GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 108, No. 11 ( 2006-11-16), p. 329-329
    Abstract: Introduction: the efficacy of Rituximab (R) with standard chemotherapy in DLBCL is well known. We investigated efficacy and safety of Rituximab as adjuvant to dose-dense and HDC as part of first line treatment in untreated pts with aa-IPI at Intermediate-High (IH) or High (H) risk with DLBCL. Patients and methods: 77 previously untreated pts 〈 61 years with DLBCL, stage III–IV at aaIPI IH or H risk were enrolled into R-HDC trial (study group; January 2001–December 2004). Treatment consisted in an induction lasting two months with 4 courses of R-MegaCEOP chemotherapy (R 375 mg/m2 day1, CTX 1200 mg/m2 + EPI 110 mg/m2 + VCR 1.4 mg/m2 day3 and PDN 40 mg/m2 days 3–7) every 14 days with G-CSF support; then 2 courses of intensified chemoimmunotherapy R-MAD (Mitoxantrone 8 mg/m2 + ARAC 2000 mg/m2/12h + Dexamethasone 4 mg/m2/12h for 3 days and R 375 mg/m2 day4 and before PBSC harvest) followed by ASCT with BEAM as conditioning regimen. Results: median age was 45 yrs (19–60); 47% were at H risk; 31% had bone marrow involvement, 78% had LDH level 〉 normal and 35% extranodal sites 〉 1. Complete Response at the end of the treatment was achieved in 60 pts (78%), PR in 2 (3%) and 11 pts (14%) did not response. Four pts (5%) died of toxicity during treatment. Few severe early toxicities (WHO grade 3–4) were reported and late toxicity was minor, with no MDS or ANLL or solid tumour. With a median follow-up of 39 months, 3-yr FFS and 3-yr OS rates were: 71% and 78%. These results were compared to those ones achieved into 41 pts, with the same clinical characteristics, enrolled in a previous phase II clinical trial with up-front HDC and ASCT but without R. Treatment in HDC control group consisted in an induction treatment lasting two months with MACOPB chemotherapy × 8 weekly infusions followed by the same intensified and HDC regimens (MAD× 2 courses + BEAM and ASCT). Three-yr FFS and OS in control group were: 46% and 54%. To properly evaluate the efficacy of R-HDC therapy, a Cox’s model was performed to adjust the effect of treatment for competing risk factors (age, IPI, BM involvement, number of extranodal sites). In this multivariate analysis the risk of failure and death was confirmed as significantly reduced in R-HDC group: adjusted hazard ratio (R-HDC vs HDC) was 0.56 (95% CI=0.30–1.01, p=.05) for FFS and 0.42 (95% CI=0.21–0.88, p=.02) for OS. PBSC harvest and time to engraftment were similar into two groups, with no statistically significant differences: all pts in both groups collected more than 2×106 CD34+/kg; median time to neutrophils engraftment (neutrophils 〉 500/mm3) was 9 days in R-HDC group and 10 days in HDC group and median time to platelets engraftment (platelets 〉 50000) was 15 vs 16 respectively. Conclusions: these results suggest that Rituximab as adjuvant to dose-dense and HDC may improve the outcome of DLBCL at poor prognosis. This promising new treatment strategy need to be compared to Rituximab dose-dense chemotherapy without HDC as R-CHOP14. Such a randomized trial is currently undergoing conducted by Intergruppo Italiano Linfomi.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2006
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 106, No. 11 ( 2005-11-16), p. 676-676
    Abstract: Introduction: We investigated efficacy and safety of adding Rituximab (R) to induction and intensified HDC as part of first line treatment in pts with aa-IPI at Intermediate-High (IH) or High (H) risk with B-DLCL at diagnosis. We compared two groups of similar pts enrolled in two consecutive non-randomized phase II clinical trials with up-front HDC and ASCT with or without R with identical inclusion criteria conducted by GIMURELL. Patients and methods: 118 previously untreated pts 〈 61 years with B-DLCL, stage III-IV at aaIPI IH or H risk were treated: 41 pts were enrolled into HDC trial (control group; August 1991-August 1995) and 77 pts into R-HDC trial (study group; January 2001-December 2004). Treatment in R-HDC study group consisted in an induction treatment lasting two months with four courses of R-MegaCEOP chemotherapy (R 375 mg/m2 day1, CTX 1200 mg/m2 + EPI 110 mg/m2 + VCR 1.4 mg/m2 day3 and PDN 40 mg/m2 days 3–7) every 14 days with G-CSF support; then two courses of intensified chemoimmunotherapy R-MAD (Mitoxantrone 8 mg/m2 + ARAC 2000 mg/m2/12h + Dexamethasone 4 mg/m2/12h for 3 days and R 375 mg/m2 day4 and before PBSC harvest) followed by ASCT with BEAM as conditioning regimen. Treatment in HDC control group consisted in an induction treatment lasting two months with MACOPB chemotherapy x 8 weekly infusions followed by the same intensified and HDC regimens (MADx 2 courses + BEAM and ASCT). All pts were given antibacterial and antifungal prophylaxis throughout the whole treatment. IF RT was given to areas of previous bulky disease in both trials. Results: Pts characteristics in both trials were comparable with no statistically significant differences: median age was 45 years (19–60); 51% were at H risk; 36% had bone marrow (BM) involvement, 80% had LDH level 〉 normal and 42% extranodal sites 〉 1. Complete Response at the end of the treatment was: 60 pts (78%) in R-HDC group and 28 (68%) in HDC group (p=.25). Failures (17% vs 24%) and toxic deaths (5% vs 7%) were comparable between the two groups (R-HDC vs HDC). Short-term toxicity appeared similar. Median follow-up was 27 months in study group and 69 months in control group. Two-year failure-free survival (FFS) and 2-yr overall survival (OS) rates in R-HDC group compared to HDC group were: FFS 70% vs 49% (p=.036); OS 78% vs 56% (p=.009). A better outcome for pts treated with R-HDC was confirmed in both IPI groups (IH and H risk). A Cox’s model was performed to adjust the effect of treatment for competing risk factors (age, IPI, BM involvement, number of extranodal sites). In this multivariate analysis the risk of failure and death was confirmed as significantly reduced in R-HDC group: adjusted hazard ratio (R-HDC vs HDC) was 0.54 (95% CI=0.30–0.98, p=.02) for FFS and 0.42 (95% CI=0.21–0.84, p=.03) for OS. Germinal center and non germinal center subtype analysis is ongoing in both treatment groups. Conclusions: these results suggest that the addition of Rituximab to induction and intensified chemotherapy before BEAM and ASCT is effective and safe in B-DLCL at poor prognosis improving the outcome of these pts.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2005
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 108, No. 11 ( 2006-11-16), p. 325-325
    Abstract: This is an update of the GITMO-IIL trial comparing R-HDS and CHOP-R in high-risk FL 〈 60 years. The whole patient (pt) population is now evaluable for analysis with a median follow-up of 36 months. Eligibility was based on age-adjusted IPI ≥2 (125 pts) or according to the Italian Lymphoma Intergroup score ≥3 (11 pts).136 pts were stratified according to histology (grade I or II 101, grade III 35) and randomized (68 each). Clinical features were: median age 50 yrs. (22–60), stage III–IV 98%, elevated LDH 78%, bulky disease 66%, B symptoms 47%, extranodal disease (other than BM) 45%, ECOG PS 〉 1 47%. R-HDS has been already described (Ladetto et al ASH 2005). The CHOP-R arm consisted of CHOP and Rituximab delivered sequentially as already published (Rambaldi et al Blood 2002). Cross-over was allowed for pts failing CHOP-R. Centralized minimal residual disease (MRD) analysis with the bcl-2/IgH was planned on BM cells. Analysis was “intention to treat”. Toxic deaths were 4 (2 in each arm); in addition 1 gastric cancer and 2 MDS-ANLL occurred in the R-HDS arm and 1 head and neck cancer in the CHOP-R arm. CR rates were 59% with CHOP-R and 85% with R-HDS (p 〈 0.001). Progressions were 28% with CHOP-R and 10% with R-HDS (p 〈 0.025). At 36 months EFS and PFS for CHOP-R are 36% and 38% while for R-HDS are 66% and 72% (EFS: figure 1a). The better outcome for R-HDS was seen both in grade I, II and grade III pts. OS at 36 months was 83% in each arm. Cross-over from CHOP-R to R-HDS was chosen in 67% patients failing CHOP-R with a CR rate of 73%. MRD analysis is available in 44% of pts. A stable molecular remission (MR) was achieved in 26% of CHOP-R pts and 78% of R-HDS pts (p 〈 0,001). A persistent MR was associated to an improved PFS (p 〈 0,001) (figure 1b). Interestingly, PFS of PCR+ and PCR− pts was similar, regardless of the treatment received: 3-years PFS for PCR+ pts was 25% for CHOP-R and 32% for R-HDS, while 3-years PFS for PCR− pts was 67% with CHOP-R and 76% with R-HDS). This is the first randomized study with a significant proportion of molecularly-studied pts in FL and compares for the first time an intensified versus a conventional schedule in the Rituximab age. Conclusions are: a) R-HDS induces a greater number of CRs and ensures a better EFS and PFS compared to CHOP-R in this rare and aggressive population of pts. Indeed the good OS in both arms compared to historical controls suggests that current treatments are improving the outcome of these pts; b) R-HDS induces more MRs; c) the similar outcome observed in PCR+ and PCR− pts, regardless of the treatment received, indicates that the superior outcome of R-HDS compared to CHOP-R is largely explained by the superior rate of MRs achieved with the former treatment. Figure Figure
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2006
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 122, No. 21 ( 2013-11-15), p. 551-551
    Abstract: Introduction A randomized multicenter study of 134 Follicular Lymphoma (FL) patients, selected for age less than 60 yrs. and poor prognostic features according to age-adjusted IPI (2-3) and IIL-score (3 or greater) was conducted between March 2000 and May 2005, among 30 Italian Centers. The study compared efficacy and tolerability of CHOP-R vs. R-HDS with autograft as primary treatment in poor-risk FL. Initial results have been already reported (Ladetto M et al, Blood 2008), showing superior disease control with R-HDS without any survival advantage. We have recently updated the long-term outcome and the results at long-term are here presented at a median follow-up of 9.5 yrs. Patients and Methods Of the original 134 randomized patients, the long-term outcome has been updated for 125 patients, 61 of CHOP-R and 64 of R-HDS arms. Clinical characteristics at study entry and treatment schedules have been already reported. Briefly, the main features of the updated patients included: median age 51 yrs. (22-60), M/F ratio 74/51, aaIPI 2-3 90%, FLIPI 〉 2 (retrospectively assigned) 60%, high LDH 49%, bulky disease 62%, B-symptoms 45%, BM involvement 86%. Clinical characteristics were balanced among the two arms. Treatment schedule consisted of: i. standard arm: 6 courses of cyclo-phosphamide/doxorubicin/vincristine/prednisone followed by 4-weekly rituximab courses (CHOP-R); ii. experimental arm: rituximab-supplemented high-dose sequential chemotherapy with autografting (R-HDS). The analysis was intention to treat with event-free survival as the primary endpoint. Minimal residual disease was evaluated post treatment in 58 patients with a bcl-2/IgH MBR or mcr translocation confirmed at diagnosis by nested PCR. The trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as no. NCT00435955. The long-term outcome has been updated in July 2013 by 28 out of 30 participating Centers accounting for 125 patients (93% of the whole series). Results Complete remission (CR) was achieved by 88 (70.4%) patients, including 35 (57%) with CHOP-R and 53 (83%) with R-HDS (p 〈 .001); in addition, 37 out of 58 (64%) patients achieved a Molecular Remission (MR). At a median follow-up (MFU) of 9.5 yrs., 88 patients (70.4%) are alive. Overall, 19 patients died for lymphoma progression (11 in the CHOP-R, 8 in the R-HDS arms), there were nine deaths for secondary malignancy (3 in the CHOP-R, 6 in the R-HDS arms), nine more patients died for other causes, including four early toxic deaths. The overall survival projection for the whole series is 78% and 70% at 5 and 10 yrs., respectively. As shown in Figure 1, there were no main differences in the long-term OS between the two arms, with 5 and 10 yrs projections respectively of 75% and 70% for CHOP-R and 81% and 70% for R-HDS (p=0.96). Response to primary treatment had a major impact on the OS, with 5 and 10 yr survival projections respectively of 90% and 80% for patients achieving CR, and of 49 and 43 for those with less than CR (p 〈 .001) (Figure 2A). Similarly, MR achievement was associated with prolonged overall survival, with 5 and 10 yr survival projections respectively of 89% and 83% for patients with PCR-ve on BM cells, and of 76 and 57 for those with persistent PCR-positivity (p = .03) (Figure 2B). Conclusion The long-term follow-up of the randomized CHOP-R vs. R-HDS trial indicate that: i. poor risk FL may now experience a prolonged survival, with approximately 70% of patients alive at 10 yrs., due to the combined efficacy of both primary chemo-immunotherapy and salvage treatments; ii. the superior disease control of R-HDS compared to CHOP-R does not translate in any survival advantage, with analogous OS regardless of which treatment is used; iii. also in FL like in other lymphoproliferative malignancies, achieving CR and MR is crucial not only for the disease control but also for long-term overall survival; iv. lymphoma progression remains the major cause of death, while secondary neoplasms, in particular secondary leukemias represent the second cause of treatment failure. Thus, efforts are still needed in order to increase the anti-tumor efficacy while reducing any potential late effect in treatment options for FL. Disclosures: Tarella: Roche Co.: support and honoraria for Conference participation Other. Ladetto:Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2013
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 5
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 106, No. 11 ( 2005-11-16), p. 2738-2738
    Abstract: Introduction: Rituximab is a monoclonal antibody commonly used in B-DLCL both in salvage regimens and in combination with first-line chemotherapy. Some studies have reported delays in neutrophil or platelet engraftment after ASCT in patients treated with high dose chemotherapy and Rituximab prior to ASCT. We investigated the effect of adding Rituximab prior to ASCT on peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) harvest, time to engraftment and short-term toxicity post ASCT. Patients and methods: We analyze stem cell mobilization, engraftment (median time to absolute neutrophil count & gt; 500/mm3 for three consecutive days and platelets & gt; 50.000) and short-term toxicity after ASCT ( & lt; 30 days) in two groups of patients affected by B-DLCL at diagnosis enrolled into two consecutive trials with or without Rituximab in combination with chemotherapy. All patients were & lt; 61 years with B-DLCL at age-adjusted IPI Intermediate-High (IH) or High (H) risk and/or with bone marrow (BM) involvement. Group A: an intensified chemoimmunotherapy regimen R-MegaCEOP (Rituximab 375 mg/m2 day 1, CTX 1200 mg/m2 + EPI 110 mg/m2 + VCR 1.4 mg/m2 day 3 and PDN 40 mg/m2 days 3 to 7) every 14 days with G-CSF support for 4 courses; patients in complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) received two courses of intensified chemotherapy R-MAD (Mitoxantrone 8 mg/m2 + ARA-C 2000 mg/m2/12h + Dexamethasone 4 mg/m2/12h days 1 to 3 and Rituximab 375 mg/m2 day 4 and before PBSC harvest). Group B: MACOP-B 8 weeks + 2 courses of MAD (in patients in CR or PR) without Rituximab. Both groups were given ASCT with BEAM as conditioning regimen. Clinical characteristics at diagnosis were well balanced between the two groups. Results: 68 patients are evaluable: 35 pts in group A (with Rituximab) and 33 pts in group B (without Rituximab). All patients in both groups collected more than 2 x 106 CD34+ cell/kg. Median CD34+ cell/kg in group A was 13 x 106 (range 0-37) compared with 41 x 106 in group B (range 0–253) with no statistically significant difference. Median time to neutrophils engraftment after ASCT was similar in the two groups: 9 days in group A and 10 days in group B. No delay in the platelet recovery was observed in patients treated with chemoimmunotherapy: 15 days in group A vs 16 days in group B. Few severe early toxicities (WHO grade 3–4) were reported with no differences between group A vs B: severe mucositis in 11 pts vs 23 pts, gastrointestinal in 6 pts vs 4 pts. Severe infections occurred in 10 patients: group A 6 patients (2 Gram+ sepsis, 1 Gram- sepsis, 1 FUO, 2 bacterial pneumonia); group B 4 patients (2 FUO, 1 bacterial and 1 viral pneumonia). One patient in group A died of bacterial pneumonia after ASCT. Conclusions: Treatment with Rituximab may be safely included in a pre-ASCT high dose chemotherapy regimen with no delay in stem cell harvest, engraftment and without increased early toxicity after ASCT.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2005
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 6
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 110, No. 11 ( 2007-11-16), p. 20-20
    Abstract: Background. A randomised trial has been performed among several GITMO/IIL italian centers, comparing Rituximab-supplemented High-Dose Sequential Chemotherapy (R-HDS) and CHOP-R in high-risk FL & lt;60 yrs. The updated results are here presented, after a median follow-up of 50 months. Patients (pts) and Methods. Eligibility was based on age-adjusted IPI & gt;=2 (125 pts) or on the IIL score & gt;=3 (11 pts). 136 pts were randomized (68/arm). Main clinical features were: median age 51 yrs. (22–59), stage III–IV 98%, elevated LDH 59%, bulky disease 56%, B symptoms 47%, extranodal disease other than bone marrow (BM) 31%, PS & gt;1 (ECOG) 60%. Both R-HDS and CHOP-R have been already described (Ladetto et al ASH 2005, Rambaldi et al Blood 2000). Cross-over was allowed for pts failing CHOP-R. Centralized minimal residual disease (MRD) analysis with the bcl-2/IgH was performed on BM samples. Analysis was intention to treat. Results. Early toxic deaths were 5 (2 in CHOP-R, 3 in R-HDS); CR rates were 61% with CHOP-R and 85% with R-HDS (p & lt;0.001). At four years EFS and PFS are 32% and 33% for CHOP-R, and 64% and 76% for R-HDS (p & lt;0.001). Despite a better EFS, OS is not different in the two arms (82% CHOP-R and 79% R-HDS). One fatal secondary myelodysplastic syndrome occurred in the CHOP-R arm and five (three fatal) in the R-HDS arm with a cumulative incidence at four years of 3.3% and 7.9% respectively. A stable molecular remission (MR) (achieved in 44% of CHOP-R and 80% of R-HDS pts) (p & lt;0,001) was associated with an improved PFS (22% vs 78% at four years) (p & lt;0,001) and proved the strongest outcome predictor for EFS and PFS by multivariate analysis (Hazard Ratio: 3.98 and 3.83, respectively). Interestingly, the PFS of PCR-negative pts was similar in the two arms, as well as that of PCR-positive pts. Of 39 patients with relapsed or refractory disease after CHOP-R 28 were crossed to R-HDS (71%). Reasons for not undergoing cross-over were: limited relapse in 4, co-morbidities in 2, refusal in 2, other causes in 3. Overall CR rate for second line treatment after CHOP-R failure was 77% (86% with R-HDS and 54% with other therapy). At a median follow-up of 30 months the three-year EFS of patients undergoing salvage R-HDS is 70%. Conclusions: In high-risk FL: a) first-line R-HDS ensures better EFS and PFS and superior molecular outcome than CHOP-R; b) pts undergoing salvage R-HDS have an excellent clinical outcome; c) the long-term OS is markedly improved compared to the pre-rituximab era, with no difference between CHOP-R and R-HDS; d) both the high efficacy as salvage treatment and the potential side effects suggest that the ideal positioning of R-HDS-like treatments is beyond first line treatment, for relapsed or refractory disease; e) a PCR-negative status is the most important prognostic factor regardless of treatment received and pts with persistent PCR-positivity might potentially be considered for specific experimental intervention.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2007
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 7
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 106, No. 11 ( 2005-11-16), p. 675-675
    Abstract: Introduction. HDS with autografting has proved to be effective (Corradini et al, J Clin Oncol 2004) and feasible at the multicenter level in FL (Ladetto et al, Blood 2002); in addition, it can be successfully combined with Rituximab (R-HDS) (Magni et al, Blood 2000). Aim of this trial was to compare R-HDS with Rituximab-supplemented CHOP (R-CHOP) in poor risk FL patients (pts) younger than 60 years. Patients and methods. Between January 2000 and March 2005, 136 patients have been randomized (68 in each arm). Patients were stratified according to histology (grade I or II 101, grade III 35). Patients were eligible if they had an age-adjusted IPI ≥2 (125 pts) or, in the absence of this criterion if they had three or more adverse parameters according to the Italian Lymphoma Intergroup score (11 pts). Clinical features were: median age 50 yrs. (22–60), stage III-IV 98%, elevated LDH 78%, bulky disease 66%, B symptoms 47%, extranodal disease (other than BM) 45%, leukemic disease 11%, ECOG PS & gt;1 47%. R-HDS consisted of: i. 2 APO and 2 DHAP courses; ii. sequential administration of Etoposide (2 g/sqm), 2 Rituximab, Cyclophosphamide (Cy) (7g/sqm) with PBPC collection (in vivo-purged with two Rituximab on day 1 and 11 post Cy); iii. Mitoxantrone (60mg/sqm) + L-Pam (180mg/sqm) with autografting (5–8x106 CD34+ cells/kg). R-CHOP consisted of 6 CHOP courses followed by 4–6 doses of Rituximab as originally reported (Rambaldi et al, Blood 2002). Cross-over was allowed for patients failing R-CHOP. Minimal residual disease analysis with the bcl-2/IgH was planned on BM cells. Patients were assessed on an “intention to treat” basis. Results. The two treatments arms were well balanced for all the previously described clinical parameters. 68% patients were able to conclude R-CHOP (failure due to progression 29% and toxicity 3%) and 78% R-HDS (failure due to progression 9%, toxicity 5%, poor mobilization 4 %, refusal 4%). Toxic deaths were 4 (2 in each arms); in addition 1 gastric cancer and 1 AML occurred in the R-HDS group. Progressions and non-responders were 35% in the R-CHOP arm and 13% in the R-HDS (p & lt;0.05) with 53% and 82% CR rates, respectively. Current median follow-up is 24 months. Event-free survival (EFS) at 24 months is 41% for the R-CHOP arm and 66% for the R-HDS arm (p & lt; .001). At present there is no difference in terms of OS. We currently have data on salvage treatment in 22 patients failing R-CHOP: 16 of them were treated with R-HDS, with 10 achieving CR. A molecular marker was available in 72% of patients. PCR results at follow-up are available in 27 patients. Molecular remission, defined as two PCR-negative BM samples taken at six months intervals, was observed in 54% of R-CHOP and 77% of R-HDS patients. Conclusions. R-HDS induces a greater number of CR and ensures a better EFS compared to R-CHOP in this rare and extremely aggressive population of high-risk FL patients. It is unknown if these results reflect a peculiar behaviour of high-risk patients or can be relevant for all younger FCL patients with advanced disease requiring cytoreductive treatments.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2005
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 8
    In: Clinical Lymphoma, Elsevier BV, Vol. 5, No. 1 ( 2004-6), p. 50-55
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1526-9655
    Language: English
    Publisher: Elsevier BV
    Publication Date: 2004
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2145066-3
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 9
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 104, No. 11 ( 2004-11-16), p. 1320-1320
    Abstract: Introduction: Elderly patients (pts) with FL do worse than younger ones and the aim of the treatment is usually palliation rather than cure. In order to outline a treatment plan specifically devised for elderly pts with a reduced amount of chemotherapy, we investigated the efficacy and safety of a brief chemo-immunotherapy FND plus Rituximab. Patients and methods: from March 1999 to March 2003, 80 elderly pts (age 〉 60) with advanced stage FL at diagnosis were enrolled. Treatment plan was: 4 courses of FND (Fludarabine 25 mg/m2 days 1–3, Mitoxantrone 10 mg/m2 day 1 and Dexamethasone 20 mg days 1–3) followed by 4 Rituximab infusions at 375 mg/m2/week; pts in partial remission received 2 further FND and 2 Rituximab infusions. PCR molecular monitoring for the presence of IgH/Bcl2 and/or Ig heavy chain gene rearrangement was performed at the beginning of the treatment, after FND, after Rituximab and during follow-up time on bone marrow (BM) samples. Results: median age was 66 (range 60–78); 42 males and 38 females; 16% had stage II, 12% stage III and 72% stage IV disease; 61% had BM involvement; 41% had bulky disease and 24% were at high risk according to IPI score. PCR molecular analysis was performed in 46 pts at diagnosis: 63% were Bcl2 rearranged and 37% were not; IgH rearrangement was detected in 24% of Bcl2 negative pts. Up to date, 70 pts are evaluable. Overall response at the end of treatment was achieved in 63 pts (90%) with 58 pts (83%) in complete remission (CR) and 5 pts (7%) in partial remission (PR). Six pts (9%) did not respond and one patient (1%) died of neutropenic sepsis during a FND course. The addition of Rituximab allowed to increase CR rate from 44% (31 pts) after FND to 83% (58 pts); 73% of responding pts did so with a brief treatment program (4 FND + 4 Rituximab). Patients with adverse prognostic features at diagnosis responded as well as those with more favorable ones with no significant differences in CR rates: BM+ 89%, BM- 79%; low IPI 83%, high IPI 82%; Bulky+ 85%, Bulky- 79%; stage II 90%, III 87%, IV 84%. A thorough molecular analysis is ongoing; to date a molecular marker was detectable in 26 pts. After FND 9/26 pts (35%) did not show anymore BM molecular disease, while PCR negativity was achieved in 23/26 pts (88%) after Rituximab treatment. With a median follow-up of 30 months, 3-yr failure free survival was 50% for the whole series of pts. Failures were observed more frequently in PCR+ pts: all 3 PCR+ pts failed compared to only 7/23 PCR- pts (p=.01). The toxicity was mild with grade 3–4 neutropenia reported in 22% of FND courses, but only 3 pts developed grade 3–4 infections. The whole program was performed in an outpatient setting. Rituximab toxicity was as expected. Conclusions: a brief course of chemo-immunotherapy is able to achieve high clinical and molecular response rates in elderly pts with low toxicity. The sequential use of FND and Rituximab induces a CR rate 〉 80% also in unfavorable subsets of pts. The achievement of PCR negative status correlates with a lower risk of failure.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2004
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 10
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 114, No. 22 ( 2009-11-20), p. 882-882
    Abstract: Abstract 882 Background. Three consecutive trials have been performed in Italy over the last 18 years, to verify the efficacy of the use of High-Dose Sequential Chemotherapy (HDS) and autograft as first-line therapy for high-risk Follicular Lymphoma (FL) 〈 60 yrs. We present the last update with 10 yrs. of median follow-up. Patients and Methods. The HDS regimen has been previously described (Corradini P et al, Blood 1997; Tarella C et al, Stem Cells 1998). Briefly, it consists of intensive debulking (2 APO courses +/− 2 DHAP courses) followed by the high-dose phase, including the sequential administration of etoposide (2 g/sqm), methotrexate (MTX) (8 g/sqm) and cyclophosphamide (CY) (7 g/sqm). PBPC collection is scheduled after the last course to maximize the “in vivo purging effect” operated by high-dose chemotherapy. The final autologous stem cell transplant (auto-SCT) conclude the program, two conditioning regimen have been employed, either the BEAM schedule or the Mitoxantrone/L-PAM combination. In the most recent schedule, Rituximab was included in place of MTX. In details, 2 Rituximab doses were administered before CY, after CY and after auto-SCT, with the aim of further improving disease control and the in-vivo purging. The first trial was a single Center phase II study exploring both feasibility and efficacy of the HDS program as first line therapy in advanced-stage indolent lymphoma (1991-1998, 26 FL patients) (Tarella C et al, Leukemia 2000); a subsequent multicenter phase 2 trial was then started at national level (GITMO, Gruppo Italiano Trapianto Midollo Osseo), to verify the efficacy of HDS in advanced-stage FL in a multicenter setting (1996-1999, 92 patients) (Ladetto M et al, Blood 2002); lastly, a muticenter phase 3 study was performed together with GITMO and IIL (Intergruppo Italiano Linfomi) Centers, comparing Rituximab supplemented HDS (R-HDS) vs. CHOP-R in aaIPI 2-3 FL (2000-2005, 68 patients in the R-HDS arm) (Ladetto M et al, Blood 2008). Overall, 186 patients have been treated with HDS, updated results have been obtained for 168 of them. They all had a diagnosis of FL (grade 1-2: 71%) and always presented with advanced stage, their median age was 48 yrs., LDH was high in 48%, BM involved in 77%. Results. 140 patients out of 168 (83%) attained Complete Remission (CR); there were 6 early toxic deaths (3.6%); 8 patients had Partial Remission (4.8%) and 14 had no response (8.3%), soon followed by disease progression. So far 14 patients (8.3%) developed secondary myelodysplasia or acute leukemia (sMDS/AL), and 7 patients (4.2%) had a secondary solid neoplasia. As of July 2008, 50 of 168 patients died, due to: i. early toxicity (6 patients); ii. disease progression (25 patients, 15%); iii. second neoplasia (12 patients, 7.1%); iv. other causes (7 patients, 4.2%). Thus, at a median follow-up of 10 yrs., 118 patients (70.2%) are alive, and 80 (48%) are in their 1st continuous CR (CCR), and most of them are also in molecular remission. The actuarial OS and DFS curves are reported in Figures 1A and B. The latest relapse has been recorded at 8 yrs since HDS. So far, 50 patients (30%) are presently in their 1st CCR between 8 and 16 yrs after HDS. Conclusions. i. advanced stage FL treated upfront with the intensive HDS regimen had a prolonged survival, with median survival not yet reached after 10 yrs. of follow-up; ii. main causes of death were disease progression and both early and late toxic side effects; iii. approximately half of the patients are long-term survivors without any sign of disease recurrence. This suggest that a prolonged PFS and possibly the disease eradication should be pursued also in advanced-stage FL. Future studies will verify whether these therapeutic goals may be achieved with chemo-immunotherapeutic schemes at least as effective but less toxic and laborious than HDS program with autograft. Disclosures: Tarella: Roche: Honoraria, research financial support. Ladetto:Roche: research financial support. Vitolo:Roche: Lecture fees. Rambaldi:Roche: Honoraria. Corradini:Roche: Honoraria.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2009
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...