GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    In: Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle, Wiley, Vol. 14, No. 4 ( 2023-08), p. 1682-1694
    Abstract: Hand grip strength (HGS) is a widely used functional test for the assessment of strength and functional status in patients with cancer, in particular with cancer cachexia. The aim was to prospectively evaluate the prognostic value of HGS in patients with mostly advanced cancer with and without cachexia and to establish reference values for a European‐based population. Methods In this prospective study, 333 patients with cancer (85% stage III/IV) and 65 healthy controls of similar age and sex were enrolled. None of the study participants had significant cardiovascular disease or active infection at baseline. Repetitive HGS assessment was performed using a hand dynamometer to measure the maximal HGS (kilograms). Presence of cancer cachexia was defined when patients had ≥5% weight loss within 6 months or when body mass index was 〈 20.0 kg/m 2 with ≥2% weight loss (Fearon's criteria). Cox proportional hazard analyses were performed to assess the relationship of maximal HGS to all‐cause mortality and to determine cut‐offs for HGS with the best predictive power. We also assessed associations with additional relevant clinical and functional outcome measures at baseline, including anthropometric measures, physical function (Karnofsky Performance Status and Eastern Cooperative of Oncology Group), physical activity (4‐m gait speed test and 6‐min walk test), patient‐reported outcomes (EQ‐5D‐5L and Visual Analogue Scale appetite/pain) and nutrition status (Mini Nutritional Assessment). Results The mean age was 60 ± 14 years; 163 (51%) were female, and 148 (44%) had cachexia at baseline. Patients with cancer showed 18% lower HGS than healthy controls (31.2 ± 11.9 vs. 37.9 ± 11.6 kg, P   〈  0.001). Patients with cancer cachexia had 16% lower HGS than those without cachexia (28.3 ± 10.1 vs. 33.6 ± 12.3 kg, P   〈  0.001). Patients with cancer were followed for a mean of 17 months (range 6–50), and 182 (55%) patients died during follow‐up (2‐year mortality rate 53%) (95% confidence interval 48–59%). Reduced maximal HGS was associated with increased mortality (per −5 kg; hazard ratio [HR] 1.19; 1.10–1.28; P   〈  0.0001; independently of age, sex, cancer stage, cancer entity and presence of cachexia). HGS was also a predictor of mortality in patients with cachexia (per −5 kg; HR 1.20; 1.08–1.33; P  = 0.001) and without cachexia (per −5 kg; HR 1.18; 1.04–1.34; P  = 0.010). The cut‐off for maximal HGS with the best predictive power for poor survival was 〈 25.1 kg for females (sensitivity 54%, specificity 63%) and 〈 40.2 kg for males (sensitivity 69%, specificity 68%). Conclusions Reduced maximal HGS was associated with higher all‐cause mortality, reduced overall functional status and decreased physical performance in patients with mostly advanced cancer. Similar results were found for patients with and without cancer cachexia.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 2190-5991 , 2190-6009
    URL: Issue
    Language: English
    Publisher: Wiley
    Publication Date: 2023
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2586864-0
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    In: Journal of the American College of Cardiology, Elsevier BV, Vol. 81, No. 16 ( 2023-04), p. 1569-1586
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0735-1097
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: Elsevier BV
    Publication Date: 2023
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468327-1
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    In: European Journal of Heart Failure, Wiley, Vol. 23, No. 11 ( 2021-11), p. 1891-1902
    Abstract: Viral‐induced cardiac inflammation can induce heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF)‐like syndromes. COVID‐19 can lead to myocardial damage and vascular injury. We hypothesised that COVID‐19 patients frequently develop a HFpEF‐like syndrome, and designed this study to explore this. Methods and results Cardiac function was assessed in 64 consecutive, hospitalized, and clinically stable COVID‐19 patients from April–November 2020 with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≥50% (age 56 ± 19 years, females: 31%, severe COVID‐19 disease: 69%). To investigate likelihood of HFpEF presence, we used the HFA‐PEFF score. A low (0–1 points), intermediate (2–4 points), and high (5–6 points) HFA‐PEFF score was observed in 42%, 33%, and 25% of patients, respectively. In comparison, 64 subjects of similar age, sex, and comorbidity status without COVID‐19 showed these scores in 30%, 66%, and 4%, respectively (between groups: P  = 0.0002). High HFA‐PEFF scores were more frequent in COVID‐19 patients than controls (25% vs. 4%, P  = 0.001). In COVID‐19 patients, the HFA‐PEFF score significantly correlated with age, estimated glomerular filtration rate, high‐sensitivity troponin T (hsTnT), haemoglobin, QTc interval, LVEF, mitral E/A ratio, and H 2 FPEF score (all P   〈  0.05). In multivariate, ordinal regression analyses, higher age and hsTnT were significant predictors of increased HFA‐PEFF scores. Patients with myocardial injury (hsTnT ≥14 ng/L: 31%) vs. patients without myocardial injury, showed higher HFA‐PEFF scores [median 5 (interquartile range 3–6) vs. 1 (0–3), P   〈  0.001] and more often showed left ventricular diastolic dysfunction (75% vs. 27%, P   〈  0.001). Conclusion Hospitalized COVID‐19 patients frequently show high likelihood of presence of HFpEF that is associated with cardiac structural and functional alterations, and myocardial injury. Detailed cardiac assessments including echocardiographic determination of left ventricular diastolic function and biomarkers should become routine in the care of hospitalized COVID‐19 patients.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1388-9842 , 1879-0844
    URL: Issue
    Language: English
    Publisher: Wiley
    Publication Date: 2021
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1500332-2
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...