GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 40, No. 6_suppl ( 2022-02-20), p. TPS8-TPS8
    Abstract: TPS8 Background: PSqCC is a rare tumor with poor prognosis and limited therapeutic options. The current standard of care for advanced disease has been palliative platinum-based chemotherapy, with only marginal survival benefit. Recent data has shown that the majority of PSqCC patients present high levels of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1). The ORPHEUS trial is evaluating the efficacy and safety of INCMGA00012 –a programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) antagonist– in patients with unresectable, locally advanced or metastatic PSqCC. Methods: ORPHEUS is an international, multicenter, open-label, single-arm, phase 2 clinical trial. Eligible patients are male aged ≥18 years with locally advanced or metastatic PSqCC, ECOG performance status of 0-1, adequate organ function, a life expectancy of ≥12 weeks, and with no prior treatment with PD-1 or PD-L1/2 agents. A total of 18 patients will be enrolled to receive INCMGA00012 500 mg administered intravenously on day 1 of each 28-day cycle. Treatment will continue until progressive disease or unacceptable toxicity. Tumor assessments per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1 and immune-related RECIST will be performed approximately every 8 weeks for the first 6 months and every 12 weeks thereafter until progressive disease. The primary endpoint is objective response rate. Secondary objectives include additional efficacy outcomes (clinical benefit rate, progression-free survival (PFS), 6-month PFS, duration of response, time to progression, overall survival, and maximum tumor shrinkage) and safety evaluated as per NCI-CTCAE 5.0. Exploratory objectives will evaluate efficacy based on immune-related RECIST; predictive and prognostic biomarkers; impact of INCMGA00012 on human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) control in patients known to be HIV-positive. The sample size calculation is based on an exact binomial test. At least 4 responders (22.2%) among 18 patients will be adequate to justify further investigation of this strategy. The analyses were designed to attain an 80% power, with a 10% dropout rate assumption, at a nominal one-sided α level of 5%. The response probabilities for null (H0) and alternative hypotheses (H1) were H0: ≤ 5% and H1: ≥ 25%, respectively. All 18 planned patients have been enrolled since the trial began in March 2020. Clinical trial information: NCT04231981.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2022
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 604914-X
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    In: European Journal of Cancer, Elsevier BV, Vol. 135 ( 2020-08), p. 62-65
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0959-8049
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: Elsevier BV
    Publication Date: 2020
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1120460-6
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    In: European Journal of Cancer, Elsevier BV, Vol. 173 ( 2022-09), p. 317-326
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0959-8049
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: Elsevier BV
    Publication Date: 2022
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1120460-6
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    In: Cancer Letters, Elsevier BV, Vol. 464 ( 2019-11), p. 15-24
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0304-3835
    Language: English
    Publisher: Elsevier BV
    Publication Date: 2019
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 195674-7
    SSG: 12
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 5
    In: Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine, Springer Science and Business Media LLC, Vol. 28, No. 8 ( 2017-8)
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0957-4530 , 1573-4838
    Language: English
    Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
    Publication Date: 2017
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2016995-4
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1031752-1
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 6
    In: BMC Cancer, Springer Science and Business Media LLC, Vol. 12, No. 1 ( 2012-12)
    Abstract: Traditional determinants proven to be of prognostic importance in breast cancer include the TNM staging, histological grade, proliferative activity, hormone receptor status and HER2 overexpression. One of the limitations of the histological grading scheme is that a high percentage of breast cancers are still classified as grade 2, a category with ambiguous clinical significance. The aim of this study was to best characterize tumors scored as grade 2. Methods We investigated traditional prognostic factors and a panel of tumor markers not used in routine diagnosis, such as NHERF1, VEGFR1, HIF-1α and TWIST1, in 187 primary invasive breast cancers by immunohistochemistry, stratifying patients into good and poor prognostic groups by the Nottingham Prognostic Index. Results Grade 2 subgroup analysis showed that the PVI (p = 0.023) and the loss of membranous NHERF1 (p = 0.028) were adverse prognostic factors. Relevantly, 72% of grade 2 tumors were associated to PVI+/membranous NHERF1- expression phenotype, characterizing an adverse prognosis (p = 0.000). Multivariate logistic regression analysis in the whole series revealed poor prognosis correlated with PVI and MIB1 (p = 0.000 and p = 0.001, respectively). Furthermore, in the whole series of breast cancers we found cytoplasmic NHERF1 expression positively correlated to VEGFR1 ( r = 0.382, p = 0.000), and in VEGFR1-overexpressing tumors the oncogenic receptor co-localized with NHERF1 at cytoplasmic level. Conclusions The PVI+/membranous NHERF1- expression phenotype identifies a category of grade 2 tumors with the worst prognosis, including patient subgroup with a family history of breast cancer. These observations support the idea of the PVI+/membranous NHERF1- expression immunophenotype as a useful marker, which could improve the accuracy of predicting clinical outcome in grade 2 tumors.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1471-2407
    Language: English
    Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
    Publication Date: 2012
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2041352-X
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 7
    In: Cancer Research, American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), Vol. 82, No. 4_Supplement ( 2022-02-15), p. OT2-19-06-OT2-19-06
    Abstract: Background: Endocrine therapy (ET) is the preferred therapy option for patients (pts) with hormone receptor-positive (HR[+]) advanced breast cancer (ABC), except for pts with visceral crisis who often receive chemotherapy to achieve rapid symptom control. Cyclin-dependent kinases 4/6 inhibitors have improved the effectiveness of ET across all subgroups of pts with ABC by targeting potential mechanisms of resistance. An exploratory analysis revealed that the addition of abemaciclib to ET conferred the largest benefit in pts with poor prognostic characteristics (liver metastases, high grade tumors, or progesterone receptor-negative status) [Di Leo, NPJ Breast Cancer 2018; 4: 41] . ABIGAIL aims to provide consistent evidence that abemaciclib plus ET is superior or non-inferior to paclitaxel in terms of early overall response as first-line regimen in HR[+], HER2-negative ABC pts with poor prognosis. Trial Design: This is a multicenter, randomized, open-label, phase 2 trial. Eligible participants are men and women of any menopausal status aged ≥18 years with HR[+] , HER2-negative ABC who had no prior systemic therapy in the advanced setting and at least one of the following aggressive disease criteria: (i) Visceral disease; (ii) High histological grade and/or progesterone receptor-negative status; (iii) Lactate dehydrogenase & gt;1.5 × the upper limit of normal; (iv) Relapse while on or within 36 months of completing adjuvant ET. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1, measurable disease as per RECIST 1.1, and adequate organ function are also required. A total of 160 pts will be randomly assigned (1:1) to receive abemaciclib (300 mg/day orally during each 28-day cycle) plus ET as per investigator’s criteria (either letrozole [2.5 mg/day orally] or fulvestrant [500 mg intramuscularly on days 1, 15 of cycle 1, and on day 1 thereafter] , or paclitaxel (90 mg/m² intravenously on days 1, 8, 15). Men and pre-/peri-menopausal women will receive a gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist if randomized to abemaciclib plus ET. At investigator’s discretion, pts in the paclitaxel arm could receive abemaciclib plus ET at any point after the first 12 weeks or extend chemotherapy for a total of 6 cycles. Randomization will be stratified according to the presence of visceral disease and endocrine therapy. The primary endpoint is 12-week overall response rate (ORR) as per RECIST 1.1. Key secondary endpoints include ORR, clinical benefit rate, 12-week progression-free survival, progression-free survival, time to response, duration of response, overall survival, time to first subsequent therapy, time to second subsequent therapy, and time to first chemotherapy for pts in abemaciclib plus ET arm, patient-reported outcomes, and safety as per NCI-CTCAE 5.0. The sample size assumes the comparison of two proportions in an asymptotical normal test. We expect that 12-week ORR will be higher in the abemaciclib plus ET arm than paclitaxel arm (30% vs. 15%), with the assumption of a 5% non-inferiority margin. Based on a 10% dropout rate, a sample size of 160 pts is necessary to attain 80% power at nominal level of two-sided alpha of 0.05. We will test the superiority of abemaciclib plus ET as compared with paclitaxel if the non-inferiority is achieved. Both analyses, will be conducted with the Newcombe hybrid score method for confidence intervals. This trial was opened to accrual in May 2021. Citation Format: Antonio Llombart-Cussac, Joseph Gligorov, Serena Di Cosimo, Cinta Albacar, Patricia Cortez, Eduardo Martinez-De Dueñas, Ana López, Vicente Carañana, Jacques Medioni, Luigi Cavanna, Marina Elena Cazzaniga, Sofia Braga, Passos Coelho, Miguel Sampayo-Cordero, Andrea Malfettone, José Manuel Pérez-García, Javier Cortes. Phase 2 study of abemaciclib in combination with endocrine therapy with or without paclitaxel induction in patients with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer and aggressive disease criteria: ABIGAIL [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr OT2-19-06.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0008-5472 , 1538-7445
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
    Publication Date: 2022
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2036785-5
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1432-1
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 8
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    S. Karger AG ; 2010
    In:  Breast Care Vol. 5, No. 2 ( 2010), p. 86-90
    In: Breast Care, S. Karger AG, Vol. 5, No. 2 ( 2010), p. 86-90
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1661-3805 , 1661-3791
    Language: English
    Publisher: S. Karger AG
    Publication Date: 2010
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2202236-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2205941-6
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 9
    In: Cancer Research, American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), Vol. 81, No. 4_Supplement ( 2021-02-15), p. PS10-27-PS10-27
    Abstract: Background: The addition of a cyclin-dependent kinase 4-6 inhibitor (CDK4/6i) to letrozole or fulvestrant significantly improves progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in HR[+]/HER2[-] MBC pts. At present, the optimal endocrine treatment (ET) after progression on a CDK4/6i remains unknown. However, preliminary findings revealed drivers of adaptive resistance more frequently related to ET than to CDK4/6i. BIOPER explored the efficacy and safety of continuing the same CDK4/6i in combination with a different ET agent beyond progression on prior P-based regimen in HR[+]/HER2[-] MBC and assessed predictive biomarkers to identify those pts who are more likely to benefit from this strategy. Methods: BIOPER (NCT03184090) is a multicenter, non-controlled, phase II trial. Eligible pts included pre- and post-menopausal women aged ≥18 years with HR[+]/HER2[-] MBC that showed a confirmed progressive disease (PD) after having achieved clinical benefit (response or stable disease ≥24 weeks) on immediately prior P plus ET-based regimen. Up to two prior ET lines and not more than one line of prior chemotherapy for MBC were allowed. Pts received P (oral, 75/100/125 mg/day 3 weeks on/1 week off) combined with ET of physician’s choice (including tamoxifen, exemestane, fulvestrant, anastrozole, or letrozole) until PD or unacceptable toxicity. Co-primary endpoints were clinical benefit rate (CBR) -in terms of complete or partial response [PR] and stable disease lasting ≥24 weeks as per RECIST 1.1 (H0: CBR≤5% versus H1: CBR≥20%)- and tumor molecular alterations in the cyclin D-CDK 4/6-retinoblastoma pathway detected at baseline as markers of resistance and sensitivity to P rechallenge. Secondary endpoints included investigator-assessed PFS, objective response rate (ORR), OS, and safety using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (AEs) 4.03. Results: Between June 15, 2017 and April 25, 2019, a total of 33 pts from 21 centers in 2 countries were enrolled. Among the 33 pts who were included in the safety set, 1 patient who did not achieve clinical benefit on prior P-based regimen was excluded from the efficacy analysis (n=32). The median age was 59.5 years (range 42-80 years) and all pts were post-menopausal. A total of 25 (78.1%) pts had visceral disease (56.3% of whom with liver metastases), 16 (50%) had ECOG 0, and 19 (59.4%) presented ≥3 metastatic sites. Of 32 pts, 15 (46.9%) received letrozole, 14 (43.8%) received fulvestrant, and 3 (9.4%) exemestane. The median PFS for the prior P-based regimen was 13.8 months (mo) (95% confidence interval [CI] 5.6-47.1 mo). The median number of prior ET and chemotherapy lines for MBC was 2 (range 1-4). By the data cutoff date, 26 PFS events occurred, 5 pts were still on treatment, and 1 patient discontinued treatment because of investigator’s decision. The CBR was 34.4% (95% CI 18.6-53.2%) reaching the prespecified primary endpoint. The ORR was 3.1% (95% CI 0.1-16.2%) with 1 patient with PR. The median PFS was 2.6 mo (95% CI 1.8-5.5 mo). With a median follow-up of 11.8 mo, the OS data were immature with a total of 8 deaths (25%). The incidence of all grade (G) and G 3 or 4 (G3-4) AEs were 90.9% and 48.5%, respectively. The most common G3-4 AEs were neutropenia (42.4%) and leukopenia (6.1%). No discontinuations due to AEs and treatment-related deaths occurred. A comprehensive molecular tumor profiling will be presented during the symposium. Conclusions: Prolonging CDK4/6 blockade beyond progression on prior P-based treatment achieved the prespecified clinical benefit among pts with HR[+]/HER2[-] MBC. This strategy is currently being evaluated in the randomized phase II PALMIRA trial. Further research is ongoing to identify patient subgroups who could benefit from this treatment strategy. Citation Format: Antonio Llombart-Cussac, Javier Cortés, Beatriz Bellosillo Paricio, Miguel Gil Gil, Giuseppe Curigliano, José Manuel Pérez-García, Laura Comerma Blesa, Manuel Ruíz Borrego, Enrique Espinosa, Lourdes Calvo, Begoña Bermejo, Meritxell Bellet, Federico Rojo Todo, Juan de la Haba, Vanesa Quiroga, Alessandro Minisini, Ana Santaballa, Miguel Sampayo, Andrea Malfettone, Joan Albanell. A phase II proof-of-concept study of palbociclib (P) rechallenge in patients (pts) with hormone receptor (HR)[+] /HER2[-] metastatic breast cancer (MBC) and clinical benefit to prior P-based treatment (BIOPER) [abstract] . In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS10-27.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0008-5472 , 1538-7445
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
    Publication Date: 2021
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2036785-5
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1432-1
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 10
    In: Cancer Research, American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), Vol. 80, No. 4_Supplement ( 2020-02-15), p. P3-09-03-P3-09-03
    Abstract: BACKGROUND: Studies of checkpoint inhibitor monotherapy have shown only modest activity in hormone receptor (HR)-positive (+)/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative (-) metastatic breast cancer (MBC). However, pembrolizumab (P) added to standard neoadjuvant therapy significantly improved the estimated pathologic complete response rate in HR+/HER2- early breast cancer in the I-SPY-2 trial. The KELLY trial aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of P in combination with eribulin (E) in anthracycline- and taxane-pretreated patients (pts) with HR+/HER2- inoperable locally recurrent or MBC irrespective of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) status. METHODS: This is an open-label, single-arm, multicenter phase IIA clinical trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03222856). Eligible pts had HR+/HER2- inoperable locally recurrent or MBC, who were previously treated with endocrine therapy and at least one, but not more than two, prior chemotherapeutic regimens for treatment of locally recurrent and/or metastatic disease, and with prior anthracycline/taxane exposure either in the early or metastatic setting. Pts received E 1.23 mg/m2 intravenously (IV) on days 1 and 8 with P 200 mg fixed dose IV on day 1 of a 21-day cycle until unacceptable toxicity or disease progression. Primary endpoint was clinical benefit rate (CBR). Secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), and safety and tolerability of the combination. Exploratory objectives included: (1) the analysis of PFS and ORR based on immune-related RECIST (irRECIST) and (2) the associations of PFS and OS to CBR/ORR, prior exposure to CDK4/6, mTOR, or PI3K inhibitors, PD-L1 status, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), gene signatures, mutational load, and circulating tumor cells. RESULTS: Between January 2018 and October 2018, 44 pts were enrolled in the study. The median age was 54.1 years (range: 46-60.5 years), 70.5% were ECOG 0, 90.1% had visceral disease (86.4% with liver metastases), and 54% with ≥3 involved organ sites. The median number of prior endocrine therapies was two (range: 1-6) and 52.3% of patients had previously received two chemotherapeutic regimens for treatment of locally recurrent and/or MBC. With a median follow-up of 6.64 months (mo.) (range: 1-14.2 mo.), E and P combination met primary endpoint (CBR 53.7%, 95%CI: 36.9-67.3%). ORR and median PFS were 36.4% (95%CI: 22.8-52.3%) and 6.03 mo. (95%CI: 3.7-8.4 mo.), respectively. All-cause adverse events occurred in 100% of pts (G3-4, 56.8%), without treatment-related deaths. ORR and median PFS based on irRECIST were 36.4% (95%CI: 22.8-52.3%) and 6.1 mo. (95%CI: 4.2-8.5 mo.), respectively. OS data are immature (13 deaths, 29.5%). A significant difference in median PFS has been observed between pts with and without clinical benefit (8.5 Vs. 2.2 mo., p & lt;0.001) and responders compared with non-responders (8.3 Vs. 3.4 mo., p=0.024). Previous exposure to CDK4/6, mTOR, or PI3K inhibitors was not associated with differences in PFS (TABLE 1). Updated data, including results about PD-L1 status and TILs will be presented. CONCLUSIONS: E plus P was a safe and active regimen for pts with previously treated HR+/HER2- locally recurrent or MBC that merits further investigation. Exploratory biomarker analysis is pending. TABLE 1Prior treatmentNEvents (%)Median PFS, mo. (95%CI)p-valueCDK4/6 inhibitorsNo2316 (69.2)6 (3.7-10.4)0.832Yes2115 (71.4)6.1 (2.5-NA)mTOR or PI3K inhibitorsNo2620 (76.9)6 (3.7-8.47)0.727Yes1811 (61.1)6 (2.5-NA) Citation Format: José Manuel Pérez-García, Antonio Llombart-Cussac, Esther Holgado, Giuseppe Curigliano, Elena López Miranda, José Luis Alonso-Romero, Begoña Bermejo, Lourdes Calvo, Vicente Carañana, Susana de la Cruz Sánchez, María Gión Cortés, Raúl Márquez Vázquez, Aleix Prat, Manuel Ruiz Borrego, Miguel Sampayo, Miguel Àngel Seguí, Jesus Soberino, Andrea Malfettone, Peter Schmid, Javier Cortés. A phase II study of pembrolizumab and eribulin in patients with HR-positive/HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer previously treated with anthracyclines and taxanes (KELLY study) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-09-03.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0008-5472 , 1538-7445
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
    Publication Date: 2020
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2036785-5
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1432-1
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...