GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
  • 1
    In: Ecology, Wiley
    Abstract: SNAPSHOT USA is a multicontributor, long‐term camera trap survey designed to survey mammals across the United States. Participants are recruited through community networks and directly through a website application ( https://www.snapshot-usa.org/ ). The growing Snapshot dataset is useful, for example, for tracking wildlife population responses to land use, land cover, and climate changes across spatial and temporal scales. Here we present the SNAPSHOT USA 2021 dataset, the third national camera trap survey across the US. Data were collected across 109 camera trap arrays and included 1711 camera sites. The total effort equaled 71,519 camera trap nights and resulted in 172,507 sequences of animal observations. Sampling effort varied among camera trap arrays, with a minimum of 126 camera trap nights, a maximum of 3355 nights, a median 546 nights, and a mean 656 ± 431 nights. This third dataset comprises 51 camera trap arrays that were surveyed during 2019, 2020, and 2021, along with 71 camera trap arrays that were surveyed in 2020 and 2021. All raw data and accompanying metadata are stored on Wildlife Insights ( https://www.wildlifeinsights.org/ ), and are publicly available upon acceptance of the data papers. SNAPSHOT USA aims to sample multiple ecoregions in the United States with adequate representation of each ecoregion according to its relative size. Currently, the relative density of camera trap arrays varies by an order of magnitude for the various ecoregions (0.22–5.9 arrays per 100,000 km 2 ), emphasizing the need to increase sampling effort by further recruiting and retaining contributors. There are no copyright restrictions on these data. We request that authors cite this paper when using these data, or a subset of these data, for publication. Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the US Government.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0012-9658 , 1939-9170
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: Wiley
    Publication Date: 2024
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1797-8
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2010140-5
    SSG: 12
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Frontiers Media SA ; 2020
    In:  Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution Vol. 8 ( 2020-5-7)
    In: Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, Frontiers Media SA, Vol. 8 ( 2020-5-7)
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 2296-701X
    Language: Unknown
    Publisher: Frontiers Media SA
    Publication Date: 2020
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2745634-1
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    In: Restoration Ecology, Wiley, Vol. 21, No. 4 ( 2013-07), p. 457-463
    Abstract: Six‐lined racerunner ( Aspidoscelis sexlineata ) is an indicator species of frequently burned Longleaf pine ( Pinus palustris ) forests. To evaluate how the species responded to forest restoration, we conducted a mark‐recapture study in formerly fire‐suppressed Longleaf pine forests exposed to prescribed fire or fire surrogates (i.e. mechanical or herbicide‐facilitated hardwood removal) as well as in fire‐suppressed control sites and reference sites, which represented the historic condition. After initial treatment, all sites were exposed to over a decade of prescribed burning with an average return interval of approximately 2 years. We used population‐level response of A. sexlineata as an indicator of the effectiveness of the different treatments in restoring habitat. Specifically, we compared mean numbers of marked adults and juveniles at treatment sites to that of reference sites. After 4 years, restoration objectives were met at sites treated with burning alone and at sites treated with mechanical removal of hardwoods followed by fire. After over 10 years of prescribed burning, restoration objectives were met at all treatments. We conclude that prescribed burning alone was sufficient to restore fire‐suppressed Longleaf pine sandhills for A. sexlineata populations.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1061-2971 , 1526-100X
    URL: Issue
    Language: English
    Publisher: Wiley
    Publication Date: 2013
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2020952-6
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 914746-9
    SSG: 12
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Oxford University Press (OUP) ; 2015
    In:  Journal of Mammalogy Vol. 96, No. 6 ( 2015-11-24), p. 1135-1141
    In: Journal of Mammalogy, Oxford University Press (OUP), Vol. 96, No. 6 ( 2015-11-24), p. 1135-1141
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0022-2372 , 1545-1542
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: Oxford University Press (OUP)
    Publication Date: 2015
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2066602-0
    SSG: 12
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 5
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    University of Chicago Press ; 2010
    In:  Journal of the North American Benthological Society Vol. 29, No. 2 ( 2010-06), p. 496-505
    In: Journal of the North American Benthological Society, University of Chicago Press, Vol. 29, No. 2 ( 2010-06), p. 496-505
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0887-3593 , 1937-237X
    Language: English
    Publisher: University of Chicago Press
    Publication Date: 2010
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2651496-5
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2090864-7
    SSG: 12
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 6
    In: Wildlife Biology, Wiley, Vol. 2023, No. 2 ( 2023-03)
    Abstract: Baited camera surveys are often used to study white‐tailed deer Odocoileus virginianus populations and inform harvest decisions. Surveys are commonly conducted in late summer or early fall when deer populations are expected to be segregated sexually, whereas hunting seasons typically occur during the breeding season when sexes are likely to be mixed. However, the effects of socio‐sexual shifts in space use on pre‐season camera surveys has not been evaluated. We conducted a baited survey before the hunting season followed by passive camera surveys during the hunting season on three properties in southwestern Georgia, USA. We collected 51 106 images of deer before and during the hunting season from baited and passive cameras. Based on interpolated maps of camera detections, the populations were highly segregated during the September baited surveys. In contrast, subsequent passive camera surveys indicated high overlap of males and females during the breeding months, with males shifting their distribution towards females. Because most management units on private lands are substantially smaller than our camera arrays (typically 〈 1000 ha), our results suggest that pre‐season surveys may not accurately reflect the population available for harvest during the hunting season. Establishment of cooperative management programs among adjacent landholdings may improve management effectiveness. In addition, managers should anticipate shifts in male distributions during the breeding months and real‐time analytical approaches could be developed with the use of cellular‐based cameras to rapidly alter harvest objectives.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1903-220X , 1903-220X
    URL: Issue
    Language: English
    Publisher: Wiley
    Publication Date: 2023
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2276904-3
    SSG: 12
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 7
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Wiley ; 2016
    In:  Wildlife Biology Vol. 22, No. 2 ( 2016-03), p. 64-70
    In: Wildlife Biology, Wiley, Vol. 22, No. 2 ( 2016-03), p. 64-70
    Abstract: The ecological implications of coyote Canis latrans colonization of the eastern USA have drawn considerable interest from land managers and the general public. The ability to predict how these ecosystems, which have lacked larger predators for decades, would respond to the invasion of this highly adaptable species needs an understanding of coyote foraging behavior given local resource availability. Therefore, we examined the diet of coyotes in a longleaf pine Pinus palustrus ecosystem from 2007–2012. We examined 673 coyote scats collected on the Joseph W. Jones Ecological Research Center in southwestern Georgia. We observed considerable seasonality in coyote use of rodents, white‐tailed deer Odocoileus virginianus , rabbits and vegetation. Coyotes exploited anthropogenic food sources, particularly waste peanuts Arachis hypogaea , during the fall and winter when native soft mast was not available. Adult white‐tailed deer were consumed during every month and was not limited to the pulse of carrion availability from hunter‐harvested animals, suggesting the use of adult white‐tailed deer may not be restricted to scavenging in this system. We found mesomammals, including armadillos Dasypus novemcinctus, raccoons Procyon lotor, Virginia opossums Didelphis viginiana, bobcats Lynx rufus, grey foxes Urocyon cineroargenteus and striped skunks Mephitis mephitis in approximately 18% of coyote scats from January–August. On our site, and some adjacent properties, the use of predator trapping focused primarily on Virginia opossum, raccoon, coyote, bobcat and gray fox, to increase northern bobwhite Colinus virginianus production may have resulted in increased use of mesomammals through scavenging. We offer evidence that coyote colonization may alter food web dynamics in longleaf pine ecosystems through depredation of white‐tailed deer and by influencing the mesomammal guild through direct predation and competition for rodents, rabbits, carrion and soft mast.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1903-220X , 1903-220X
    Language: English
    Publisher: Wiley
    Publication Date: 2016
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2276904-3
    SSG: 12
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 8
    In: Southeastern Naturalist, Humboldt Field Research Institute, Vol. 19, No. 1 ( 2020-2-20)
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1528-7092
    Language: Unknown
    Publisher: Humboldt Field Research Institute
    Publication Date: 2020
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2103435-7
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2505999-3
    SSG: 12
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 9
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Wiley ; 2010
    In:  The Journal of Wildlife Management Vol. 74, No. 1 ( 2010-01), p. 73-80
    In: The Journal of Wildlife Management, Wiley, Vol. 74, No. 1 ( 2010-01), p. 73-80
    Abstract: ABSTRACT  Although nest predation is often the single largest source of mortality in avian populations, manipulative studies to determine predator impacts on nest survival are rare, particularly studies that examine impacts of mid‐size mammalian predators (hereafter, mesopredators) on nest survival of shrub‐nesting birds. We quantified nest survival and identified nest predators of shrub‐nesting songbirds within 4 large (approx. 40‐ha) exclosures and 4 control sites within a longleaf pine ( Pinus palustris ) ecosystem. During 2003–2006, we located and monitored 535 shrub nests (222 with videography) for 4,804 nest‐days to quantify daily nest survival and document predation events. We found no support for a treatment effect, suggesting mesopredators had little impact on daily nest survival (0.9303 in controls and 0.9260 in exclosures) of shrub‐nesting songbirds. For the 5 most commonly monitored species, daily nest survival within species was constant. Our analysis suggested that shrub nests were most vulnerable during the nestling stage and presence of cameras on nests increased survival with the increase in survival being more pronounced during the incubation stage. We filmed 107 nest predation events, identifying predators at 88 nests. Of these 88 nests, snakes caused 33%, red imported fire ants (hereafter fire ants, Solenopsis invicta ) 28%, raptors 17%, corvids 8%, mesopredators 6%, and small mammals 8% of nest predations. Cause‐specific nest predation in controls and exclosures did not differ from expectation, providing evidence that compensatory predation did not occur. Nest predators differed from expectation with regard to nest stage; fire ants and raptors only depredated nests during the nestling stage. Presence of cameras had no effect on nest abandonment. Fire ants were the most prevalent nest predator, and nest predation by fire ants was only observed on nestlings, potentially reducing likelihood of renesting. Magnitude and timing of fire ant predation suggests that fire ants may be the most influential nest predator of shrub‐nesting birds within the longleaf pine ecosystem. Our data suggest that controlling mesopredators will have no effect on nest success of shrub‐nesting birds within longleaf pine forests.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0022-541X , 1937-2817
    Language: English
    Publisher: Wiley
    Publication Date: 2010
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2066663-9
    SSG: 12
    SSG: 23
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 10
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Wiley ; 2005
    In:  Ecology Vol. 86, No. 11 ( 2005-11), p. 3125-3129
    In: Ecology, Wiley, Vol. 86, No. 11 ( 2005-11), p. 3125-3129
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0012-9658
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: Wiley
    Publication Date: 2005
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1797-8
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2010140-5
    SSG: 12
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...