GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
Material
Language
Subjects(RVK)
  • 1
    In: Open Forum Infectious Diseases, Oxford University Press (OUP), Vol. 7, No. Supplement_1 ( 2020-12-31), p. S256-S256
    Abstract: Our objective was to describe the clinical course, risk factors and outcomes of patients infected with COVID-19 around the globe comparing cancer to non-cancer patients. Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study of COVID-19 confirmed cases through an international multicenter collaboration including 17 centers around the world including the United States of America, Brazil, Europe, Far East, Middle East and Australia from January to date. We evaluated the patients’ clinical characteristics, clinical course of the disease, hospitalization and outcome. Death was considered to be COVID-associated if it occurred within 30 days from the time of diagnosis. Results Preliminary data on 571 patients included 186 cancer patients and 385 non-cancer patients. Cancer patients were more likely to have COPD and received steroids but were less likely to have COVID-related symptoms compared to non-cancer patients (84% vs 97%, p & lt; 0.0001). The rate of pneumonia with hypoxia, non-invasive ventilation and mechanical ventilation were similar in both groups. Despite the fact that hospital admissions were significantly higher in non-cancer patients (70% vs 56%, p & lt; 0.001), promising antiviral and immune-related therapy including remdesivir, convalescent plasma and immunomodulators were more commonly used in cancer patients compared to non-cancer patients (P=0.04). Cancer patients had a higher COVID-associated mortality rate compared to non-cancer patients (20% vs 11%, p=0.006). Conclusion Despite the fact that cancer patients received more frequent antiviral and immune-related therapy, the mortality rate among cancer patients was significantly higher than non-cancer patients. Disclosures Roy F. Chemaly, MD, MPH, FACP, FIDSA, Chimerix (Consultant, Research Grant or Support)Clinigen (Consultant)Merck (Consultant, Research Grant or Support)Novartis (Research Grant or Support)Oxford Immunotec (Consultant, Research Grant or Support)Shire/Takeda (Research Grant or Support)Viracor (Research Grant or Support) Issam I. Raad, MD, Citius (Other Financial or Material Support, Ownership interest)Cook Medical (Grant/Research Support)Inventive Protocol (Other Financial or Material Support, Ownership interest)Novel Anti-Infective Technologies (Shareholder, Other Financial or Material Support, Ownership interest)
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 2328-8957
    Language: English
    Publisher: Oxford University Press (OUP)
    Publication Date: 2020
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2757767-3
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    In: Open Forum Infectious Diseases, Oxford University Press (OUP), Vol. 7, No. Supplement_1 ( 2020-12-31), p. S634-S634
    Abstract: Procalcitonin (PCT) and lactic acid have emerged as biomarkers that increase in bacterial infections/sepsis and have been used in conjunction with clinical judgment to guide antibiotic administration. The Multinational Association for Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC) risk index has been used to classify the risk for patients with neutropenic fever. However this index includes subjective elements and complex metrics that make it difficult to use in an oncological emergency center (EC). The purpose of this study is to evaluate the role of serum PCT alone and in combination with lactate to predict bloodstream infections (BSI), hospitalization and 14 days mortality in febrile neutropenic cancer patients presenting to the EC. Methods We conducted a retrospective study of all febrile neutropenic cancer patients who presented to our EC between April 1, 2018 and April 30, 2019 and had a serum PCT and lactic acid levels done. Fever was defined either as a documented temperature of ≥100.4 °F or a chief complaint of fever reported at home. Neutropenia was defined as an absolute neutrophil count ≤500 cells/mL. Results We included 550 cancer patients of which 385 (70%) had hematologic malignancies and 165 (30%) had solid tumors. A BSI was documented in 116 (21%) patients due to gram negative organisms in 66%, gram positive organisms in 30%, and both in 4%. A higher rate of mortality within 14 days of EC presentation was seen in patients whose PCT ≥ 0.25 compared to those with PCT & lt; 0.25 (5.2% vs 0.7%; p=0.002). Similarly a higher rate of BSI and a longer hospital stay was seen in patients whose PCT ≥ 0.25 compared to those with PCT & lt; 0.25. A PCT ≥ 0.25 or a lactate level & gt;2.2 had a sensitivity of 93% and a negative predictive value of 100% for a 14 day mortality. A logistic regression analysis showed an association between BSI and hematological malignancy, PCT ≥ 0.25, and lacate level & gt;2.2 mmole/L. Conclusion A PCT ≥ 0.25 was associated with BSI, LOS and 14 day mortality. The combination of PCT / serum lactate have a good sensitivity and high negative predictive value for BSI and mortality. Because this combination could be useful in identifying the high risk febrile patients requiring hospital admission, it will be compared to the standard but more labor intensive MASCC score index. Disclosures Issam I. Raad, MD, Citius (Other Financial or Material Support, Ownership interest)Cook Medical (Grant/Research Support)Inventive Protocol (Other Financial or Material Support, Ownership interest)Novel Anti-Infective Technologies (Shareholder, Other Financial or Material Support, Ownership interest)
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 2328-8957
    Language: English
    Publisher: Oxford University Press (OUP)
    Publication Date: 2020
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2757767-3
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    In: Open Forum Infectious Diseases, Oxford University Press (OUP), Vol. 7, No. Supplement_1 ( 2020-12-31), p. S555-S556
    Abstract: The prevalence of chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in patients with cancer in the U.S. has been reported to be 1.5% overall and up to 10.6% in specific subgroups. Testing for antibody to HCV (anti-HCV) is a low-cost diagnostic method in widespread use worldwide; however, the optimal screening test for HCV in cancer patients has not been established. We sought to identify the optimal screening test for HCV in patients with hematologic malignancies and/or prior hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT). Methods New patients who were seen at the Lymphoma/Myeloma, Leukemia, and Stem Cell Transplant clinics at MD Anderson Cancer Center (02/11/2019-11/5/2019) were simultaneously screened for HCV with serologic (antibody to HCV [anti-HCV]) and molecular (HCV RNA) assays. Anti-HCV testing was performed by using the ARCHITECT Anti-HCV assay and HCV RNA testing was performed by using the Cobas HCV test. The agreement between the two tests was evaluated using Cohen’s kappa statistic and McNemar’s test. All tests were two-sided with a significance level of 0.05. Results A total of 214 patients were enrolled in the study, of whom 127 (59%) were men (Table), One hundred forty-nine patients (70%) had a lymphoid neoplasm, 65 (30%) had a myeloid neoplasm, and 15 (7%) underwent HCT. Ninety-three patients (43%) had progressive disease. Three patients (1.4%) had positive anti-HCV, and two (0.9%) had positive HCV RNA. The overall percentage agreement was 99.5% (95% CI, 97.4% to 99.9%). Of the 3 patients with positive anti-HCV, 2 had positive and 1 had negative HCV RNA. There were no cases of seronegative HCV infection. The positive percentage agreement was 66.7% (95 CI, 20.8% to 93.9%), and the negative percentage agreement was 100.0% (95% CI, 98.2% to 100.0%). Cohen’s Kappa coefficient was 0·80 (95% CI, 0.41 to 1.00, p & lt; 0·0001), indicating substantial agreement between anti-HCV and HCV RNA tests for diagnosis of HCV infection. Conclusion The diagnostic yield for screening for chronic HCV infection in heavily immunocompromised cancer patients is similar for serologic and molecular testing. The use of anti-HCV, a diagnostic method with low cost, in patients with cancer would contribute to the World Health Organization’s goal of HCV elimination worldwide. Table. Characteristics of the study population (n=214) Disclosures Harrys A. Torres, MD, Merck & Co., Inc. (Grant/Research Support) Issam I. Raad, MD, Citius (Other Financial or Material Support, Ownership interest)Cook Medical (Grant/Research Support)Inventive Protocol (Other Financial or Material Support, Ownership interest)Novel Anti-Infective Technologies (Shareholder, Other Financial or Material Support, Ownership interest)
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 2328-8957
    Language: English
    Publisher: Oxford University Press (OUP)
    Publication Date: 2020
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2757767-3
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    In: Open Forum Infectious Diseases, Oxford University Press (OUP), Vol. 7, No. Supplement_1 ( 2020-12-31), p. S645-S645
    Abstract: Despite the implementation of successful antibiotic stewardship programs, antibiotic resistance continue to emerge particularly against gram-negative bacteria. With the increase use of antibiotics in high risk patients with hematological malignancies, the empiric therapy with standard antibiotic could be inappropriate. New antibiotics may be useful to cover potential resistant pathogens. We evaluated the role of a new cephalosporin /β-lactamase inhibitor ceftolozane-tazobactam (C/T) in comparison to standard of care (SOC) antibiotics in the empiric treatment of febrile neutropenic cancer patients with hematological malignancies. Methods We conducted a prospective randomized open label comparative study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of C/T vs SOC antibiotics consisting of cefepime, piperacillin-tazobactam or meropenem when used in combination with gram positive antibacterial agents. Between May 2018 and March 2020, we enrolled 88 febrile neutropenic patients with hematological malignancies who presented to our emergency center. Patients received at least 72 hours of intravenous study drugs and were followed through end of IV therapy and for up to 42 days. Results A total of 88 patients were analyzed of whom 42 received C/T and 46 SOC antimicrobial agents. The rate of documented bloodstream infections was similar in both groups (CE-TZ 21% vs SOC 26%, p=0.61). Favorable clinical response at end of IV therapy was significantly better in the C/T arm compared to SOC therapy (88% vs 72%, p=0.039), at test of cure (21 days), and last follow-up (42 days). In patients with documented infections, the rate of microbiological eradication was similar in both groups. Drug-related adverse events that led to drug discontinuation was similar in both groups (7%). Similarly overall mortality was similar in both groups. Conclusion The empiric use of C/T to cover gram negative organisms in high risk febrile neutropenic patients with hematological malignancies is safe and associated with better clinical outcome than SOC antimicrobial agents. The emergence of resistant pathogens should be further evaluated. Disclosures Issam I. Raad, MD, Citius (Other Financial or Material Support, Ownership interest)Cook Medical (Grant/Research Support)Inventive Protocol (Other Financial or Material Support, Ownership interest)Novel Anti-Infective Technologies (Shareholder, Other Financial or Material Support, Ownership interest)
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 2328-8957
    Language: English
    Publisher: Oxford University Press (OUP)
    Publication Date: 2020
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2757767-3
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 5
    In: Open Forum Infectious Diseases, Oxford University Press (OUP), Vol. 7, No. Supplement_1 ( 2020-12-31), p. S448-S448
    Abstract: Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infections (CLABSIs) remain a significant medical problem for critically ill cancer patients who required catheters for extended durations. Minocycline (M) -Rifampin (R) loaded catheters have shown the greatest impact on reducing CLABSIs; however, there is a risk for developing antibiotic resistant organisms when exposed to catheters whose concentration becomes depleted below antimicrobially effective levels due to extended indwells. Chlorhexidine (CH) and M-R combination catheters (MRCH) have been proposed as a next generation catheter with improved performance. Here we studied whether bacteria that were Tetracycline and Rifampin resistant became resistant to MRCH when allowed to form biofilms on MRCH catheters depleted below antimicrobially effective MRCH concentrations. Methods Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of Tetracycline and/or Rifampin resistant stock isolates were measured by standard microbroth dilution methods. MRCH catheters were depleted to below antimicrobially effective concentrations by soaking in serum for 6 weeks. The resistant bacteria were then allowed to form biofilm for 24 hrs on the depleted catheters in broth. Following 24 hour incubation the adherent (breakthrough) bacteria were removed by sonication and MICs were remeasured. The same organisms grown on non-antimicrobial catheters were used as controls. Results MICs (ug/mL) of the organisms against each agent and the combination are tabulated below: MICs (ug/mL) of the organisms against each agent and the combination Conclusion The M and R resistant bacteria did not develop in vitro resistance to the MRCH combination after forming biofilms on MRCH catheters depleted below antimicrobially effective concentrations. Disclosures Joel Rosenblatt, PhD, Cook Medical (Shareholder, Other Financial or Material Support, Inventor of the MRCH catheter technology which is owned by the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center and has been licensed to Cook Medical)Novel Anti-Infective Technologies (Shareholder, Other Financial or Material Support, Inventor of the MRCH catheter technology which is owned by the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center and has been licensed to Cook Medical) Issam I. Raad, MD, Citius (Other Financial or Material Support, Ownership interest)Cook Medical (Grant/Research Support)Inventive Protocol (Other Financial or Material Support, Ownership interest)Novel Anti-Infective Technologies (Shareholder, Other Financial or Material Support, Ownership interest)
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 2328-8957
    Language: English
    Publisher: Oxford University Press (OUP)
    Publication Date: 2020
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2757767-3
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 6
    In: Open Forum Infectious Diseases, Oxford University Press (OUP), Vol. 7, No. Supplement_1 ( 2020-12-31), p. S616-S616
    Abstract: Invasive fungal infections (IFIs) are a major cause of morbidity and mortality among immunocompromised patients with hematologic malignancies (HM) and stem cell transplants (SCT). Isavuconazole was approved by FDA as a primary therapy for Invasive Aspergillosis (IA) and Mucormycosis. The aim of this study is to look at the real-world use of Isavuconazole in patients with HM and evaluate their clinical outcomes and safety. Methods We conducted a retrospective study of 200 HM patients at MD Anderson Cancer Center who had definite, probable or possible mold infections between April 2016 and January 2020 and were treated with Isavuconazole for a period of at least 7 days. Clinical and radiological findings were assessed at baseline and at 6 and 12 weeks of follow up. Results HM patients with IFIs were classified as definite (11), probable (66) and possible (123). IA was the most commonly isolated pathogen followed by mucor and candida. The majority of patients (65%) received prophylaxis with anti-mold therapy, 73% consisted of azoles and 22% of echinocandins. Isavuconazole was used as a primary therapy in 57.5% of patients, and as salvage therapy in 42.5%. The switch to Isavuconazole was driven by failure of the primary therapy in 50% of the cases and by adverse effects in 28%. These included elevated liver function tests (LFTs), subtherapeutic voriconazole levels and prolonged QT. Isavuconazole was used as monotherapy in 30% of the cases and combination in 70% mostly with a polyene (54%) and/or an echinocandin (27%). A favorable response with Isavuconazole was observed in 57% at 6 weeks of therapy. Adverse events possibly related to Isavuconazole were reported in 6 patients (3%) leading to drug discontinuation. These included 5 elevated transaminases and 1 nausea. All-cause mortality was reported in 46% of patients and IFI-attributable mortality in 25%. Conclusion Selecting Isavuconazole therapy was mainly driven by failure of other antifungal agents or adverse events to other antifungals such as increased LFTs, subtherapeutic voriconazole levels or prolonged QT. Isavuconazole seems to have a promising clinical response and a good safety profile as an antifungal therapy in high risk cancer patients with HM. Disclosures Issam I. Raad, MD, Citius (Other Financial or Material Support, Ownership interest)Cook Medical (Grant/Research Support)Inventive Protocol (Other Financial or Material Support, Ownership interest)Novel Anti-Infective Technologies (Shareholder, Other Financial or Material Support, Ownership interest)
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 2328-8957
    Language: English
    Publisher: Oxford University Press (OUP)
    Publication Date: 2020
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2757767-3
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 7
    In: Open Forum Infectious Diseases, Oxford University Press (OUP), Vol. 7, No. Supplement_1 ( 2020-12-31), p. S809-S809
    Abstract: The risk of latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) reactivation in cancer patients during checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapy (CPI) remains largely unknown. We sought to evaluate LTBI therapy and outcomes between cancer patients receiving CPI versus conventional chemotherapy (CC) and hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) recipients. Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study of adult patients with LTBI (positive T-SPOT TB test) at MD Anderson Cancer Center between April 2016 and May 2020, who received CPI or combined with other conventional chemotherapy. Thereafter we compared each group to patients treated with other anti-cancer therapies including CC alone or HCT. Results We identified 106 patients with LTBI, who were analyzed into 3 distinct groups: CPI (32 patients, 30%) CC alone (37 patients, 35%), and HCT (37 patients, 35% (7 autologous versus 30 allogeneic). The majority of patients in the CPI group (97%) had solid tumors compared to 54% in the CC group. Nivolumab was the most commonly used CPI agent in 13 patients (40%), followed by pembrolizumab 10 pts (31%). In the CPI group, 20 pts (62%) received LTBI therapy that included Isoniazid (INH), versus 18 patients (49%) in the HCT group and 16 patients (43%) in the CC group (p=0.26). Only 3 patients (CC group) had TB reactivations (8%; p=0.11). None of these 3 patients had received LTBI therapy or corticosteroids prior to the diagnosis. Immune-related adverse effect (IrAEs) were reported in 11 pts (34%) patients, and 9 (82%) of them received corticosteroids. Out of 20 of CPI patients whom received INH, 4 (20%) developed possible INH-induced liver toxicities leading to interruption of medication versus 1 (6%) patient which had mild hepatitis in CC group versus none of HCT patients (p=0.09). Conclusion Our data suggest that latent tuberculosis reactivation remains rare, especially in the severely immunocompromised patients on CPI, CC and steroids. However, hepatotoxicity is relatively common in patients treated with CPI and INH. Therefore, caution and close laboratory and clinical monitoring is required to avoid significant hepatic injury and interruption of LTBI therapy and lifesaving oncological therapy. Disclosures Issam I. Raad, MD, Citius (Other Financial or Material Support, Ownership interest)Cook Medical (Grant/Research Support)Inventive Protocol (Other Financial or Material Support, Ownership interest)Novel Anti-Infective Technologies (Shareholder, Other Financial or Material Support, Ownership interest)
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 2328-8957
    Language: English
    Publisher: Oxford University Press (OUP)
    Publication Date: 2020
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2757767-3
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 8
    In: Cancer, Wiley, Vol. 83, No. 12 ( 1998-12-15), p. 2597-2607
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0008-543X , 1097-0142
    URL: Issue
    Language: English
    Publisher: Wiley
    Publication Date: 1998
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1479932-7
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2599218-1
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2594979-2
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1429-1
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 9
    In: Clinical Infectious Diseases, Oxford University Press (OUP), Vol. 52, No. 4 ( 2011-02-15), p. 427-431
    Abstract: This document updates and expands the initial Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) Fever and Neutropenia Guideline that was published in 1997 and first updated in 2002. It is intended as a guide for the use of antimicrobial agents in managing patients with cancer who experience chemotherapy-induced fever and neutropenia. Recent advances in antimicrobial drug development and technology, clinical trial results, and extensive clinical experience have informed the approaches and recommendations herein. Because the previous iteration of this guideline in 2002, we have a developed a clearer definition of which populations of patients with cancer may benefit most from antibiotic, antifungal, and antiviral prophylaxis. Furthermore, categorizing neutropenic patients as being at high risk or low risk for infection according to presenting signs and symptoms, underlying cancer, type of therapy, and medical comorbidities has become essential to the treatment algorithm. Risk stratification is a recommended starting point for managing patients with fever and neutropenia. In addition, earlier detection of invasive fungal infections has led to debate regarding optimal use of empirical or preemptive antifungal therapy, although algorithms are still evolving. What has not changed is the indication for immediate empirical antibiotic therapy. It remains true that all patients who present with fever and neutropenia should be treated swiftly and broadly with antibiotics to treat both gram-positive and gram-negative pathogens. Finally, we note that all Panel members are from institutions in the United States or Canada; thus, these guidelines were developed in the context of North American practices. Some recommendations may not be as applicable outside of North America, in areas where differences in available antibiotics, in the predominant pathogens, and/or in health care–associated economic conditions exist. Regardless of venue, clinical vigilance and immediate treatment are the universal keys to managing neutropenic patients with fever and/or infection.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1058-4838 , 1537-6591
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: Oxford University Press (OUP)
    Publication Date: 2011
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2002229-3
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 10
    In: Medicine, Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health), Vol. 82, No. 5 ( 2003-09), p. 309-321
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0025-7974
    Language: English
    Publisher: Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
    Publication Date: 2003
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2049818-4
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...