GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    In: Neuro-Oncology, Oxford University Press (OUP), Vol. 24, No. Supplement_7 ( 2022-11-14), p. vii75-vii75
    Abstract: Trotabresib, a novel bromodomain and extraterminal protein inhibitor, has demonstrated antitumor activity and blood–brain barrier penetration in patients with high-grade gliomas, and enhanced the antiproliferative effects of temozolomide in preclinical models. CC-90010-GBM-002 (NCT04324840) is a phase 1b/2 study investigating the addition of trotabresib to standard-of-care (SOC) concomitant temozolomide plus radiotherapy and adjuvant temozolomide, followed by maintenance trotabresib, in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma. The design of the dose escalation (part A) has been described previously (Vieito M, et al. SNO 2021. Abstract CTNI-51). Primary objectives of part A were to establish the safety, tolerability, and maximum tolerated dose/recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of trotabresib. In part A, addition of trotabresib to SOC was safe and well tolerated in the concomitant (N = 14) and adjuvant (N = 18) cohorts; the most frequent grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse event was thrombocytopenia (7/14 and 9/18 patients, respectively). The RP2D for trotabresib was 30 mg/day 4 days on/24 days off in both settings. At data cutoff (February 20, 2022), median duration of treatment was 34 weeks (concomitant cohort) and 33 weeks (adjuvant cohort); progression-free survival data are not yet mature. Trotabresib plasma pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics were consistent with monotherapy. At last follow-up, 6 and 5 patients remained on treatment in the concomitant and adjuvant dose-escalation cohorts, respectively, including 1 patient in cycle 20 with ongoing complete response. The ongoing randomized phase 2 dose expansion (part B; planned N = 162) is comparing concomitant trotabresib at the RP2D + SOC followed by adjuvant trotabresib at the RP2D + SOC, followed by maintenance trotabresib 45 mg/day 4 days on/24 days off, versus SOC alone in patients with newly diagnosed IDH–wild-type glioblastoma. Key objectives are to compare progression-free and overall survival, safety, and tolerability. Longer follow-up from part A and the first disclosure of data from part B will be presented.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1522-8517 , 1523-5866
    Language: English
    Publisher: Oxford University Press (OUP)
    Publication Date: 2022
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2094060-9
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    In: Targeted Oncology, Springer Science and Business Media LLC, Vol. 15, No. 5 ( 2020-10), p. 613-622
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1776-2596 , 1776-260X
    Language: English
    Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
    Publication Date: 2020
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2222136-0
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    In: Neuro-Oncology Advances, Oxford University Press (OUP), Vol. 4, No. 1 ( 2022-01-01)
    Abstract: Standard-of-care treatment for newly diagnosed glioblastoma (ndGBM), consisting of surgery followed by radiotherapy (RT) and temozolomide (TMZ), has improved outcomes compared with RT alone; however, prognosis remains poor. Trotabresib, a novel bromodomain and extraterminal inhibitor, has demonstrated antitumor activity in patients with high-grade gliomas. Methods In this phase Ib, dose-escalation study (NCT04324840), we investigated trotabresib 15, 30, and 45 mg combined with TMZ in the adjuvant setting and trotabresib 15 and 30 mg combined with TMZ+RT in the concomitant setting in patients with ndGBM. Primary endpoints were to determine safety, tolerability, maximum tolerated dose, and/or recommended phase II dose (RP2D) of trotabresib. Secondary endpoints were assessment of preliminary efficacy and pharmacokinetics. Pharmacodynamics were investigated as an exploratory endpoint. Results The adjuvant and concomitant cohorts enrolled 18 and 14 patients, respectively. Trotabresib in combination with TMZ or TMZ+RT was well tolerated; most treatment-related adverse events were mild or moderate. Trotabresib pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in both settings were consistent with previous data for trotabresib monotherapy. The RP2D of trotabresib was selected as 30 mg 4 days on/24 days off in both settings. At last follow-up, 5 (28%) and 6 (43%) patients remain on treatment in the adjuvant and concomitant settings, respectively, with 1 patient in the adjuvant cohort achieving complete response. Conclusions Trotabresib combined with TMZ in the adjuvant setting and with TMZ+RT in the concomitant setting was safe and well tolerated in patients with ndGBM, with encouraging treatment durations. Trotabresib 30 mg was established as the RP2D in both settings.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 2632-2498
    Language: English
    Publisher: Oxford University Press (OUP)
    Publication Date: 2022
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 3009682-0
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 39, No. 15_suppl ( 2021-05-20), p. e14046-e14046
    Abstract: e14046 Background: Glioblastoma (GBM) grade IV represents the most frequent and aggressive primary brain tumor. Despite complete surgical resection, GBM infiltrative potential leads to local recurrence rates of around 100%. Standard treatment with adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) and radiotherapy (RT) according Stupp regimen aims to reduce relapse and improve survival, but toxicities associated with these therapies represent a problem in elderly unfit population. O6-Methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation status has been recognized as a predictive factor of response to alkylating agents as temozolomide. We aimed to compare overall survival (OS) results in elderly GBM patients according with MGMT promoter status and systemic treatment after surgery. Methods: We performed a database from the information available from RETSINE (Registro Nacional Español de Tumores de Sistema Nervioso Central). We selected ≥ 65 years GBM diagnosed patients. Relevant information was tumor MGMT promoter methylation status and adjuvant CT and/or RT after resection. Kaplan- Meier analysis was performed. Selected outcome was OS and 95% confidence intervals (CI) and p value 〈 0.05 were used as measures of statistical significance. Results: We identified 400 eligible GBM patients diagnosed ≥ 65 years (male = 232- 58%; female = 168-42% ). According tumor MGMT status: 125 (31.3%) methylated tumors, 115 (28.7%) non methylated and 160 unknown MGMT status. Included population median age was 72 years (65-88 years). Median global population OS was 7.93 months (IC95% 6.84-9.02). Survival analysis showed better OS for methylated tumors group, median OS 7.33 (IC 95%4.1-10.56) vs. unmethylated OS 7.06 (IC95% 4.9-9.1) (p = 0.021). Survival analysis in methylated patients showed improved OS in patients treated with RT + CT vs. no adjuvant therapy. Median OS for methylated patients treated with CT + RT was 11.46m (IC95%7.6-15.9) vs 9.6 months with only RT(IC95%3.67-7.26) and 2.1m with no treatment (IC95%2.03-3.76) p = 0,00. Unmethylated patients median OS was 9.36m (IC95%3.67-7.26) for RT-CT, 5.4 m (IC95%2.37-8.42) for RT only and 2.76 (IC95% 1.37-4.15) for no treatment p = 0.00. Conclusions: Elderly GBM patients have similar treatment options than young patients and comprise surgical resection, RT and alkylating CT with temozolomide. Comorbidities and performance status have relevant implications in elderly population treatment decisions. The MGMT promoter status has been described as a prognostic and predictive marker of response to temozolomide. In our series both methylated and unmethylated patients can benefit with systemic treatment.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2021
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 5
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 38, No. 6_suppl ( 2020-02-20), p. 757-757
    Abstract: 757 Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors have increased survival in mRCC across all risk groups. In this new treatment paradigm, inflammatory markers could add prognostic information to the International metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium (IMDC) model in patients treated with ICI. Methods: We conducted a multicenter retrospective analysis of mRCC patients treated with ICI from 2013 to 2019. Clinical, pathological and laboratory data including blood cell counts were collected. Multivariate Cox-regression models were performed to evaluate the independent prognostic significance of the IMDC score, the derived neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (dNLR) and LDH at baseline, as well as the inflammatory prognostic index (IPI). Results: A total of 104 patients were included. Of these, 19% were treatment-naïve, 34% had received one previous line of treatment and 47% had received two or more previous lines of treatment. Distribution of IMDC model for favorable, intermediate and poor risk was 23%,57% and 20%. Median OS was 15 months and the disease control rate (DCR) was 51%. The multivariate analysis identified the IMDC risk score, the dNLR and the IPI as independent predictors of OS. In addition, both inflammatory markers, the IPI and the dNLR, were able to improve the prognostic value of the IMDC risk score (p = 0.01 and p = 0.006, respectively). Specifically, in patients with 0 or 1 IMDC risk factors, both the IPI and the dNLR were able to subclassify additional prognostic subgroups (i.e. dNLR 〉 3 vs ≤3 HR = 3,16; 95% CI; 1.71-5.76). Conclusions: Adding IPI and/or dNLR may add further information about the benefit of ICIs in mRCC patients with 0 or 1 IMDC risk factors. Inflammatory systemic markers may improve the prognostic performance of the IMDC model.[Table: see text]
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2020
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 6
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) ; 2020
    In:  Journal of Clinical Oncology Vol. 38, No. 6_suppl ( 2020-02-20), p. 702-702
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 38, No. 6_suppl ( 2020-02-20), p. 702-702
    Abstract: 702 Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are beneficial in a subset of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) patients. Elderly patients are usually under-represented in pivotal trials. Importantly, aging has been pointed as a potential detrimental factor for the benefit with ICIs as a consequence of the “immunosenescence” which could decrease the efficacy of these treatments. Methods: We assessed the potential role of aging according to Cochrane Collaboration's Guidelines. Search of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing ICIs (monotherapy or in combination with other therapies) to standard of care (SoC) in mRCC patients was performed. Trials must have included subgroup analysis evaluating the selected outcome (overall survival-OS-) in different subsets of patients according to age. Additionally, a retrospective series of mRCC patients treated with ICIs from our institution was also reviewed to assess the impact of age. Results: A total of 3415 patients (4 studies) were included in the meta-analysis (ICIs arm: 1709 patients; SoC arm: 1706 patients). Altogether, OS results favored ICIs. Older patients (aged more than 75 years-old) seem to present a less clear benefit with ICIs compared to SoC in comparison with younger patients (aged up to 75 years-old; p-value for difference between subgroups: 0.006) (Table). No differences between subgroups were found when considering 65 years-old as the borderline (p-value: 0.179). A similar trend was found in our series, with a numerically better median OS in patients younger than 65 years-old compared to those older than 65 years-old (31,6 vs. 23,6 months); the effect of age on outcomes was maintained along all International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium (IMDC) score subgroups. Conclusions: Elderly patients with mRCC, particularly older than 75 years-old, could benefit to a lesser extent compared to younger counterparts from receiving ICIs.[Table: see text]
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2020
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 7
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 38, No. 6_suppl ( 2020-02-20), p. TPS598-TPS598
    Abstract: TPS598 Background: Intravesical Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) induction + BCG maintenance after transurethral resection (TURBT) is the current standard of care for patients (pt) with high-risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). Recurrence rate at 2 years is around 30%, which is clearly unsatisfactory. Programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) is a surface glycoprotein that functions as an inhibitor of T-cells and plays a crucial role in suppression of cellular immune response. Atezolizumab is a humanized IgG1 monoclonal antibody targeting PD-L1 and is associated with long-term durable remissions in pts with metastatic urothelial cancer (Powles T. Lancet. 2018). Atezolizumab in combination with standard BCG could be beneficial in pts with NMIBC. BladderGATE (NCT04134000) is a phase Ib-II study aims to evaluate the clinical impact and safety of the combination of Atezolizumab + intravesical BGC (medac strain), including a translational study (microbioma and urobioma) in pts with NMIBC. Methods: Eligible pt have confirmed histopathology of NMIBC, BCG naïve or stopped 〉 3 years ago, WHO PS 0-1, no prior radiation to bladder and adequate hematologic and end-organ function. We propose a de-escalation design to enroll patients to identify DLT and MTD proposed to safety and efficacy expansion cohort. Pt will receive induction BCG, 1 instillation every week (qw) (dose level 0) or BCG, 1/2 instillation qw (dose level -1) + intravenously atezolizumab 1200 mg every 3 w (q3w), during 6 w. After induction, BCG will be administered as maintenance treatment at weeks 12, 24 and 48 and atezolizumab 1200 mg q3w up to 1 year. Pt will be accrued to each dose level in cohorts of 10 pt until the MTD is achieved (the highest dose at which 〈 4 out of 10 pt experience DLT). DLT will be evaluated during induction treatment. Additional pt will be included in the expansion cohort up to 40 pt. DLT and safety profile will be evaluated according to NCI-CTCAE v 5.0 criteria. Recurrence-free survival will be assessed per RECIST 1.1. Tissue, plasma and urine sample will be collected for translational study. Clinical trial information: NCT04134000.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2020
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 8
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 37, No. 15_suppl ( 2019-05-20), p. 6617-6617
    Abstract: 6617 Background: Retrospective database studies have suggested that statins and vitamin D have a positive impact on prostate cancer survival and specifically in mCRPC patients (pt). Methods: We conducted a post-hoc analysis of individual pt data of mCRPC pts treated with abiraterone (AA) and/or Prednisone (P) on two randomized phase III clinical trials COU -AA-301 and COU-AA-302 to analyze the impact of statins and vitamin D in overall survival (OS). Statistical analyses were performed using the Kaplan Meier method and Independent predictors were investigated using Cox regression analysis. This study, carried out under YODA Project #2016-1136, used data obtained from the Yale University Open Data Access Project. Results: These two studies included 2280 patients (1340 treated with AA/P and 640 with P). Use of Statin + vitamin D was associated with a 38% reduction in mortality in the postdocetaxel setting and 32% in the predocetaxel setting in patients treated with abiraterone (Table 1 and 2). No significant reduction in the rate of skeletal-related events was seen in patients treated with vitamin D or statins. Conclusions: To our knowledge this is the first report suggesting the impact of vitamin D+statin in mCPRC treated with abiraterone. The potential benefits of vitamin D do not seem to be secondary to concomitant statin use in this population. Further studies are needed to confirm these results. [Table: see text] [Table: see text]
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2019
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 9
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Elsevier BV ; 2022
    In:  Archives of Medical Research Vol. 53, No. 8 ( 2022-12), p. 807-817
    In: Archives of Medical Research, Elsevier BV, Vol. 53, No. 8 ( 2022-12), p. 807-817
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0188-4409
    Language: English
    Publisher: Elsevier BV
    Publication Date: 2022
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2010312-8
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 10
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 38, No. 6_suppl ( 2020-02-20), p. 704-704
    Abstract: 704 Background: ICIs + TKIs have shown to improve outcomes in treatment-naïve metastatic clear-cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC). We aimed to analize the efficacy of all combinations published including the subgroup analysis based on age, sex and IMDC prognostic factors score. Methods: We searched published RCTs in MEDLINE and EMBASE comparing ICIs + TKIs vs TKIs in 1L metastatic ccRCC. Outcomes selected to assess efficacy were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and objective response rate (ORR) in the intent-to-treat population. Hazard ratios (HR) for PFS and OS, and relative risk (RR) for ORR with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used as efficacy measures. Subgroup-based meta-analysis was afterwards performed according to randomized-effect model. Results: We identified two eligible RCTs of ICIs + TKIs (avelumab [avelu] or pembrolizumab [pembro] + axitinib [axi]) versus TKIs (sunitinib). Combined sample size was 1,747 patients (avelu + axi arm 442 patients; pembro + axi arm 432 patients; sunitinib arm 873 patients). Globally, three outcomes favored the combination. Improved HRs for PFS (0.69), OS (0.64) and ORR (1.81) were found for combination (Table). Regarding subgroup analysis HRs for PFS were favorable for combination in male (0.665) and female (0.66). Benefit in combination arms was confirmed in terms of age 〈 65 years (0.68) and ≥ 65 years (0.66). Intermediate and poor IMDC subgroups showed statistically significant benefit for combination (HR 0.68 and 0.56), whereas PFS in favorable group (0.68) was not statistically significant. Conclusions: ICIs + TKIs combination therapy has consistently demonstrated to be superior in terms of OS, PFS and ORR in 1L ccRCC to TKIs alone. We hereby confirm statistically significant benefit per subgroups except for favorable IMDC subgroup.[Table: see text]
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2020
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...