GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Ihre E-Mail wurde erfolgreich gesendet. Bitte prüfen Sie Ihren Maileingang.

Leider ist ein Fehler beim E-Mail-Versand aufgetreten. Bitte versuchen Sie es erneut.

Vorgang fortführen?

Exportieren
Filter
Materialart
Sprache
Erscheinungszeitraum
  • 1
    In: Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer, BMJ, Vol. 9, No. 10 ( 2021-10), p. e002989-
    Kurzfassung: Immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) therapy has improved patient outcomes in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but better biomarkers are needed. A clinically validated, blood-based proteomic test, or host immune classifier (HIC), was assessed for its ability to predict ICI therapy outcomes in this real-world, prospectively designed, observational study. Materials and methods The prospectively designed, observational registry study INSIGHT (Clinical Effectiveness Assessment of VeriStrat® Testing and Validation of Immunotherapy Tests in NSCLC Subjects) ( NCT03289780 ) includes 35 US sites having enrolled over 3570 NSCLC patients at any stage and line of therapy. After enrolment and prior to therapy initiation, all patients are tested and designated HIC-Hot (HIC-H) or HIC-Cold (HIC-C). A prespecified interim analysis was performed after 1-year follow-up with the first 2000 enrolled patients. We report the overall survival (OS) of patients with advanced stage (IIIB and IV) NSCLC treated in the first-line (ICI-containing therapies n=284; all first-line therapies n=877), by treatment type and in HIC-defined subgroups. Results OS for HIC-H patients was longer than OS for HIC-C patients across treatment regimens, including ICI. For patients treated with all ICI regimens, median OS was not reached (95% CI 15.4 to undefined months) for HIC-H (n=196) vs 5.0 months (95% CI 2.9 to 6.4) for HIC-C patients (n=88); HR=0.38 (95% CI 0.27 to 0.53), p 〈 0.0001. For ICI monotherapy, OS was 16.8 vs 2.8 months (HR=0.36 (95% CI 0.22 to 0.58), p 〈 0.0001) and for ICI with chemotherapy OS was unreached vs 6.4 months (HR=0.41 (95% CI 0.26 to 0.67), p=0.0003). HIC results were independent of programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1). In a subgroup with PD-L1 ≥50% and performance status 0–1, HIC stratified survival significantly for ICI monotherapy but not ICI with chemotherapy. Conclusion Blood-based HIC proteomic testing provides clinically meaningful information for immunotherapy treatment decision in NSCLC independent of PD-L1. The data suggest that HIC-C patients should not be treated with ICI alone regardless of their PD-L1 expression.
    Materialart: Online-Ressource
    ISSN: 2051-1426
    Sprache: Englisch
    Verlag: BMJ
    Publikationsdatum: 2021
    ZDB Id: 2719863-7
    Standort Signatur Einschränkungen Verfügbarkeit
    BibTip Andere fanden auch interessant ...
  • 2
    Online-Ressource
    Online-Ressource
    American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) ; 2021
    In:  Cancer Research Vol. 81, No. 13_Supplement ( 2021-07-01), p. 662-662
    In: Cancer Research, American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), Vol. 81, No. 13_Supplement ( 2021-07-01), p. 662-662
    Kurzfassung: Motivation. A blood-based proteomic host immune classifier (HIC) that identifies a patient's disease state as Hot or Cold can aid prognostication and help guide treatment decisions in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The HIC Hot label is associated with 2-2.5 times longer overall survival (OS) depending on treatment type. While pretreatment HIC labels are informative, label flips over the course of therapy have been observed. We sought to quantify the prevalence of label flips, determine their impact on prognosis, and investigate the utility of longitudinal testing to monitor changes in disease state throughout therapy. Methods. In a real-world observational study (NCT03289780) enrolling over 3,700 patients with NSCLC at any stage and line of therapy to date, 267 of 1464 patients with advanced (Stage 3b/4) NSCLC with at least 1 year follow-up (f/u) had longitudinal testing at first f/u. Patient disease states were designated HH (Hot baseline and f/u), HC (Hot baseline, Cold f/u), CH (Cold baseline, Hot f/u) or CC (Cold baseline and f/u). Results. For patients receiving all therapy lines and regimens, 38 of 209 patients with baseline Hot test result (18%) flipped to Cold (HC), whereas 28 of 58 patients with baseline Cold, (48%) flipped (CH) (table). Patients with a baseline Hot result (HH+HC) had significantly longer OS compared to baseline Cold (CH+CC). Comparing patient groups based on f/u result (HH+CH vs. HC+CC) yielded an even greater separation. Similar trends were observed in the subgroup of patients receiving chemotherapy (n=124), with 18 patients flipping from Hot to Cold (20%), and 12 from Cold to Hot (36%) at f/u. Average time to f/u (TTF) was 6 months and did not vary significantly between groups. Conclusions. For some patients with NSCLC, disease states and prognosis can change in response to therapy. Longitudinal proteomic testing may be a viable method to monitor changes in disease state and host immune response to guide treatment. Survival of study subjectsGroupmOS [95% CI], monthsMean TTF (SD) [95% CI] , monthsTotal (N=267)6.12 (3.70) [5.67-6.56]HH (N=171)NR [17.0-und] 5.65 (3.50) [4.01-7.29]HC (N=38)11.6 [9.2-und] 5.94 (3.31) [4.86-7.03]CH (N=20)NR [11.6-und] 6.30 (3.91) [5.71-6.89]CC (N=38)10.2 [7.9-17.4] 5.71 (3.19) [4.67-6.76]Total (N=267)HR [95% CI] P valueHH vs. HC1.81 [1.11-2.96]0.018HH vs. CH1.03 [0.47-2.24] 0.946HH vs. CC2.56 [1.60-4.10] & lt;0.0001HC vs. CH0.59 [0.25-1.40]0.234HC vs. CC1.40 [0.78-2.52] 0.260CH vs. CC2.38 [1.02-5.54]0.045All Tx (N=267)mOS [95% CI] , monthsHR [95% CI], P valueHH+HC (N=209)NR [16.6-und] 0.59 [0.39-0.89], P=0.012CH+CC (N=58)12.9 [9.3-und] HH+CH (N=191)NR [17.5-und]0.47 [0.33-0.69] , P & lt;0.0001HC+CC (N=76)11.6 [9.3-16.4]Chemo (N=124)mOS [95% CI] , monthsHR [95% CI], P valueHH+HC (N=91)NR [15.3-und] 0.52 [0.31-0.88], P=0.015CH+CC (N=33)11.6 [7.9-17.9] HH+CH (N=85)NR [15.6-und]0.42 [0.25-0.70] , P & lt;0.001HC+CC (N=39)9.6 [7.9-16.4]All Tx, all treatment; Chemo, chemotherapy ; CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio; NR, not reached; SD, standard deviation; TTF, time to follow-up; und, undefined Citation Format: Eric Schaefer, R. Brian Mitchell, Jason Boyd, James Orsini, Nagaprasad Nagajothi, Savita Bidyasar, Mazen Khalil, Mitchell Haut, Ray Page, Kan Huang, John W. Dubay, Wallace Akerley. Longitudinal blood-based proteomic testing in advanced non-small cell lung cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2021; 2021 Apr 10-15 and May 17-21. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(13_Suppl):Abstract nr 662.
    Materialart: Online-Ressource
    ISSN: 0008-5472 , 1538-7445
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Sprache: Englisch
    Verlag: American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
    Publikationsdatum: 2021
    ZDB Id: 2036785-5
    ZDB Id: 1432-1
    ZDB Id: 410466-3
    Standort Signatur Einschränkungen Verfügbarkeit
    BibTip Andere fanden auch interessant ...
  • 3
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 29, No. 18 ( 2011-06-20), p. 2582-2589
    Kurzfassung: Sorafenib, an oral multikinase inhibitor, has shown preliminary activity in non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Patients with advanced NSCLC were treated with erlotinib with or without sorafenib in this multicenter phase II trial. Patients and Methods Key eligibility criteria included the following: stage IIIB or IV NSCLC; one to two prior regimens; Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 to 2; and measurable disease. Patients were randomly assigned 2:1 to sorafenib (400 mg orally twice a day) plus erlotinib (150 mg orally daily) or placebo plus erlotinib and stratified by squamous/nonsquamous histology and prior bevacizumab. Treatment efficacy, measured by progression-free survival (PFS) and overall response rate (ORR), was compared. Treatment of 168 patients allowed detection of 40% improvement in the historical PFS of 2.2 months with single-agent erlotinib. Results One hundred sixty-eight patients enrolled from February 2008 to February 2009. Clinical characteristics of the two groups were similar. ORRs for sorafenib/erlotinib and placebo/erlotinib were 8% and 11%, respectively (P = .56); disease control rates were 54% and 38%, respectively (P = .056). Median PFS was 3.38 months for sorafenib/erlotinib versus 1.94 months for placebo/erlotinib (hazard ratio, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.60 to 1.22; P = .196). Seventy-two patients consented to analyses of tumor epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). In 67 patients with EGFR wild-type (WT) tumors, median PFS was 3.38 months for sorafenib/erlotinib versus 1.77 months for placebo/erlotinib (P = .018); median overall survival (OS) was 8 months for sorafenib/erlotinib versus 4.5 months for placebo/erlotinib (P = .019). An OS advantage for sorafenib/erlotinib was suggested among 43 patients with fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) EGFR-negative tumors (P = .064). Both regimens were tolerable, with modest toxicity increase with sorafenib. Conclusion Although there was little difference in ORR or PFS, subset analyses in EGFR WT and EGFR FISH–negative patients suggest a benefit for the combination of erlotinib/sorafenib compared with single-agent erlotinib with respect to PFS and OS.
    Materialart: Online-Ressource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Sprache: Englisch
    Verlag: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publikationsdatum: 2011
    ZDB Id: 2005181-5
    Standort Signatur Einschränkungen Verfügbarkeit
    BibTip Andere fanden auch interessant ...
  • 4
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 32, No. 15_suppl ( 2014-05-20), p. e18510-e18510
    Materialart: Online-Ressource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Sprache: Englisch
    Verlag: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publikationsdatum: 2014
    ZDB Id: 2005181-5
    Standort Signatur Einschränkungen Verfügbarkeit
    BibTip Andere fanden auch interessant ...
  • 5
    In: Cancer Research, American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), Vol. 70, No. 8_Supplement ( 2010-04-15), p. LB-77-LB-77
    Kurzfassung: Background: Sorafenib is an oral multikinase inhibitor of angiogenesis and cellular proliferation which has shown preliminary activity in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We conducted a multicenter phase II trial of erlotinib +/− sorafenib in 2nd/3rd line NSCLC. Methods: Patients with previously treated stage IIIB/IV NSCLC were eligible (1-2 prior regimens). Additional eligibility criteria included: ECOG performance status 0-2, all NSCLC histologies, measurable disease, adequate organ function, and the absence of major cardiovascular disease. Patients with treated brain metastases and/or on stable anticoagulation were eligible. Patients were stratified according to squamous/non-squamous histology, prior bevacizumab use, and line of therapy and were randomized 2:1 to receive erlotinib 150mg orally once daily and sorafenib 400mg orally twice daily, or erlotinib and placebo. Patients were also consented for biomarker testing for epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations, EGFR amplification, and K-ras mutations. The primary endpoint was to assess the efficacy of each arm in terms of objective response rate (ORR) and progression-free survival (PFS). The trial was designed to enroll 168 patients to demonstrate a 40% improvement on an historical 2.2 month PFS ( & gt; 80%, 1-sided 0.1). Results: 168 patients were enrolled from February 2008 to February 2009. Baseline characteristics were well-matched between cohorts (median age, 65 years; 3rd line therapy, 39%; prior bevacizumab, 36%; squamous histology, 30%). The ORRs for the sorafenib/erlotinib and erlotinib/placebo cohorts were 8.1% v. 10.9%, respectively (p=.55). However, the disease control rates (ORR + proportion of patients with stable disease) were 54.1% (sorafenib/erlotinib) v. 38.2% (erlotinib/placebo) (p=.06). The median PFS was 3.25 months (sorafenib/erlotinib) v. 1.87 months (erlotinib/placebo) (HR 0.86 [95% CI 0.60, 1.22], p=.20). 72 (44%) patients had material assessable for EGFR mutation analysis. Among the 67 patients who were found to have EGFR wild-type (WT) tumors, the median PFS was 3.25 months (sorafenib/erlotinib) v. 1.71 months (erlotinib/placebo) (HR 0.55 [95% CI 0.32, 0.96] , p=.02). Conclusions: Additional preplanned subset analyses based on histology, EGFR amplification, K-ras mutation, prior bevacizumab treatment, and line of therapy will be presented, as well as updated overall response, PFS, survival, and toxicity data. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 101st Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2010 Apr 17-21; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2010;70(8 Suppl):Abstract nr LB-77.
    Materialart: Online-Ressource
    ISSN: 0008-5472 , 1538-7445
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Sprache: Englisch
    Verlag: American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
    Publikationsdatum: 2010
    ZDB Id: 2036785-5
    ZDB Id: 1432-1
    ZDB Id: 410466-3
    Standort Signatur Einschränkungen Verfügbarkeit
    BibTip Andere fanden auch interessant ...
  • 6
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 38, No. 15_suppl ( 2020-05-20), p. 9545-9545
    Kurzfassung: 9545 Background: Immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) has improved outcomes for many treatment-naïve advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. However, better biomarkers are needed to predict patient response and guide treatment decisions considering added toxicity and higher cost of combination treatments. A prospectively designed, observational study assessed the ability of a clinically validated, blood-based, host immune classifier (HIC) to predict ICI therapy outcomes. Methods: The study (NCT03289780) includes 33 US sites having enrolled over 3,000 NSCLC patients at any stage and line of therapy. All enrolled patients are tested and designated HIC-Hot (HIC-H) or HIC-Cold (HIC-C) prior to therapy initiation. An interim analysis of secondary and exploratory endpoints was performed after 12- 18 months (mo) follow-up with the first 2,000 enrolled patients. We report the overall survival (OS) of HIC-defined subgroups comprising advanced stage (IIIB and higher) NSCLC patients treated with first-line regimens (284 ICI containing treatments, 877 total first-line patients). Results: In a real-world clinical setting, OS of advanced stage NSCLC treatment-naïve patients receiving platinum-based chemotherapy (n = 392) did not differ significantly from patients receiving any type of ICI containing regimen (n = 284); 11.7 mo vs. 14.4 mo; hazard ratio (HR) = 0.94 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.76–1.17], p = 0.59. HIC-H patients experienced longer survival than HIC-C across multiple regimens, including ICI. For all ICI, median OS (mOS) was not reached for HIC-H (n = 196, CI: 15.4 mo–undefined) vs. 5.0 mo (n = 88, CI: 2.9 mo–6.4 mo) for HIC-C patients (HR = 0.38 [CI: 0.27–0.53] , p 〈 0.0001). Similar results were seen in the ICI only (16.8 mo vs. 2.8 mo; n = 117, HR = 0.36 [CI: 0.22–0.58], p 〈 0.0001) and ICI/chemotherapy combination subgroups (unreached vs. 6.4 mo; n = 161, HR = 0.41 [CI: 0.26–0.67], p = 0.0003). In the PD-L1 high cohort (PD-L1 ≥50%), mOS for HIC-H was not reached (n = 81, CI: 13.9 mo–undefined) vs. 3.9 mo (n = 41, CI: 2.1 mo–7.8 mo) for HIC-C (HR: 0.39 [CI: 0.24-0.66] , p = 0.0003). HIC results were independent of PD-L1 score (p = 0.81) and remained predictive of OS in first-line ICI-treated patients when adjusted for PD-L1 and other covariates by multivariate analysis (HR = 0.40 [CI: 0.28-0.58], p 〈 0.0001). Conclusions: Blood-based host immune profiling may provide clinically meaningful information for selecting NSCLC patients for two common ICI containing regimens independent of and complementary to PD-L1 score.
    Materialart: Online-Ressource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Sprache: Englisch
    Verlag: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publikationsdatum: 2020
    ZDB Id: 2005181-5
    Standort Signatur Einschränkungen Verfügbarkeit
    BibTip Andere fanden auch interessant ...
  • 7
    Online-Ressource
    Online-Ressource
    Informa UK Limited ; 1998
    In:  Cancer Investigation Vol. 16, No. 6 ( 1998-01), p. 381-384
    In: Cancer Investigation, Informa UK Limited, Vol. 16, No. 6 ( 1998-01), p. 381-384
    Materialart: Online-Ressource
    ISSN: 0735-7907 , 1532-4192
    Sprache: Englisch
    Verlag: Informa UK Limited
    Publikationsdatum: 1998
    ZDB Id: 2043112-0
    Standort Signatur Einschränkungen Verfügbarkeit
    BibTip Andere fanden auch interessant ...
  • 8
    In: The American Journal of Medicine, Elsevier BV, Vol. 85, No. 5 ( 1988-11), p. 662-667
    Materialart: Online-Ressource
    ISSN: 0002-9343
    Sprache: Englisch
    Verlag: Elsevier BV
    Publikationsdatum: 1988
    ZDB Id: 2003338-2
    Standort Signatur Einschränkungen Verfügbarkeit
    BibTip Andere fanden auch interessant ...
  • 9
    Online-Ressource
    Online-Ressource
    Springer Science and Business Media LLC ; 1994
    In:  Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology Vol. 34, No. 6 ( 1994), p. 509-514
    In: Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology, Springer Science and Business Media LLC, Vol. 34, No. 6 ( 1994), p. 509-514
    Materialart: Online-Ressource
    ISSN: 0344-5704 , 1432-0843
    Sprache: Englisch
    Verlag: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
    Publikationsdatum: 1994
    ZDB Id: 1458488-8
    SSG: 15,3
    Standort Signatur Einschränkungen Verfügbarkeit
    BibTip Andere fanden auch interessant ...
  • 10
    In: Transplantation, Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health), Vol. 94, No. 4 ( 2012-08-27), p. 331-337
    Materialart: Online-Ressource
    ISSN: 0041-1337
    RVK:
    Sprache: Englisch
    Verlag: Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
    Publikationsdatum: 2012
    ZDB Id: 2035395-9
    Standort Signatur Einschränkungen Verfügbarkeit
    BibTip Andere fanden auch interessant ...
Schließen ⊗
Diese Webseite nutzt Cookies und das Analyse-Tool Matomo. Weitere Informationen finden Sie hier...