Abstract: Abstract 2971 Introduction: Bendamustine is a bifunctional alkylating agent approved for the treatment of several lymphoproliferative disorders. Studies have evidenced its efficacy in multiple myeloma (MM), but data so far available in this setting are scarce. We performed a retrospective analysis of Italian patients with relapsed/refractory MM, who had received bendamustine as salvage therapy within a national compassionate use program. Patients and methods: Seventy-eight patients (42 males, 36 females) were collected in 19 hematological centers. Mean age was 64.2 years (range 38–84). ISS was equally distributed, with about one third of patents being represented in single stages. Twenty-three of 43 analyzed patients had cytogenetic abnormalities, the most frequent being del13q (14 patients); t(4;14) and t(11;14) were observed in 4 and 2 patients, respectively, while t(6;14), del17p or complex karyotype occurred in single patients. The median number of prior lines of therapy was 4 (range 1–10). Ninety-seven percent of patients had previously received bortezomib, 94% IMIDs, 85% melphalan, 74% cyclophosphamide, 45% anthracyclines, 26% other drugs, 33% radiotherapy. Sixty percent of patients had undergone autologous and 4% allogeneic stem cell transplantation. The last treatment before bendamustine was a bortezomib-based regimen in 31%, an IMIDs-based regimen in 42%, a combined bortezomib/IMIDs-based regimen in 9%, while 18% of patients had received other therapies. Seventy-three percent of patients were resistant to last therapy received, while 27% had relapsed. Median duration of response to last treatment received before bendamustine was 9 months (range 2–46). Median Hb value was 10.1 g/dl (range 7.6–14.9), WBC count 2.700/μl (range 550–15.200), PLT count 130.000/μl (range 6.000–410.000). Serum creatinine, calcium, beta2-microglobulin and LDH levels were increased in 12 (15%), 4 (5%), and 44 (56%) patients, respectively, while albumin levels were decreased in 27 patients (35%). The median percentage of marrow plasma cells (as evaluated in 57 cases) was 60% (range 1–100). Seventy-six percent of patients had osteolytic bone involvement and 78% extramedullary localizations, with 13% showing secondary plasma cell leukemia and 7% documented amyloidosis or proteinuria. Finally, 45% of patients presented with at least one severe comorbidity, mainly cardio-vascular, liver or pulmonary dysfunction, and diabetes. Results: A total of 236 cycles was administered (median 3, range 1–9). In 47% of patients bendamustine was variously associated to bortezomib (23%), or IMIDs (21%), or to a combination of both (3%). In 80% of patients receiving bendamustine +/− steroids, a median dose of 90 mg/sqm for two consecutive days every 28 days was employed; the median dose was 80 mg/sqm when bendamustine was combined with bortezomib, 60 mg/sqm with IMIDs (total range: 40–140 mg/sqm). The remaining patients received single, monthly doses ranging from 60 to 150 mg/sqm. According to IMWG uniform response criteria, 21 out of 73 evaluable patients achieved a response after a median time of 3 months. In particular, there were 16 PR, 1 VGPR, 1 sCR, and 3 CR; overall response rate (ORR) was, therefore, 29%. Response rate was 10% (4/39) in bendamustine single agent +/− steroids, 38% (5/13) in bendamustine + bortezomib and 62% (10/16) in bendamustine + IMIDs subgroups, respectively. Responders had received a lower number of previous treatments than non responders (median 3 vs 4). Response rate was higher in relapsed (12/21, 57%) than in resistant patients (10/57, 17%). The time to best response ranged from 1 to 8 months. After a median follow-up of 8 months, median PFS duration was 6 months, with 13 out of 21 responding patients not yet progressed. Median OS of the entire cohort was 6.2 months (7 months in responders and 4 months in non responders, range 0–27). Grade 3–4 hematological and non-hematological toxicities occurred in 56% and 15% of patients, respectively, causing three interruptions of the treatment. Conclusions: Though with the clear limits due to the high heterogeneity of treatments applied and of population analyzed, our data indicate that bendamustine may be a therapeutic option in heavily pretreated MM, suggesting a possible non cross-resistance with other agents. Its earlier use with appropriate doses and combinations might further improve the results obtained in this study. Disclosures: Musto: Mundipharma: Honoraria. Off Label Use: Bendamustine in relapsed/refractory myeloma. Fragasso:Mundipharma: Honoraria. Baldini:Mundipharma: Honoraria. Storti:Mundipharma: Honoraria.

Abstract: Abstract 1801 Background: Velcade ® (V) and Mabthera ® (M) have demonstrated an individual considerable efficacy in the treatment of non Hodgkin's lymphoma. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the combination of V and M in patients with relapsed Follicular lymphoma (FL). Methods: Patients (pts) with histologic documentation of CD20+ FL, measurable and active disease, received : 1.3 mg/m2 of V on days 1–4-8-11 every 21 days for 6 cycle and M 375 mg/m2 on day 1 of each cycle from cycle III to VI. Two additional doses of M were administered alone after cycle VI, every 21 days (cycle VII and VIII). Response was assessed after 2 and 8 cycles using the NCI recommendations for Non-Hodgkin's Lymphomas. Results: At the time of current analysis, initial planned accrual of 41 evaluable pts was not completed. From 2007 to now 37 pts entered into the trial. The pts characteristics at baseline were: median age 66 years (range: 46–84), male 51%, stage IV 43 % elevated values of LDH, 27%, and of Beta2microglobulin 41%. The FLIPI score was calculated in 34 pts (92%) and 11 pts (31%) had a poor prognostic score ( 〉 3). The median number of previous immuno/chemotherapy regimens was 2 (range:1-3), and the median duration of last remission before registration into trial was 23 months (range: 3–67). In four out of the 37 pts who entered into the trial, the treatment is ongoing and thirty-three pts were evaluable for response. The overall response rate in the intent to treat analysis was 58% (19 pts), of which 16 pts (49%) obtained complete response (CR) and 3 (9%) partial response (PR). Stable disease was seen in 1 pt (3%). Eight pts (24%) had progressive disease and 2 (6%) pts were lost at follow-up. Three pts (9%) had to stop the treatment: one pt (3%) for grade IV peripheral neuropathy, one pt (3%) refused to continue the treatment after 2 cycle and one pt (3%) died during the treatment for toxicity . After a median follow up of 14 month (0-44), the median overall survival and the event free survival were not reached. Overall, 2 pts relapsed (10 %) and 1 pt (5 %) showed a progression of disease. A total of five pts died, four because of lymphoma progression, and one for toxicity during treatment. Complete response are ongoing in 14 pts . Toxicity was evaluable in 33 patients. We observed the following grade 1/2 adverse events: neuropathy (10 pts), neutropenia (2 pts), infection (5 pts), constipation (4 pts), rash (2 pts), fatigue (1 pt). Further we saw the following grade 3/4 adverse events: thrombocytopenia (5 pts), neuropathy (5 pts), neutropenia (1 pt) and infection with fever(1 pt). Three patient interrupted the treatment due to severe neuropathy. Conclusions: The combination of V+M is associated with acceptable toxicity and a promising percentage of response. Further follow-up is required to evaluate the response duration and survival in the whole group of patients Disclosures: Sacchi: Janssen-Cilag: Research Funding. Off Label Use: Velcade is not approved in Italy for the treatment of Follicular lymphomas. However,we have perfomed with study has I have thought that the association with Mabthera could have efficacy and low toxicity in the treatment of NHL.

Abstract: Background. MDS may be characterized by hypocellular marrow, irrespective of their WHO classification or molecular characteristics. Their prognostic weight must still be completely evaluated. MDS with hypocellular marrow tend to be considered an aplastic anemia "overlap syndrome" or a pre-aplastic anemia stage. There are no strong specific therapy recommendations, and large studies analyzing the outcome of hypocellular MDS are lacking. While selective sensitivity to immunosuppressive therapy is suggested, evidence in this sense is controversial. Aims. We wanted to evaluate the clinical characteristics, outcome and choice of therapy of patients with hypocellular MDS and compare them with normocellular MDS. Methods. We analyzed 2559 MDS cases with complete clinical annotations and with evaluable bone trephine biopsy, enrolled in our Italian National Registry FISMonlus. In this cohort of patients, 438 had a bone marrow cellularity 〈 = 30% and 2121 cellularity above 30%. We proceeded by comparing these two groups in terms of age, gender, WHO classification, IPSS-R categories, overall survival and first line therapies. As a validation cohort, 874 unselected MDS cases enrolled in Rete Ematologica Lombarda (REL) registry were analyzed. In this population, 108 patients had cellularity 〈 = 30%. Results. In FISM cohort median age was 72.5 yrs in the hypocellular group and 72,3 yrs in the normocellular group; M/F were 53.2%/46.8% for hypocellular MDS vs 62.6%/37.4% in normocellular MDS. IPSS-R risk categories were distributed as follows: Hypocellular MDS Very Low 15.5%, Low 35.1%, Intermediate 30.1%, High 11.3%, Very high 8%; Normocellular MDS Very Low 12.8%, Low 37.2%, intermediate 23.7%, High 15.5%, Very High 11.4%. Global median overall survival (OS) was 77 months for hypocellular MDS and 56 months for normocellular MDS. When OS was evaluated in the different IPSS-R risk groups, Lower risk MDS cases with hypocellular BM had a median OS of 125 mos while normocellular had a median OS of 74 mos (p 〈 .001). Higher risk MDS with hypocellular BM had 19 mos median OS vs 20 mos OS in normocellular MDS. Regarding the first line therapy, the comparison of hypocellular MDS with normocellular ones yielded the following: watch and wait 33.8% vs 31.6% for IPSS-R lower risk, 12.1% vs 16% for higher risk cases; AML like chemotherapy and HSCT were chosen for 〈 1% of lower risk cases overall, and in 1.7% of higher risk hypocellular MDS, while higher risk MDS with normocellular marrow received it in 6.2% of the cases. Azacitidine was first line treatment for 36.2% of the higher risk MDS patients with hypocellular BM and 25% of normocellular BM. Immunosuppressive treatments were emploied for 〈 1% and 1.5% respectively in lower risk cases only. Erythroid stimulating agents were administered in 42.6% and 41.2% MDS IPSS-R lower risk, hypo- and normocellular, respectively. We then focused on the validation cohort (REL registry). Median age was 74 yrs in the hypocellular group IPSS-R risk categories were distributed as follows: Very Low risk 9 %, Low 36%, Intermediate 39%, High 17 %, Very high 9%. Global median overall survival (OS) was 79 months for hypocellular MDS and 64 months for normocellular MDS. The difference was significant in very low/low IPSS-R risk groups, cases with hypocellular BM having a median OS of 103 mos vs. 69 mos of normocellular cases (p=.011). No significant differences were present in higher disease risk categories. No significant difference was noticed on first line treatment of choice between hypocellular an normocellular MDS. Immunosuppressive treatments were used in a very low proportion of cases (2% and 3% respectively). Conclusion. Our results are based on an unbiased analysis of "real life" MDS patients with hypocellular BM compared to normocellular ones. Clinical characteristics between the two groups were not significantly different in terms of age, gender, and distribution in the various IPSS-R risk categories. The outcome of the hypocellular marrow-MDS cases was better in comparison with that of normocellular MDS, with significantly longer OS in IPSS-R lower risk cases. The advantage in OS for hypoplastic MDS wasn't present for IPSS-R higher risk cases. Finally, the choice of first line therapy doesn't seem to be influenced by the BM cellularity, with a surprising very low proportion of patients receiving immunosuppressive agents, despite several guideline recommend of this treatment for hypoplastic MDS. Disclosures Santini: Novartis: Honoraria; Otsuka: Consultancy; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; AbbVie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Finelli:Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Gaidano:Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Morphosys: Honoraria; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria. Oliva:Celgene: Consultancy, Other: Royalties, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; La Jolla: Consultancy; Sanofi: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Cilloni:celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Abstract: 5-Azacytidine (AZA) is an hypomethylating agent approved in US for the treatment of all FAB subtypes of myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). Some recent reports have raised the question of a possible efficacy of AZA in selected patients with acute myeloid leukaemia (AML). In September 2007, we started a retrospective study aiming to register and analyse all Italian patients with MDS or AML who had received AZA for the treatment of their disease outside of clinical trials, on the basis of a national patient named program. Among a total of 246 patients treated in 31 different Italian Institutions since 2005, 55 AML diagnosed according to WHO criteria were collected. Median age was 72 years (range 29–87) and 28 patients were male. Poor karyotype was present in 11 patients (20%), while 14 patients (25%) had secondary AML. Median time from diagnosis was 5 months (range 0–72). Eighteen patients (33%) received AZA as front-line treatment, as they were considered not eligible for intensive chemotherapy due to age, co-morbidities or poor performance status. Thirty-seven patients (67%) were pre-treated with growth factors (3 patients) or with one or more lines of chemotherapy (11 and 23 patients, respectively); most of the pre-treated patients (22 out of 34) had received high dose chemotherapy, including autologous or allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Low dose chemotherapy had been employed in the remaining cases. The median number of monthly AZA cycles administered was 4 (range 1–22). Thirty-nine patients (71%) received AZA at the fixed dose of 100 mg/d s.c., 16 patients (29%) received a dose of 75 mg/sqm/d s.c.. A seven-day per month schedule was employed in 43 patients (78%), while 11 patients (20%) received AZA for more than 7 days and one patient for 5 days. Twenty-nine patients (52.8%) received AZA alone, twenty-six (47.2%) in various combinations with growth factors (1), valproic acid +/− ATRA (21) or gentuzumab-ozogamycin (4).The most relevant toxicities observed (grade 3–4) were represented by further myelosuppression (15%), infections (24%: in particular, 1 fungal lung infection, 3 pneumonia and 1 septic shock) and gastrointestinal adverse events (20%). The overall response rate was 35.3% (18/51): 8 patients achieved a complete remission (CR) (15.7%), while a partial response (PR) was observed in 5 patients (9.8%). Five haematological improvements were also seen (9.8%). Response rate was significantly higher in untreated patients compared to pre-treated ones (p=0.02). A statistically significant difference (p=0.04) in response rate in favour of 75 mg/sqm/d versus 100 mg fixed dose was also observed. The actuarial probability of overall survival (OS) at 16 months was 45% for patients responding to AZA and 10% for those non responding (p=0.0027). In conclusion, our data show that: AZA can induce significant responses in about one third of AML patients; the “standard” dose of 75 mg/sqm/d seems to be more effective than 100 mg/d (one single vial) fixed dose; AZA is more effective in de novo as compared to pre-treated (refractory and/or relapsed) disease; AML patients responding to AZA have a significant survival advantage compared to non responders.

Abstract: Abstract 1662 Poster Board I-688 Introduction Bendamustine is an alkylating agent with a nitrogen mustard group and a purine like benzimidazol group. Recently this drug was introduced in Italy. We analized all pts treated in sixteen haematological Italian centers with Bendamustine alone or in combination with anti-CD20 antibody. Patients and methods On an intention to treat basis pts who have received at least one complete cycle were evaluable for response and toxicity. The treatments consisted of: Bendamustine 60-90 mg/m2 days 1,2 alone or in combination with Rituximab 375 mg/m2 day 0, every 21 or 28 days. 173 pts were analized, median age was 67 (range 31-87), 114 were male, 63 chronic lymphatic leukaemia 41 indolent non-follicular lymphoma, 26 diffuse large B cell lymphoma, 26 follicular lymphoma, 15 mantle cell lymphoma, 2 Peripheral T cell lymphoma. Pts were heavily pretreated, the median number of previous treatments was 3,5 (range 1-8), 121 pts have experienced more than three chemotherapy schemes. One hundred and twenty-seven pts were previously treated with Rituximab and 24 performed an autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation. The Bendamustine pre-treatment condition was: 70 relapsed pts, 40 with refractory disease and 63 with a progressive disease after partial response. The median number of Bendamustine cycles was 4.3 (range 1-11). Results All patients were evaluable for response: 48 pts (28%) obtained a complete remission, 78 (45%) a partial response or stable disease with an overall response rate of 73% and 47 were non responders. According to histotype we observed that 10/15 pts (67%) with mantle cell lymphoma obtained a response (6 CR;4 PR), 37/41 (9 CR; 28 PR) indolent non follicular lymphoma and 25/26 (96%) follicular lymphoma obtained a response (12 CR;13 PR), 46/63 CLL obtained a response and 8/26 (31%) DLBCL obtained a response to therapy (4 CR;4 PR), none of the two T lymphoma pts responded to therapy. With a median period of observation of 12 months (1-46) 121 (70%) pts are alive and 83 pts are in complete remission or with stable disease without any other treatment. The overall survival was 82%, 72%, 68% and 27% respectively for indolent, CLL, mantle cell and diffuse large B cell lymphoma. The progression free survival was 31%, 27%, 15% and 10% respectively for indolent, CLL, mantle cell and diffuse large B cell lymphoma. Fifthy-two pts died, 47 for progressive disease, 11 due to infection and sepsis (6%) and 2 due to other causes not related with therapy or disease. In this group of heavily pretreated pts 760 cycles were performed. The extrahematological toxicity was mild the most important problem were infections (Herpes Zooster, pneumonia, enteritis) reported in 16 pts, hepatic in 4 and cardiologic in 2 pts. The hematological toxicity was trombocytopenia grade 3-4 in 20 pts (12%), neutropenia grade 3-4 in 40 pts (23%) and anemia grade 3-4 in 19 pts (11%). Discussion In conclusion this retrospective study shows that treatment with Bendamustine alone or in combination with Rituximab is a safe and efficacy regimen in a subset of pluriresistent patients. This data shows also that the best results could be obtained in indolent lymphoma and CLL incouraging data in mantle cell lymphoma are reported. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.