Abstract: Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is the most common cause of lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI) in infants. Nirsevimab is a single-dose monoclonal antibody with extended half-life that was shown to protect preterm infants 29 to & lt; 35 weeks gestation against RSV LRTI. However, most medically attended (MA) cases occur in otherwise healthy, term infants for whom there is currently no effective RSV prevention strategy. We report the primary analysis of efficacy and safety, along with the impact of nirsevimab in late preterm and term infants (≥ 35 weeks gestation) in the phase 3 MELODY study (NCT03979313). Methods Infants were randomized 2:1 to receive one intramuscular injection of nirsevimab (50 mg if & lt; 5 kg; 100 mg if ≥ 5 kg at dosing) or placebo entering their first RSV season. The primary endpoint was the incidence of MA RSV LRTI over 150 days postdose. Cases met predefined clinical criteria of disease severity and were confirmed by real-time reverse-transcriptase PCR. Safety was evaluated through 360 days postdose. Enrollment started on 23 July 2019 and was suspended following the declaration of the COVID-19 pandemic by the WHO on 11 March 2020. Results Overall, 1490 infants were randomized and included in the intent-to-treat population; 1465 (98%) completed the 150-day efficacy follow-up, and 1367 (92%) completed the 360-day safety follow-up. The incidence of MA RSV LRTI was 1.2% (n=12/994) in the nirsevimab group and 5.0% (n=25/496) in the placebo group, giving nirsevimab an efficacy of 74.5% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 49.6, 87.1; p & lt; 0.0001). Nirsevimab averted 93.6 (95% CI 63.0, 124.0) MA LRTIs per 1000 infants dosed. Nirsevimab was well tolerated, with similar rates of adverse events (87.4% nirsevimab; 86.8% placebo) and serious adverse events (6.8% nirsevimab; 7.3% placebo) between groups. Conclusion In this phase 3 study, a single dose of nirsevimab protected late preterm and term infants against MA RSV LRTI over an RSV season with a favorable safety profile. Approximately 11 infants need to be immunized to prevent 1 case of LRTI; nirsevimab has the potential to be an important intervention to reduce the burden of RSV LRTI in healthy infants. Disclosures Laura Hammitt, MD, MedImmune (Grant/Research Support, Scientific Research Study Investigator, Research Grant or Support)Merck & Co., Inc. (Grant/Research Support, Scientific Research Study Investigator, Research Grant or Support)Novavax (Grant/Research Support, Scientific Research Study Investigator, Research Grant or Support)Pfizer (Grant/Research Support, Scientific Research Study Investigator, Research Grant or Support) Laura Hammitt, MD, MedImmune (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Grant/Research Support, Research grant to my institution; Merck (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Grant/Research Support, Research grant to my institution; Pfizer (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Grant/Research Support, Research grant to my institution Ron Dagan, MD, Medimmune/AstraZeneca (Grant/Research Support, Scientific Research Study Investigator, Research Grant or Support)MSD (Consultant, Grant/Research Support, Scientific Research Study Investigator, Advisor or Review Panel member, Research Grant or Support, Speaker’s Bureau)Pfizer (Consultant, Grant/Research Support, Scientific Research Study Investigator, Advisor or Review Panel member, Research Grant or Support, Speaker’s Bureau) Yuan Yuan, PhD, AstraZeneca (Employee, Shareholder) Shabhir A. Mahdi, PhD, BMGF (Research Grant or Support)EDCTP (Research Grant or Support)GlaxoSmithKline (Research Grant or Support)Melody (Research Grant or Support)Minervax (Research Grant or Support)Novavax (Research Grant or Support)SAMRC (Research Grant or Support) William J. Muller, MD, PhD, Ansun (Scientific Research Study Investigator)Astellas (Scientific Research Study Investigator)AstraZeneca (Scientific Research Study Investigator)Genentech (Scientific Research Study Investigator)Gilead (Scientific Research Study Investigator)Janssen (Scientific Research Study Investigator)Karius (Scientific Research Study Investigator)Melinta (Scientific Research Study Investigator)Merck (Scientific Research Study Investigator)Nabriva (Scientific Research Study Investigator)Seqirus (Scientific Research Study Investigator)Tetraphase (Scientific Research Study Investigator) William J. Muller, MD, PhD, Ansun (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Grant/Research Support; Astellas (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Research Grant or Support; AstraZeneca (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Grant/Research Support; BD (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Research Grant or Support; Eli Lilly (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Grant/Research Support; Gilead (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Grant/Research Support; Karius, Inc. (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Grant/Research Support, Scientific Research Study Investigator; Melinta (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Grant/Research Support; Merck (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Grant/Research Support; Moderna (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Grant/Research Support; Nabriva (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Grant/Research Support; Seqirus (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Consultant; Tetraphase (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Grant/Research Support Heather J. Zar, PhD, AstraZeneca (Grant/Research Support)Novavax (Grant/Research Support)Pfizer (Grant/Research Support, Advisor or Review Panel member) Dennis Brooks, MD, AstraZeneca (Employee) Amy Grenham, MSc, AstraZeneca (Employee, Shareholder) Ulrika Wählby Hamrén, PhD, AstraZeneca R & D (Employee, Shareholder) Vaishali S. Mankad, MD, AstraZeneca (Employee) Therese Takas, BSc, AstraZeneca (Employee, Other Financial or Material Support, Own stock in AstraZeneca) Jon Heinrichs, PhD, AstraZeneca (Shareholder)Bristol Myers Squibb (Shareholder)J & J (Shareholder)Merck (Shareholder)Organon (Shareholder)Procter & Gamble (Shareholder)Sanofi (Shareholder)Sanofi Pasteur (Employee) Amanda Leach, MRCPCH, AstraZeneca (Employee, Shareholder) M. Pamela Griffin, MD, AstraZeneca (Employee) Tonya L. Villafana, PhD, AstraZeneca (Employee)

Abstract: O presente artigo trata-se de uma revisão bibliográfica, que aborda sobre o controle interno. Que são os sistemas usados por uma organização para gerenciar riscos e diminuir as fraudes. A estrutura desse mecanismo é composta pelos fatores de controle, pelas ferramentas da contabilidade e por procedimentos denominados atividades de controle. Um sistema de controle interno devidamente projetado e funcionando não eliminará o risco de perda, mas o reduzirá. A presente pesquisa tem como objetivo principal descrever e relacionar a importância do controle interno como mecanismo essencial para o controle de fraudes em empresa. Já os objetivos específicos são: apresentar as ferramentas e estratégias utilizadas para o segmento do controle interno organizacional; descrever o papel da contabilidade na gestão do controle interno de uma empresa e relacionar o controle de fraudes em empresas com a eficácia do controle interno. O presente artigo tem intuito de responder a seguinte pergunta problema: de que forma uma organização pode estabelecer a necessidade da implantação de sistemas para o controle interno e qual a segurança que essa implantação possa garantir a redução de riscos e ocorrência de fraudes? Portanto, o presente artigo trata-se de uma revisão de literatura que utiliza os fins exploratórios, com a utilização e análise de artigos científicos e livros que abordam a temática escolhida nessa pesquisa. Sendo esperado com o desenvolvimento da pesquisa que as informações selecionadas possam alcançar os objetivos estabelecidos e responder à pergunta problema escolhida. Além de servir como material de apoio para acadêmicos e recém-formados e profissionais da área

Abstract: The Muller F element (4.2 Mb, ~80 protein-coding genes) is an unusual autosome of Drosophila melanogaster; it is mostly heterochromatic with a low recombination rate. To investigate how these properties impact the evolution of repeats and genes, we manually improved the sequence and annotated the genes on the D. erecta, D. mojavensis, and D. grimshawi F elements and euchromatic domains from the Muller D element. We find that F elements have greater transposon density (25–50%) than euchromatic reference regions (3–11%). Among the F elements, D. grimshawi has the lowest transposon density (particularly DINE-1: 2% vs. 11–27%). F element genes have larger coding spans, more coding exons, larger introns, and lower codon bias. Comparison of the Effective Number of Codons with the Codon Adaptation Index shows that, in contrast to the other species, codon bias in D. grimshawi F element genes can be attributed primarily to selection instead of mutational biases, suggesting that density and types of transposons affect the degree of local heterochromatin formation. F element genes have lower estimated DNA melting temperatures than D element genes, potentially facilitating transcription through heterochromatin. Most F element genes (~90%) have remained on that element, but the F element has smaller syntenic blocks than genome averages (3.4–3.6 vs. 8.4–8.8 genes per block), indicating greater rates of inversion despite lower rates of recombination. Overall, the F element has maintained characteristics that are distinct from other autosomes in the Drosophila lineage, illuminating the constraints imposed by a heterochromatic milieu.

Abstract: The World Health Organization (WHO) Surgical Safety Checklist has fostered safe practice for 10 years, yet its place in emergency surgery has not been assessed on a global scale. The aim of this study was to evaluate reported checklist use in emergency settings and examine the relationship with perioperative mortality in patients who had emergency laparotomy. Methods In two multinational cohort studies, adults undergoing emergency laparotomy were compared with those having elective gastrointestinal surgery. Relationships between reported checklist use and mortality were determined using multivariable logistic regression and bootstrapped simulation. Results Of 12 296 patients included from 76 countries, 4843 underwent emergency laparotomy. After adjusting for patient and disease factors, checklist use before emergency laparotomy was more common in countries with a high Human Development Index (HDI) (2455 of 2741, 89·6 per cent) compared with that in countries with a middle (753 of 1242, 60·6 per cent; odds ratio (OR) 0·17, 95 per cent c.i. 0·14 to 0·21, P & lt; 0·001) or low (363 of 860, 42·2 per cent; OR 0·08, 0·07 to 0·10, P & lt; 0·001) HDI. Checklist use was less common in elective surgery than for emergency laparotomy in high-HDI countries (risk difference −9·4 (95 per cent c.i. −11·9 to −6·9) per cent; P & lt; 0·001), but the relationship was reversed in low-HDI countries (+12·1 (+7·0 to +17·3) per cent; P & lt; 0·001). In multivariable models, checklist use was associated with a lower 30-day perioperative mortality (OR 0·60, 0·50 to 0·73; P & lt; 0·001). The greatest absolute benefit was seen for emergency surgery in low- and middle-HDI countries. Conclusion Checklist use in emergency laparotomy was associated with a significantly lower perioperative mortality rate. Checklist use in low-HDI countries was half that in high-HDI countries.

Abstract: Isavuconazole, administered as the water-soluble prodrug isavuconazonium sulfate, is a new triazole agent used to treat invasive fungal infections. This phase 1 study evaluated the pharmacokinetics (PK), safety, and tolerability of isavuconazole in 46 immunocompromised pediatric patients, stratified by age (1 to 〈 6 [intravenous (i.v.) only], 6 to 〈 12, and 12 to 〈 18 years), receiving 10 mg/kg body weight (maximum, 372 mg) isavuconazonium sulfate either i.v. or orally. A population PK model using weight-based allometric scaling was constructed with the pediatric i.v. and oral data plus i.v. data from a phase 1 study in adults. The best model was a 3-compartment model with combined zero-order and first-order input, with linear elimination. Stepwise covariate modeling was performed in Perl-speaks-NONMEM version 4.7.0. None of the covariates examined, including age, sex, race, and body mass index, were statistically significant for any of the PK parameters. The area under the concentration–time curve at steady state (AUC SS ) was predicted for pediatric patients using 1,000 Monte Carlo simulations per age cohort for each administration route. The probability of target attainment (AUC SS range, 60 to 233 μg · h/ml) was estimated; this target range was derived from plasma drug exposures in adults receiving the recommended clinical dose. Predicted plasma drug exposures were within the target range for 〉 80% and 〉 76% of simulated pediatric patients following i.v. or oral administration, respectively. Intravenous and oral administration of isavuconazonium sulfate at the studied dosage of 10 mg/kg was well tolerated and resulted in exposure in pediatric patients similar to that in adults. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under identifier NCT03241550).

Abstract: Adjunctive diagnostic studies (aDS) are recommended to identify occult dissemination in patients with candidemia. Patterns of evaluation with aDS across pediatric settings are unknown. Methods Candidemia episodes were included in a secondary analysis of a multicenter comparative effectiveness study that prospectively enrolled participants age 120 days to 17 years with invasive candidiasis (predominantly candidemia) from 2014 to 2017. Ophthalmologic examination (OE), abdominal imaging (AbdImg), echocardiogram, neuroimaging, and lumbar puncture (LP) were performed per clinician discretion. Adjunctive diagnostic studies performance and positive results were determined per episode, within 30 days from candidemia onset. Associations of aDS performance with episode characteristics were evaluated via mixed-effects logistic regression. Results In 662 pediatric candidemia episodes, 490 (74%) underwent AbdImg, 450 (68%) OE, 426 (64%) echocardiogram, 160 (24%) neuroimaging, and 76 (11%) LP; performance of each aDS per episode varied across sites up to 16-fold. Longer durations of candidemia were associated with undergoing OE, AbdImg, and echocardiogram. Immunocompromised status (58% of episodes) was associated with undergoing AbdImg (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.38; 95% confidence intervals [95% CI] 1.51–3.74). Intensive care at candidemia onset (30% of episodes) was associated with undergoing echocardiogram (aOR 2.42; 95% CI 1.51–3.88). Among evaluated episodes, positive OE was reported in 15 (3%), AbdImg in 30 (6%), echocardiogram in 14 (3%), neuroimaging in 9 (6%), and LP in 3 (4%). Conclusions Our findings show heterogeneity in practice, with some clinicians performing aDS selectively, potentially influenced by clinical factors. The low frequency of positive results suggests that targeted application of aDS is warranted.

Abstract: Invasive candidiasis is the most common invasive fungal disease in children and adolescents, but there are limited pediatric-specific antifungal effectiveness data. We compared the effectiveness of echinocandins to triazoles or amphotericin B formulations (triazole/amphotericin B) as initial directed therapy for invasive candidiasis. Methods This multinational observational cohort study enrolled patients aged & gt;120 days and & lt;18 years with proven invasive candidiasis from January 1, 2014, to November 28, 2017, at 43 International Pediatric Fungal Network sites. Primary exposure was initial directed therapy administered at the time qualifying culture became positive for yeast. Exposure groups were categorized by receipt of an echinocandin vs receipt of triazole/amphotericin B. Primary outcome was global response at 14 days following invasive candidiasis onset, adjudicated by a centralized data review committee. Stratified Mantel-Haenszel analyses estimated risk difference between exposure groups. Results Seven-hundred and fifty invasive candidiasis episodes were identified. After exclusions, 541 participants (235 in the echinocandin group and 306 in the triazole/amphotericin B group) remained. Crude failure rates at 14 days for echinocandin and triazole/amphotericin B groups were 9.8% (95% confidence intervals [CI]: 6.0% to 13.6%) and 13.1% (95% CI: 9.3% to 16.8%), respectively. The adjusted 14-day risk difference between echinocandin and triazole/amphotericin B groups was −7.1% points (95% CI: −13.1% to −2.4%), favoring echinocandins. The risk difference was −0.4% (95% CI: −7.5% to 6.7%) at 30 days. Conclusions In children with invasive candidiasis, initial directed therapy with an echinocandin was associated with reduced failure rate at 14 days but not 30 days. These results may support echinocandins as initial directed therapy for invasive candidiasis in children and adolescents. Clinical Trials Registration NCT01869829.

Abstract: Diagnosis of invasive candidiasis (IC) relies on insensitive cultures; the relative utility of fungal biomarkers in children is unclear. Methods This multinational observational cohort study enrolled patients aged & gt;120 days and & lt;18 years with concern for IC from 1 January 2015 to 26 September 2019 at 25 centers. Blood collected at onset of symptoms was tested using T2Candida, Fungitell (1→3)-β-D-glucan, Platelia Candida Antigen (Ag) Plus, and Platelia Candida Antibody (Ab) Plus assays. Operating characteristics were determined for each biomarker, and assays meeting a defined threshold considered in combination. Sterile site cultures were the reference standard. Results Five hundred participants were enrolled at 22 centers in 3 countries, and IC was diagnosed in 13 (2.6%). Thirteen additional blood specimens were collected and successfully spiked with Candida species, to achieve a 5.0% event rate. Valid T2Candida, Fungitell, Platelia Candida Ag Plus, and Platelia Candida Ab Plus assay results were available for 438, 467, 473, and 473 specimens, respectively. Operating characteristics for T2Candida were most optimal for detecting IC due to any Candida species, with results as follows: sensitivity, 80.0% (95% confidence interval, 59.3%–93.2%), specificity 97.1% (95.0%–98.5%), positive predictive value, 62.5% (43.7%–78.9%), and negative predictive value, 98.8% (97.2%–99.6%). Only T2Candida and Platelia Candida Ag Plus assays met the threshold for combination testing. Positive result for either yielded the following results: sensitivity, 86.4% (95% confidence interval, 65.1%– 97.1%); specificity, 94.7% (92.0%–96.7%); positive predictive value, 47.5% (31.5%–63.9%); and negative predictive value, 99.2% (97.7%–99.8%). Conclusions T2Candida alone or in combination with Platelia Candida Ag Plus may be beneficial for rapid detection of Candida species in children with concern for IC. Clinical Trials Registration NCT02220790.