In:
PLOS Genetics, Public Library of Science (PLoS), Vol. 17, No. 3 ( 2021-3-19), p. e1009443-
Abstract:
Most epigenome-wide association studies (EWAS) quantify DNA methylation (DNAm) in peripheral tissues such as whole blood to identify positions in the genome where variation is statistically associated with a trait or exposure. As whole blood comprises a mix of cell types, it is unclear whether trait-associated DNAm variation is specific to an individual cellular population. We collected three peripheral tissues (whole blood, buccal epithelial and nasal epithelial cells) from thirty individuals. Whole blood samples were subsequently processed using fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) to purify five constituent cell-types (monocytes, granulocytes, CD4 + T cells, CD8 + T cells, and B cells). DNAm was profiled in all eight sample-types from each individual using the Illumina EPIC array. We identified significant differences in both the level and variability of DNAm between different sample types, and DNAm data-derived estimates of age and smoking were found to differ dramatically across sample types from the same individual. We found that for the majority of loci variation in DNAm in individual blood cell types was only weakly predictive of variance in DNAm measured in whole blood, although the proportion of variance explained was greater than that explained by either buccal or nasal epithelial samples. Covariation across sample types was much higher for DNAm sites influenced by genetic factors. Overall, we observe that DNAm variation in whole blood is additively influenced by a combination of the major blood cell types. For a subset of sites, however, variable DNAm detected in whole blood can be attributed to variation in a single blood cell type providing potential mechanistic insight about EWAS findings. Our results suggest that associations between whole blood DNAm and traits or exposures reflect differences in multiple cell types and our data will facilitate the interpretation of findings in epigenetic epidemiology.
Type of Medium:
Online Resource
ISSN:
1553-7404
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pgen.1009443
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pgen.1009443.g001
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pgen.1009443.g002
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pgen.1009443.g003
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pgen.1009443.g004
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pgen.1009443.g005
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pgen.1009443.g006
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pgen.1009443.s001
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pgen.1009443.s002
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pgen.1009443.s003
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pgen.1009443.s004
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pgen.1009443.s005
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pgen.1009443.s006
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pgen.1009443.s007
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pgen.1009443.s008
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pgen.1009443.s009
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pgen.1009443.s010
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pgen.1009443.s011
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pgen.1009443.s012
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pgen.1009443.s013
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pgen.1009443.s014
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pgen.1009443.s015
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pgen.1009443.s016
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pgen.1009443.s017
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pgen.1009443.s018
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pgen.1009443.s019
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pgen.1009443.s020
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pgen.1009443.s021
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pgen.1009443.s022
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pgen.1009443.s023
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pgen.1009443.s024
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pgen.1009443.s025
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pgen.1009443.s026
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pgen.1009443.s027
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pgen.1009443.s028
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pgen.1009443.s029
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pgen.1009443.s030
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pgen.1009443.s031
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pgen.1009443.s032
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pgen.1009443.s033
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pgen.1009443.s034
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pgen.1009443.r001
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pgen.1009443.r002
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pgen.1009443.r003
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pgen.1009443.r004
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pgen.1009443.r005
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pgen.1009443.r006
Language:
English
Publisher:
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Publication Date:
2021
detail.hit.zdb_id:
2186725-2
Permalink