GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
Material
Language
  • 1
    In: Cancer, Wiley, Vol. 109, No. 10 ( 2007-05-15), p. 2068-2076
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0008-543X , 1097-0142
    URL: Issue
    Language: English
    Publisher: Wiley
    Publication Date: 2007
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1479932-7
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2599218-1
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2594979-2
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1429-1
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    In: Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, Springer Science and Business Media LLC, Vol. 17, No. 1 ( 2022-12)
    Abstract: In individuals suffering from a rare disease the diagnostic process and the confirmation of a final diagnosis often extends over many years. Factors contributing to delayed diagnosis include health care professionals' limited knowledge of rare diseases and frequent (co-)occurrence of mental disorders that may complicate and delay the diagnostic process. The ZSE-DUO study aims to assess the benefits of a combination of a physician focusing on somatic aspects with a mental health expert working side by side as a tandem in the diagnostic process. Study design This multi-center, prospective controlled study has a two-phase cohort design. Methods Two cohorts of 682 patients each are sequentially recruited from 11 university-based German Centers for Rare Diseases (CRD): the standard care cohort (control, somatic expertise only) and the innovative care cohort (experimental, combined somatic and mental health expertise). Individuals aged 12 years and older presenting with symptoms and signs which are not explained by current diagnoses will be included. Data will be collected prior to the first visit to the CRD’s outpatient clinic (T0), at the first visit (T1) and 12 months thereafter (T2). Outcomes Primary outcome is the percentage of patients with one or more confirmed diagnoses covering the symptomatic spectrum presented. Sample size is calculated to detect a 10 percent increase from 30% in standard care to 40% in the innovative dual expert cohort. Secondary outcomes are (a) time to diagnosis/diagnoses explaining the symptomatology; (b) proportion of patients successfully referred from CRD to standard care; (c) costs of diagnosis including incremental cost effectiveness ratios; (d) predictive value of screening instruments administered at T0 to identify patients with mental disorders; (e) patients’ quality of life and evaluation of care; and f) physicians’ satisfaction with the innovative care approach. Conclusions This is the first multi-center study to investigate the effects of a mental health specialist working in tandem with a somatic expert physician in CRDs. If this innovative approach proves successful, it will be made available on a larger scale nationally and promoted internationally. In the best case, ZSE-DUO can significantly shorten the time to diagnosis for a suspected rare disease. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov; Identifier: NCT03563677; First posted: June 20, 2018, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03563677 .
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1750-1172
    Language: English
    Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
    Publication Date: 2022
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2225857-7
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 120, No. 21 ( 2012-11-16), p. 1503-1503
    Abstract: Abstract 1503 Background: The frequent development of acquired resistance in patients with Ph+ALL initially responsive to tyrosine kinase inhibitor(TKI)-based regimens highlights the need for more effective post-remission therapy. Imatinib or dasatinib as single agents or combined with chemotherapy are commonly employed, but do not adequately prevent relapse. Interferon-alpha as treatment for bcr-abl positive leukemias has attracted renewed interest, fueled by preclinical observations suggesting that IFN-a may target leukemic stem cells. Proposed mechansims of IFN-a action include recruitment of dormant CML stem cells into the cell cycle, enhancing their susceptibility to eradication by TKIs. Whereas several recent randomized clinical studies in CML demonstrate greater efficacy of combined IFN-a and TKI compared to TKIs alone, no long-term clinical data on the combination of IFN-a and TKIs are available for patients with Ph+ALL. Aims: This prospective, open-label phase II study was designed to investigate the combination of low-dose IFN-a with imatinib mesylate (IM) 600mg daily as maintenance therapy in Ph+ALL patients in terms of hematologic and non-hematologic toxicity and the ability to adhere to the planned dose of the study drugs. In addition, we examined whether bcr-abl transcript levels and mutation status were predictive of relapse and remission duration. Outcome with study treatment is compared with that of patients with Ph+ALL who received the same initial therapy, followed by maintenance with imatinib alone. Patients and study design: Patients with Ph+ALL in first CR after receiving induction and consolidation chemotherapy according the GMALL protocol for elderly Ph+ALL who were not candidates for allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT). were eligible. MT consisted of IM at a single dose of 600 mg daily, combined with low dose subcutaneous interferon-alfa-2a (RoferonÒ) starting at 1 MU three times a week with dose escalation to a target dose of 3 MU three times a week as rapidly as tolerated. The trial was approved by the Ethics Committee of the University of Frankfurt, Germany. Results: 19 elderly patients (median age 66 yrs; [60 – 75 yrs]) were enrolled in the combination study, 12 patients (median age 67 yrs; [58 – 75 yrs] ) who received only IM as recommended MT after the same front-line therapy served as a control group. The median overall duration of MT is 26 mos. [3 – 110 mos] . Median overall survival for pts. receiving IM+ IFN-a is 5.4 yrs [2.5 – 11.4 yrs] vs. 2.9 yrs. [0.7 – 8.7 yrs] for pts. receiving IM alone (p=ns). For pts. receiving IM+ IFN-a, the median remission duration from start of maintenance is 2.2 yrs. [0.4–9.5 yrs] versus 0.75 yrs[0.1–7.6 yrs] . for patients receiving IM as MT (p=0.07). Three of 19 pts. are in ongoing CR 7.9, 8.6, and 10.4 years after start of maintenance. 4 pts. died in CR of causes unrelated to leukemia and 12 patients relapsed, 2 (16%) with isolated CNS involvement. Remission duration was independent of the number of previous cycles of intensive chemotherapy, of the MRD response during the first 6 mos. of intensive front-line therapy (16 mos. vs. 26 mos.) and of achievement of PCR negativity at any time during intial therapy. Surprisingly, the BCR-ABL transcript level at the start of MT likewise had no impact on time to disease recurrence. Prolonged MRD positivity without hematologic relapse occured in several patients. For pts. receiving IM as MT, 2 of 12 pts. are in ongoing CR 6.5 and 7.6 yrs. from start of maintenance. 2 of the 10 patients relapsed on MT with CNS involvement. Overall tolerability was acceptable, adverse events which lead to dose reductions for IFN-a were noted in 9 of 18 evaluable pts. Nine pts. suffered from moderate depression or fatigue. Hematologic toxicity during MT with IM+ IFN-a was mild with grade III cytopenia developing in only 2 pts. Conclusions: In elderly Ph+ALL pts. ineligible for allogeneic SCT, maintenance with IM in combination with low-dose IFN-a results in long-term sustained remissions in a substantial proportion of patients, with acceptable side effects. Surprisingly, the level of MRD was not predictive for remission duration. The lack of relationship between number of consolidation cycles and remission duration suggests IM+IFN-a MT may be effective even if started earlier during front-line therapy. Evaluation of the more potent 2nd generation TKI in combination with LD IFN-a as MT for Ph+ALL is warrented. Disclosures: Ottmann: Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria, Research Funding.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2012
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 104, No. 11 ( 2004-11-16), p. 685-685
    Abstract: Background and study design: Despite intensive chemotherapy (ChThx), preferably followed by allogeneic SCT, the prognosis of adult patients with Ph+ALL is poor. Adding Imatinib to first-line treatment may improve efficacy and outcome and reduce the occurrence of Imatinib-resistance. However, it has not yet been established how Imatinib is best incorporated in front-line treatment of Ph+ALL. In a prospective, multicenter study of the GMALL, we compared the safety, anti-leukemic efficacy and MRD response of two strategies in which Imatinib was incorporated either intercurrently between (cohort 1) or simultaneously with (cohort 2) induction and consolidation cycles. Cohort 1 patients had to have a CR after induction therapy, with persistance of minimal residual disease (MRD) by RT-PCR; in contrast, patients in cohort 2 received Imatinib simultaneously with the 2nd phase of induction irrespective of remission status, with continuation of Imatinib for up to 8 weeks after the first consolidation cycle. Results: Cohort 1 encompasses 48 pts. (median age 47 y, range: 24–72), 46 of whom were in CR and 2 in PR upon starting Imatinib at 400 mg/d (n=36) or 600 mg (n=12). Imatinib was initiated 18 (5–52) days after completion of induction and given for a median of 28 (13–176) days. No patient relapsed during post-induction Imatinib, three pts. relapsed prior to SCT and one death occurred in CR after consolidation therapy due to septicaemia. Hematologic and non-hematologic toxicities were limited to WHO grades I/II. Cohort 2 encompasses 46 pts. (median age 39 y, range: 19–62) enrolled to date; 58% (19/33) had achieved a CR prior to initiation of Imatinib after induction phase I, a PR or non-response was documented in 18% and 24%, respectively. After completion of induction phase II concurrent with Imatinib, 96% (23/24 evaluable) had achieved a CR, one pt. (4%) failed and died. Comparison of median bcr/abl transcripts prior to and after induction II showed no significant decrease in cohort I (ChThx alone) in contrast to a 1.4 log reduction in cohort 2 (ChThx+Imatinib). Comparison of bcr/abl transcripts prior to consolidation I with pre-induction II levels showed a 3.9 log reduction in cohort 2 versus a 1.5 log reduction in cohort 1. Moreover, the frequency with which bcr/abl transcripts became undetectable by RT-PCR prior to consolidation I increased from 10% in cohort 1 to 50% in cohort 2. The duration of grade III/IV thrombocytopenia and neutropenia in cohort 2 was 12 (3–57) days and 16 (3–47) days, respectively, with cytopenias and/or infectious complications entailing Imatinib dose reductions in 40% and interruption of Imatinib in 77% of pts. The most frequent grade III/IV non-hematologic toxicity was hepatic (43% of evaluable pts.). There were no treatment related deaths. Summary: Imatinib given concurrently with and subsequent to induction and consolidation is highly effective first-line treatment for adult Ph+ALL, with a CR rate exceeding 90% and 50% MRD negativity. This strategy is more effective than alternating chemotherapy and Imatinib cycles, but is accompanied by substantial hematologic and non-hematologic toxicity. The overall impact on long-term survival in this very high risk group or patients remains to be determined, particularly in light of subsequent allogeneic SCT in a large proportion of patients.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2004
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 5
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 110, No. 11 ( 2007-11-16), p. 10-10
    Abstract: Background: In Ph+ALL, responsiveness to single-agent imatinib (IM) is determined by the disease stage: whereas more than 90% of pts. with newly diagnosed Ph+ALL achieve a complete remission (CR), the CR rate in patients who failed previous chemotherapy is only 20–30%, with a median time to progression of only 2.2 months. Approximately 80% of pts. with Ph+ALL who relapse during IM-based therapy express a BCR-ABL Tyrosine Kinase Domain (TKD) mutation known to confer high-level IM resistance. We recently showed that in 30– 40% of pts. with de novo Ph+ALL, the same mutation found at relapse is already detectable at a low level prior to first IM exposure; in conjunction with the high response rate, this finding indicates limited growth kinetics of the mutant BCR-ABL clones. To elucidate the reasons for the low CR rate observed in advanced Ph+ALL receiving IM salvage therapy, we compared the frequency and type of up-front mutations, the level of mutant clones, and the outgrowth kinetics of mutations during the first 4 weeks of IM monotherapy in de novo Ph+ALL pts. and in pts. who had failed prior chemotherapy. Patients and methods: We employed denaturing high-performance liquid chromatography (D-HPLC) and cDNA sequencing to examine bone marrow and/or peripheral blood samples collected pre-treatment, during therapy and at the time of relapse from 54 pts. with newly diagnosed Ph+ALL ( 〉 55 yrs.) enrolled in a GMALL study of combined IM and chemotherapy (n=48) or treated analogously (n=6) and from 67 Ph+ALL pts. who were enrolled in the initial phase II studies of single-agent IM as salvage treatment after prior chemotherapy. Results: Prior to first IM exposure, TKD mutations were detected in 33% (21/63) of pts. with advanced Ph+ALL and 31% (9/29) of pts. with de novo Ph+ALL. The incidence of mutations observed at relapse was substantially higher but did not differ significantly between the two cohorts: 70% in pts. with advanced disease who relapsed on IM monotherapy (33 of 50 pts.; P-loop 48%, T315I 16%, A-loop 2%) and 84% in de novo ALL pts. (n=26), treated with combination therapy (P-loop 46%, T315I 15%, A-loop 9,5%). In contrast, the outgrowth of cells expressing mutated bcr-abl during the first four weeks of IM therapy was considerably more rapid in Ph+ALL pts who had failed prior chemotherapy: mutations were detected after 2 and/or 4 weeks IM in only 44% of patients (8/18 evaluable) with newly diagnosed Ph+ALL, whereas 69% of patients (27/39) with advanced Ph+ALL expressed mutant BCR-ABL on at least one of these timepoints. Moreover, the percentage of mutated BCR-ABL was below 1% in all 8 pts. with a mutation in the former cohort (de novo Ph+ALL), but higher than 5% (range: 5 – 100) in 16 of the 27 advanced disease pts (59%) who had a TKD mutation. Conclusions: In Ph+ALL, the incidence, distribution pattern and level of TKD mutations detected prior to - or at relapse on - IM does not differ between pts with newly diagnosed leukemia and those having failed prior chemotherapy. In contrast, patients with advanced disease are characterised by considerably more rapid outgrowth kinetics of leukemic cells expressing BCR-ABL mutations, providing clinical-translational evidence for a cooperative effect between mutational and non-mutational resistance mechanisms.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2007
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 6
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 110, No. 11 ( 2007-11-16), p. 2817-2817
    Abstract: Background: The tyrosine kinase inhibitor imatinib (IM), alone or in combination with induction and post-remission chemotherapy, has become the mainstay of front-line treatment for Ph+ ALL, followed by allogeneic SCT as a potentially curative treatment option. However, alloSCT is not feasible in many elderly or comorbid patients. In a prospective, randomized clinical trial of elderly patients with de novo Ph+ ALL, we recently demonstrated that IM induction followed by IM in combination with intensive consolidation chemotherapy of approximately one year duration was feasible in the majority of pts. but associated with a high relapse rate. To assess the impact of IM-based maintenance, we here provide an analysis of maintenance therapy with IM either alone, in combination with low dose interferon-α (LD-IFNα), or with zoledronic acid. In addition, we examined whether determination of minimal residual disease (MRD) and/or BCR-ABL mutation status prior to and during pre-maintenance therapy were predictive of freedom from relapse and remission duration. Patients and Methods: Remission induction and consolidation therapy have been reported previously (Ottmann et al.,Cancer109:2068–76, 2007). As the present analysis focuses entirely on the maintenance phase, patients who failed to achieve a CR, relapsed or died during the consolidation cycles are not included. Following a median of 6 cycles of remission induction and consolidation chemotherapy given concurrently with IM, 33 CR pts. (n=33; median age 69.5 yrs; [58–75 yrs.]) were enrolled either in a clinical trial of IM in combination with low-dose IFN (n=19), or with zoledronic acid (n=4), or received Glivec as a single agent (n=8). Minimal residual disease was serially assessed by quantitative RT-PCR and mutational analyses was performed by D-HPLC and direct sequencing. Results: With a median duration of maintenance of 17 months (range 6–72 mos.), 14 of 33 patients (42%) are in ongoing CR, with a median maintenance duration of 46 mos. (20–72 mos.). Median overall survival of all patients is 28 mos. (range: 9–81 mos.). Detection of a BCR-ABL mutation at or within 4 weeks of initial diagnosis was associated with inferior remission duration, 18 mos. versus 27 mos. (p=0.06). Remission was independent of the MRD response during induction and consolidation: 24 mos. and 26 mos. in pts. who did or did not achieve MRD negativity at any time; similarly, detection of MRD at the start of maintenance had no impact on time to progression. Conclusions: Among elderly Ph+ALL pts. who did not undergo SCT, treatment outcome with IM-based maintenance therapy is encouraging, but remissions are not sustained in the majority of patients. Surprisingly, persistent MRD positivity during consolidation or at the start of maintenance were not associated with an inferior outcome; conversely, relapses occurred even in patients who had achieved prolonged MRD negativity.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2007
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 7
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 108, No. 11 ( 2006-11-16), p. 285-285
    Abstract: Background: Dasatanib (SPRYCEL®, formerly BMS-354825) is a potent inhibitor of BCR-ABL and SRC kinases with significant clinical activity in pts. with CML or Ph(+)ALL who have failed IM. The association between patient characteristics and pretreatment disease features and subsequent response to dasatinib has not been established. Patients and Methods: We evaluated the response of 34 consecutive pts. with Ph(+)ALL (n=30) or LyBP (n=4) who were enrolled at our center in two multicenter phase II studies of dasatinib in pts with Ph(+) lymphoid leukemias resistant to or intolerant of IM (CA180-015 and CA180-035). Dasatinib was given orally, at a starting dose of 70mg twice a day. Bone marrow (BM) was examined after 2 weeks and then monthly and included cytology, cytogenetics, quantitative PCR and BCR-ABL mutation analysis. Hematologic responses had to be maintained for at least 4 weeks. Thirty-two pts. (94%) were IM-resistant, 14 (41%) had undergone prior SCT, and 6 (18%) had failed prior therapy with nilotinib. Of 26 pts. evaluable at baseline, 18 had a complex karyotype in conjunction with either a single (n=12) or a double (n=6) Ph chromosome. BCR-ABL tyrosine kinase domain (TKD) mutations at baseline were observed in 17 of 29 eval. pts. (59%), 5 (17%) with T315I and 9 (31%) with p-loop mutations. Results: Dasatinib induced a major hematologic response (MHR) in 48% of pts. (38% complete hematologic responses (CHR), 10% no evidence of leukemia: 〈 5% BM blasts but incomplete PB recovery). Negative predictors of hematologic response were prior nilotinib failure (MHR: 0 of 7 pts, and presence of a T315I mutation (MHR: 0 of 5 pts.). Factors not associated with an inferior hematologic response or survival were p-loop mutations, complex karyotype, additional Ph chromosomes, prior SCT, 〉 2nd relapse versus 1st relapse, BM blasts 〉 80% or percentage of PB blasts. Clearance of PB blasts by day 7 was associated with an 82% MHR rate, no MHR was noted in pts. in whom PB blasts persisted after 14 days. BCR-ABL negativity by RT-PCR was achieved by 6 patients (18%) and was observed exclusively in patients who had undergone prior SCT. Thus, remission quality appears to be superior in pts with prior SCT, despite similar hematologic response rates. In addition, molecular responses were sustained only in the subgroup of patients (n=5) with wild-type BCR-ABL at study entry. Estimated median time to progression was 85 d in MHR pts. who remained PCR pos. and was not reached in the PCR neg. group. Severe adverse events (Grades 3+4) included pleural effusion (14,7%), thrombocytopenia (8,8%), neutropenic fever (8,8%), pulmonary hypertension with cor pulmonale (5,8%), gastrointestinal hemorrhage (5.8%), subdural hematomas (5.8%) and diarrhea (5,8%), indicating the need for close patient monitoring in this advanced disease population. Conclusion: Dasatinib has significant activity in Ph(+)ALL pts who have failed prior therapy including IM. In this single-center experience of 34 pts, sustained molecular responses were observed only in the 5 pts previously transplanted who had no evidence of TKD mutations at the start of dasatinib treatment, suggesting that additional immunologic and non-mutational resistance mechanisms play an important role in determining the long-term response in pts with Ph(+)ALL.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2006
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 8
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 118, No. 21 ( 2011-11-18), p. 247-247
    Abstract: Abstract 247 Background: The presence of minimal residual disease (MRD) after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT) for Ph+ ALL is highly predictive of eventual relapse. Imatinib (IM) has very limited efficacy in hematologic relapse of Ph+ALL, but may prevent leukemia recurrence if started when the leukemia burden is still very low and detectable only by molecular techniques. The optimal time for starting IM post transplant and the prognostic relevance of different bcr-abl transcript levels in relation to time after SCT have not been established. Aims: To determine the impact of post-transplant IM, given either prophylactically or after detection of bcr-abl transcripts (pre-emptively), on the overall incidence of MRD, remission duration, long-term treatment outcome and tolerability in pts. who underwent SCT for Ph+ALL in complete remission. Study Design: In a prospective, randomized multicenter trial, previously transplanted Ph+ ALL pts. (n=55) were assigned to receive imatinib prophylactically (n=26) or pre-emptively (n=29). SCT was performed in CR1 in 23 pts. and 27 pts. in the two groups, respectively. Five pts.were transplanted in CR2. Serial assessment of bcr-abl transcripts was performed by quantitative RT-PCR and additionally by nested-RT-PCR if the sensitivity of the qRT-PCR was below the quantitative range. Confirmatory testing of a second independent sample was not required, to reduce the risk of treatment delays. Samples were considered PCR negative only if the ABL copy number exceeded 104. Imatinib administration was scheduled for one year of continuous PCR negativity. Results: IM was started in 24/26 pts. allocated to prophylactic IM and in 14/29 pts. in the pre-emptive arm. The majority of pts. received IM 400 mg/d (26/38 pts.), the other 12 pts. 600 mg IM daily. IM was started a median of 48 d after SCT in the prophylactic arm and 70 d after SCT with pre-emptive therapy. After a median follow-up of 30 mos. and 32 mos., respectively, 82% and 78% of pts. are alive in ongoing CR, 4 pts. died in CR. Five pts. transplanted in CR1 and 2/5 pts. transplanted in CR2 have relapsed (median follow-up 9 mos. and 10.5 mos., respectively). The frequency of MRD positivity was significantly lower in pts. assigned to prophylactic imatinib (10/26; 40%) than those in the pre-emptive treatment arm (20/29; 69%) (p=0.046 by chi2 test). Only 9 of 29 pts. assigned to pre-emptive imatinib remained continuously PCR negative after SCT, with a median follow-up of 32 months (18–46 months) after SCT. The median duration of sustained, uninterrupted PCR negativity after SCT is 26.5 months with prophylactic and 6.8 months with pre-emptive administration of imatinib (p=0.065). The probability of remaing in CHR after SCT was significantly lower in partients who remained MRD negative after SCT (p=0.0002). Analysis of the kinetics of molecular relapse showed that detection of bcr-abl transcripts within 100 days of transplant, despite rapid initiation of IM, was associated with a significantly inferior EFS compared to first detection of MRD positivity more than 100 days after SCT. IM was discontinued prematurely in 54% pts. receiving imatinib prophylactically and in 64% of pts. receiving imatinib pre-emptively, mostly due to gastrointestinal toxicity. Accordingly, the time to IM discontinuation was 245 d and 191 d in the prophylactic and the pre-emptive treatment arms, respectively. Despite this early discontinuation rate, overall survival in the two treatment groups was 80% and 74.5% after 5 years, with no significant difference by log rank test (p=0.84). Conclusions: Prophylactic administration of imatinib significantly reduces the incidence of molecular relapse after SCT. Both interventional strategies are associated with a low rate of hematologic relapse, durable remissions and excellent long-term outcome in patients with Ph+ ALL. The presence of MRD both prior to and early after SCT identifies a small subset of patients with a poor prognosis despite post-transplant imatinib, and warrants testing of alternative approaches to prevent hematologic relapse. Disclosures: Schuld: Novartis: Employment. Goekbuget:Micromet: Consultancy. Ottmann:Novartis Corporation: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2011
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 9
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 116, No. 21 ( 2010-11-19), p. 893-893
    Abstract: Abstract 893 Introduction: A European collaborative harmonization study involving 61 laboratories is being conducted under the auspices of the European Treatment and Outcome Study (EUTOS) for CML that aims to facilitate reporting of molecular BCR-ABL quantification results according to the International Scale (IS). The aim of this analysis was to investigate the effectiveness of this process and specifically the stability of conversion factors (CF) over time. Methods: The currently accepted way of adopting the IS is to establish and validate a laboratory-specific CF which is then used to convert local results to the IS. For round 1, preliminary CFs were calculated by centrally distributing standard samples containing 10–20 million WBC approximating to 10%, 1%, 0.1%, and 0.01% BCR-ABL IS. Rounds 2 and 3 were employed to refine the CF calculations using 25–30 CML patient samples from each participating laboratories covering a range of BCR-ABL levels between 0.01% and 10%. Log BCR-ABL values for the same samples were compared between reference and local laboratories applying the Bland-Altman bias plot. In order to judge the stability of each laboratory`s methodology, a CF index (ratio of round 3 CF divided by round 2 CF) was calculated and evaluated according to its capability to achieve optimum concordance of results. Results: Of the 61 laboratories participating in round 1, evaluable patient samples have been provided to date by 56 and 30 laboratories in rounds 2 and 3, respectively. Of the 30 laboratories with complete data, 12 had stable CFs (defined as a CF index within 0.75–1.33) whereas 18 laboratories were outside this range. Comparison of the CFs derived from round 2 with those derived from round 3 revealed better and more consistent concordance between laboratories with stable CFs compared to those with unstable CFs. For the 12 stable laboratories, 79% (round 3 CF) vs 79% (round 2 CF) of the samples were within a 2-fold range (0.5–2.0) and 93% vs 89% were within a 3-fold range (0.33–3.0). For the 18 unstable laboratories, 74% vs 55% of the samples were within a 2-fold range (0.5–2.0), p=0.0005 and 92% vs 77% were within a 3-fold range (0.33–3.0), p=0.0005. 2 of 12 laboratories with stable CFs and 8 of 18 laboratories with unstable CFs indicated changes in either one or more components of their procedures (cDNA synthesis, PCR platform, RQ-PCR protocol) that may have impacted on their CFs. Conclusion: These data indicate that CFs may be unstable in some laboratories even in the absence of significant changes to laboratory protocols. Further, it supports the need for continuous revalidation of CFs. In laboratories with unstable CFs we suggest revalidation within 3 to 6 months whereas those with stable CFs should be assessed on a yearly basis. We also suggest that laboratories with unstable CFs need to rigorously examine their internal processes to identify potential sources of variation. Disclosures: Müller: Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding. Schnittger:MLL Munich Leukemia Laboratory: Employment, Equity Ownership.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2010
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 10
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 118, No. 21 ( 2011-11-18), p. 2535-2535
    Abstract: Abstract 2535 Background: Minimal residual disease is well established as an important prognostic parameter in a number of hematologic diseases and is used for stratification and treatment decisions in adult and childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL). DNA- based PCR analysis of Ig-/TCR-rearrangements have been well standardised during the last decade, resulting in robust systems for MRD analysis with an intra- and inter-assay variability of less than half a log and low false positivity. In Ph+ALL, MRD analysis relies on RNA-based RT-PCR techniques that are highly sensitive but as yet lack standardisation between laboratories. Since laboratories differ substantially in both their methodology and analysis strategy, interpretation and meaningful comparison of results between laboratories and from different studies is difficult or impossible. Moreover, and in contrast to CML, there are no generally accepted definitions of molecular response that could identify thresholds on which to base therapeutic decisions. Aims: To assess i) the variability of BCR-ABL quantification between laboratories with recognized expertise in bcr-abl analysis, ii) identify optimal laboratory methods and iii) to standardize analysis and interpretation of RT-PCR results for Ph+ALL, the EWALL and ESG-MRD-ALL consortia initiated a multinational project for quality assurance involving more than 30 laboratories from 14 countries worldwide. We here report the results of the first six m-BCR-ABL laboratory control rounds, performed between march 2008 and august 2011, that focussed on inter-intraassay variability of rt-PR techniques, comparison of housekeeping genes, plasmids, platforms and reagents. Methods: Serial dilutions of the BCR-ABL positive cell line Sup B15 with the BCR-ABL negative cell line Nalm 6 covering 5 logs were produced. In the 6 lab rounds, 1355 aliquots, each generated from with a total amount of 5 × 10E+06 cells in a final volume of 1 ml were produced, stabilized in TRIZOL or buffer RLT and frozen at −20°C until shipment or centralized isolation of RNA and reverse transcribed. Participants were asked to process the material using predefined procedures. Results: In the first QC round a major finding was the high variability in RNA-yield between laboratories despite using the same extraction method, with an up to 3 log difference in ABL copy numbers. In addition, there was rare false-positivity and false negativity (specifity 94.8%). With centrally produced cDNA the variability improved and there was a lower frequency of false-positivity reaching 100% specifity in QC 2. By using standardized assays, in 12 of 33 laboratories no conversion factor is needed, 20 of 33 laboratories are at the moment within one log difference when comparing the BCR-ABL/ABL ratios. Comparison of housekeeping genes (ABL/GUS) revealed non-linearity at high transcript levels resulting in an underestimation of intraindividual log reductions and may be relevant when assessing disease prognosis. The quantitative range was generally above 10E-04. Conclusion: Initiation of laboratory control rounds and implementation of standardized methodology improved the variability and reduced the frequency of false-positive results. Sensitivity of current techniques is still unsatisfactory for diseases with aggressive growth kinetics such as Ph*ALL. Further standardisation of technical and analytical methodology will provide the basis for defining levels of molecular remission and relapse and help to ensure comparability between laboratories and clinical trials at the European level. Disclosures: Goekbuget: Micromet: Consultancy. Ottmann:Novartis Corporation: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2011
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...