GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) ; 2018
    In:  Journal of Clinical Oncology Vol. 36, No. 15_suppl ( 2018-05-20), p. 550-550
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 36, No. 15_suppl ( 2018-05-20), p. 550-550
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2018
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) ; 2022
    In:  Journal of Clinical Oncology Vol. 40, No. 16_suppl ( 2022-06-01), p. e17054-e17054
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 40, No. 16_suppl ( 2022-06-01), p. e17054-e17054
    Abstract: e17054 Background: Prostate cancer (PC) is the most common cancer and second leading cause of cancer-related death among males in the United States. Screening recommendations and treatments for PC have changed considerably over the past two decades, with differential effects across sociodemographic groups. This study aims to characterize trends in incidence of PC from 2000 to 2018 by age, race, region, and rurality to better understand these effects on incidence. Methods: Data were obtained from the National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR), which represents patients for all 50 states. Incidence rates and average annual percent change (AAPC) were calculated using SEER*Stat software. Incident rates were calculated as the number of new cancers arising in the prostate (ICD-O-3 Site Code: C619) per 100,000 males. Trends across sociodemographic groups were analyzed and visualized in R. Results: PC incidence decreased significantly for all ages 40 and above from 2000 to 2018. Ages 85+ experienced the sharpest decline with an AAPC of -5.5% (95% CI: -6.0% to -5.1%). However, for all 5-year age brackets between 60 and 85, incidence reaches a minimum in 2014 before rising again as shown by segmented regression analysis. All race/ethnicity groups experienced a significant decline in incidence from 2000 to 2018 with sharpest decline in Hispanics -3.9% (95% CI: -4.5% to -3.3%). All regions also experienced a significant decline, with the greatest decline in the West at -4.0 (95% CI: -4.7 to -3.3). Metropolitan counties experienced a greater decline than nonmetropolitan. Patients ages 65 to 79, of Black race/ethnicity, and metropolitan groups had the highest overall incidence over the study period in their respective categories with 2018 incidences of 663, 181, and 115 per 100,000 males respectively. Conclusions: Nearly all sociodemographic groups have experienced a decline in the incidence of PC from 2000 to 2018. However, PC incidence increased from 2014 to 2018 for several sociodemographic groups. Importantly, 65 to 79 year olds, Black Americans, and metropolitan groups had the highest incidence over the study period. This study demonstrates a sustained rise in incidence of PC for several sociodemographic groups, as well as identifies groups at higher risk of PC. These trends may be due to evolving PC screening guidelines and merit further investigation.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2022
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) ; 2018
    In:  Journal of Clinical Oncology Vol. 36, No. 15_suppl ( 2018-05-20), p. e17061-e17061
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 36, No. 15_suppl ( 2018-05-20), p. e17061-e17061
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2018
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Springer Science and Business Media LLC ; 2018
    In:  npj Breast Cancer Vol. 4, No. 1 ( 2018-01-25)
    In: npj Breast Cancer, Springer Science and Business Media LLC, Vol. 4, No. 1 ( 2018-01-25)
    Abstract: Metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients with bone only metastasis (BOM) are a unique population with limited characterization. We identified patients followed at MD Anderson Cancer Center from 01/01/1997 to 12/31/2015 for at least 6 months with a BOM diagnosis as first site of metastasis. Tumor subtype (TS) was assessed by initial breast biopsy immunohistochemistry using hormonal receptor (HR) and HER2 status, with four subtypes identified: HR+/HER2−, HR+/HER2+, HR−/HER2−, HR−/HER2+. HR+ was defined as estrogen receptor or progesterone receptor ≥1%. We identified 1445 patients with BOM, 1048 with TS data available. Among these patients, the majority were HR+/HER2− (78%). Median time from breast cancer diagnosis to first bone metastasis was 2.3 years (95% CI 2.1, 2.5) and varied significantly by TS, with longer time to distant disease in HR+/HER2− patients relative to all other TS ( p   〈  .0001). Median overall survival (OS) from breast cancer diagnosis was 8.7 years (95% CI 8.0, 9.7) and varied significantly by TS with poorer OS for HR−/HER2− and HR-/HER2+ patients relative to HR+/HER2− TS ( p   〈  .0001). The 442 patients with de novo BOM disease, defined as bone metastasis diagnosis within 4 months of breast cancer diagnosis, had significantly shorter OS ( p   〈  .0001). Overall, several higher risk BOM subsets were identified in this analysis, most notably HR−/HER2+ and HR−/HER2− TS and de novo BOM patients.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 2374-4677
    Language: English
    Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
    Publication Date: 2018
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2843288-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 5
    In: npj Breast Cancer, Springer Science and Business Media LLC, Vol. 9, No. 1 ( 2023-06-08)
    Abstract: Adjuvant chemotherapy recommendations for ER+/HER2− early-stage breast cancers (eBC) involve integrating prognostic and predictive information which rely on physician judgment; this can lead to discordant recommendations. In this study we aim to evaluate whether Oncotype DX improves confidence and agreement among oncologists in adjuvant chemotherapy recommendations. We randomly select 30 patients with ER+/HER2− eBC and recurrence score (RS) available from an institutional database. We ask 16 breast oncologists with varying years of clinical practice in Italy and the US to provide recommendation for the addition of chemotherapy to endocrine therapy and their degree of confidence in the recommendation twice; first, based on clinicopathologic features only (pre-RS), and then with RS result (post-RS). Pre-RS, the average rate of chemotherapy recommendation is 50.8% and is higher among junior (62% vs 44%; p   〈  0.001), but similar by country. Oncologists are uncertain in 39% of cases and recommendations are discordant in 27% of cases (interobserver agreement K 0.47). Post-RS, 30% of physicians change recommendation, uncertainty in recommendation decreases to 5.6%, and discordance decreases to 7% (interobserver agreement K 0.85). Interpretation of clinicopathologic features alone to recommend adjuvant chemotherapy results in 1 out of 4 discordant recommendations and relatively high physician uncertainty. Oncotype DX results decrease discordancy to 1 out of 15, and reduce physician uncertainty. Genomic assay results reduce subjectivity in adjuvant chemotherapy recommendations for ER +/HER2− eBC.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 2374-4677
    Language: English
    Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
    Publication Date: 2023
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2843288-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 6
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    American Medical Association (AMA) ; 2021
    In:  JAMA Network Open Vol. 4, No. 10 ( 2021-10-07), p. e2128530-
    In: JAMA Network Open, American Medical Association (AMA), Vol. 4, No. 10 ( 2021-10-07), p. e2128530-
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 2574-3805
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Medical Association (AMA)
    Publication Date: 2021
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2931249-8
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 7
    In: European Urology, Elsevier BV, Vol. 80, No. 3 ( 2021-09), p. 389-390
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0302-2838
    Language: English
    Publisher: Elsevier BV
    Publication Date: 2021
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1482253-2
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 8
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) ; 2022
    In:  Journal of Clinical Oncology Vol. 40, No. 16_suppl ( 2022-06-01), p. 10571-10571
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 40, No. 16_suppl ( 2022-06-01), p. 10571-10571
    Abstract: 10571 Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has caused unprecedented disruptions in medical care, especially in those with cancer. Prior studies have demonstrated a higher risk of mortality in patients with cancer and COVID-19, which could be due to factors such as immunosuppression and higher burden of co-morbidities. However, there are limited studies examining the impact of sociodemographic factors including race, gender, rurality, and region on mortality in patients with COVID-19 and cancer. This study aims to characterize and analyze sociodemographic trends in COVID-19 mortality in patients with cancer. Methods: Data on patients with COVID-19 and cancer listed on death certificates from the Multiple Cause of Death Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Wide-Ranging Online Data for Epidemiologic Research (CDC WONDER) database were extracted. Age-adjusted mortality rates (AAMR) were calculated and compared across sociodemographic groups. Results: A total of 18,467 total deaths occurred in patients with COVID-19 and cancer listed on multiple cause of death certificates in 2020, with overall AAMR of 4.4 (95% CI: 4.4-4.5). AAMR for patients with COVID-19 and cancer was significantly higher in Non-Hispanic (NH) Black or African American (7, 95% CI: 6.8-7.3), NH American Indian or Alaska Native (6.4, 95% CI: 5.4-7.3), and Hispanic or Latino (5.4, 95% CI: 5.2-5.7) groups than NH White (4, 95% CI: 3.9-4.1) and NH Asian or Pacific Islander (2.5, 95% CI: 2.3-2.7). AAMR was also higher in males (5.9, 95% CI: 5.8-6.1) and those in Northeast (5.6, 95% CI: 5.4-5.8) and Midwest (5.3, 95% CI: 5.2-5.5) census regions. Those in medium metro counties had significantly lower AAMR (3.8, 95% CI: 3.7-4) compared to other locations based on the NCHS Urban-Rural Classification Scheme for Counties. Conclusions: AAMR in patients with any cancer and COVID-19 was significantly higher in NH Black or African American, NH American Indian or Alaskan, and Hispanic or Latino race/ethnicity groups, as well as in males. Regional and rurality disparities also exist. This study highlights persistent disparities in COVID-19 and cancer outcomes and identifies groups at higher risk of mortality. Future studies examining sociodemographic trends in COVID-19 mortality in patients with specific cancers are necessary. [Table: see text]
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2022
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 9
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) ; 2021
    In:  Journal of Clinical Oncology Vol. 39, No. 15_suppl ( 2021-05-20), p. 6519-6519
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 39, No. 15_suppl ( 2021-05-20), p. 6519-6519
    Abstract: 6519 Background: Utilizing race and ethnicity data from the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME), this study aims to assess representation trends across American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) participant specialties from the past five academic years in order to characterize current needs and effectively address these needs moving forward. Methods: Self-reported ethnicity/race data from the ACGME database books were collected from academic years 2015-16 to 2019-2020 for the following oncologic training programs: hematology and medical oncology, medical oncology, gynecologic oncology, pediatric hematology and oncology, radiation oncology, complex general surgical oncology. Summary statistics and chi-square analysis were conducted to compare underrepresented minority (URM) trends across programs. URM groups were cross-referenced with definitions provided by the AAMC and included those who identify as Hispanic, Latino or of Spanish origin, Black or African American, and Native American or Alaskan. Results: Over the study period, only 1,250 (9.0%) of 13,853 oncology trainees identified as URM. Chi-square analysis demonstrated no significant change in URM representation in all oncology specialties combined between 2015-16 and 2019-20 (8.9% [95% CI, 7.8%-10.0%] vs. 9.7% [95% CI, 8.7%-10.8%] ; P=.31). Between 2015-16 and 2019-20, Hematology and oncology (+1.3%), pediatric hematology and oncology (+0.3%) all demonstrated insignificant increasing trends in representation while radiation oncology (-0.3%), complex general surgical oncology (-4.0%) had statistically insignificant decreasing trends in representation. Gynecologic oncology (+6.0%) demonstrated a significant increasing trend in representation. Conclusions: This is the first study to characterize the vast disparities in representation in oncologic training programs in the United States. There is a demonstrated lack of representation across all oncology training programs and a lack of significant improvement over the study period. A multiprong approach is needed to improve diversity and representation across the spectrum of the oncology workforce in the United States.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2021
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 10
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) ; 2017
    In:  Journal of Clinical Oncology Vol. 35, No. 15_suppl ( 2017-05-20), p. 1072-1072
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 35, No. 15_suppl ( 2017-05-20), p. 1072-1072
    Abstract: 1072 Background: Metastatic breast cancer (MBC) pts with BOM are a unique population with limited characterization. Our goal was to characterize the TS of BOM pts, evaluating differences in sites and types of bone metastases (BM), treatment, and survival. Methods: We identified pts followed at MD Anderson Cancer Center from 01/01/1997 to 12/31/2015 for at least 6 months with a BOM diagnosis as first site of metastasis (met). TS was assessed by initial biopsy immunohistochemistry (IHC) (Table 1) with hormone receptor (HR) + defined as ER or PR 〉 10%. Results: We identified 1445 pts with BOM, 1049 with initial biopsy IHC available to group into TS (Table 1). Among BOM pts, the majority had multiple BM at diagnosis (1141/79%), most in both the axial (Ax) and appendicular (App) skeleton (53%). Of the 808 pts with BM categorized on imaging at diagnosis, the majority were lytic (389/48%), with 21% sclerotic, 18% mixed, and 12% blastic. Time from breast cancer diagnosis to first met differed significantly by TS, χ 2 (3) = 94.33, P 〈 .0001, with median time to met longer for pts with blastic (3.08 years; 95% CI 2.03, 4.24) versus lytic lesions (1.75 years; 95% CI 1.27, 2.17). Conclusions: BOM patients are a unique MBC subpopulation, more commonly found in luminal TS patients. Our study demonstrates prognostic differences in BOM pts specific to TS and emphasizes the need for further study of BOM patients. [Table: see text]
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2017
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...