In:
PLOS Digital Health, Public Library of Science (PLoS), Vol. 2, No. 8 ( 2023-8-15), p. e0000322-
Abstract:
Digital adherence technologies (DATs) have emerged as an alternative to directly observed therapy (DOT) for supervisions of tuberculosis (TB) treatment. We conducted a meta-analysis of implementation feedback obtained from people with TB and health care workers (HCWs) involved in TB REACH Wave 6-funded DAT evaluation projects. Projects administered standardized post-implementation surveys based on the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation, Behavior (COM-B) model to people with TB and their health care workers. The surveys included questions on demographics and technology use, Likert scale questions to assess capability, opportunity, and motivation to use DAT and open-ended feedback. We summarized demographic and technology use data descriptively, generated pooled estimates of responses to Likert scale questions within each COM-B category for people with TB and health care workers using random effects models, and performed qualitative analysis of open-ended feedback using a modified framework analysis approach. The analysis included surveys administered to 1290 people with TB and 90 HCWs across 6 TB REACH-funded projects. People with TB and HCWs had an overall positive impression of DATs with pooled estimates between 4·0 to 4·8 out of 5 across COM-B categories. However, 44% of people with TB reported taking TB medications without reporting dosing via DATs and 23% reported missing a dose of medication. Common reasons included problems with electricity, network coverage, and technical issues with the DAT platform. DATs were overall perceived to reduce visits to clinics, decrease cost, increase social support, and decrease workload of HCWs. DATs were acceptable in a wide variety of settings. However, there were challenges related to the feasibility of using current DAT platforms. Implementation efforts should concentrate on ensuring access, anticipating, and addressing technical challenges, and minimizing additional cost to people with TB.
Type of Medium:
Online Resource
ISSN:
2767-3170
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pdig.0000322
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pdig.0000322.g001
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pdig.0000322.g002
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pdig.0000322.g003
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pdig.0000322.t001
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pdig.0000322.t002
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pdig.0000322.t003
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pdig.0000322.t004
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pdig.0000322.s001
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pdig.0000322.s002
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pdig.0000322.s003
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pdig.0000322.s004
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pdig.0000322.s005
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pdig.0000322.s006
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pdig.0000322.s007
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pdig.0000322.s008
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pdig.0000322.s009
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pdig.0000322.s010
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pdig.0000322.s011
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pdig.0000322.s012
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pdig.0000322.s013
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pdig.0000322.s014
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pdig.0000322.s015
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pdig.0000322.s016
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pdig.0000322.s017
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pdig.0000322.s018
Language:
English
Publisher:
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Publication Date:
2023
detail.hit.zdb_id:
3106944-7
Permalink