Abstract: Background : High grade B cell lymphoma (HGBL) either Not Otherwise Specified (NOS) or either Double Hit (DH MYC/BCL2 or DH MYC/BCL6) or Triple Hit (TH) have been considered as separate entities from Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL) NOS in the 2016 WHO classification. Until now, treatment of these particularly aggressive histological sybtypes remains unclear and most of patients (pts) still have a poor outcome because of chemoresistance or early relapse. Except IPI score, prognosis factors are not completely clarified. Since few years, treatment with Chimeric Antigen Receptor T (CAR-T) cells has changed the prognosis of relapsed refractory DLBCL and could represent a promising therapeutic approach - early in the course of the disease - to improve survival of HGBL. The aim of the present study is to describe a « real life » cohort of pts treated in our institution and to evaluate the prognostic impact of clinical, histological, genetic and imaging characteristics and treatment. Methods : We collected data of 45 pts diagnosed between January 2009 and October 2020. BCL2, BCL6 and MYC break were analyzed by Interphase Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization (FISH) with break-apart probes. When MYC was rearranged, MYC partner gene was analyzed with double fusion probes (MYC/IgH, MYC/IgL, MYC/IgK). Total metabolic tumor volume (TMTV) was calculated using fully automatic segmentation of lymphoma lesions by an artificial intelligence (P. Blanc-Durand, Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging, 2021). All pts were treated with rituximab R-CHOP/CHOP-like regimens. Treatment was reinforced (intensive regimen) with high dose methotrexate (14 pts treated with RCOPADM and one with R-ACVBP) when they were considered fit enough. Autologous stem cell transplantation at 1st relapse was performed in 3 pts and 5 pts were treated with CAR-T cells at 2 nd relapse. Results : Baseline characteristics were as follows: median age 60 y (28-80), IPI 3-5 : n=33 (73%), CNS localization : n=8/42 (19%), bone marrow involvement : n=10/34 (22%). Twenty-seven pts were DH lymphoma (MYC/BCL2: 18; MYC/BCL6: 9), 8 patients were TH-lymphoma and 10 were HGBL-NOS. MYC rearrangement was detected in 40 cases with an immunoglobulin partner gene (IgH, IgL or IgK) in 14 (52%) of 27 evaluable cases. TMTV was calculated for 29 pts with a median TMTV of 1019 ml (2-4536 ml). Fifteen pts were treated with an intensive regimen. With a median follow-up of alive pts of 17 months, 2-y progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 42% [26.4 ; 56.8] and 62% [43.7 ; 75.5] respectively. PFS and OS were significantly affected by IPI 3-5 (PFS: p= 0.006, HR=3.37 ; OS: p= 0.01, HR=3.71) and CNS involvement (PFS : p=0.006, HR=6.93 ; OS: p=0.006, HR=7.44). TMTV & gt;1000ml (PFS: p=0.051, HR 2.99 ; OS: p=0.033, HR=4.13) was associated with a significantly inferior OS. Prognosis of HGBL DH/TH and HGBL-NOS was similar (PFS: p= 0.89, HR=0.93 ; OS: p=0.64, HR=1.32). Immunoglobulin as MYC partner gene had no significant impact on prognosis (PFS: p=0.47, HR=1.48 ; OS: p=0.32, HR=1.73). Intensive regimens did not improve significantly prognosis (PFS: p=0.26, HR=1.71 ; OS: p=0.08, HR=2.86). Conclusion: This monocentric study confirms previous reports on the poor prognosis of HGBL (DH/TH and NOS) especially for patients for both high IPI or high TMTV and in case of initial CNS involvement. We confirm that intensive regimen don't improve prognosis supporting the need of alternative strategies incorporating bispecific monoclonal antibodies or consolidative CAR-T cells in very high risk pts. Disclosures Roulin: Janssen: Other: Travel and meetings. Lemonnier: Institut Roche: Research Funding; Gilead: Other: travel grant. Le Bras: Novartis: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria, Research Funding; Kite Gilead: Honoraria; Celgene BMS: Research Funding. Gaulard: Innate Pharma: Research Funding; Sanofi: Research Funding; Alderaan: Research Funding; Gilead: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria. Haioun: Miltenyi: Honoraria, Research Funding; Gilead: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Honoraria, Research Funding; Servier: Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding.

Abstract: Introduction: Central nervous system (CNS) relapse in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is uncommon but is associated with poor outcomes. In selected high risk patients (pts), high dose methotrexate (HDMTX) is often used as CNS prophylaxis with frontline (1L) DLBCL therapy despite uncertain efficacy, optimum dose and timing of delivery. A recent UK study (Wilson et al 2020) showed that intercalated HDMTX (i-HDMTX) was associated with increased toxicity and R-CHOP delays compared to end of treatment (EOT) delivery. Although hypothesis generating, the study size was insufficient to determine whether EOT was non-inferior in terms of CNS relapse risk. Methods: We conducted an international, multicentre retrospective analysis of consecutive DLBCL or high grade BCL pts between 2007-20 from 47 centers in Europe, Australia and N. America. Pts were included if they received R-CHOP or R-CHOP-like 1L therapy with curative intent as well as HDMTX CNS prophylaxis (≥1 cycle). Concurrent intrathecal (IT) prophylaxis was permitted. Pts with known CNS involvement at baseline and those treated with more intensive protocols (e.g. R-DA-EPOCH) were excluded. i-HDMTX was defined as any pt receiving a HD-MTX cycle before the final R-CHOP cycle. CNS relapse events were excluded if occurring after first systemic lymphoma relapse/progression. Time to event endpoints were measured from diagnosis to first event or censor and analysed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression methods. Time to CNS relapse was analysed using competing risk Fine and Gray method (for death and non-synchronous systemic relapse). To mitigate for possible immortality bias in the EOT arm, a landmark analysis for pts alive and free from progression at 6 months was conducted. We aimed to exclude a 5% difference in 2-year (y) CNS relapse rates. Results: 1,384 pts were analysed. 750 received i-HDMTX and 634 received EOT HDMTX. Key baseline characteristics are summarised in Table 1. Median follow up was 37.9 months. 44.2% had high CNS IPI (4-6) with no significant difference between i-HDMTX and EOT groups (45.1% vs 43.1%, p=0.087). ≥2 cycles of HDMTX were used in 86.6% with no difference between groups (85.6% vs 87.9%, p=0.22). Concurrent IT prophylaxis use was higher for EOT pts (55.6% vs 38.1% p & lt;0.0001). 78 CNS relapses (42 i-HDMTX, 36 EOT) were observed: parenchymal in 41 (53%), parenchymal and leptomeningeal in 16 (21%) and isolated leptomeningeal in 21 (27%). There was no significant difference in 2y CNS relapse rates between i-HDMTX and EOT in all pts: 5.2% vs 3.9%, adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 0.92 (95% CI 0.58-1.47), p=0.74, 2y difference -0.2% (-2.0-2.5) or landmark analysis: 2.8% vs 4.1%, HR: 0.93 (0.56-1.55), p=0.79, 2y difference: -0.3% (-1.8-2.2%) (Fig 1a/b). Exploratory analyses focusing on pts with isolated CNS relapse (n=57) demonstrated similar results (2y rates 3.6% vs 3.0%, p=0.99). On multivariable analysis (MVA) of risk factors for CNS relapse, renal/adrenal involvement was the only variable associated with increased CNS relapse risk (adjusted HR 1.74 (1.03-2.92), p=0.038). Notably, IT prophylaxis was not associated with reduction in CNS relapse. In 600 high CNS IPI (4-6) pts, there was no difference in CNS relapse risk between i-HD-MTX and EOT (3y rates 9.4% vs 8.6%, HR 0.92 (95% CI 0.52-1.62)). In a composite high risk group including CNS IPI 4-6 and/or any of the following: ≥3 extranodal sites, renal, adrenal, testicular or breast involvement (n=885) there was no difference in 3y CNS relapse rates between groups (i-HDMTX 7.6% vs EOT 7.4%, HR 0.94 (0.58-1.53)). Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in the i-HDMTX and EOT groups were as follows: 3y PFS 70.7% vs 76.7% (p=0.098), 3y OS 79.9% vs 87.0% (p=0.0016). However, there were no PFS/OS differences between groups on landmark analysis (n=1259) (Fig 1c). On analysis of pts experiencing ≥1 R-CHOP delay of ≥7 days, use of i-HDMTX was the only factor on MVA associated with increased delays (p & lt;0.0001). Discussion: We found no evidence that EOT delivery increases CNS relapse risk when compared to i-HDMTX in this large analysis of pts treated with 1L R-CHOP. Delays to R-CHOP cycles were increased with i-HDMTX. Findings in a high risk subgroup were unchanged and rates of CNS relapse in this HDMTX treated group were similar to published comparable high risk cohorts receiving infrequent CNS prophylaxis. Where HDMTX prophylaxis is used, delivery could be deferred until R-CHOP completion. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Wilson: Takeda: Other: Conference fees; Janssen: Other: Conference fees; Abbvie: Honoraria. Eyre: Janssen: Honoraria; Secura Bio: Consultancy, Honoraria; Gilead/KITE: Honoraria, Other: Travel support for conferences, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel to conferences; AstraZeneca: Honoraria, Research Funding; Loxo Oncology: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte: Consultancy; Beigene: Honoraria, Research Funding. Ahearne: Pfizer: Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria; Roche: Honoraria. Schorb: Roche: Research Funding; Riemser Pharma GmbH: Honoraria, Research Funding; AbbVie: Research Funding. Ku: Antegene: Consultancy; Roche: Consultancy; Genor Biopharma: Consultancy. Narkhede: Genentech/Roche: Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding; Genmab: Other: Medical writing support, Research Funding; TG Therapeautics: Research Funding. Lewis: AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria, Patents & Royalties; Novartis: Patents & Royalties; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria. Øvlisen: Abbvie: Other: Travel expenses. Santarsiere: Janssen: Honoraria. Shah: Abbvie, Janssen and Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Roulin: Janssen: Other: Travel and meetings. Manos: Bristol-Myers Squibb: Other: Travel and meetings. Hamad: Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Lopez-Garcia: Roche: Other: Speaker Honoraria, Travel and accommodation grants; Janssen: Other: Speaker Honoraria, Advisor, Travel and accommodation grants, Research Funding; Abbvie: Other: Speaker Honoraria, Advisor, Travel and accommodation grants; Celgene: Other: Speaker Honoraria; Fresenius: Other: Speaker Honoraria; Novonordisk: Other: Speaker Honoraria. El-Galaly: ROCHE Ltd: Ended employment in the past 24 months; Abbvie: Other: Speakers fee. Cheah: Beigene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: advisory; AbbVie: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: advisory; Loxo/Lilly: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: advisory; TG Therapeutics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: advisory; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: advisory and travel expenses, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: advisory; MSD: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: advisory, Research Funding; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: advisory; Ascentage pharma: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: advisory. Ferreri: Gilead, Novartis, Juno, PletixaPharm, Roche, Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS, Beigene, Pharmacyclics, Hutchison Medipharma, Amgen, Genmab, ADC Therapeutics, Gilead, Novartis, Pfizer: Research Funding. Fox: Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Other: speaker fees. Cwynarski: Gilead: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Incyte: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Atara: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy, Other: travel to scientific conferences, Speakers Bureau; Kite, a Gilead Company: Consultancy, Other: travel to scientific conferences, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Other: travel to scientific conferences; Roche: Consultancy, Other: travel to scientific conferences, Speakers Bureau; BMS/Celgene: Other: travel to scientific conferences. McKay: Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Honoraria, Other: Travel Support; KITE: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel Support; Janssen: Honoraria, Other: Travel Support; Beigene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS/Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Abstract: Climate change affects timing of reproduction in many bird species, but few studies have investigated its influence on annual reproductive output. Here, we assess changes in the annual production of young by female breeders in 201 populations of 104 bird species (N = 745,962 clutches) covering all continents between 1970 and 2019. Overall, average offspring production has declined in recent decades, but considerable differences were found among species and populations. A total of 56.7% of populations showed a declining trend in offspring production (significant in 17.4%), whereas 43.3% exhibited an increase (significant in 10.4%). The results show that climatic changes affect offspring production through compounded effects on ecological and life history traits of species. Migratory and larger-bodied species experienced reduced offspring production with increasing temperatures during the chick-rearing period, whereas smaller-bodied, sedentary species tended to produce more offspring. Likewise, multi-brooded species showed increased breeding success with increasing temperatures, whereas rising temperatures were unrelated to reproductive success in single-brooded species. Our study suggests that rapid declines in size of bird populations reported by many studies from different parts of the world are driven only to a small degree by changes in the production of young.

Abstract: e19538 Background: Venetoclax (VEN) is an orally bioavailable small molecule inhibitor of the anti-apoptotic protein BCL-2 and has been shown to have efficacy against myeloma (MM), particularly in patients that harbor t(11;14). Approximately, 50% of AL amyloidosis patients will exhibit t(11;14) making VEN an attractive therapeutic option. Methods: We here report the results of a retrospective analysis of a monocentric series of refractory/relapsed (R/R) patients (pts) heavily pretreated with cardiac AL amyloidosis treated in a french academic center. VEN was given daily alone or in association with dexamethasone (DEX), with or without bortezomib (BTZ). Treatment was planned to be administered until progression. Results: Between February 2017 and January 2019, 7 consecutive R/R pts have been treated. All had received previous BTZ and daratumumab (DARA) containing regimen. Baseline characteristics were: median age: 72.7 years (range 40-84), Mayo Clinic stage: stage I in 2 pts, stage II in 3 and stage IIIA in 2. All patients but one had in addition to cardiac deposit, systemic involvement including kidney, joint, neurologic, gastro-intestinal tract, lymph node and muscle. All but one pts were refractory to their last treatment consisting of DARA-DEX with or without IMID. The t(11;14) translocation was present in 5 pts, absent in 1 and undetermined in 1 pts. Two pts had concomitant MM at diagnosis. Median number of previous line treatments was 4 (3-5). Five patients received VEN- BTZ- DEX as described in MM (PMID: 28847998), 1 with DEX and 1 as monotherapy. Five pts received 400 mg/d, one 200 mg/d and one 100 mg/d. Median duration of treatment was 76 days (30-713). All patients but one are still on treatment. One patient treated with 400 mg/d had a dose reduction to 100 mg/d due to grade 2 diarrhea. Four patients received at least 2 cycles and were evaluable for response. One 84 y old patient in stable disease after 1 cycle died due to influenza infection. 2 patients received only one cycle of treatment. Hematological complete response occurred in 2/4 (50%) patients, after 63 and 27 days. Interestingly, responses were sustained as the 2 responders were still on therapy after 76 and 713 days. This later patient, refractory to 2 previous lines had a cardiac and neurologic response. The 2 responding patients had proven t(11:14). Conclusions: On this limited series of heavily pretreated patients with R/R AL cardiac amyloidosis VEN used as a single agent or in combination can induce prolonged response and seems a promising drug with an acceptable safety profile in patients with t(11;14).

Abstract: Prophylactic high-dose methotrexate (HD-MTX) is often used for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients at high risk of central nervous system (CNS) relapse, despite limited evidence demonstrating efficacy or the optimal delivery method. We conducted a retrospective, international analysis of 1384 patients receiving HD-MTX CNS prophylaxis either intercalated (i-HD-MTX) (n = 749) or at the end (n = 635) of R-CHOP/R-CHOP-like therapy (EOT). There were 78 CNS relapses (3-year rate 5.7%), with no difference between i-HD-MTX and EOT: 5.7% vs 5.8%, P = .98; 3-year difference: 0.04% (−2.0% to 3.1%). Conclusions were unchanged on adjusting for baseline prognostic factors or on 6-month landmark analysis (n = 1253). In patients with a high CNS international prognostic index (n = 600), the 3-year CNS relapse rate was 9.1%, with no difference between i-HD-MTX and EOT. On multivariable analysis, increasing age and renal/adrenal involvement were the only independent risk factors for CNS relapse. Concurrent intrathecal prophylaxis was not associated with a reduction in CNS relapse. R-CHOP delays of ≥7 days were significantly increased with i-HD-MTX vs EOT, with 308 of 1573 (19.6%) i-HD-MTX treatments resulting in a delay to subsequent R-CHOP (median 8 days). Increased risk of delay occurred in older patients when delivery was later than day 10 in the R-CHOP cycle. In summary, we found no evidence that EOT delivery increases CNS relapse risk vs i-HD-MTX. Findings in high-risk subgroups were unchanged. Rates of CNS relapse in this HD-MTX-treated cohort were similar to comparable cohorts receiving infrequent CNS prophylaxis. If HD-MTX is still considered for certain high-risk patients, delivery could be deferred until R-CHOP completion.