In:
PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science (PLoS), Vol. 17, No. 6 ( 2022-6-27), p. e0270424-
Abstract:
The existing evidence demonstrates that survivors of SJS/TEN have reported long-lasting psychological effects of their condition. Burns patients experience similar psychological effects. It is important to look at ways to help allay the psychological complications of SJS/TEN. As there is an absence of evidence on SJS/TEN psychotherapeutic interventions, it was judged to be beneficial to determine the evidence underpinning psychotherapeutic interventions used with burns patients. Aims and objectives The aim of this systematic integrative review was to synthesize the evidence relating to psychotherapeutic interventions used with adult burns patients and patients with SJS/TEN. Method The systematic review was guided by Whittemore and Knafl’s integrative review process and the PRISMA guidelines. Nine databases were searched for English and French language papers published January 2008 to January 2021. The protocol for the review was registered with PROSPERO. Results Following a screening process, 17 studies were included in the review. Two themes were identified using content analysis, (i) Empirically supported psychotherapeutic treatments, (ii) Alternative psychotherapeutic treatments. This review revealed no evidence on specific psychotherapeutic interventions for patients with SJS/TEN. Some of the interventions used with burns patients, viz. relaxation therapy, hypnosis and cognitive behavioral therapy showed some significant benefits. However, the evidence for burns patients is mainly focused on pain and pain anxiety as outcomes. Conclusion Following further research, some of the interventions deployed in burns patients may be applicable to SJS/TEN patients, particularly stress reduction techniques. In addition, the caring behaviours such as compassion, respect, and getting to know the patient as a person are important components to psychological care.
Type of Medium:
Online Resource
ISSN:
1932-6203
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0270424
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0270424.g001
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0270424.g002
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0270424.t001
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0270424.t002
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0270424.t003
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0270424.t004
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0270424.t005
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0270424.s001
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0270424.s002
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0270424.s003
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0270424.s004
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0270424.s005
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0270424.s006
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0270424.r001
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0270424.r002
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0270424.r003
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0270424.r004
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0270424.r005
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0270424.r006
Language:
English
Publisher:
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Publication Date:
2022
detail.hit.zdb_id:
2267670-3
Permalink