In:
PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science (PLoS), Vol. 16, No. 9 ( 2021-9-23), p. e0257432-
Abstract:
In this study, High throughput sequencing was used to analyze the effects of different vegetable rotations on the rhizosphere bacterial diversity and community structure in a substrate that was used for continuous tomato cropping (CK). The vegetable rotations tested were cabbage/tomato (B), kidney bean/tomato (D), and celery/tomato (Q). The results revealed that the substrate bacterial diversity and richness of each crop rotation were higher than those of CK. The highest bacterial diversity was found in the B substrate, followed by the Q and D substrates. Further comparison showed that the rhizosphere bacterial community structure of Q substrate was significantly different to that of CK. Compared with the CK, the Q substrate had a significantly higher relative abundance of several dominant microflora, such as Acidobacteria, Chloroflexi, and Firmicutes. Additionally, the Q rotation significantly increased the abundance of beneficial bacteria, such as Actinobacteria_unclassified and Anaerolineaceae_unclassified . A redundancy analysis showed that Most dominant bacteria correlated positively with the substrate pH, total N, and alkali-hydrolyzable N but negatively with the available P, available K, total P, total K, and organic matter contents and substrate EC. The substrates after crop rotation improved the growth and physiological condition of the subsequent tomato plants, among which those from the Q rotation performed the best. Therefore, celery rotation not only increased the richness and diversity of bacterial communities in the substrate but also significantly increased the richness of the beneficial bacterial communities, allowing better maintenance of the substrate microenvironment for the healthy growth of crops.
Type of Medium:
Online Resource
ISSN:
1932-6203
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0257432
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0257432.g001
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0257432.g002
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0257432.g003
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0257432.g004
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0257432.t001
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0257432.t002
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0257432.t003
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0257432.s001
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0257432.s002
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0257432.s003
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0257432.s004
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0257432.s005
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0257432.r001
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0257432.r002
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0257432.r003
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0257432.r004
Language:
English
Publisher:
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Publication Date:
2021
detail.hit.zdb_id:
2267670-3
Permalink