an increased size of invasive recurrence following the 2-month stop of the first pandemic peak. The full impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on recurrent cancer diagnosis will be known when national population-based data become available in the coming years. Citation Format: Serena Di Cosimo, Catherine Depretto, Rosalba Miceli, Paolo Baili, Silva Ljevar, Milena Sant, Claudio Ferranti, Secondo Folli, Massimiliano Gennaro, Filippo G de Braud, Claudio Vernieri, Maria Carmen De Santis, Laura Lozza, Andrea Vingiani, Giancarlo Pruneri, Giovanni Apolone, Alfonso Marchianò, Gianfranco P Scaperrotta. The impact of COVID-19 on diagnosis of recurrent breast cancer [abstract] . In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-01-12.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0008-5472 , 1538-7445
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
    Publication Date: 2022
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2036785-5
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1432-1
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 410466-3
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 9
    In: La radiologia medica, Springer Science and Business Media LLC, Vol. 128, No. 10 ( 2023-08-02), p. 1199-1205
    Abstract: To evaluate the technical success and efficacy rates of US-guided percutaneous vacuum-assisted excision (VAE) of breast fibroadenomas, also assessing procedural complications and long-term patient satisfaction rates. Materials and methods The institutional database of a tertiary breast cancer referral centre was retrospectively reviewed to retrieve all women with fibroadenomas who underwent US-guided VAE between May 2011 and September 2019. We subsequently included in this study all fibroadenomas with a maximum diameter of 3 cm at US and an available histological confirmation obtained by core-needle biopsy before VAE. Immediately after VAE, technical success (defined as the correct VAE execution) and the occurrence of procedural complications were evaluated. Imaging follow-up (US ± mammography) after 6, 12, 24 and 36 months was performed to evaluate technical efficacy (defined as the absence of fibroadenoma recurrence at 6-month follow-up). Long-term patient satisfaction was evaluated with telephonic interviews in October 2022. Results We retrospectively included 108 women (median age 46 years) with 110 fibroadenomas diagnosed at core-needle biopsy with a median lesion size at US of 12 mm. Technical success was obtained in 110/110 VAEs (100%). Minor procedural complications (haematomas) occurred in 7/110 VAEs (6%), whereas 8/110 patients had a fibroadenoma recurrence at 6-month follow-up, resulting in a 93% technical efficacy (102/110 VAEs). All patients available for telephonic follow-up (104/104, 100%) reported high satisfaction with VAE results. Conclusion US-guided VAE is a safe and effective procedure for the excision of fibroadenomas, representing a viable alternative to surgery, with a low complication rate and high patient satisfaction.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1826-6983
    Language: English
    Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
    Publication Date: 2023
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2225828-0
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 10
    In: La radiologia medica, Springer Science and Business Media LLC, Vol. 127, No. 5 ( 2022-05), p. 471-483
    Abstract: Radiology is an essential tool in the management of a patient. The aim of this manuscript was to build structured report (SR) Mammography based in Breast Cancer. Methods A working team of 16 experts (group A) was composed to create a SR for Mammography Breast Cancer. A further working group of 4 experts (group B), blinded to the activities of the group A, was composed to assess the quality and clinical usefulness of the SR final draft. Modified Delphi process was used to assess level of agreement for all report sections. Cronbach’s alpha (Cα) correlation coefficient was used to assess internal consistency and to measure quality analysis according to the average inter-item correlation. Results The final SR version was built by including n  = 2 items in Personal Data, n  = 4 items in Setting, n  = 2 items in Comparison with previous breast examination, n  = 19 items in Anamnesis and clinical context; n  = 10 items in Technique; n  = 1 item in Radiation dose; n  = 5 items Parenchymal pattern; n  = 28 items in Description of the finding; n  = 12 items in Diagnostic categories and Report and n  = 1 item in Conclusions. The overall mean score of the experts and the sum of score for structured report were 4.9 and 807 in the second round. The Cronbach’s alpha (Cα) correlation coefficient was 0.82 in the second round. About the quality evaluation, the overall mean score of the experts was 3.3. The Cronbach’s alpha (Cα) correlation coefficient was 0.90. Conclusions Structured reporting improves the quality, clarity and reproducibility of reports across departments, cities, countries and internationally and will assist patient management and improve breast health care and facilitate research.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1826-6983
    Language: English
    Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
    Publication Date: 2022
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2225828-0
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...