GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

X

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Impact of mutant IDH (mIDH) inhibition on DNA hydroxymethylation, tumor cell function, and tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) in resected m IDH1 lower-grade glioma (LGG).
    American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) ; 2021
    In:  Journal of Clinical Oncology Vol. 39, No. 15_suppl ( 2021-05-20), p. 2008-2008
    Details
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 39, No. 15_suppl ( 2021-05-20), p. 2008-2008
    Abstract: 2008 Background: Somatic mutations in IDH1 and IDH2 occur in ̃80% and ̃4% of LGGs, respectively, promoting tumorigenesis via increased levels of the oncometabolite D-2-hydroxyglutarate (2-HG). Vorasidenib (VOR; AG-881) is an oral, brain-penetrant, dual inhibitor of mIDH1/2; ivosidenib (IVO; AG-120) is a first-in-class oral inhibitor of mIDH1. In this ongoing perioperative study, treatment with IVO/VOR reduced 2-HG levels in resected tumors vs untreated control tumors in patients (pts) with LGG (NCT03343197; Mellinghoff SNO 2019). We assessed the biological impact of 2-HG suppression on tumors and TIME. Methods: Pts (n = 49) with recurrent, non-enhancing, mIDH1-R132H LGG eligible for resection were randomized to IVO (500 mg QD/250 mg BID), VOR (10/50 mg QD), or no treatment, for 4 weeks preoperatively. Tumor tissue samples collected at surgery were assessed in genomic (n = 42), transcriptomic (n = 42), and immunohistochemistry (IHC; n = 43) analyses. Unpaired t-test was used for statistical comparisons. Results: Optimal 2-HG suppression (post-treatment 2-HG below the upper limit of 2-HG levels in a reference set of 15 wild-type [wt] IDH samples) was observed in 23 of 40 pts, including 9 (90%) pts receiving VOR 50 mg QD and 6 (50%) receiving IVO 500 mg QD. Of samples with valid biomarker data, those with optimal 2-HG suppression (n = 21) showed upregulation of neural differentiation-related gene expression, but downregulation of stemness-related gene expression, vs those with suboptimal 2-HG suppression (post-treatment 2-HG above upper limit of wt IDH 2-HG levels; n = 17; p 〈 0.01). IHC analysis of the proliferation marker Ki-67 showed a ̃2-fold decrease in Ki-67–positive cells in samples with optimal 2-HG suppression (mean 2.7%; n = 22) vs those with suboptimal suppression (5.8%; n = 16; p 〈 0.05). Epigenetic analysis revealed a ̃2-fold increase in mean 5-hydroxymethylcytosine (5hmC) levels in samples with optimal (0.36%; n = 17) vs suboptimal 2-HG suppression (0.2%; n = 15; p 〈 0.05), suggesting reversal of TET2 inhibition. IHC analysis of TIME revealed increases in mean CD3+ and CD8+ tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte levels in samples with optimal (1.05% [CD3]/0.22% [CD8] ; n = 22) vs suboptimal 2-HG suppression (0.44% [CD3]/0.07% [CD8] ; n = 16; p 〈 0.05). Optimal 2-HG suppression was associated with upregulation of gene expression related to type I interferon signaling and antigen presentation (p 〈 0.01). Conclusions: These data suggest that both tumor-intrinsic and -extrinsic mechanisms underlie 2-HG suppression by VOR and IVO. VOR, and IVO to a lesser extent, increased 5hmC, promoted cellular differentiation, and inhibited tumor cell proliferation; both also increased T-cell infiltration, activated interferon signaling, and increased antigen presentation capability. These data support development of VOR in combination with immunotherapy. Clinical trial information: NCT03343197.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    URL: Article
    DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2021.39.15_suppl.2008
    RVK:
    XA 52760
    RVK:
    XA 10000
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2021
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 604914-X
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
    Online Resource
  • 2
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Final results from ClarIDHy, a global, phase 3, randomized, double-blind study of ivosidenib (IVO) versus placebo (PBO) in patients (pts) with previously treated cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) and an isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 ( IDH1 ) mutation.
    American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) ; 2021
    In:  Journal of Clinical Oncology Vol. 39, No. 15_suppl ( 2021-05-20), p. 4069-4069
    Details
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 39, No. 15_suppl ( 2021-05-20), p. 4069-4069
    Abstract: 4069 Background: CCA is a rare cancer for which there are limited effective therapies. IDH1 mutations occur in ̃20% of intrahepatic CCAs, resulting in production of the oncometabolite D-2-hydroxyglutarate, which promotes oncogenesis. IVO (AG-120) is a first-in-class, oral, small-molecule inhibitor of mutant IDH1 (mIDH1). ClarIDHy aimed to demonstrate the efficacy of IVO vs PBO in pts with unresectable or metastatic m IDH1 CCA. The primary endpoint was met with significant improvement in progression-free survival (PFS) by independent radiology center (IRC) with IVO vs PBO (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.37, p 〈 0.0001). Objective response rate (ORR) and stable disease for IVO were 2.4% (3 partial responses) and 50.8% (n = 63) vs 0% and 27.9% (n = 17) for PBO. IVO pts experienced significantly less decline in physical and emotional functioning domains of quality of life at cycle 2 day 1 vs PBO pts (nominal p 〈 0.05). Methods: Pts with m IDH1 CCA were randomized 2:1 to IVO (500 mg PO QD) or matched PBO and stratified by prior systemic therapies (1 or 2). Key eligibility: unresectable or metastatic m IDH1 CCA based on central testing; ECOG PS 0–1; measurable disease (RECIST v1.1). Crossover from PBO to IVO was permitted at radiographic progression. Primary endpoint: PFS by IRC. Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS; by intent-to-treat), ORR, PFS (by investigator), safety, and quality of life. The planned crossover-adjusted OS was derived using the rank-preserving structural failure time (RPSFT) model. Results: As of 31 May 2020, ̃780 pts were prescreened for an IDH1 mutation and 187 were randomized to IVO (n = 126) or PBO (n = 61); 13 remain on IVO. Median age 62 y; M/F 68/119; 91% intrahepatic CCA; 93% metastatic disease; 47% had 2 prior therapies. 70% of PBO pts crossed over to IVO. OS data were mature, with 79% OS events in IVO arm and 82% in PBO. Median OS (mOS) was 10.3 months for IVO and 7.5 months for PBO (HR = 0.79; 95% CI 0.56–1.12; one-sided p = 0.093). The RPSFT-adjusted mOS was 5.1 months for PBO (HR = 0.49; 95% CI 0.34–0.70; p 〈 0.0001). Common all-grade treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs, ≥ 15%) in the IVO arm: nausea 41%, diarrhea 35%, fatigue 31%, cough 25%, abdominal pain 24%, decreased appetite 24%, ascites 23%, vomiting 23%, anemia 18%, and constipation 15%. Grade ≥ 3 TEAEs were reported in 50% of IVO pts vs 37% of PBO pts, with grade ≥ 3 treatment-related AEs in 7% of IVO pts vs 0% in PBO. 7% of IVO pts experienced an AE leading to treatment discontinuation vs 9% of PBO pts. There were no treatment-related deaths. Conclusions: IVO was well tolerated and resulted in a favorable OS trend vs PBO despite a high rate of crossover. These data – coupled with statistical improvement in PFS, supportive quality of life data, and favorable safety profile – demonstrate the clinical benefit of IVO in advanced m IDH1 CCA. Clinical trial information: NCT02989857.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    URL: Article
    DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2021.39.15_suppl.4069
    RVK:
    XA 52760
    RVK:
    XA 10000
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2021
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 604914-X
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
    Online Resource
  • 3
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Changes in health-related quality of life in patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia receiving ivosidenib + azacitidine or placebo + azacitidine.
    American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) ; 2022
    In:  Journal of Clinical Oncology Vol. 40, No. 16_suppl ( 2022-06-01), p. e19024-e19024
    Details
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 40, No. 16_suppl ( 2022-06-01), p. e19024-e19024
    Abstract: e19024 Background: Ivosidenib (IVO) is a potent, targeted inhibitor of mutant isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (mIDH1) that is approved for acute myeloid leukemia (AML). IVO plus azacitidine (AZA) demonstrated clinical benefit compared with placebo (PBO) and AZA in the AGILE study (NCT03173248), and here we report the impact of IVO+AZA versus PBO+AZA on health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Methods: In the double-blind, PBO-controlled phase 3 AGILE study, patients (pts) were randomized 1:1 to IVO 500 mg QD + AZA 75 mg/m 2 SC or IV for 7 days in 28-day cycles, or PBO+AZA. HRQoL was a secondary endpoint assessed using two validated questionnaires: the European Organisation of Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) and the EuroQol 5-dimension 5-level questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L). Questionnaires were administered pre-dose on cycle (C) 1 Day (D) 1, on C1D15, C2D1, C2D15, and on D1 of every odd cycle thereafter until the end of treatment. Score change from baseline across visits for all subscales of EORTC QLQ-C30 was analyzed with mixed models. A 10-point threshold in EORTC QLQ-C30 subscale score was used to evaluate clinically meaningful changes from baseline or differences between arms. Two-sided nominal p-values are reported. Results: At baseline, 69 and 68 pts out of 72 receiving IVO+AZA completed the EORTC QLQ-C30 and EQ-5D-5L, respectively, and 66 pts out of 74 receiving PBO+AZA completed both. Mean baseline HRQoL scores were similar between treatment arms. There was an initial decline in HRQoL (EORTC QLQ-C30 global health status [GHS/QoL]) in both arms for ̃4 months, consistent with time to response, and which was generally not clinically meaningful. IVO+AZA was associated with preserved or improved HRQoL compared to baseline for most subscales of the EORTC QLQ-C30 from C5 to C19 (after which no PBO+AZA HRQoL data were available), and at most timepoints for EQ-5D-5L VAS scores and index values. EORTC QLQ-C30 subscales with clinically meaningful improvements from baseline at most timepoints from C5 to C19 in the IVO+AZA arm included GHS/QoL, fatigue, pain and appetite loss. In contrast, there were few clinically meaningful improvements from baseline in PBO+AZA pts. GHS/QoL scores were significantly improved (p≤0.05) for IVO+AZA versus PBO+AZA at C2D1, C2D15, C7 and C9, and differences were clinically meaningful at C2D1 (10.2 point difference), C2D15 (10.1), C7 (12.6), C9 (22.6), C13 (14.9), C15 (15.4) and C19 (19.2). Likewise, improvements in EORTC QLQ-C30 fatigue, appetite loss, nausea and vomiting, diarrhea, cognitive functioning and social functioning favored IVO+AZA over PBO+AZA at multiple timepoints. Conclusions: Data from the AGILE study show that patients with mIDH1 AML receiving treatment with IVO+AZA tended to report maintenance or improved HRQoL from cycle 5 through to cycle 19 compared with PBO+AZA. Clinical trial information: NCT03173248.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    URL: Article
    DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2022.40.16_suppl.e19024
    RVK:
    XA 52760
    RVK:
    XA 10000
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2022
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 604914-X
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
    Online Resource
  • 4
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Phase II study of dalantercept, a novel inhibitor of ALK1-mediated angiogenesis, in patients with recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.
    American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) ; 2013
    In:  Journal of Clinical Oncology Vol. 31, No. 15_suppl ( 2013-05-20), p. TPS6098-TPS6098
    Details
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 31, No. 15_suppl ( 2013-05-20), p. TPS6098-TPS6098
    Abstract: TPS6098 Background: Despite advances in the treatment of recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN), the prognosis remains poor with a need to develop novel therapeutic strategies. Targeting angiogenesis in SCCHN is an active area of clinical research. Activin receptor-like kinase 1 (ALK1) is a type 1 receptor in the TGF-ß superfamily which is selectively expressed on activated endothelial cells. ALK1 binds bone morphogenetic proteins (BMP) 9 and 10 (ligands for ALK1) and is primarily involved in the maturation stage of angiogenesis. Dalantercept is a human ALK1-Fc receptor fusion protein that binds BMP9/10 and acts as a ligand trap. In preclinical tumor models, dalantercept demonstrated a decrease in tumor vascularization and delayed tumor growth. In a completed phase I study, dalantercept demonstrated anti-tumor activity in patients with advanced solid tumors including SCCHN. Methods: An open label, multi-center, multiple dose, phase II study to evaluate dalantercept in patients with advanced SCCHN is ongoing. Dalantercept is being administered every three weeks via SC injection in a total of 45 patients to assess safety, tolerability, and efficacy. 13 patients were enrolled at the 0.6 mg/kg dose level. To date, 6 out of 30 planned patients have received dalantercept at the 1.2 mg/kg dose level. Key inclusion criteria are tumors arising from the oral cavity, oropharynx, hypopharynx, or larynx, at least one prior platinum-containing regimen, ECOG performance status 〈 /= 1, and measurable disease. Exclusion criteria include prior anti-angiogenesis therapy, significant pulmonary, cardiovascular, or bleeding risk. The primary efficacy endpoint is RR. Secondary endpoints include PFS, OS, TTP, DOR, DCR, and PD biomarkers on tumor and serum specimens including BMP9/10 and ALK1 expression. Clinical trial information: NCT01458392.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    URL: Article
    DOI: 10.1200/jco.2013.31.15_suppl.tps6098
    RVK:
    XA 52760
    RVK:
    XA 10000
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2013
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 604914-X
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
    Online Resource
  • 5
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Vorasidenib (VOR; AG-881), an inhibitor of mutant IDH1 and IDH2, in patients (pts) with recurrent/progressive glioma: Updated results from the phase I non-enhancing glioma population.
    American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) ; 2020
    In:  Journal of Clinical Oncology Vol. 38, No. 15_suppl ( 2020-05-20), p. 2504-2504
    Details
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 38, No. 15_suppl ( 2020-05-20), p. 2504-2504
    Abstract: 2504 Background: Isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 and 2 mutations (m IDH1/2) occur in approximately 70% and 4% of low-grade gliomas (LGGs), respectively, promoting oncogenesis via increased production of D-2-hydroxyglutarate. In this ongoing phase 1 trial, VOR, a potent, oral, reversible, brain-penetrant, first-in-class dual inhibitor of mIDH1/2, is being evaluated in advanced m IDH1/2 solid tumors, including gliomas. Safety and preliminary results were presented previously (Mellinghoff et al., J Clin Oncol 2018). Here, we report updated data for the non-enhancing glioma pt population. Methods: Pts with recurrent/progressive m IDH1/2 glioma received VOR daily (continuous 28-day cycles). Key eligibility criteria included: ≥18 years; histologically or cytologically confirmed glioma with documented m IDH1/2; ECOG 0-2; and evaluable disease by RANO-LGG criteria. Dose escalation cohorts enrolled using a Bayesian logistic regression model (BLRM) escalation guided by the overdose control (EWOC). Tumor response was evaluated by MRI every 8 weeks using RANO-LGG criteria by local assessment. Results: As of 28 Nov 2019, 22 pts with non-enhancing glioma had received VOR and 8 (36%) remain on treatment. M/F, 8/14; grade 2/3, 17/5; median age, 47 years; m IDH1/2, 20/1; 1p19q intact, 9/22; median (range) number of prior systemic therapies, 2 (1–4). Common (≥5 pts) treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) of any grade and regardless of causality included increased ALT/AST (63.6%/59.1%), headache (45.5%), nausea (40.9%), neutropenia (31.8%), fatigue and hyperglycemia (27.3% each), and seizures and decreased white blood cell count (22.7% each). Transaminase elevations were grade 1 in severity at dose levels 〈 100mg and were less frequent (5 [38.5%] of 13 pts). Three subjects had related grade ≥3 AEs; 2 discontinued due to AEs. Objective response rate was 13.6% (1 partial response, 2 minor responses), and 17 (77.3%) pts achieved stable disease. 60.5% of pts were progression free and alive at 24 months. Conclusions: In this previously treated population with non-enhancing glioma, VOR was associated with a favorable safety profile. The study results also show encouraging preliminary activity within that population, with PFS duration extending to 24 months or longer in 60% of participants. A global randomized phase 3 study of VOR in grade 2 non-enhancing glioma pts who have had surgery only is currently enrolling (NCT04164901). Clinical trial information: NCT02481154 .
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    URL: Article
    DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2020.38.15_suppl.2504
    RVK:
    XA 52760
    RVK:
    XA 10000
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2020
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 604914-X
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
    Online Resource
  • 6
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Final results from ClarIDHy, a global, phase III, randomized, double-blind study of ivosidenib (IVO) versus placebo (PBO) in patients (pts) with previously treated cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) and an isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 ( IDH1 ) mutation.
    American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) ; 2021
    In:  Journal of Clinical Oncology Vol. 39, No. 3_suppl ( 2021-01-20), p. 266-266
    Details
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 39, No. 3_suppl ( 2021-01-20), p. 266-266
    Abstract: 266 Background: CCA is a rare cancer for which there are limited effective therapies. IDH1 mutations occur in ~20% of intrahepatic CCAs, resulting in production of the oncometabolite D-2-hydroxyglutarate, which promotes oncogenesis. IVO (AG-120) is a first-in-class, oral, small-molecule inhibitor of mutant IDH1 (m IDH1). ClarIDHy aimed to demonstrate the efficacy of IVO vs PBO in pts with unresectable or metastatic m IDH1 CCA. The primary endpoint was met with significant improvement in progression-free survival (PFS) by independent radiology center (IRC) with IVO vs PBO (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.37, p 〈 0.0001). Objective response rate (ORR) and stable disease for IVO were 2.4% (3 partial responses) and 50.8% (n = 63) vs 0% and 27.9% (n = 17) for PBO. IVO pts experienced significantly less decline in physical and emotional functioning domains of quality of life at cycle 2 day 1 vs PBO pts (nominal p 〈 0.05). Methods: Pts with m IDH1 CCA were randomized 2:1 to IVO (500 mg PO QD) or matched PBO and stratified by prior systemic therapies (1 or 2). Key eligibility: unresectable or metastatic m IDH1 CCA based on central testing; ECOG PS 0–1; measurable disease (RECIST v1.1). Crossover from PBO to IVO was permitted at radiographic progression. Primary endpoint: PFS by IRC. Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS; by intent-to-treat), ORR, PFS (by investigator), safety, and quality of life. The planned crossover-adjusted OS was derived using the rank-preserving structural failure time (RPSFT) model. Results: As of 31 May 2020, ~780 pts were prescreened for an IDH1 mutation and 187 were randomized to IVO (n = 126) or PBO (n = 61); 13 remain on IVO. Median age 62 y; M/F 68/119; 91% intrahepatic CCA; 93% metastatic disease; 47% had 2 prior therapies. 70% of PBO pts crossed over to IVO. OS data were mature, with 79% OS events in IVO arm and 82% in PBO. Median OS (mOS) was 10.3 months for IVO and 7.5 months for PBO (HR = 0.79; 95% CI 0.56–1.12; one-sided p = 0.093). The RPSFT-adjusted mOS was 5.1 months for PBO (HR = 0.49; 95% CI 0.34–0.70; p 〈 0.0001). Common all-grade treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs, ≥ 15%) in the IVO arm: nausea 41%, diarrhea 35%, fatigue 31%, cough 25%, abdominal pain 24%, decreased appetite 24%, ascites 23%, vomiting 23%, anemia 18%, and constipation 15%. Grade ≥ 3 TEAEs were reported in 50% of IVO pts vs 37% of PBO pts, with grade ≥ 3 treatment-related AEs in 7% of IVO pts vs 0% in PBO. 7% of IVO pts experienced an AE leading to treatment discontinuation vs 9% of PBO pts. There were no treatment-related deaths. Conclusions: IVO was well tolerated and resulted in a favorable OS trend vs PBO despite a high rate of crossover. These data – coupled with statistical improvement in PFS, supportive quality of life data, and favorable safety profile – demonstrate the clinical benefit of IVO in advanced m IDH1 CCA. Clinical trial information: NCT02989857.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    URL: Article
    DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2021.39.3_suppl.266
    RVK:
    XA 52760
    RVK:
    XA 10000
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2021
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 604914-X
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
    Online Resource
  • 7
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    A first-in-human phase Ib study to evaluate the MEK inhibitor GDC-0973, combined with the pan-PI3K inhibitor GDC-0941, in patients with advanced solid tumors.
    American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) ; 2012
    In:  Journal of Clinical Oncology Vol. 30, No. 15_suppl ( 2012-05-20), p. 2566-2566
    Details
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 30, No. 15_suppl ( 2012-05-20), p. 2566-2566
    Abstract: 2566 Background: Both RAS/RAF/MEK and PI3K/Akt signaling pathways are deregulated in many tumor types. Targeting both pathways may be more efficacious than targeting either pathway alone. In preclinical models, concurrent administration of GDC‑0973, a potent, selective, MEK1/2 inhibitor and GDC-0941, a potent class I PI3K inhibitor, shows improved efficacy compared to either agent alone dosed continuously or intermittently. Methods: A phase Ib dose-escalation study with 3+3 design was initiated in patients (pts) with advanced solid tumors to evaluate the safety and pharmacokinetics (PK) of oral dosing of GDC-0973 and GDC-0941. Pts received: concurrent GDC-0973 + GDC-0941 once daily (qd) on a 21 day on/7 day off (21/7) schedule; intermittent GDC-0973 on Days 1, 4, 8, 11, 15, 18 of a 28 day cycle + GDC-0941 qd on a 21/7 schedule (MEK int); or GDC-0973 + GDC-0941 qd on a 7 day on /7 day off schedule (7/7). Starting doses were 20 mg GDC-0973 + 80 mg GDC-0941 (21/7), 100 mg GDC-0973 + 130 mg GDC-0941 (MEK int); 40 mg GDC-0973 + 130 mg GDC-0941 (7/7). Serial plasma PK samples, FDG-PET, and CT scans were obtained. Results: 78 pts have enrolled. DLTs were G3 lipase (n=1), G4 CPK elevation (n=1). Compared to the 21/7 MTD of 40 mg GDC-0973 + 100 mg GDC-0941, higher doses of GDC-0973 + GDC-0941 were tolerated on the MEK int schedule. Overall, adverse events related to the study drug combination in ≥ 20% pts were diarrhea, rash, nausea, fatigue, vomiting, decreased appetite, dysgeusia, and elevated CPK. Preliminary analysis indicated PK of GDC-0973 and GDC-0941 are not altered when dosed in combination. Of 46 evaluable pts, 26 had an FDG-PET partial metabolic response (≥ 20% decrease in mean SUV max from baseline) at ≥1 time points. Partial responses were observed in 3 pts (mBRAF melanoma, mBRAF pancreatic ca, mKRAS endometrioid ca); 5 pts had stable disease ≥ 5 months. Conclusions: Combination dosing of GDC‑0973 and GDC-0941 is generally well tolerated, with toxicities similar to those observed in single agent GDC-0973 and GDC-0941 phase 1 trials. There are early signs of anti-tumor activity. Dose escalation on MEK int and 7/7 schedules continues and updated data will be presented.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    URL: Article
    DOI: 10.1200/jco.2012.30.15_suppl.2566
    RVK:
    XA 52760
    RVK:
    XA 10000
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2012
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 604914-X
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
    Online Resource
  • 8
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Hematologic improvements with ivosidenib + azacitidine compared to placebo + azacitidine in patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia.
    American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) ; 2022
    In:  Journal of Clinical Oncology Vol. 40, No. 16_suppl ( 2022-06-01), p. 7042-7042
    Details
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 40, No. 16_suppl ( 2022-06-01), p. 7042-7042
    Abstract: 7042 Background: Ivosidenib (IVO) is a potent oral targeted inhibitor of mutant isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (mIDH1). IVO plus azacitidine (AZA) significantly improved event-free survival (EFS), overall survival and complete remission + partial hematologic recovery rates compared with placebo (PBO) + AZA, in patients (pts) with newly diagnosed IDH1-mutant acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in the Phase 3 AGILE trial (NCT03173248). Here we report blood count recovery results from the AGILE trial. Methods: Pts were randomized 1:1 to IVO 500 mg QD + AZA 75 mg/m 2 SC or IV for 7 days in 28-day cycles (n = 72), or PBO+AZA (n = 74). Red blood cell (RBC)/platelet transfusion history were assessed at screening and follow-up. Bone marrow (BM) and peripheral blood samples were obtained at screening, and during weeks 9, 17, 25, 33, 41, 53, and every 24 weeks thereafter, and at end of treatment and during EFS follow up. Samples were analyzed at each local site according to ICSH guidelines. Results: In the IVO+AZA and PBO+AZA arms, 4.2% and 5.5% of pts, respectively, received concomitant granulocyte colony-stimulating factor. Hemoglobin levels steadily increased from baseline at a similar rate in both treatment arms. Mean platelet count recovered from baseline values in the IVO+AZA and PBO+AZA arms (71.0 and 92.6 x 10 9 /L, respectively) as early as week 9 of treatment (171.1 and 155.1 x 10 9 /L, respectively) and continued to steadily increase thereafter in the treated population. In pts receiving IVO+AZA, mean neutrophil counts rapidly increased from baseline (0.99 x 10 9 /L) to week 2 (2.05 x 10 9 /L) and week 5 (4.07 x 10 9 /L), and then generally stabilized to within the normal range to study end (last available cycle value; ̃2.0 x 10 9 /L). Mean neutrophil counts initially declined with PBO+AZA before slowly recovering to near-normal levels after 36-40 weeks. The increased blood counts were accompanied by a rapid decrease in the mean BM blast percentage from 54.8% at baseline to 12.0% and 7.2% at week 9 and 17, respectively, in IVO+AZA treated patients and were maintained for 149 weeks. The decline in BM blasts was slower in the PBO+AZA arm (53.7%, 34.6% and 19.6% at baseline, week 9 and week 17, respectively). Among patients who were RBC/platelet transfusion-dependent at baseline (̃54.0% in both groups), 46.2% in the IVO+AZA group achieved RBC/platelet transfusion independence compared with 17.5% in the PBO+AZA arm (1-sided p = 0.0032). Additionally, fewer adverse events of febrile neutropenia (28.2% vs 34.2%) and infections (28.2% vs 49.3%) were reported in the IVO+AZA arm compared to the PBO+AZA arm. Conclusions: IVO+AZA demonstrated a significant clinical benefit compared with PBO+AZA and this sub-analysis demonstrated a rapidly improved recovery of blood counts and a reduced dependence on RBC and/or platelet transfusion. Moreover, rates of febrile neutropenia and infections were reduced with IVO+AZA. Clinical trial information: NCT03173248.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    URL: Article
    DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2022.40.16_suppl.7042
    RVK:
    XA 52760
    RVK:
    XA 10000
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2022
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 604914-X
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
    Online Resource
  • 9
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Randomized, open-label, phase II trial of gemcitabine with or without bavituximab in patients with nonresectable stage IV pancreatic adenocarcinoma.
    American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) ; 2013
    In:  Journal of Clinical Oncology Vol. 31, No. 15_suppl ( 2013-05-20), p. 4054-4054
    Details
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 31, No. 15_suppl ( 2013-05-20), p. 4054-4054
    Abstract: 4054 Background: Despite advances in the treatment of metastatic pancreatic cancer (PC), there is critical need to develop novel therapies.Median survival with combination chemotherapy is limited to less than one year and only the optimally conditioned patients can tolerate these therapies. Bavituximab (B) is a monoclonal antibody (mAB) directed againstphosphatidylserine (PS) that causes vascular shutdown and reactivation of the innate and adaptive immunity in animal models. Preclinical data in mouse PC models indicate that gemcitabine (G) increases PS exposure and the addition of a mAb targeting PS reduces tumor burden, visible liver metastases, microvessel density, and increases tumor macrophage infiltration compared to G alone (Beck et al. 2006). The purpose of this trial is to evaluate and compare the efficacy and safety of the combination of G+B vs. G alone as first line therapy in pts. with nonresectable Stage IV PC. Methods: Seventy patients were randomized (1:1) to receive G 1000 mg/m 2 on days 1, 8, and 15 every 28Edays with or without weekly B 3mg/kg IV until disease progression or unacceptable toxicities. Key eligibility criteria were Stage IV PC, ECOG ≤2, measurable disease, age≥18 years, total bilirubin ≤1.5xULN, and adequate renal, hematologic, and hepatic function. The primary efficacy endpoint was overall survival (OS) and secondary endpoints included overall response rate (ORR) and progression free survival (PFS). Results: Of the 70 (G/G+B 34/36) patients randomized, 67 (G/G+B 33/34) received study treatment and 63 (G/G+B 31/32) were evaluable. No significant difference was seen in age, gender, race or ECOG. At analysis 87% deaths had been reported in G and 72% in G+B group. Median OS estimate is 5.2 months for G and 5.6 months for G+B. No difference between groups was observed in PFS (median 3.9 months for G and 3.7 months for G+B). ORR was 13% for G and 28% for G+B. Most AEs were grade 1-2 and typical of exposure to G. Conclusions: In this patient population with extensive disease burdens and limited treatment options, G+B was well tolerated and demonstrated moderate activity in tumor response and survival. Clinical trial information: NCT01272791.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    URL: Article
    DOI: 10.1200/jco.2013.31.15_suppl.4054
    RVK:
    XA 52760
    RVK:
    XA 10000
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2013
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 604914-X
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
    Online Resource
  • 10
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    ClarIDHy: A phase 3, multicenter, randomized, double-blind study of AG-120 vs placebo in patients with an advanced cholangiocarcinoma with an IDH1 mutation.
    American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) ; 2017
    In:  Journal of Clinical Oncology Vol. 35, No. 15_suppl ( 2017-05-20), p. TPS4142-TPS4142
    Details
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 35, No. 15_suppl ( 2017-05-20), p. TPS4142-TPS4142
    Abstract: TPS4142 Background: Advanced cholangiocarcinoma (CC) is a life-threatening disease for which there are limited therapeutic options. Mutations in isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (mIDH1) occur in up to 25% of intrahepatic CC cases. mIDH1 lead to epigenetic and genetic changes that promote oncogenesis via production of the oncometabolite, D-2-hydroxyglutarate (2-HG). AG-120 is a first-in-class oral inhibitor of the mIDH1 enzyme, and is being tested in a phase 1 study that enrolled 73 patients (pts) with mIDH1 CC who had received a median of 2 prior therapies (range 1–5). AG-120 has demonstrated a favorable safety profile and clinical activity in this study. Among the 72 efficacy evaluable pts (≥1 post-baseline response assessment or discontinued prematurely), 6% (n = 4) had a confirmed partial response and 56% (n = 40) had stable disease. Progression-free survival (PFS) rate at 6 months was 40% as of Dec 16, 2016. The 500 mg once daily (QD) dose of AG-120 was selected for the ongoing phase 3 study in mIDH1 CC described here. Methods: ClarIDHy is a global, phase 3, multicenter, double-blind study randomizing 186 pts with mIDH1 CC in a 2:1 ratio to AG-120 (500 mg QD) or matched placebo (NCT02989857). Key eligibility criteria: nonresectable or metastatic CC; documented mIDH1 based on central laboratory testing; ECOG 0–1; measurable disease (RECIST v1.1); documented disease progression following ≤2 prior systemic therapies in the advanced setting, including at least 1 gemcitabine- or 5-fluorouracil-containing regimen; and no prior mIDH inhibitor therapy. Crossover from the placebo arm to the AG-120 arm will be permitted. The primary endpoint is PFS as assessed by an independent review. Secondary endpoints include safety, tolerability, overall response rate, overall survival, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic analyses on plasma, and quality of life as assessed by the EORTC QLQ-C30, EORTC QLQ-BIL21, and EQ-5D-5L instruments. An independent data monitoring committee will monitor the data throughout the study. The ClarIDHy study is currently activated at participating sites in the US and will be activated in centers throughout Europe and in South Korea. Clinical trial information: NCT02989857.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    URL: Article
    DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2017.35.15_suppl.TPS4142
    RVK:
    XA 52760
    RVK:
    XA 10000
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2017
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 604914-X
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
    Online Resource
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...