GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

X

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Sacituzumab govitecan (SG) versus treatment of physician’s choice (TPC) in patients (pts) with previously treated, metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC): Final results from the phase 3 ASCENT study.
    American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) ; 2022
    In:  Journal of Clinical Oncology Vol. 40, No. 16_suppl ( 2022-06-01), p. 1071-1071
    Details
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 40, No. 16_suppl ( 2022-06-01), p. 1071-1071
    Abstract: 1071 Background: Treatment goals for pts with metastatic breast cancer include extended survival and improved quality of life (QoL). SG is an antibody-drug conjugate composed of an anti–Trop-2 antibody coupled to the cytotoxic SN-38 payload via a proprietary, hydrolyzable linker. SG received FDA approval for pts with mTNBC who received ≥2 prior chemotherapies (at least 1 in the metastatic setting). In the pivotal phase 3 ASCENT study (NCT02574455), SG demonstrated a significant survival benefit over single-agent chemotherapy TPC in the primary analysis population of pts with second line or greater (2L+) mTNBC without known brain metastases at baseline (Bardia A et al. NEJM 2021) and QoL (Loibl S. et al. ESMO 2021). With additional follow up, we present the final data on efficacy, including overall survival (OS), safety, and QoL. Methods: Pts with mTNBC refractory or relapsing after ≥2 prior chemotherapies with at least 1 in the metastatic setting were randomized 1:1 to receive SG (10 mg/kg IV on days 1 and 8, every 21 days) or TPC (capecitabine, eribulin, vinorelbine, or gemcitabine) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) per RECIST 1.1 by independent review in pts without known brain metastases at baseline. Key secondary endpoints included OS, safety, and health-related QoL. Safety was analyzed in pts who received ≥1 dose of study drug. Results: Of 529 pts enrolled, 468 did not have known brain metastases at baseline (median age: 54 y [range, 27-82]; median prior lines: 4 [range, 2-17] ). As of Feb 25, 2021 (final database lock), SG (n = 235) vs TPC (n = 233) significantly improved median PFS (5.6 vs 1.7 mo; HR: 0.39; P 〈 0.0001) and median OS (12.1 vs 6.7 mo; HR: 0.48; P 〈 0.0001). The OS rate at 24 months was 22.4% (95% CI, 16.8-28.5) in the SG arm and 5.2% (95% CI, 2.5-9.4) in the TPC arm. In the safety population (n = 482), key treatment-related grade ≥3 adverse events with SG (n = 258) vs TPC (n = 224) were diarrhea (11% vs 0.4%), neutropenia (52% vs 33%), anemia (8% vs 5%), and febrile neutropenia (6% vs 2%). There was no grade ≥3 neuropathy and 1 case of grade 3 interstitial lung disease reported with SG. No patient experienced a treatment-related death with SG, and there was 1 treatment-related death with TPC due to neutropenic sepsis. Treatment discontinuations due to AEs were ≤3% in both arms. SG arm showed clinically meaningful and statistically significant improvements than the TPC arm in scores for all five primary focus health-related QoL domains. Conclusions: The analysis based on the final database lock of ASCENT confirms the superior survival outcomes of SG over single-agent chemotherapy, with a manageable safety profile and improvement in QoL for pts with mTNBC in the 2L+ setting. These findings reinforce SG as an effective treatment option for this pt population. Clinical trial information: NCT02574455.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    URL: Article
    DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2022.40.16_suppl.1071
    RVK:
    XA 52760
    RVK:
    XA 10000
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2022
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
    Online Resource
  • 2
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Abstract GS3-06: Biomarker evaluation in the phase 3 ASCENT study of sacituzumab govitecan versus chemotherapy in patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer
    American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) ; 2021
    In:  Cancer Research Vol. 81, No. 4_Supplement ( 2021-02-15), p. GS3-06-GS3-06
    Details
    In: Cancer Research, American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), Vol. 81, No. 4_Supplement ( 2021-02-15), p. GS3-06-GS3-06
    Abstract: Background: Trophoblast cell-surface antigen-2 (Trop-2) is highly expressed in many epithelial tumors, including triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Sacituzumab govitecan (SG) is an antibody-drug conjugate composed of an anti-Trop-2 antibody coupled to SN-38, an active metabolite of irinotecan, via a unique hydrolyzable linker that allows for SN-38 release intracellularly and in the tumor microenvironment (bystander effect). Preclinical studies have shown a great range of efficacy with SG in mice bearing tumors with low, moderate, and high Trop-2 expression levels. We report subgroup analyses by Trop-2 expression from ASCENT, a randomized, phase 3 confirmatory study of SG versus standard-of-care chemotherapy in patients with metastatic TNBC (mTNBC). Methods: In the global, multicenter, open-label, phase 3 ASCENT study (NCT02574455), 529 patients with mTNBC refractory to or relapsing after at least 2 prior chemotherapies were randomized 1:1 to receive SG (10 mg/kg intravenously on days 1 and 8 every 21 days) or single-agent treatment of physician’s choice (capecitabine, eribulin, vinorelbine, or gemcitabine) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) measured by central independent review per RECIST v1.1. Secondary endpoints included objective response rate (ORR) per RECIST v1.1, duration of response, overall survival (OS), and safety. Exploratory endpoints included biomarker assessments, including Trop-2 and BRCA1/2. Trop-2 expression was assessed using a validated immunohistochemistry assay. Results: Subgroup analyses by biomarker expression including Trop-2 and BRCA1/2 were performed, and outcomes by PFS, OS, ORR, and safety results will be reported. Conclusions: These analyses will provide further insights into the relationship of Trop-2 expression and the activity of SG in previously treated patients with mTNBC. Citation Format: Sara A. Hurvitz, Sara M. Tolaney, Kevin Punie, Delphine Loirat, Mafalda Oliveira, Kevin Kalinsky, Amelia Zelnak, Philippe Aftimos, Florence Dalenc, Sagar Sardesai, Erika Hamiltion, Priyanka Sharma, Sabela Recalde, Eva Ciruelos Gil, Tiffany Traina, Joyce O'Shaughnessy, Javier Cortés, Michaela Tsai, Linda Vahdat, Véronique Diéras, Lisa Carey, Hope S. Rugo, David M. Goldenberg, Quan Hong, Martin Olivo, Loretta M. Itri, Aditya Bardia. Biomarker evaluation in the phase 3 ASCENT study of sacituzumab govitecan versus chemotherapy in patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr GS3-06.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0008-5472 , 1538-7445
    URL: Article
    DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.SABCS20-GS3-06
    RVK:
    XA 36000
    RVK:
    XA 10000
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
    Publication Date: 2021
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2036785-5
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1432-1
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 410466-3
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
    Online Resource
  • 3
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Abstract P5-16-01: Assessment of health-related quality of life by clinical response from the phase 3 ASCENT study in metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC)
    American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) ; 2022
    In:  Cancer Research Vol. 82, No. 4_Supplement ( 2022-02-15), p. P5-16-01-P5-16-01
    Details
    In: Cancer Research, American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), Vol. 82, No. 4_Supplement ( 2022-02-15), p. P5-16-01-P5-16-01
    Abstract: Background: In ASCENT, patients with mTNBC refractory to or relapsing after ≥2 prior chemotherapies (at least one in the metastatic setting) were randomized 1:1 to receive sacituzumab govitecan (SG) or single-agent treatment of physician’s choice (TPC) (capecitabine, eribulin, vinorelbine, or gemcitabine). Primary endpoint was progression free survival. Secondary endpoints included overall survival, objective response rate, clinical benefit rate, and safety. Here we examined whether health-related quality of life (HRQoL) differed by clinical response. Methods: The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQC30) version 3 was used to assess HRQoL at baseline and on day 1 of each treatment cycle. This analysis included intention-to-treat patients who had a completed at least one of the 15 domains/scales at baseline and at least one evaluable assessment at post-baseline visits based on EORTC QLQ-C30. Patients were classified as responders (partial or complete disease response) or non-responders (stable or progressive disease or not evaluable) based on best overall response (RECIST). A mixed-effect model for repeated measures (MMRM) was used to estimate leastsquare (LS) mean EORTC QLQC30 score changes from baseline using all HRQoL data assessed during Cycle 2 Day 1 (C2D1) to C6D1 (where n was ≥25 in both treatment arms) for responders and nonresponders within each treatment group. Results: Mean QLQ-C30 subscale scores at baseline were similar between treatment arms. The analysis included 236 patients in the SG arm of the full trial population, of whom 82 (35%) were clinical responders; and 183 in the TPC arm, of whom 11 (6%) were clinical responders. Due to the small number of TPC responders, inferential statistical testing to compare between-group difference was not performed.Irrespective of their clinical response status, patients treated with SG showed more favorable LS mean changes than patients who received TPC in all EORTC QLQ-C30 domains, except for nausea/vomiting and diarrhea (Table). Overall, LS mean changes in EORTC QLQ-C30 scores in SG nonresponders were less favorable than those in SG responders, but more favorable than those in TPC responders and TPC nonresponders for most EORTC QLQ-C30 domains. Conclusions: The analysis demonstrates that regardless of response status, SG responders and non-responders showed a better trend in HRQoL changes than TPC. Patients who achieved a tumor response to SG may benefit most in HRQoL. Although patients treated with SG reported higher rates of diarrhea, this did not generate a negative impact on their overall quality of life or functioning. Table: Mixed effects model least-square mean EORTC QLQ-C30 score changes from baselineLeast-square mean change from baseline (95% confidence interval)SG responders(N=82)SG nonresponders(N=154)TPC responders(N=11)TPC non-responders(N=172)Global health status/QoL2.46 (-1.52, 6.43)-0.57 (-3.68, 2.54)-1.64 (-10.22, 6.95)-2.29 (-5.63, 1.05)FunctioningPhysical2.93 (-0.92, 6.79)0.22 (-2.71, 3.15)-3.47 (-11.93, 4.99)-3.75 (-6.87, -0.63)Role-0.35 (-5.74, 5.04)-3.23 (-7.45, 0.99)-8.40 (-19.93, 3.13)-7.33 (-11.88, -2.78)Emotional6.20 (2.23, 10.18)1.97 (-1.12, 5.06)4.87 (-3.70, 13.44)0.08 (-3.24, 3.40)Cognitive0.90 (-2.99, 4.79)-2.25 (-5.26, 0.76)-4.46 (-12.87, 3.95)-1.26 (-4.49, 1.98)Social2.06 (-3.50, 7.61)-3.35 (-7.65, 0.95)-5.79 (-18.29, 6.72)-4.36 (-8.99, 0.27)SymptomsFatigue0.90 (-3.49, 5.28)2.84 (-0.60, 6.29)4.15 (-5.34, 13.65)6.65 (2.93, 10.38)Nausea/vomiting4.68 (1.42, 7.95)4.03 (1.42, 6.64)1.38 (-5.53, 8.29)2.62 (-0.21, 5.45)Pain-11.40 (-16.43, -6.36)-8.57 (-12.48, -4.66)-11.99 (-22.85, -1.13)-0.24 (-4.47, 3.99)Dyspnea-7.88 (-13.09, -2.67)-1.90 (-5.93, 2.13)1.97 (-9.33, 13.27)3.86 (-0.47, 8.18)Insomnia-6.12 (-11.99, -0.26)-3.51 (-8.04, 1.02)4.83 (-7.85, 17.51)-0.98 (-5.86, 3.90)Appetite loss0.22 (-5.25, 5.70)5.45 (1.15, 9.75)8.67 (-3.05, 20.40)4.60 (-0.05, 9.26)Constipation0.93 (-4.57, 6.43)2.20 (-2.09, 6.49)3.87 (-7.96, 15.70)3.52 (-1.12, 8.16)Diarrhea16.03 (10.32, 21.74)13.65 (9.19, 18.11)2.46 (-9.88, 14.80)-1.53 (-6.34, 3.29)Financial difficulties-3.57 (-8.54, 1.39)-2.44 (-6.21, 1.34)-4.41 (-15.27, 6.46)0.61 (-3.42, 4.64)A higher score for a functional domain represents a higher or healthier level of functioning; a higher score for the global health status/QoL represents a higher overall HRQoL; but a higher score for a symptom domain represents a higher level of symptomatology or problems Citation Format: Sibylle Loibl, Sara M. Tolaney, Kevin Punie, Mafalda Oliveira, Hope S. Rugo, Aditya Bardia, Sara A. Hurvitz, Adam Brufsky, Kevin M Kalinsky, Javier Cortes, Joyce O’Shaughnessy, Lisa A. Carey, Luca Gianni, Véronique Diéras, Ling Shi, Mahdi Gharaibeh, Luciana Preger, Lee Moore, See Phan, Martine Piccart. Assessment of health-related quality of life by clinical response from the phase 3 ASCENT study in metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-16-01.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0008-5472 , 1538-7445
    URL: Article
    DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.SABCS21-P5-16-01
    RVK:
    XA 36000
    RVK:
    XA 10000
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
    Publication Date: 2022
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2036785-5
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1432-1
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 410466-3
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
    Online Resource
  • 4
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Abstract PD13-07: Subgroup analysis of patients with brain metastases from the phase 3 ASCENT study of sacituzumab govitecan versus chemotherapy in metastatic triple-negative breast cancer
    American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) ; 2021
    In:  Cancer Research Vol. 81, No. 4_Supplement ( 2021-02-15), p. PD13-07-PD13-07
    Details
    In: Cancer Research, American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), Vol. 81, No. 4_Supplement ( 2021-02-15), p. PD13-07-PD13-07
    Abstract: Background: Patients (pts) with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC) who have brain metastases represent a poor prognosis cohort with a high unmet clinical need. Sacituzumab govitecan (SG) is an antibody-drug conjugate composed of an anti-Trop-2 antibody coupled to SN-38, an active metabolite of irinotecan, via a unique hydrolyzable linker that allows for SN-38 release intracellularly and in the tumor microenvironment (bystander effect). SN-38 can cross the blood-brain barrier and is a drug partner in central nervous system (CNS) disease regimens (PMID: 18784279; PMID: 26080460). Although antibody-based therapy raises concerns regarding CNS penetration, activity with SG has been seen in intracranial xenograft models (Brenner Neurooncol Adv 2019). In a subgroup analysis from ASCENT, the efficacy and safety of SG were evaluated in pts with stable brain metastases. Methods: In the phase 3 ASCENT study (NCT02574455), 529 pts with mTNBC refractory to or relapsing after at least 2 prior chemotherapies were randomized 1:1 to receive SG (10 mg/kg IV on days 1 and 8 every 21 days) or single-agent treatment of physician’s choice (TPC; capecitabine, eribulin, vinorelbine, or gemcitabine) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Brain MRIs were required in pts with known brain metastases who were eligible if they had stable CNS disease for ≥4 wk by MRI. Per protocol, stable disease was defined as ≥2 wk from discontinuation of antiseizure medication and corticosteroid dose (≤20 mg prednisone equivalent) that was stable or decreasing for ≥2 wk before randomization. In these pts, brain MRIs were required throughout the study. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) per independent central review (RECIST v1.1) in brain metastases-negative pts. Secondary endpoints included PFS per investigator assessment, PFS in the full population (in pts with/without brain metastases) by central review, objective response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), and safety. Results: Overall, 61 of 529 (12%) enrolled pts had stable brain metastases at screening and were randomized to SG (n=32) or TPC (n=29). Median age was 53 y for SG and 51 y for TPC; all pts were female and had a median of 5 prior anticancer regimens. In this subset, median PFS was 2.8 mo (95% CI, 1.5-3.9) for SG vs 1.6 mo (95% CI, 1.3-2.9) for TPC by central review, and median OS was 6.8 mo (95% CI, 4.7-14.1) for SG vs 7.5 mo (95% CI, 4.7-11.1) for TPC. ORR for SG vs TPC, respectively, was 3% (1/32) vs 0% by central review, with a clinical benefit rate of 9.4% vs. 3.4%. Stable disease was achieved in 15 (47%) pts with SG vs 9 (31%) pts with TPC. In 53 pts who received at least 1 dose of treatment (SG, n=30; TPC, n=23), any-grade treatment-emergent adverse events ( & gt;20% with SG) for SG vs TPC were fatigue (63% vs 52%), diarrhea (50% vs 13%), neutropenia (43% vs 35%), nausea (43% vs 26%), decreased appetite (30% vs 17%), decreased neutrophil count (33% vs 22%), anemia (23% vs 35%), alopecia (23% vs 13%), and constipation (23% vs 22%). There were no treatment-related deaths. Two pts treated with SG are continuing study treatment for 16.2 and 6.3 mo as of the data cutoff date. Conclusions: Data interpretation in this population with poor prognosis is limited by the small sample size. In this exploratory analysis of pts with brain metastases from the phase 3 ASCENT study, SG was numerically better than TPC for tumor response and PFS but not OS. The safety profile was similar to that of the population without brain metastases for both study arms. SG is currently under clinical investigation for pts undergoing elective craniotomy for breast cancer with brain metastases or recurrent glioblastoma (NCT03995706) based on promising preclinical and intracranial clinical data. Citation Format: Véronique Diéras, Robert Weaver, Sara M. Tolaney, Aditya Bardia, Kevin Punie, Adam Brufsky, Hope S. Rugo, Kevin Kalinsky, Tiffany Traina, Leonard Klein, Delphine Loirat, Filipa Lynce, Brooke Daniel, Foluso Ademuyiwa, Sara A. Hurvitz, David M. Goldenberg, Quan Hong, Martin Olivo, Loretta M. Itri, Lisa Carey. Subgroup analysis of patients with brain metastases from the phase 3 ASCENT study of sacituzumab govitecan versus chemotherapy in metastatic triple-negative breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD13-07.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0008-5472 , 1538-7445
    URL: Article
    DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.SABCS20-PD13-07
    RVK:
    XA 36000
    RVK:
    XA 10000
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
    Publication Date: 2021
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2036785-5
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1432-1
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 410466-3
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
    Online Resource
  • 5
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Abstract P5-16-15: Post-progression therapy outcomes in patients (pts) from the phase 3 ASCENT study of sacituzumab govitecan (SG) in metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC)
    American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) ; 2022
    In:  Cancer Research Vol. 82, No. 4_Supplement ( 2022-02-15), p. P5-16-15-P5-16-15
    Details
    In: Cancer Research, American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), Vol. 82, No. 4_Supplement ( 2022-02-15), p. P5-16-15-P5-16-15
    Abstract: Background: SG is an antibody-drug conjugate composed of an anti-Trop-2 antibody coupled to the cytotoxic SN-38 payload via a proprietary, hydrolyzable linker. SG is FDA approved for pts with mTNBC who received ≥2 prior chemotherapies (≥1 in the metastatic setting). The confirmatory phase 3 ASCENT study (NCT02574455) in pts treated in second line or greater (2L+) mTNBC demonstrated significant progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) benefit of SG over single-agent chemotherapy treatment of physician’s choice (median PFS: 4.8 vs 1.7 months, HR 0.43, P & lt;0.001; median OS: 11.8 vs 6.9 months, HR 0.51) in the full trial population, with a manageable safety profile. However, outcomes and patterns of subsequent therapy for pts who discontinue SG following progressive disease (PD) are not well characterized. This post hoc subgroup analysis investigates post-progression treatment and OS of pts who discontinued SG due to PD during the ASCENT trial. Methods: In ASCENT, pts with mTNBC refractory/relapsing after ≥2 prior chemotherapies (≥1 in the metastatic setting) were randomized 1:1 to receive SG (10 mg/kg IV on d 1 and 8, every 21 d) or TPC (capecitabine, eribulin, vinorelbine, or gemcitabine) until unacceptable toxicity or progression. Post-progression outcomes were assessed in pts who discontinued SG due to progressive disease (PD). Pts were followed every 4 weeks for OS, including documentation of further therapy for breast cancer. Time to post-progression therapy was defined as the number of months from time of randomization until the initiation of subsequent anticancer therapy. OS was analyzed in pts who received post-progression therapy vs those who did not and defined as the number of months from randomization or from end of SG treatment, using Kaplan Meier estimates and Cox regression. Results: 222/267 (83%) pts who were randomized to receive SG discontinued SG due to PD. In these patients median age was 53 years (range, 27-82), median number of prior anticancer regimens was 4, and 7% had known germline BRCA1/2 mutations. Pts received SG for a median duration of 4.2 months (range, 0.0-18.7). Following SG discontinuation, post-progression therapy was received by 73% (n=163) of pts; common post-SG therapies included eribulin (n=70; 32%), carboplatin (n=34; 15%), capecitabine (n=34; 15%), and atezolizumab, (n=15; 7%). The median time to receipt of post-progression therapy was 5.4 months (range, 1.0-19.8). Median OS in pts who received any post PD treatment vs those who did not receive post PD treatment following SG was 13.4 vs 7.3 months (HR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.32-0.67; P & lt;0.0001) from time of randomization and 7.9 vs 2.0 months (HR, 0.14; 95% CI, 0.09-0.22; P & lt;0.0001) from end of SG treatment, respectively. In pts who received eribulin, carboplatin, atezolizumab, or capecitabine, median OS was 14.1 (95% CI, 10.9-14.9), 13.6 (95% CI, 10.6-15.9), 16.5 (95% CI, 8.7 to not evaluable), and 14.9 (95% CI, 10.9-16.8) months from time of randomization and 8.4 (95% CI, 6.8-9.2), 8.9 (95% CI, 6.7-10.8), 8.6 (95% CI, 4.3 to not evaluable), and 8.9 (95% CI, 6.6-10.3) months from end of SG treatment, respectively. Conclusions: In ASCENT, the majority of pts who discontinued SG due to PD were able to receive subsequent therapy post-progression. Pts who received post PD therapy following SG had significantly improved median OS over those who did not receive further therapy. Pts who received eribulin, carboplatin, atezolizumab, or capecitabine, as post PD therapy had similar median OS. These results indicate that treatment with SG does not prevent receipt of further systemic therapy. Citation Format: Javier Cortés, Aditya Bardia, Delphine Loirat, Sara M. Tolaney, Kevin Punie, Mafalda Oliveira, Sara A. Hurvitz, Adam Brufsky, Sagar Sardesai, Kevin M Kalinsky, Tiffany Traina, Erika Hamilton, Joyce O’Shaughnessy, Véronique Diéras, Lisa A. Carey, Martine Piccart, Sibylle Loibl, Hope S. Rugo, Yanni Zhu, See Phan, Luca Gianni. Post-progression therapy outcomes in patients (pts) from the phase 3 ASCENT study of sacituzumab govitecan (SG) in metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-16-15.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0008-5472 , 1538-7445
    URL: Article
    DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.SABCS21-P5-16-15
    RVK:
    XA 36000
    RVK:
    XA 10000
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
    Publication Date: 2022
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2036785-5
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1432-1
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 410466-3
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
    Online Resource
  • 6
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Health-related quality of life in the phase III ASCENT trial of sacituzumab govitecan versus standard chemotherapy in metastatic triple-negative breast cancer
    Elsevier BV ; 2023
    In:  European Journal of Cancer Vol. 178 ( 2023-01), p. 23-33
    Details
    In: European Journal of Cancer, Elsevier BV, Vol. 178 ( 2023-01), p. 23-33
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0959-8049
    URL: Article
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2022.10.003
    RVK:
    XA 42017.A
    RVK:
    XA 42017
    Language: English
    Publisher: Elsevier BV
    Publication Date: 2023
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1120460-6
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468190-0
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 82061-1
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
    Online Resource
  • 7
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Analysis of patients without and with an initial triple-negative breast cancer diagnosis in the phase 3 randomized ASCENT study of sacituzumab govitecan in metastatic triple-negative breast cancer
    Springer Science and Business Media LLC ; 2022
    In:  Breast Cancer Research and Treatment Vol. 195, No. 2 ( 2022-09), p. 127-139
    Details
    In: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, Springer Science and Business Media LLC, Vol. 195, No. 2 ( 2022-09), p. 127-139
    Abstract: Sacituzumab govitecan (SG) is an antibody–drug conjugate composed of an anti–Trop-2 antibody coupled to SN-38 via a proprietary hydrolyzable linker. In the ASCENT study, SG improved survival versus single-agent treatment of physician’s choice (TPC) in pre-treated metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC). Hormone/HER2 receptor changes are common, particularly at relapse/metastasis. This subanalysis assessed outcomes in patients who did/did not have TNBC at initial diagnosis, before enrollment. Methods TNBC diagnosis was only required at study entry. Patients with mTNBC refractory/relapsing after ≥ 2 prior chemotherapies were randomized 1:1 to receive SG or TPC. Primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) in patients without brain metastases. Results Overall, 70/235 (30%) and 76/233 (33%) patients who received SG and TPC, respectively, did not have TNBC at initial diagnosis. Clinical benefit with SG versus TPC was observed in this subset. Median PFS was 4.6 versus 2.3 months (HR 0.48; 95% CI 0.32–0.72), median overall survival was 12.4 versus 6.7 months (HR 0.44; 95% CI 0.30–0.64), and objective response rate (ORR) was 31% versus 4%; those who also received prior CDK4/6 inhibitors had ORRs of 21% versus 5%. Efficacy and safety for patients with TNBC at initial diagnosis were generally similar to those who did not present with TNBC at initial diagnosis. Conclusion Patients without TNBC at initial diagnosis had improved clinical outcomes and a manageable safety profile with SG, supporting SG as a treatment option for mTNBC regardless of subtype at initial diagnosis. Subtype reassessment in advanced breast cancer allows for optimal treatment. Clinical trial registration number NCT02574455, registered October 12, 2015.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0167-6806 , 1573-7217
    URL: Article
    DOI: 10.1007/s10549-022-06602-7
    Language: English
    Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
    Publication Date: 2022
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2004077-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
    Online Resource
  • 8
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Assessment of sacituzumab govitecan (SG) in patients with prior neoadjuvant/adjuvant chemotherapy in the phase 3 ASCENT study in metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC).
    American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) ; 2021
    In:  Journal of Clinical Oncology Vol. 39, No. 15_suppl ( 2021-05-20), p. 1080-1080
    Details
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 39, No. 15_suppl ( 2021-05-20), p. 1080-1080
    Abstract: 1080 Background: mTNBC is a heterogenous disease with few treatment options and poor outcomes. Pts who recur ≤ 12 mo after completing (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy may represent a subset with more aggressive disease. SG is an antibody-drug conjugate composed of an anti–Trop-2 antibody coupled to the cytotoxic SN-38 payload via a proprietary, hydrolyzable linker. SG received accelerated approval for pts with mTNBC who received ≥ 2 prior therapies for metastatic disease; clinical benefit for SG over treatment of physician's choice (TPC) was confirmed in the phase 3 ASCENT study (NCT02574455) for median progression-free survival (PFS; 5.6 vs 1.7 mo), median overall survival (OS; 12.1 vs 6.7 mo), objective response rate (ORR; 35% vs 5%), clinical benefit rate (CBR; 45% vs 9%), and median duration of response (6.3 vs 3.6 mo). This ASCENT subanalysis of pts with mTNBC who recurred ≤ 12 mo after (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy and then only received 1 line of therapy in the metastatic setting assessed the benefit of SG in this subgroup vs the overall trial population. Methods: In ASCENT, pts with mTNBC refractory/relapsing after ≥ 2 prior chemotherapies were randomized 1:1 to receive SG (10 mg/kg IV on days 1 and 8, every 21 days) or TPC (capecitabine, eribulin, vinorelbine, or gemcitabine). Per protocol, a pt was eligible after only 1 prior regimen in the metastatic setting if their disease recurred within 12 months of completing (neo)adjuvant therapy. Primary endpoint was PFS per RECIST 1.1 by independent review in brain metastases-negative (BMNeg) pts. Efficacy and safety was assessed in a subset of pts who recurred ≤ 12 mo after (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy and then received 1 line of therapy in the metastatic setting. Results: In total, 33 and 32 BMNeg pts with a median age of 49 and 51 yrs received SG and TPC in this subgroup, respectively. In this subgroup, treatment with SG (vs TPC) improved PFS (median 5.7 vs 1.5 mo; HR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.22-0.76; P = 0.0049) and OS (median 10.9 vs 4.9 mo; HR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.28-0.91; P = 0.0227). We also observed higher ORR (30% vs 3%) and CBR (42% vs 6%) with a median response duration of 6.7 mo with SG vs not calculable with TPC. The efficacy results from this subgroup are similar to those for SG vs TPC in the overall BMNeg population. The safety profile of SG in pts in this subgroup was consistent with prior reports. There were no treatment-related deaths with SG. Conclusions: Pts with mTNBC who recurred ≤ 12 mo after (neo)adjuvant therapy and then had 1 line of prior therapy in the metastatic setting may represent a subset with more aggressive disease. In this subgroup, pts had superior outcomes with SG vs TPC in the second-line metastatic setting, consistent with the benefit seen in the overall BMNeg population. Studies are ongoing (NeoSTAR, NCT04230109; SASCIA, NCT04595565) to evaluate SG as an earlier-line treatment option for TNBC. Clinical trial information: NCT02574455 .
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    URL: Article
    DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2021.39.15_suppl.1080
    RVK:
    XA 52760
    RVK:
    XA 10000
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2021
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
    Online Resource
  • 9
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Outcomes in patients (pts) aged ≥65 years in the phase 3 ASCENT study of sacituzumab govitecan (SG) in metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC).
    American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) ; 2021
    In:  Journal of Clinical Oncology Vol. 39, No. 15_suppl ( 2021-05-20), p. 1011-1011
    Details
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 39, No. 15_suppl ( 2021-05-20), p. 1011-1011
    Abstract: 1011 Background: Approximately 20% of pts diagnosed with TNBC are aged ≥65 y. Often, older pts are less fit for chemotherapy due to a greater rate of comorbidities, increased use of medications, and pre-existing frailty or functional loss. SG is an antibody-drug conjugate composed of an anti–Trop-2 antibody coupled to the cytotoxic SN-38 payload via a proprietary, hydrolyzable linker. The landmark phase 3 ASCENT study (NCT02574455) showed improved outcomes with SG vs single-agent chemotherapy of physician’s choice (TPC) in pts with relapsed/refractory mTNBC (median progression-free survival [PFS], 5.6 vs 1.7 mo; median overall survival [OS] , 12.1 vs 6.7 mo). Here we assess the impact of age on the efficacy and safety of SG in ASCENT. Methods: Pts with mTNBC refractory/relapsing after ≥2 prior chemotherapies were randomized 1:1 to receive SG (10 mg/kg IV on days 1 and 8, every 21 days) or TPC (capecitabine, eribulin, vinorelbine, or gemcitabine) until disease progression/unacceptable toxicity. Primary endpoint was PFS per RECIST 1.1 by independent review in brain metastases-negative (BMNeg) pts. Safety outcomes were assessed in all treated pts. This prespecified subgroup analysis assessed the impact of age (pts ≥65 y) on PFS, OS, and safety. Results: Of 529 pts enrolled, 468 were BMNeg (median age, 54 y); of these, 44/235 pts (19%) who received SG and 46/233 pts (20%) who received TPC were aged ≥65 y. SG treatment improved median PFS vs TPC in pts ≥65 y (7.1 vs 2.4 mo; HR, 0.22; 95% CI, 0.12-0.40). SG vs TPC treatment also improved median OS in pts ≥65 y (15.3 vs 8.2 mo; HR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.22-0.64). Treatment with SG vs TPC resulted in higher ORR (50% vs 0%) and clinical benefit rate (CBR, 61% vs 9%) in pts ≥65 y. Of the 7 pts ≥75 y who received SG, 2 had partial response, 4 had stable disease [SD], and 1 had SD 〉 6 mo as best response. In pts 〈 65 y, median PFS for SG vs TPC was 4.6 vs 1.7 mo (HR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.35-0.59), and median OS was 11.2 vs 6.6 mo (HR, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.40-0.64), respectively; the ORR and CBR were 31% vs 6% and 41% vs 9%, respectively. Pts ≥65 y treated with SG vs TPC had similar rates of all grade and grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). TEAEs leading to dose reduction were similar in pts ≥65 y in the SG vs TPC arms (35% vs 33%) and were lower in pts 〈 65 y (19% vs 24%). Key treatment-related TEAEs leading to dose reduction in pts ≥65 y in the SG vs TPC arms were neutropenia (including febrile neutropenia; 14% vs 25%), fatigue (10% vs 4%), diarrhea (6% vs 0%), and nausea (4% vs 0%). TEAEs leading to treatment discontinuation with SG vs TPC were low in pts ≥65 y (2% vs 2%) and 〈 65 y (5% vs 6%). There were no treatment-related AEs leading to death in any SG-treated age group. Conclusions: Irrespective of age, pts who received SG had a significant survival benefit vs TPC, with a tolerable safety profile. Proactive AE monitoring and management will allow optimal therapeutic exposure to SG in older pts. Clinical trial information: NCT02574455 .
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    URL: Article
    DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2021.39.15_suppl.1011
    RVK:
    XA 52760
    RVK:
    XA 10000
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2021
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
    Online Resource
  • 10
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Sacituzumab Govitecan in Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
    Massachusetts Medical Society ; 2021
    In:  New England Journal of Medicine Vol. 384, No. 16 ( 2021-04-22), p. 1529-1541
    Details
    In: New England Journal of Medicine, Massachusetts Medical Society, Vol. 384, No. 16 ( 2021-04-22), p. 1529-1541
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0028-4793 , 1533-4406
    URL: Article
    DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2028485
    RVK:
    XA 10000
    Language: English
    Publisher: Massachusetts Medical Society
    Publication Date: 2021
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468837-2
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
    Online Resource
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...