GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 41, No. 16_suppl ( 2023-06-01), p. 10614-10614
    Abstract: 10614 Background: Germline genetic testing is traditionally done in patients suspected with hereditary cancer syndrome for enhanced cancer surveillance and/or prevention. In recent years, germline genetic testing is increasingly performed for therapeutic indication, given the approval of PARP inhibitor in advanced cancer patients with germline BRCA1/2 or other homologous recombination repair (HRR) gene mutations, and immunotherapy for patients with mismatch repair gene mutations. We evaluated the clinical utility of actionable (treatable) pathogenic germline mutations (PGM) in a tertiary cancer center in Asia. Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of cancer patients who underwent germline genetic testing at the National University Cancer Institute, Singapore, Cancer Genetics Clinic. The primary objectives were to determine the prevalence of potentially actionable PGM in cancer predisposition genes and their therapeutic applications, with focus on BRCA, HRR and mismatch repair genes. Results: From 2000 till 2022, 1154 cancer patients underwent germline genetic testing, with the majority (81.9%) tested with multi-gene panels comprising 9-134 genes. 93% (n = 1069) fulfilled conventional criteria for genetic testing; 7% (n = 81) were tested specifically for treatment decisions. 411 (35.6%) patients tested positive for a PGM, of which 334 (81%) were potentially actionable. BRCA1/2 mutations accounted for 62.3% of actionable mutations, followed by mismatch repair (18%; MLH1 8.7%, MSH2 6%, MSH6 2.1%, PMS2 1.2%), and other HRR genes (19.7%: RAD51 6.3%, ATM 4.8%, PALB2 3%, BRIP1 2.4%, others 3.3%). Among patients with BRCA/HRR gene mutations, breast (60%) and ovarian cancer (26.7%) were the commonest primary cancer. 152 germline positive patients have advanced cancers, and 79 (52%) patients received germline directed therapies (PARP inhibitor: n = 75; immunotherapy: n = 4). Median duration of immunotherapy in the 4 mismatch repair gene carriers was 20.5 months (range 5-40). Among germline BRCA/HRR mutation carriers with advanced cancer who were treated with PARP inhibitor, ovarian cancer was the commonest (n = 49), followed by breast (n = 14) then prostate (n = 6). Median PARP inhibitor treatment duration was 8 months (range 1-76). Among germline BRCA/HRR mutation carriers who received platinum-based chemotherapy, pathological complete response rate in the neoadjuvant setting was 53% (n = 17 breast cancers; TNBC [n = 11], other subtypes [n = 6] ) and objective response rate was 〉 80% in the advanced setting (n = 71; ovarian = 51, breast = 9, others = 11). Conclusions: About one-third of cancer patients tested in a high risk Cancer Genetics Clinic in a tertiary cancer centre in Asia carry PGM, of which ~80% are potentially actionable. 〉 50% advanced cancer patients with actionable PGM received germline directed therapies, confirming the clinical utility of germline testing in the real world.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2023
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 38, No. 15_suppl ( 2020-05-20), p. 3561-3561
    Abstract: 3561 Background: Somatic profiling of MBC has highlighted actionable mutations and driven trials of matched targeted therapy (tx). Previous phase I studies have reported improved outcomes following matched therapies with tumour molecular profiles. Here, we review next generation sequencing (NGS) and treatment outcomes of Asian MBC patients (pts) in the phase I unit of a tertiary centre. Methods: Pts with MBC referred to a phase I unit underwent NGS (n = 152). Tumour tissue was sequenced via the amplicon based Ion Ampliseq Cancer (IAC) v2 (50 genes) platform from 2014-2017 prior to institutional change to Foundation Medicine 1 (FM1) (324 genes) 2017-2019. Patients were counselled on findings and enrolled onto matched therapeutic trials where available. Results: NGS was successfully performed in 107 pts (IAC 46%, FM1 54%) of which tumour subtypes include hormone receptor positive 63%, triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) 28% and Her2 positive 19%. Median lines of prior tx for MBC was 4 (range 0-12). 89% had prior chemotherapy (CT), 57% prior endocrine therapy (ET). 72/107 (67%) sequenced patients had further treatment and 18 (25%) were matched to tx based on NGS findings (15 clinical trial, 3 off trial). Matching rates on both NGS platforms were similar (IAC 22% vs FM1 28%). Mutated pathways with potential matched tx included PIK3CA/AKT/PTEN (52%), DNA damage response (DRR) (15%), and FGFR (11%) pathways. PIK3 mutations were seen in 43% and associated with higher number of metastatic sites (p = 0.03); most prevalent aberrations were PIK3CA H1047R (41%) and PIK3CA E542K (13%). Matched cases were more heavily pretreated (mean lines of prior tx 5.3 matched vs 3.7, unmatched p = 0.05), and showed a median progression free survival (mPFS) of 24 weeks [w] and clinical benefit rate (complete/partial response or stable disease ≥ 12 weeks) of 53% on matched tx. Comparison by NGS platform showed improved mPFS for matched vs unmatched pts sequenced on FM1 vs IAC (FM1: 26 vs 19w, HR = 0.76 [95% CI: 0.3-1.9] ; IAC: 8 vs 12w; HR = 1.21 [95% CI: 0.5-2.8]). Interestingly, 1 pt with SMARCB mutation, reportedly associated with the FGFR pathway, had a PFS of 70w on tx with a pan-FGFR inhibitor after progressing on 3 prior lines of tx (ET and CT). Conclusions: Molecular profiling of MBC in a phase I unit led to matched tx in 25% of cases. Matched pts showed encouraging mPFS with a suggestion of benefit in those matched after sequencing on a broader gene panel (FM1).
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2020
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    In: JAMA Oncology, American Medical Association (AMA), Vol. 9, No. 9 ( 2023-09-01), p. 1221-
    Abstract: Despite patients with cancer being at risk of poor outcomes from COVID-19, there are few published studies for vaccine efficacy in this group, with suboptimal immunogenicity and waning vaccine efficacy described in small studies being a concern. Objective To assess the incidence rate of severe COVID-19 disease outcomes associated with the number of vaccine doses received and the waning of protection over time. Design, Setting, and Participants A prospective multicenter observational cohort study was carried out over 2 time periods (September 15, 2021, to December 20, 2021 [delta wave], and January 20, 2022, to November 11, 2022 [omicron wave] ) predominated by SARS-CoV-2 delta and omicron variants, respectively. Overall, 73 608 patients with cancer (23 217 active treatment, 50 391 cancer survivors) and 621 475 controls matched by age, sex, race and ethnicity, and socioeconomic status were included. Exposure Vaccine doses received, from zero to 4 doses, and time elapsed since last vaccine dose. Outcomes Competing-risk regression analyses were employed to account for competing risks of death in patients with cancer. Main outcomes were incidence rate ratios (IRRs) of COVID-19 infection, hospitalization, and severe disease (defined as requirement for supplemental oxygen, intensive care, or death). The IRRs stratified by time from last vaccine dose served as indicators of waning of vaccine effectiveness over time. Results The mean (SD) age of actively treated patients with cancer, cancer survivors, and controls were 62.7 (14.7), 62.9 (12.6), and 61.8 (14.7) years, respectively. Of 73 608 patients with cancer, 27 170 (36.9%) were men; 60 100 (81.6%) were Chinese, 7432 (10.1%) Malay, 4597 (6.2%) Indian, and 1479 (2.0%) were of other races and ethnicities. The IRRs for the 3-dose and 4-dose vs the 2-dose group (reference) for COVID-19 hospitalization and severe disease were significantly lower during both the delta and omicron waves in cancer and control populations. The IRRs for severe disease in the 3-dose group for active treatment, cancer survivors, and controls were 0.14, 0.13, and 0.07 during the delta wave and 0.29, 0.19, and 0.21 during omicron wave, respectively. The IRRs for severe disease in the 4-dose group during the omicron wave were even lower at 0.13, 0.10 and 0.10, respectively. No waning of vaccine effectiveness against hospitalization and severe disease was seen beyond 5 months after a third dose, nor up to 5 months (the end of this study’s follow-up) after a fourth dose. Conclusion This cohort study provides evidence of the clinical effectiveness of mRNA-based vaccines against COVID-19 in patients with cancer. Longevity of immunity in preventing severe COVID-19 outcomes in actively treated patients with cancer, cancer survivors, and matched controls was observed at least 5 months after the third or fourth dose.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 2374-2437
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Medical Association (AMA)
    Publication Date: 2023
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    In: Journal of Translational Medicine, Springer Science and Business Media LLC, Vol. 13, No. 1 ( 2015-12)
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1479-5876
    Language: English
    Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
    Publication Date: 2015
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2118570-0
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 5
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 38, No. 15_suppl ( 2020-05-20), p. 1019-1019
    Abstract: 1019 Background: Preclinical studies show cross talk between RET and estrogen receptor, with at least additive treatment (Tx) effect of Len, a RET inhibitor, with Let. Our previous work concluded a recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of Len 14mg daily and Let 2.5mg daily (Lim, ASCO 2019). We present efficacy data from dose escalation and expansion cohorts. Methods: Safety, tolerability and efficacy data of MBC patients in both dose escalation (Len dose level 1 [DL]:20mg, DL -1:16mg and DL -2:14mg) and expansion (Len 14mg) cohort of this phase Ib/II study of combination Len+Let study was analysed. Patients were treated with single-agent Len for 2 weeks, followed by Len+Let until disease progression (PD). Serial tumor biopsies at baseline, after Len alone, 4 weeks post Len+Let, and upon PD, were sequenced for 440 genes with the ACTOnco+ platform. Results: A total of 33 pts (DL1 6pts, DL-1 6pts, DL-2 + expansion 21pts) with median 5 lines of prior Tx (range 0-11) were enrolled; 87.9%, 75.8%, and 75.8% had prior endocrine therapy (ET), ET+CDK4/6 inhibitor (i), and chemotherapy (CT) respectively. Objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR) ≥6 months (m), median duration of response (DOR), and percentage progression-free (PPF) at 12m were 33.3%, 45.5%, 11.5m (range 6.3-22.4), and 27.2% respectively. Among patients who previously progressed on CDK4/6i (n = 25), ORR, DCR ≥6m, median DOR, and PPF at 12m were 24.0%, 40.0%, 13.7m (range 6.3-18.2), and 12.0% respectively. Of note, 3/25 (12%) patients had durable response to Len+Let lasting ≥12m, despite having only modest PFS on ET+CDK4/6i (3, 7, and 12 months respectively). Most frequent all-grade toxicities (tox) were HTN (n = 15, G3:15), hypothyroidism (n = 20, G3:0) and fatigue (n = 13, G3:2), with no G4/5 tox. No new toxicity signals were observed compared to dose escalation phase. Pre-treatment tumor molecular profiling showed responders to be more likely to harbor NEFH, USH2A and PTCH1 mutations, while non-responders were more likely to carry PIK3R1, APC and PALB2 mutations. Sequencing of serial biopsies showed downregulation of BRD4, PTCH1, KIT, NTRK1 and CREBBP after Len treatment. Conclusions: Len+Let showed significant anti-tumor activity with meaningful duration of response, even in pts who failed prior CT or ET+CDK4/6i. The results support further investigation in randomized studies. Tumor profiling identified mutations associated with response and insights on molecular effects of lenvatinib. Clinical trial information: NCT02562118 .
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2020
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 6
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 36, No. 15_suppl ( 2018-05-20), p. 2588-2588
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2018
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 7
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 37, No. 15_suppl ( 2019-05-20), p. 1045-1045
    Abstract: 1045 Background: Endocrine blockade (EB) is standard of care for patients (pts) with HR+ LABC/MBC. RET over-expression (RET+) occurs in up to 75% of HR+ breast cancers and is a postulated mechanism of endocrine resistance. Preclinical studies show cross talk between RET and estrogen receptor, and at least additive treatment (Tx) effect of Len+EB. Methods: We performed a phase Ib trial (3+3 dose escalation) to study safety, tolerability, pharmacodynamics and efficacy of Len+Let. Both drugs were given as continuous daily dosing with 2 weeks (wks) of Len alone, followed by Len+Let for 12 wks then surgery (LABC), or till disease progression (PD) (MBC). Serial tumor biopsies (n = 15) were done at baseline, after Len alone, 4 wks post Len+Let, and at surgery [LABC] / upon PD [MBC] . Results: 16 pts were treated (4 LABC, 12 MBC); Among MBC pts, median lines of prior Tx was 3 (range 0-10); 84.6%, 66.7%, and 58.3% had prior EB, EB+CDK4/6 inhibitor (i), and chemotherapy (CT) respectively. At dose level (DL) 1, 2/4 pts had dose-limiting toxicities (DLT). There was no DLT at DL-1, but 6/6 pts needed dose reductions (DR), with 4/6 DR within 6 wks of Len+Let (3 G3 hypertension [HTN], 1 G3 wound pain), deeming DL-1 intolerable. At DL-2, 0/6 pts had DLT; this was declared recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D). Most frequent G3 toxicities (tox) were HTN (6/16), proteinuria (2/16) and palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia (PPE) (2/16), with no G4/5 tox. Len+Let was active with 93.8% overall disease control rate (DCR) (50.0% partial response [PR] , 43.8% stable disease [SD]). Among MBCts (8/12 had prior EB+CDK4/6i), DCR ≥12 wks was 91.7%; 1 pt had sustained PR for 48 wks and 1 ongoing PR at 40 wks. 9/16 pts had RET+ tumors on immunohistochemistry at baseline, and 66.7% showed down-regulation with Tx (RECIST: 4 PR, 2 SD). Conclusions: Len+Let showed significant anti-tumor activity, even in pts who failed prior CT or EB+CDK4/6i. RP2D of 14mg Len and 2.5mg Let is tolerated with efficacy; dose expansion is currently underway. Clinical trial information: NCT02562118. [Table: see text]
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2019
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 8
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 35, No. 15_suppl ( 2017-05-20), p. 2550-2550
    Abstract: 2550 Background: Genomic profiling of single core biopsies (bx) are confounded intratumoral heterogeneity, resulting in sampling bias. We explored the use of a novel technique to obtain multiple bx from single metastatic lesion in pts to evaluate heterogeneity and identify therapeutic ATM. Methods: 15 pts (5 NSCLC; 3 ovarian; 2 colon, 2 uterine and 1 breast, cervix and HCC) with biopsiable lesions were identified. Using a single pass radiologically guided percutaneous bx technique, we obtained multiple spatially distinct core bx samples from a single metastatic lesion. Each bx underwent DNA extraction and WES using the NextSeq500. Results: Median of 4 core bx were obtained from each lesion. Complication rate utilizing this technique was 0%. 2 pts were omitted from analysis due to poor quality DNA with 13 pts successfully sequenced. In 1 pt, only 2 of 4 cores were successfully sequenced. The median amounts of total and non-synonymous variants were 137 (27-1286) and 66 (10-649) respectively. The median (range) filtered variants detected in 1/4, 2/4, 3/4, and 4/4 bx cores was 63(16-91)%, 5(1-65)%, 4(0-30)% and 26(0-63)% respectively, suggesting significant subclonal diversity within a single lesion. ATMs were identitified in 8/13 pts. 4/13 pts (31%) had no ATM across all 4 cores. 3 pts received therapy with inhibitors targeting ATMs. A pt with AKT1_E17K ATM received an AKT inhibitor with 21% tumour shrinkage and PFS 6.1 mths. 2 NSCLC pts harbouring an EGFR_T790M ATM were treated with an EGFRT790M specific TKI. 1 withdrew due to toxicity after 2mths and another had PFS 〉 16.5 mths. Tumour mutational burden (TMB) was consistent across multiple bx from each lesion. A NSCLC pt with the highest TMB received a checkpoint inhibitor with ongoing 〉 4 mths stable disease. Conclusions: Utilizing a single pass radiologically guided techniqueto obtainmultiple bx is feasible, safe and informative. This allows reconstruction of a tumour’s subclonal genomic architecture, providing insights into mutational heterogeneity and help guide therapy.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2017
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 9
    In: Endocrine-Related Cancer, Bioscientifica, Vol. 27, No. 9 ( 2020-09), p. R307-R327
    Abstract: The ensuing COVID-19 pandemic poses unprecedented and daunting challenges to the routine delivery of oncological and supportive care to patients with breast cancer. Considerations include the infective risk of patients who are inherently immunosuppressed from their malignancy and therapies, long-term oncological outcomes from the treatment decisions undertaken during this extraordinary period, and diverted healthcare resources to support a coordinated whole-of-society outbreak response. In this review, we chronicle the repercussions of the COVID-19 outbreak on breast cancer management in Singapore and describe our approach to triaging and prioritising care of breast tumours. We further propose adaptations to established clinical processes and practices across the different specialties involved in breast oncology, with references to the relevant evidence base or expert consensus guidelines. These recommendations have been developed within the unique context of Singapore’s public healthcare sector. They can serve as a resource to guide breast cancer management for future contingencies in this city-state, while certain elements therein may be extrapolatable to other medical systems during this global public health emergency.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1351-0088 , 1479-6821
    Language: Unknown
    Publisher: Bioscientifica
    Publication Date: 2020
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2010895-3
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 10
    In: British Journal of Cancer, Springer Science and Business Media LLC, Vol. 119, No. 8 ( 2018-10), p. 922-927
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0007-0920 , 1532-1827
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
    Publication Date: 2018
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2002452-6
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80075-2
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...