GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    In: Database, Oxford University Press (OUP), Vol. 2019 ( 2019-01-01)
    Abstract: Document recommendation systems for locating relevant literature have mostly relied on methods developed a decade ago. This is largely due to the lack of a large offline gold-standard benchmark of relevant documents that cover a variety of research fields such that newly developed literature search techniques can be compared, improved and translated into practice. To overcome this bottleneck, we have established the RElevant LIterature SearcH consortium consisting of more than 1500 scientists from 84 countries, who have collectively annotated the relevance of over 180 000 PubMed-listed articles with regard to their respective seed (input) article/s. The majority of annotations were contributed by highly experienced, original authors of the seed articles. The collected data cover 76% of all unique PubMed Medical Subject Headings descriptors. No systematic biases were observed across different experience levels, research fields or time spent on annotations. More importantly, annotations of the same document pairs contributed by different scientists were highly concordant. We further show that the three representative baseline methods used to generate recommended articles for evaluation (Okapi Best Matching 25, Term Frequency–Inverse Document Frequency and PubMed Related Articles) had similar overall performances. Additionally, we found that these methods each tend to produce distinct collections of recommended articles, suggesting that a hybrid method may be required to completely capture all relevant articles. The established database server located at https://relishdb.ict.griffith.edu.au is freely available for the downloading of annotation data and the blind testing of new methods. We expect that this benchmark will be useful for stimulating the development of new powerful techniques for title and title/abstract-based search engines for relevant articles in biomedical research.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1758-0463
    Language: English
    Publisher: Oxford University Press (OUP)
    Publication Date: 2019
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2496706-3
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    In: Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), Vol. 29, No. 12_Supplement ( 2020-12-01), p. PO-068-PO-068
    Abstract: INTRODUCTION: The lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer/questioning (LGBTQ) community is a medically underserved population that suffers from cancer disparities. To identify potential gaps in attitudes, knowledge, and institutional practices toward LGBTQ patients, we conducted a mixed-methods survey of healthcare providers in the ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group. METHODS: A validated, web-based survey was administered to members of the ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group in late 2019. The survey was completed by 490 healthcare providers measuring attitudes and knowledge about LGBTQ health and institutional practices regarding collection of sexual orientation and gender identity data. Results were quantified using descriptive and stratified analyses. RESULTS: Among the 490 healthcare providers that completed the survey, 77% were White, 86% were non- Hispanic, 75% were female, 81% were heterosexual, and the mean age was 46 years. Approximately 47% of the respondents were medical oncologists, 39% practiced in academic medical centers (AMCs), and 49% were from the Midwest/Northeast. As reported by prior institutional and national survey studies, there was high interest (77%) in receiving education regarding the unique health needs of LGBTQ patients, an overall limited knowledge about LGBTQ health and cancer needs, and a significant decrease from survey assessment to postsurvey assessment for confidence in knowledge for LGBT health needs. There was high agreement (71%) regarding the importance of knowing gender identity, which was contrasted with a low agreement (48%) regarding the importance of knowing sexual orientation. Stratified analyses revealed significant differences of some attitude and knowledge items. For example, when stratified by licensure/terminal degree, MD/DO vs. RN/NP/PA were significantly more willing to be listed as a LGBTQ-friendly provider (81% vs. 50%) and reported to be knowledgeable about LGB health needs (69% vs. 53%). Providers at AMCs were significantly more willing to be listed as a LGBTQ-friendly provider (71% vs.53%) believe there should be mandatory education (72% vs. 60%) regarding care of LGBQ patients versus those at non-AMCs. Having family and/or friends who are LGBTQ (vs. none) and political affiliation (conservative vs. liberal) were strong effect modifiers resulting in significant differences for 9 and 8 items, respectively. CONCLUSION: To our knowledge, this was the first study of cancer care providers in a large cancer clinical trials research group that assessed attitudes, knowledge, and institutional practices of LGBTQ patients with cancer. Consistent with prior studies, there was limited knowledge about LGBTQ health and cancer needs, but high interest in receiving education regarding this community. New and intriguing differences for many attitude and knowledge items were revealed when we stratified the responses by licensure/terminal degree, practice setting, LGBTQ friends and/or family members, and political affiliation. Citation Format: Matthew B. Schabath, Jaileene Perez-Morales, Megan Sutter, Lynne Wagner, Melissa Simon, Ruth C. Carlos, Bruce J. Giantonio, Gwendolyn P. Quinn, Edith P. Mitchell. Survey of healthcare providers in the ECOG-ACRIN cancer research group: Attitudes, knowledge, and practice behaviors about LGBTQ patients with cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Virtual Conference: Thirteenth AACR Conference on the Science of Cancer Health Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved; 2020 Oct 2-4. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2020;29(12 Suppl):Abstract nr PO-068.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1055-9965 , 1538-7755
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
    Publication Date: 2020
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2036781-8
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1153420-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    In: Future Oncology, Future Medicine Ltd, Vol. 14, No. 29 ( 2018-12), p. 3059-3072
    Abstract: Once unimaginable, fertility management is now a nationally established part of cancer care in institutions, from academic centers to community hospitals to private practices. Over the last two decades, advances in medicine and reproductive science have made it possible for men, women and children to be connected with an oncofertility specialist or offered fertility preservation soon after a cancer diagnosis. The Oncofertility Consortium's National Physicians Cooperative is a large-scale effort to engage physicians across disciplines – oncology, urology, obstetrics and gynecology, reproductive endocrinology, and behavioral health – in clinical and research activities to enable significant progress in providing fertility preservation options to children and adults. Here, we review the structure and function of the National Physicians Cooperative and identify next steps.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1479-6694 , 1744-8301
    Language: English
    Publisher: Future Medicine Ltd
    Publication Date: 2018
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) ; 2020
    In:  Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention Vol. 29, No. 12_Supplement ( 2020-12-01), p. PO-013-PO-013
    In: Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), Vol. 29, No. 12_Supplement ( 2020-12-01), p. PO-013-PO-013
    Abstract: Background: While societal acceptance for sexual and gender minority (SGM/LGBTQ) individuals is increasing, this population continues to face health care barriers. In addition to encountering stigmatization, SGM/LGBTQ patients are an understudied population, particularly within oncology. Little is known about clinicians’ knowledge and practice behaviors regarding SGM in the oncology setting. To address this lack of knowledge, a mixed method survey was administered to members of the ECOG- ACRIN Cancer Research Group in late 2019. Methods: In this analysis, we report on results of the qualitative portion of the survey. Four open-ended questions asked healthcare providers (i.e., oncology physicians, researchers, physician assistants, and nurses) to describe experiences with SGM patients, reservations in caring for SGM patients, suggestions for improvement in SGM cancer care, and any additional comments. Responses were organized in spreadsheet and content analysis was used to group a priori and emergent themes. Results: 490 people responded to the quantitative survey and 365 provided responses to the open-ended questions. In the personal experience question, the majority noted they had no or little familiarity with SGM patients. A minority of respondents noted experience with gay and lesbian patients with cancer, but not transgender patients; many who reported experience with transgender patients noted difficulty navigating the correct use of pronouns. In the reservations question, the majority stated they had no reservations treating SGM patients but lacked training. Suggestions for improvement included providing training in the care of SGM patients with cancer, ensuring training occurred throughout the institution and not only among clinicians, need to attend to unique end-of-life care issues among SGM patients, and need to build trust. A minority of respondents described SGM patients with cancer as difficult to treat and non- compliant. Many respondents endorsed a fear of offending patients due to general lack of knowledge or saying the wrong thing. Additional comments offered related to lack of knowledge about potential interactions between cancer treatment and gender-affirming hormones, and lesbian women’s frustrations with requirements of pregnancy testing. Conclusions: Clinicians have minimal experiences and/or exposure to SGM patients with cancer but desire training. Training the entire workforce may improve trust with, outreach efforts to, and cancer care delivery to the SGM community. Citation Format: Christina L. Tamargo, Edith P. Mitchell, Lynne I. Wagner, Melissa A. Simon, Ruth C. Carlos, Bruce J. Giantonio, Gwendolyn P. Quinn, Matthew B. Schabath. Qualitative results to a survey of ECOG-ACRIN members regarding experience with sexual and gender minority patients with cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Virtual Conference: Thirteenth AACR Conference on the Science of Cancer Health Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved; 2020 Oct 2-4. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2020;29(12 Suppl):Abstract nr PO-013.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1055-9965 , 1538-7755
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
    Publication Date: 2020
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2036781-8
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1153420-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 5
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 30, No. 20 ( 2012-07-10), p. 2516-2521
    Abstract: The negative attitudes of patients with cancer regarding clinical trials are an important contributor to low participation rates. This study evaluated whether a brief psychoeducational intervention was effective in improving patients' attitudes as well as their knowledge, self-efficacy for decision making, receptivity to receiving more information, and general willingness to participate in clinical trials. Patients and Methods A total of 472 adults with cancer who had not been asked previously to participate in a clinical trial were randomly assigned to receive printed educational information about clinical trials or a psychoeducational intervention that provided similar information and also addressed misperceptions and concerns about clinical trials. The primary (attitudes) and secondary outcomes (knowledge, self-efficacy, receptivity, and willingness) were assessed via patient self-report before random assignment and 7 to 28 days later. Results Patients who received the psychoeducational intervention showed more positive attitudes toward clinical trials (P = .016) and greater willingness to participate (P = .011) at follow-up than patients who received printed educational information. Evidence of an indirect effect of intervention assignment on willingness to participate (estimated at 0.168; 95% CI, 0.088 to 0.248) suggested that the benefits of psychoeducation on willingness to participate were explained by the positive impact of psychoeducation on attitudes toward clinical trials. Conclusion A brief psychoeducational intervention can improve the attitudes of patients with cancer toward clinical trials and thereby increase their willingness to participate in clinical trials. Findings support conducting additional research to evaluate effects of this intervention on quality of decision making and rates of participation among patients asked to enroll onto therapeutic clinical trials.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2012
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 6
    In: Cancer Medicine, Wiley, Vol. 9, No. 1 ( 2020-01), p. 225-237
    Abstract: For the advancement of cancer research, the collection of tissue specimens from drug‐resistant tumors after targeted therapy is crucial. Although patients with lung cancer are often provided targeted therapy, post‐therapy specimens are not routinely collected due to the risks of collection, limiting the study of targeted therapy resistance mechanisms. Posthumous rapid tissue donation (RTD) is an expedient collection process that provides an opportunity to understand treatment‐resistant lung cancers. Methods Consent to participate in the thoracic RTD protocol was obtained during patient care. When death occurred, tumor and paired non‐tumor, cytology, and blood specimens were collected within 48 hours and preserved as formalin‐fixed and frozen specimens. Tissue sections were evaluated with hematoxylin and eosin staining and immunohistochemistry (IHC) against multiple biomarkers, including various programmed death ligand 1 (PD‐L1) clones. Next‐generation sequencing was performed on 13 specimens from 5 patients. Results Postmortem specimens (N = 180) were well preserved from 9 patients with lung cancer. PD‐L1 IHC revealed heterogeneity within and between tumors. An AGK‐BRAF fusion was newly identified in tumor from a donor with a known echinoderm microtubule‐associated protein‐like 4 to anaplastic lymphoma kinase ( EML4‐ALK ) fusion and history of anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) inhibitor therapy. RNA expression analysis revealed a clonal genetic origin of metastatic cancer cells. Conclusions Post‐therapy specimens demonstrated PD‐L1 heterogeneity and an acyl glycerol kinase to B‐rapidly accelerated fibrosarcoma ( AGK‐BRAF ) fusion in a patient with an EML4‐ALK –positive lung adenocarcinoma as a potential resistance mechanism to ALK inhibitor therapy. Rapid tissue donation collection of postmortem tissue from lung cancer patients is a novel approach to cancer research that enables studies of molecular evolution and drug resistance.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 2045-7634 , 2045-7634
    URL: Issue
    Language: English
    Publisher: Wiley
    Publication Date: 2020
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2659751-2
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 7
    In: Journal of Adolescent and Young Adult Oncology, Mary Ann Liebert Inc, Vol. 9, No. 5 ( 2020-10-01), p. 572-578
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 2156-5333 , 2156-535X
    Language: English
    Publisher: Mary Ann Liebert Inc
    Publication Date: 2020
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 8
    In: Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network, Harborside Press, LLC, ( 2021-08-13)
    Abstract: Background: Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related death in the United States and globally, and many questions exist about treatment options. Harmonizing data across registries and other data collection efforts would yield a robust data infrastructure to help address many research questions. The purpose of this project was to develop a minimum set of patient and clinician relevant harmonized outcome measures that can be collected in non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patient registries and clinical practice. Methods: Seventeen lung cancer registries and related efforts were identified and invited to submit outcome measures. Representatives from medical specialty societies, government agencies, health systems, health information technology groups, patient advocacy organizations, and industry formed a stakeholder panel to categorize the measures and harmonize definitions using the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality’s supported Outcome Measures Framework (OMF). Results: The panel reviewed 66 outcome measures and identified a minimum set of 8 broadly relevant measures in the OMF categories of patient survival, clinical response, events of interest, and resource utilization. The panel harmonized definitions for the 8 measures through in-person and virtual meetings. The panel did not reach consensus on 1 specific validated instrument for capturing patient-reported outcomes. The minimum set of harmonized outcome measures is broadly relevant to clinicians and patients and feasible to capture across NSCLC disease stages and treatment pathways. A pilot test of these measures would be useful to document the burden and value of the measures for research and in clinical practice. Conclusions: By collecting the harmonized measures consistently, registries and other data collection systems could contribute to the development research infrastructure and learning health systems to support new research and improve patient outcomes.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1540-1405 , 1540-1413
    Language: Unknown
    Publisher: Harborside Press, LLC
    Publication Date: 2021
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 9
    In: The Lancet Oncology, Elsevier BV, Vol. 22, No. 2 ( 2021-02), p. e68-e80
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1470-2045
    Language: English
    Publisher: Elsevier BV
    Publication Date: 2021
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2049730-1
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 10
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Frontiers Media SA ; 2022
    In:  Frontiers in Psychology Vol. 13 ( 2022-8-15)
    In: Frontiers in Psychology, Frontiers Media SA, Vol. 13 ( 2022-8-15)
    Abstract: While societal acceptance for sexual and gender minority (SGM) individuals is increasing, this group continues to face barriers to quality healthcare. Little is known about clinicians’ experiences with SGM patients in the oncology setting. To address this, a mixed method survey was administered to members of the ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group. Materials and methods We report results from the open-ended portion of the survey. Four questions asked clinicians to describe experiences with SGM patients, reservations in caring for them, suggestions for improvement in SGM cancer care, and additional comments. Data were analyzed using content analysis and the constant comparison method. Results The majority of respondents noted they had no or little familiarity with SGM patients. A minority of respondents noted experience with gay and lesbian patients, but not transgender patients; many who reported experience with transgender patients also noted difficulty navigating the correct use of pronouns. Many respondents also highlighted positive experiences with SGM patients. Suggestions for improvement in SGM cancer care included providing widespread training, attending to unique end-of-life care issues among SGM patients, and engaging in efforts to build trust. Conclusion Clinicians have minimal experiences with SGM patients with cancer but desire training. Training the entire workforce may improve trust with, outreach efforts to, and cancer care delivery to the SGM community.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1664-1078
    Language: Unknown
    Publisher: Frontiers Media SA
    Publication Date: 2022
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2563826-9
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...