GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

X

Ihre E-Mail wurde erfolgreich gesendet. Bitte prüfen Sie Ihren Maileingang.

Leider ist ein Fehler beim E-Mail-Versand aufgetreten. Bitte versuchen Sie es erneut.

Vorgang fortführen?

Exportieren
  • 1
    Online-Ressource
    Online-Ressource
    Isn't a Flood a “Rainy Day?” Does the Political Nature of Disasters Impact the Use of States’ Rainy Day Funds?
    Wiley ; 2019
    In:  Social Science Quarterly Vol. 100, No. 7 ( 2019-12), p. 2555-2566
    Details
    In: Social Science Quarterly, Wiley, Vol. 100, No. 7 ( 2019-12), p. 2555-2566
    Kurzfassung: To determine if state governments utilize rainy day funds (RDFs) for political purposes in the aftermath of disasters rather than their intended purpose of combating state cyclical economic downturns. Methods This research draws from multiple state‐level data sources to construct a panel data set from 1992 to 2010. Results Disaster damage, relief funds, and politics all influence the usage of states’ RDFs. We also find that the RDF balance is lower when disaster damages increase, when it is an election year, and the same party holds party control of the governor and legislature. Conclusion The findings of this empirical research are consistent with the literature about the importance state‐level politics plays in the use of state stabilization funds intended for cyclical economic downturns as opposed to providing more politically expedient disaster relief.
    Materialart: Online-Ressource
    ISSN: 0038-4941 , 1540-6237
    URL: Issue
    URL: Article
    DOI: 10.1111/ssqu.v100.7
    DOI: 10.1111/ssqu.12663
    Sprache: Englisch
    Verlag: Wiley
    Publikationsdatum: 2019
    ZDB Id: 2130790-8
    SSG: 3,4
    Standort Signatur Einschränkungen Verfügbarkeit
    BibTip Andere fanden auch interessant ...
    Online-Ressource
  • 2
    Online-Ressource
    Online-Ressource
    Strategic Spending: Does Politics Influence Election Administration Expenditure?
    Wiley ; 2019
    In:  American Journal of Political Science Vol. 63, No. 2 ( 2019-04), p. 427-438
    Details
    In: American Journal of Political Science, Wiley, Vol. 63, No. 2 ( 2019-04), p. 427-438
    Kurzfassung: Recently, election administration has been an important part of the national and global conversation about the results of elections. The important issue of election administration spending has not been examined extensively, and the influence of politics on election administration spending levels has not been examined in the United States. While theories of voter turnout and policy preference suggest that politics should influence election administration spending levels in the counties that administer elections, to our knowledge, there has been no evidence produced to support a partisan election administration expenditure effect. This research finds that Republican county commissions in North Carolina spend significantly less on election administration once the county electorate is a sufficient Republican majority. The article presents a novel model and method for estimating election administration spending and calls for additional research to examine the outcomes of these significant differences in spending on election administration.
    Materialart: Online-Ressource
    ISSN: 0092-5853 , 1540-5907
    URL: Issue
    URL: Article
    DOI: 10.1111/ajps.2019.63.issue-2
    DOI: 10.1111/ajps.12422
    RVK:
    MA 1000
    Sprache: Englisch
    Verlag: Wiley
    Publikationsdatum: 2019
    ZDB Id: 2010010-3
    ZDB Id: 280044-5
    SSG: 3,6
    Standort Signatur Einschränkungen Verfügbarkeit
    BibTip Andere fanden auch interessant ...
    Online-Ressource
  • 3
    Online-Ressource
    Online-Ressource
    Tweeting Blame in a Federalist System: Attributions for Disaster Response in Social Media Following Hurricane Sandy
    Wiley ; 2019
    In:  Social Science Quarterly Vol. 100, No. 7 ( 2019-12), p. 2594-2606
    Details
    In: Social Science Quarterly, Wiley, Vol. 100, No. 7 ( 2019-12), p. 2594-2606
    Kurzfassung: Attribution of responsibility for government performance in a federalist system is challenging but necessary for democratic accountability. We identify competing hypotheses for how attributions for government performance might arise in social media and test our expectations using data drawn from Twitter following Hurricane Sandy. Method We use a novel linguistic approach to measure blame attributions in text and compare patterns of blame attributions toward multiple levels of government over time. Results Social media blame attributions emerge at the outset of the storm and are more likely to center on federal actors, followed by local actors. State actors received the least blame. We find similar patterns in retweets. Conclusion Our results suggest that social media privileges attributions that target broadly salient national political actors; however, social media accounts of disaster may make it easier for the public to assess performance of local and state government.
    Materialart: Online-Ressource
    ISSN: 0038-4941 , 1540-6237
    URL: Issue
    URL: Article
    DOI: 10.1111/ssqu.v100.7
    DOI: 10.1111/ssqu.12669
    Sprache: Englisch
    Verlag: Wiley
    Publikationsdatum: 2019
    ZDB Id: 2130790-8
    SSG: 3,4
    Standort Signatur Einschränkungen Verfügbarkeit
    BibTip Andere fanden auch interessant ...
    Online-Ressource
  • 4
    Online-Ressource
    Online-Ressource
    Making Every Vote Count: The Important Role of Managerial Capacity in Achieving Better Election Administration Outcomes
    Wiley ; 2020
    In:  Public Administration Review Vol. 80, No. 5 ( 2020-09), p. 733-742
    Details
    In: Public Administration Review, Wiley, Vol. 80, No. 5 ( 2020-09), p. 733-742
    Kurzfassung: A public agency's capacity to implement policy and achieve valued public outcomes has been a long‐running area of research in public administration. Many articles provide theory and empirics regarding the capacity to implement policy, but relatively few examine multiple types of agency capacity within the same analysis. This article develops a model based on the election administration literature in political science and public administration to examine the effects of managerial capacity, financial capacity, and technology on the election management outcome of the residual vote rate in North Carolina election jurisdictions. The results indicate that higher levels of management capacity and technology significantly reduce problems with voting as measured by the residual vote rate. Financial capacity shows a negative association with the residual vote rate but is not significant. The article concludes by discussing how studying election administration provides an important and uniquely good administrative context for developing administrative theory.
    Materialart: Online-Ressource
    ISSN: 0033-3352 , 1540-6210
    URL: Issue
    URL: Article
    DOI: 10.1111/puar.v80.5
    DOI: 10.1111/puar.13216
    RVK:
    MA 1000
    Sprache: Englisch
    Verlag: Wiley
    Publikationsdatum: 2020
    ZDB Id: 2045553-7
    SSG: 2
    SSG: 3,6
    SSG: 3,7
    Standort Signatur Einschränkungen Verfügbarkeit
    BibTip Andere fanden auch interessant ...
    Online-Ressource
  • 5
    Online-Ressource
    Online-Ressource
    Evaluating the Recessionary Impact on Election Administration Budgeting and Spending : Part of Special Symposium on Election Sciences
    SAGE Publications ; 2020
    In:  American Politics Research Vol. 48, No. 6 ( 2020-11), p. 709-713
    Details
    In: American Politics Research, SAGE Publications, Vol. 48, No. 6 ( 2020-11), p. 709-713
    Kurzfassung: Recent research indicates the need to understand the role financial resources play in election administration. A key question is, when considering “financial resources,” how much does economic hardship affect the differences between the budgeted amount and the actual amount spent?. The limited research that has examined this question comes from the United Kingdom; it shows that there are significant differences between the two measures and they vary systematically based upon fiscal environmental conditions. This research examines whether the fiscal environment influences election administration budgets, spending, and the resulting budget variance in local US jurisdictions. Using county election administration spending data from four states, this research indicates election administration budgets, spending, and variances are related to the fiscal environment. Not only does this work have implications for measurement of election cost, but this work is key to understanding the financial situation election administration faces given pandemic-related economic woes.
    Materialart: Online-Ressource
    ISSN: 1532-673X , 1552-3373
    URL: Article
    DOI: 10.1177/1532673X20935785
    Sprache: Englisch
    Verlag: SAGE Publications
    Publikationsdatum: 2020
    ZDB Id: 2095947-3
    ZDB Id: 2016689-8
    SSG: 7,26
    SSG: 3,6
    Standort Signatur Einschränkungen Verfügbarkeit
    BibTip Andere fanden auch interessant ...
    Online-Ressource
  • 6
    Online-Ressource
    Online-Ressource
    Guns or Butter… or Elections? Understanding intertemporal and distributive dimensions of policy choice through the examination of budgetary tradeoffs at the local level
    Wiley ; 2021
    In:  Public Budgeting & Finance Vol. 41, No. 4 ( 2021-12), p. 3-19
    Details
    In: Public Budgeting & Finance, Wiley, Vol. 41, No. 4 ( 2021-12), p. 3-19
    Kurzfassung: Using data from North Carolina counties, we find partisanship and time horizon generally influence budgetary tradeoffs in ways consistent with intertemporal policy choice. The budgetary tradeoff model suggests that elections administration is underfunded in part because it lacks a natural constituency, likely because outcomes are observed intermittently. Jacobs' (2011, 2016) intertemporal and distributive policy choice framework can be a useful guide for understanding the policy choices that are made at the local level. The political context of the county affects expenditure decisions indicating that budgetary tradeoffs may be an important avenue for future research in other areas of policy. Elections administration is a clear case that fits into the theory of distributive and intertemporal policy choice. There is a need to study a range of policies that have no clear constituency and only future observed impacts is evident.
    Materialart: Online-Ressource
    ISSN: 0275-1100 , 1540-5850
    URL: Issue
    URL: Article
    DOI: 10.1111/pbaf.v41.4
    DOI: 10.1111/pbaf.12289
    Sprache: Englisch
    Verlag: Wiley
    Publikationsdatum: 2021
    ZDB Id: 2029127-9
    SSG: 3,6
    SSG: 3,7
    Standort Signatur Einschränkungen Verfügbarkeit
    BibTip Andere fanden auch interessant ...
    Online-Ressource
Schließen ⊗
Diese Webseite nutzt Cookies und das Analyse-Tool Matomo. Weitere Informationen finden Sie hier...