GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

X

Ihre E-Mail wurde erfolgreich gesendet. Bitte prüfen Sie Ihren Maileingang.

Leider ist ein Fehler beim E-Mail-Versand aufgetreten. Bitte versuchen Sie es erneut.

Vorgang fortführen?

Exportieren
  • 1
    Online-Ressource
    Online-Ressource
    A phase I study of GPC3 targeted CAR-T cell therapy in advanced GPC3-expressing hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).
    American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) ; 2023
    In:  Journal of Clinical Oncology Vol. 41, No. 4_suppl ( 2023-02-01), p. TPS624-TPS624
    Details
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 41, No. 4_suppl ( 2023-02-01), p. TPS624-TPS624
    Kurzfassung: TPS624 Background: The mortality of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is increasing worldwide, but outcome of systemic treatments in advanced HCC is suboptimal. Adoptive T-cell transfer therapy represents a promising field that exploits the ability of T-cells to recognize and eliminate their target. Targeting the tumor-associated antigen glypican- 3 (GPC3) through chimeric antigen receptors (CAR) engineered T cells is a mechanistically rational novel treatment for advanced HCC. This study aims to determine the dose and early signals of GPC3 targeted (CAR)-T cells in advanced GPC3 expressing HCC (NCT05003895). Methods: This phase I first in human dose escalation trial will study the safety and feasibility of CAR (hYP7)- T cells in advanced HCC patients expressing GPC3. Eligibility criteria includes advanced HCC, not candidates for curative interventions, progressed on first line systemic treatment, tumor GPC3 positivity of ³ 25% by IHC, Child-Pugh Class A, ³1 measurable lesion, ECOG 0 or 1, adequate organ and marrow function. ParticipantsÕ T cells collected through leukapheresis will be transduced with a lentivirus encoding the CAR construct to generate CAR expressing T cells. Patients receive a conditioning chemotherapy regimen of cyclophosphamide and fludarabine prior to the infusion of the GPC3 directed CAR-T cells (Table). The trial has a 4-level modified Fibonacci dose escalation with a minimum of 3 patients at each level and a 28-day interval between the first three patients. Response will be assessed by imaging every two months during the first year. Patients undergo close monitoring with safety assessments during the first year and are followed for life. The primary objective is to determine the MTD, DLT, safety and feasibility of anti-GPC3 CAR expressing T- cells in patients with GPC3-expressing advanced HCC. Secondary objectives include best overall response and overall survival. Exploratory objectives are multiple and include studies to evaluate the persistence and peak levels of anti-GPC3 CAR-T cells after infusion. Recruitment began in December 2021 and the two patients at dose level -1 has been treated; the planned sample size is 38 patients. Table 1 Dose Level Anti-GPC3 CAR-T Cyclophosphamide (mg/m2) Fludarabine (mg/m2) Level -1 0.3x106 CAR-T per kg bw 200 30 Level 1 0.3x106 CAR-T per kg bw 300 30 Level 2 1x106 CAR-T per kg bw 300 30 Level 3 3x106 CAR-T per kg bw 300 30. Clinical trial information: NCT05003895 .
    Materialart: Online-Ressource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    URL: Article
    DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2023.41.4_suppl.TPS624
    RVK:
    XA 52760
    RVK:
    XA 10000
    Sprache: Englisch
    Verlag: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publikationsdatum: 2023
    ZDB Id: 2005181-5
    Standort Signatur Einschränkungen Verfügbarkeit
    BibTip Andere fanden auch interessant ...
    Online-Ressource
  • 2
    Online-Ressource
    Online-Ressource
    Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC) clinical practice guideline on immunotherapy for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma
    BMJ ; 2021
    In:  Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer Vol. 9, No. 9 ( 2021-09), p. e002794-
    Details
    In: Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer, BMJ, Vol. 9, No. 9 ( 2021-09), p. e002794-
    Kurzfassung: Patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) have historically had few options and faced extremely poor prognoses if their disease progressed after standard-of-care tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Recently, the standard of care for HCC has been transformed as a combination of the immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) atezolizumab plus the anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) antibody bevacizumab was shown to offer improved overall survival in the first-line setting. Immunotherapy has demonstrated safety and efficacy in later lines of therapy as well, and ongoing trials are investigating novel combinations of ICIs and TKIs, in addition to interventions earlier in the course of disease or in combination with liver-directed therapies. Because HCC usually develops against a background of cirrhosis, immunotherapy for liver tumors is complex and oncologists need to account for both immunological and hepatological considerations when developing a treatment plan for their patients. To provide guidance to the oncology community on important concerns for the immunotherapeutic care of HCC, the Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC) convened a multidisciplinary panel of experts to develop a clinical practice guideline (CPG). The expert panel drew on the published literature as well as their clinical experience to develop recommendations for healthcare professionals on these important aspects of immunotherapeutic treatment for HCC, including diagnosis and staging, treatment planning, immune-related adverse events (irAEs), and patient quality of life (QOL) considerations. The evidence- and consensus-based recommendations in this CPG are intended to give guidance to cancer care providers treating patients with HCC.
    Materialart: Online-Ressource
    ISSN: 2051-1426
    URL: Article
    DOI: 10.1136/jitc-2021-002794
    Sprache: Englisch
    Verlag: BMJ
    Publikationsdatum: 2021
    ZDB Id: 2719863-7
    Standort Signatur Einschränkungen Verfügbarkeit
    BibTip Andere fanden auch interessant ...
    Online-Ressource
  • 3
    Online-Ressource
    Online-Ressource
    Correction: Immune Checkpoint Blockade in Combination with Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy in Patients with Metastatic Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma
    American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) ; 2021
    In:  Clinical Cancer Research Vol. 27, No. 1 ( 2021-01-01), p. 358-358
    Details
    In: Clinical Cancer Research, American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), Vol. 27, No. 1 ( 2021-01-01), p. 358-358
    Materialart: Online-Ressource
    ISSN: 1078-0432 , 1557-3265
    URL: Article
    DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-20-4640
    RVK:
    XA 36791
    Sprache: Englisch
    Verlag: American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
    Publikationsdatum: 2021
    ZDB Id: 1225457-5
    ZDB Id: 2036787-9
    Standort Signatur Einschränkungen Verfügbarkeit
    BibTip Andere fanden auch interessant ...
    Online-Ressource
  • 4
    Online-Ressource
    Online-Ressource
    Immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) in combination with SBRT in patients with advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma (aPDAC).
    American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) ; 2019
    In:  Journal of Clinical Oncology Vol. 37, No. 4_suppl ( 2019-02-01), p. 192-192
    Details
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 37, No. 4_suppl ( 2019-02-01), p. 192-192
    Kurzfassung: 192 Background: Chemotherapy in aPDAC has resulted in only modest improvements in outcome. The effectiveness of ICI monotherapy is also limited in PDAC, suggesting an immunogenic inert tumor microenvironment. SBRT is safe and effective in locally advanced PDAC and exhibits enhanced antitumor immunity. We hypothesize that ICI plus SBRT will improves immunomodulatory effects of ICI in patients with aPDAC resulting in a greater clinical benefit. Methods: Eligible patients with aPDAC were enrolled to four different treatment cohorts. Cohort 1: Durvalumab (Durva) 1500 mg every 4 weeks + SBRT 1 fraction x 8Gy on day 1. Cohort 2: SBRT 5 fractions x 5Gy followed by Durva. Cohort 3: Durva + Tremelimumab (Treme) 75 mg every 4 weeks + SBRT 1 fraction x 8Gy on day 1. Cohort 4: SBRT 5 fractions x 5Gy followed by Durva + Treme. This was continued until unacceptable toxicity or progression of disease. A biopsy was performed at baseline and pre-cycle 2 of treatment for exploratory correlative analysis. The primary objective was to evaluate the safety and feasibility of combining ICI and SBRT to enhance the efficacy of ICI. Results: 51 patients with aPDAC were enrolled and 31 patients were evaluable for the efficacy. The most commonly TRAEs were lymphopenia. Grade 3-4 AEs were lymphopenia and anemia. No dose limiting toxicities were seen. Out of total 31 evaluable patients, 1 patient achieved a confirmed partial response seen in Cohort 1 and 2 patients in Cohort 4, and 7 stable disease across the 4 treatment arms. Median PFS and OS was 1.7 months (95% CI 0.7-2.8 months) and 3.4 months (95% CI 0.9-11.4 months) in cohort 1; 2.6 months (95% CI 2.1-4.7 months) and 9.1 months (95% CI 3.4-18.7 months)in cohort 2; 1.6 months (95% CI 0.5-4.0 months) and 3.0 months (95% CI 0.7-6.6 months) in cohort 3; and 3.2 months (95% CI 1.5-16.5months) and 6.4 months (95% CI 1.5-17.6 months) in cohort 4. Conclusions: The combination of ICI and SBRT is safe and well tolerated in patients with aPDAC. The overall response rate of 9.6% including 2 patients who achieved a durable partial response lasting over 12 months, suggests meaningful clinical activity. This signifies that ICI and SBRT is a potential new treatment for aPDAC. Clinical trial information: NCT02311361.
    Materialart: Online-Ressource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    URL: Article
    DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2019.37.4_suppl.192
    RVK:
    XA 52760
    RVK:
    XA 10000
    Sprache: Englisch
    Verlag: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publikationsdatum: 2019
    ZDB Id: 2005181-5
    Standort Signatur Einschränkungen Verfügbarkeit
    BibTip Andere fanden auch interessant ...
    Online-Ressource
  • 5
    Online-Ressource
    Online-Ressource
    A phase I/II study of Pexa-Vec oncolytic virus in combination with immune checkpoint inhibition in refractory colorectal cancer.
    American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) ; 2020
    In:  Journal of Clinical Oncology Vol. 38, No. 4_suppl ( 2020-02-01), p. 117-117
    Details
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 38, No. 4_suppl ( 2020-02-01), p. 117-117
    Kurzfassung: 117 Background: The benefit of immune checkpoint inhibition is limited to the small percentage of advanced colorectal cancer (CRC) patients whose tumors present mismatch repair (MMR) gene abnormalities; immunotherapy has not shown benefit in patients with MMR proficient CRC. Oncolytic immunotherapy represents a unique therapeutic platform. This phase I trial tests the safety of the combination of pexastimogene devacirepvec (Pexa-Vec) plus durvalumab (durva) in patients with locally advanced or metastatic CRC. Methods: Eligible patients with advanced proficient mixed match repair (pMMR) CRC received intravenous infusion of Pexa-Vec at dose level 3 x 10 8 plaque forming units (pfu) (DL1) or at 10 9 pfu (DL2) every 2 weeks for 4 doses and durva 1500 mg every 28 days. Response was assessed with CT every 8 weeks. Adverse events were recorded and managed. The primary endpoint included safety, tolerability and feasibility of this combination therapy. Samples of tumor and peripheral blood were collected for assessment of immune parameters. Results: Sixteen patients (6 males and 10 females) enrolled with a median age of 52.1 years (range 39-69) from Dec, 2017 to Oct, 2018. Four patients were treated with Pexa-Vec at DL1 and durva;twelve patients were treated with Pexa-Vec at DL2 and durva.The most common treatment related adverse events (TRAE) included fever 15/16 (94 %), hypotension 12/16 (75 %), chills 12/16 (75%), fatigue 8/16 (50%), sinus tachycardia 7/16 (44%) and rash 6/16 (38%). Grade 3/4 TRAEs were reported in 8/16 (50%)patients; the most common were fever 7/16 (44 %), lymphopenia 2/16 (13%), neutropenia 1/16 (6%) and anemia 1/16 (6%). 14 patients were evaluable for response analysis; one patient 1/14 (7 %) achieved a confirmed partial response (lasting 7.1 months) and continues to receive treatment, while 13 patients had progressive disease. The median progression free survival (PFS) was 2.2 months (95% CI: 2.2-2.3 months) and the median overall survival (OS) was 7.5 months (CI: 4.9-10.1 months). Conclusions: Combination therapy of Pexa-Vec with durva ICI issafe, well tolerated and demonstrates possible activity in patients with advanced pMMR CRC. Clinical trial information: NCT03206073.
    Materialart: Online-Ressource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    URL: Article
    DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2020.38.4_suppl.117
    RVK:
    XA 52760
    RVK:
    XA 10000
    Sprache: Englisch
    Verlag: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publikationsdatum: 2020
    ZDB Id: 2005181-5
    Standort Signatur Einschränkungen Verfügbarkeit
    BibTip Andere fanden auch interessant ...
    Online-Ressource
  • 6
    Online-Ressource
    Online-Ressource
    Perioperative MVT-5873, a fully human monoclonal antibody against a CA 19-9 epitope, for operable CA 19-9 producing pancreatic cancers, cholangiocarcinomas, and metastatic colorectal cancers.
    American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) ; 2020
    In:  Journal of Clinical Oncology Vol. 38, No. 15_suppl ( 2020-05-20), p. TPS4655-TPS4655
    Details
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 38, No. 15_suppl ( 2020-05-20), p. TPS4655-TPS4655
    Kurzfassung: TPS4655 Background: Operable hepatopancreatobiliary (HPB) cancers continue to pose significant challenges. Radical resections are rarely curative, and chemotherapy is able to reduce tumor recurrence for only a fraction of patients. Despite the obvious advantages of extirpation of the identifiable tumor(s), the inflammatory milieu that accompanies surgery and the obligate time off cytotoxic agents allows for activation of remote quiescent disseminated tumor cells, leading to metastatic recurrence. We are conducting a study to determine the safety and efficacy of immediate peri-operative MVT-5873, a cytotoxic monoclonal antibody targeting Carbohydrate Antigen 19-9 (CA 19-9), in patients undergoing resections pancreatic cancer, cholangiocarcinoma or metastatic colorectal cancer to the liver. MVT-5873 is a human IgG1 antibody isolated from a patient following immunization with a sLe a -KLH vaccine. MVT-5873 has demonstrated cell surface binding in sLe a positive human tumor lines and has been shown to be potent in complement-dependent cytotoxicity assays and antibody-dependent cell mediated cytotoxicity assays. In patients with CA 19-9-producing cancers, MVT-5873 treatment has been shown to decrease serum CA 19-9 levels and prevent tumor progression. This trial may open the door for investigation of additional and/or synergistic agents in the immediate peri-operative period and usher in a new paradigm in the management of surgically treated cancers. Methods: This is a prospective, Phase II trial designed to determine the efficacy (increase in 1-yr DFS) and safety of peri-operative MVT-5873 for subjects with operable pancreatic, liver and bile duct cancers with elevated CA 19-9 levels. Patients may receive any standard neoadjuvant regimen prior to enrollment at the NIH Clinical Center in Bethesda, Maryland. Eligible patients will receive a pre-operative dose of MVT-5873 three days prior to the planned operation to remove all demonstrable disease. Following the operation, patients will receive a total of four doses of MVT-5873; the first two doses on postoperative days four and ten. The third dose will be administered on the normally scheduled postoperative clinic visit, followed by a final dose one month after discharge from the hospital and prior to the start of adjuvant treatment. Clinical trial information: NCT03801915 .
    Materialart: Online-Ressource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    URL: Article
    DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2020.38.15_suppl.TPS4655
    RVK:
    XA 52760
    RVK:
    XA 10000
    Sprache: Englisch
    Verlag: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publikationsdatum: 2020
    ZDB Id: 2005181-5
    Standort Signatur Einschränkungen Verfügbarkeit
    BibTip Andere fanden auch interessant ...
    Online-Ressource
  • 7
    Online-Ressource
    Online-Ressource
    VB-111 (ofranergene obadenovec) in combination with nivolumab in patients with microsatellite stable colorectal liver metastases: a single center, single arm, phase II trial
    BMJ ; 2024
    In:  Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer Vol. 12, No. 1 ( 2024-01), p. e008079-
    Details
    In: Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer, BMJ, Vol. 12, No. 1 ( 2024-01), p. e008079-
    Kurzfassung: Microsatellite stable colorectal liver metastases (MSS CLM) maintain an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME). Historically, immune-based approaches have been ineffective. VB-111 (ofranergene obadenovec) is a genetically-modified adenoviral vector targeting the TME; its unique dual mechanism induces an immune response and disrupts neovascularization. Checkpoint inhibition may synergize the immune response induced by viral-mediated anti-angiogenic gene therapy. We aimed to examine the safety and antitumor activity of VB-111 and nivolumab in patients with refractory MSS CLM and to characterize immunological treatment-response. Methods This was a phase II study of adult patients with histologically-confirmed MSS CLM who progressed on prior therapy. A priming dose of VB-111 1×10 13 viral particles was given intravenously 2 weeks prior to starting biweekly nivolumab 240 mg and continued every 6 weeks. The combination continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary objectives were overall response rate and safety/tolerability. Secondary objectives included median overall survival and progression-free survival. Correlative studies were performed on paired tumor biopsies and blood. Results Between August 2020 and December 2021, 14 patients were enrolled with median age 50.5 years (40–75), and 14% were women. Median follow-up was 5.5 months. Of the 10 evaluable patients, the combination of VB-111 and nivolumab failed to demonstrate radiographic responses; at best, 2 patients had stable disease. Median overall survival was 5.5 months (95% CI: 2.3 to 10.8), and median progression-free survival was 1.8 months (95% CI: 1.4 to 1.9). The most common grade 3–4 treatment-related adverse events were fever/chills, influenza-like symptoms, and lymphopenia. No treatment-related deaths were reported. Qualitative analysis of immunohistochemical staining of paired tumor biopsies did not demonstrate significant immune infiltration after treatment, except for one patient who had exceptional survival (26.0 months). Immune analysis of peripheral blood mononuclear cells showed an increase of PD-1 high Ki67 high CD8 + T cells and HLA-DR high T cells after VB-111 priming dose. Plasma cytokines interleukin-10 and tumor necrosis factor-α increased after treatment with both drugs. Conclusion In patients with MSS CLM, VB-111 and nivolumab did not improve overall response rate or survival but were tolerated with minimal toxicities. While challenging to distinguish between antiviral or antitumor, correlative studies demonstrated an immune response with activation and proliferation of CD8 + T cells systemically that was poorly sustained. Trial registration number NCT04166383 .
    Materialart: Online-Ressource
    ISSN: 2051-1426
    URL: Article
    DOI: 10.1136/jitc-2023-008079
    Sprache: Englisch
    Verlag: BMJ
    Publikationsdatum: 2024
    ZDB Id: 2719863-7
    Standort Signatur Einschränkungen Verfügbarkeit
    BibTip Andere fanden auch interessant ...
    Online-Ressource
  • 8
    Online-Ressource
    Online-Ressource
    A phase I/II study of pexa-vec oncolytic virus in combination with immune checkpoint inhibition in refractory colorectal cancer: Safety report.
    American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) ; 2019
    In:  Journal of Clinical Oncology Vol. 37, No. 4_suppl ( 2019-02-01), p. 646-646
    Details
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 37, No. 4_suppl ( 2019-02-01), p. 646-646
    Kurzfassung: 646 Background: The efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitor has been limited to small portion of colorectal cancer (CRC) patients whose tumors with mismatch repair (MMR) gene abnormalities. There is an urgent need for patients with MMR proficient (pMMR) tumors. Oncolytic immunotherapy represents a novel therapeutic platform for the treatment of cancer with unique activity compared to conventional chemotherapy. The trial is to evaluate if the combination of Pexa-Vec oncolytic virus (PV) with immune checkpoint inhibition enhance antitumor immunity. Methods: Patients with microsatellite-stable and MSI-H mCRC refractory to PD-1 monotherapy were enrolled. Patients received either Arm A treated with PV + Durvalumab or Arm B with PV + Durvalumab and Tremelimumab. Each arm had two dose levels (DL) of PV, 3 x 10 8 pfu in DL1 and at 10 9 pfu in DL2, every 2 weeks for total 4 doses. The first dose of PV was administered on Day -12, followed by three more dose administration on Days 2, 16 and 30 in combination with the immune checkpoint inhibition. The primary endpoint is response rate, safety, tolerability and feasibility of these combination therapy in refractory metastatic CRC. Results: Here we report the safety data of Arm A.A total of 9 patients was enrolled so far. The longest follow-up time is 8 months. Four patients received DL1 PV and subsequent five patients received DL2 PV. No DLT was observed at the time of this abstract. No grade 4-5 adverse event (AE) were observed. All patients experienced lymphopenia. All patients with DL2 developed fever, hypotension and papulopastular rashes and were successfully managed with antipyretics, fluid support and skin protection, respectively. The most frequent treatment-related AEs were lymphopenia (8 [100%], fever (7 [87.5%] ), chills (6 [75.0%]), hypotension (5 [62.5%] ), papulopastular rashes (5 [62.5%], flu-like symptoms (2 [12.5%] ), Nausea/vomiting (2 [12.5%]). Conclusions: Pexa-Vec in combination with Durvalumab showed a favorable safety profile. Clinical trial information: NCT03206073.
    Materialart: Online-Ressource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    URL: Article
    DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2019.37.4_suppl.646
    RVK:
    XA 52760
    RVK:
    XA 10000
    Sprache: Englisch
    Verlag: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publikationsdatum: 2019
    ZDB Id: 2005181-5
    Standort Signatur Einschränkungen Verfügbarkeit
    BibTip Andere fanden auch interessant ...
    Online-Ressource
  • 9
    Online-Ressource
    Online-Ressource
    A pilot study of the combination of checkpoint inhibition with ablation in subjects with biliary tract cancer.
    American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) ; 2021
    In:  Journal of Clinical Oncology Vol. 39, No. 15_suppl ( 2021-05-20), p. e16150-e16150
    Details
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 39, No. 15_suppl ( 2021-05-20), p. e16150-e16150
    Kurzfassung: e16150 Background: Immune checkpoint inhibition has demonstrated modest activity in biliary tract carcinoma (BTC). Augmentation of the immune response by ablative procedures to improve efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibition has been previously demonstrated in hepatocellular carcinoma, however the outcome of the combination of immune checkpoint inhibition with tremelimumab (anti-CTLA4) and durvalumab (anti-PD1) with ablation in advanced biliary tract carcinoma is unclear. The primary objective of this study was to establish the efficacy via 6-month progression-free survival (PFS) of combining tremelimumab and durvalumab in patients with advanced BTC either alone or with tumor ablation. Secondary objectives were safety and feasibility of combination treatment. An exploratory objective was overall survival (OS). Methods: Eligible patients had histologically confirmed advanced or unresectable BTC (intra- or extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, gallbladder cancer, or ampullary cancer) who had progressed on, been intolerant to, or refused prior chemotherapy. Disease had to be technically amenable to cryoablation with at least two measurable lesions. Adequate organ function and an ECOG of 0 or 1 were required. Patients were treated with tremelimumab and durvalumab with or without tumor ablation. Tremelimumab and durvalumab were administered intravenously every 28 days for four cycles followed by durvalumab every 28 days until disease progression. Cryoablation was performed on day 36. Patients were imaged every 8 weeks and response was defined per RECIST v 1.1 criteria. Results: In total, 22 patients have been enrolled into the BTC cohort. Half underwent ablation and half received immunotherapy alone. The median age was 59 years (range 21-80). All patients had received prior systemic chemotherapy, locally advanced disease was present in 68% of patients. Median PFS was 2.1m and median OS was 5.6 m. DCR was 45% (SD). Median OS and PFS was similar in the group that received ablation vs immunotherapy alone with a median OS of 6.8 m vs 6.7 m and 2.0 m vs 2.7 m respectively. The most common grade 3- 4 adverse events were lymphopenia (27%), increased AST (41%), increased alkaline phosphatase (32%) and elevated bilirubin (27%). Conclusions: Combination checkpoint inhibition combined with tumor ablative procedures is a safe and effective treatment strategy for patients with advanced BTC, however the addition of ablative therapy may not enhance efficacy in this small cohort of patients. Results illustrate the poor prognosis of advanced BTC and may represent a non-chemotherapeutic approach to treatment in this patient population. Further studies are warranted to identify patient populations most likely to respond to these interventions. Clinical trial information: NCT02821754.
    Materialart: Online-Ressource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    URL: Article
    DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2021.39.15_suppl.e16150
    RVK:
    XA 52760
    RVK:
    XA 10000
    Sprache: Englisch
    Verlag: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publikationsdatum: 2021
    ZDB Id: 2005181-5
    Standort Signatur Einschränkungen Verfügbarkeit
    BibTip Andere fanden auch interessant ...
    Online-Ressource
  • 10
    Online-Ressource
    Online-Ressource
    Immune Checkpoint Blockade in Combination with Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy in Patients with Metastatic Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma
    American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) ; 2020
    In:  Clinical Cancer Research Vol. 26, No. 10 ( 2020-05-15), p. 2318-2326
    Details
    In: Clinical Cancer Research, American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), Vol. 26, No. 10 ( 2020-05-15), p. 2318-2326
    Kurzfassung: The effectiveness of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) is limited in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). We conducted a phase I study to evaluate the safety of ICI with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in patients with metastatic PDAC. Patients and Methods: Patients enrolled must have received at least one line of prior systemic chemotherapy for metastatic disease. Cohorts A1 and A2 received durvalumab every 2 weeks plus either 8 Gy in one fraction of SBRT on day 1 or 25 Gy in five fractions on day −3 to +1. Cohorts B1 and B2 received durvalumab plus tremelimumab every 4 weeks and either 8 Gy in one fraction of SBRT on day 1 or 25 Gy in five fractions on day −3 to +1. ICIs were continued until unacceptable toxicity or disease progression. The primary objective was the safety and feasibility of treatment. Objective response was assessed in lesions not subjected to SBRT. Results: Fifty-nine patients were enrolled and 39 were evaluable for efficacy. No dose-limiting toxicities were seen. The most common adverse event was lymphopenia. Two patients achieved a partial response (one confirmed and the other unconfirmed). The overall response rate was 5.1%. Median PFS and OS was 1.7 months [95% confidence intervals (CI), 0.8–2.0 months] and 3.3 months (95% CI, 1.2–6.6 months) in cohort A1; 2.5 months (95% CI, 0.1–3.7 months) and 9.0 months (95% CI, 0.5–18.4 months) in A2; 0.9 months (95% CI, 0.7–2.1 months) and 2.1 months (95% CI, 1.1–4.3 months) in B1; and 2.3 months (95% CI, 1.9–3.4 months) and 4.2 months (95% CI, 2.9–9.3 months) in B2. Conclusions: The combination of ICI and SBRT has an acceptable safety profile and demonstrates a modest treatment benefit in patients with metastatic PDAC.
    Materialart: Online-Ressource
    ISSN: 1078-0432 , 1557-3265
    URL: Article
    DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-19-3624
    RVK:
    XA 36791
    Sprache: Englisch
    Verlag: American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
    Publikationsdatum: 2020
    ZDB Id: 1225457-5
    ZDB Id: 2036787-9
    Standort Signatur Einschränkungen Verfügbarkeit
    BibTip Andere fanden auch interessant ...
    Online-Ressource
Schließen ⊗
Diese Webseite nutzt Cookies und das Analyse-Tool Matomo. Weitere Informationen finden Sie hier...