GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    In: Trials, Springer Science and Business Media LLC, Vol. 21, No. 1 ( 2020-12)
    Abstract: Approximately 8 - 10 % of COVID-19 patients present with a serious clinical course and need for hospitalization, 8% of hospitalized patients need ICU-treatment. Currently, no causal therapy is available and treatment is purely supportive. The main reason for death in critically ill patients is acute respiratory failure. However, in a number of patients a severe hyperinflammatory response with excessively elevated proinflammatory cytokines causes vasoplegic shock resistant to vasopressor therapy. A new polystyrene-based hemoadsorber (CytoSorb®, Cytosorbents Inc., New Jersey, USA) has been shown to adsorb effectively cytokines and other middle molecular weight toxins this way reducing their blood concentrations. This has been routinely used in clinical practice in the EU for other conditions where a cytokine storm occurs and an observational study has just been completed on COVID-19 patients. We hypothesized that the extracorporeal elimination of cytokines in critically ill COVID-19 patients with suspected hyperinflammation and shock may stabilize hemodynamics and improve outcome. The primary endpoint is time until resolution of vasoplegic shock, which is a well implemented, clinically relevant endpoint in critical care studies. Trial design Phase IIb, multicenter, prospective, open-label, randomized, 1:1 parallel group pilot study comparing the additional use of “CytoSorb” to standard of care without “CytoSorb”. Participants Patients are recruited from the Intensive Care Units (ICUs) of 7 participating centers in Germany (approximately 10 ICUs). All patients aged 18- 80 with positive polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test for SARS-CoV-2, a C-reactive protein (CRP) ≥ 100 mg/l, a Procalcitonin (PCT) 〈 2 ng/l, and suspected cytokine storm defined via a vasoplegic shock (Norepinephrine 〉 0.2 μg/min/kg to achieve a Mean Arterial Pressure ≥ 65mmHg). Patients are included irrespective of indication for renal replacement therapy. Suspected or proven bacterial cause for vasoplegic shock is a contraindication. Intervention and comparator Within 24 hours after meeting the inclusion criteria patients will be randomized to receive either standard of care or standard of care and additional “CytoSorb” therapy via a shaldon catheter for 3-7 days. Filter exchange is done every 24 hours. If patients receive antibiotics, an additional dose of antibiotics is administered after each change of “CytoSorb” filter in order to prevent underdosing due to “CytoSorb” treatment. Main outcomes Primary outcome is time to resolution of vasoplegic shock (defined as no need for vasopressors for at least 8 hours in order to sustain a MAP ≥ 65mmHg) in days. Secondary outcomes are 7 day mortality after fulfilling the inclusion criteria, mortality until hospital discharge, Interleukin-6 (IL-6) measurement on day 1 and 3, need for mechanical ventilation, duration of mechanical ventilation, duration of ICU-stay, catecholamine dose on day 1/2/3 after start of “CytoSorb” and acute kidney injury. Randomization An electronic randomization will be performed using the study software secuTrial® administered by the Clinical Study Center (CSC) of the Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany. Randomization is done in blocks by 4 stratified by including center. Blinding (masking) The trial will be non-blinded for the clinicians and patients. The statistician will receive a blinded data set, so that all analyses will be conducted blinded. Numbers to be randomized (sample size) As this is a pilot study with the goal to examine the feasibility of the study design as well as the intervention effect, no formal sample size calculation was conducted. A total number of approximately 80-100 patients is planned (40-50 patients per group). Safety assessment is done after the inclusion of each 10 patients per randomization group. Trial Status Please see the study protocol version from April 24 2020. Recruitment of patients is still pending. Trial registration The study was registered on April 27 2020 in the German Registry of Clinical Trials (DRKS) under the number DRKS00021447 . Full protocol The full protocol is attached as an additional file, accessible from the Trials website (Additional file 1). In the interest in expediting dissemination of this material, the familiar formatting has been eliminated; this Letter serves as a summary of the key elements of the full protocol.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1745-6215
    Language: English
    Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
    Publication Date: 2020
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2040523-6
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Georg Thieme Verlag KG ; 2014
    In:  Dialyse aktuell Vol. 17, No. 10 ( 2014-1-20), p. 535-539
    In: Dialyse aktuell, Georg Thieme Verlag KG, Vol. 17, No. 10 ( 2014-1-20), p. 535-539
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1434-0704 , 1860-3300
    URL: Issue
    Language: German
    Publisher: Georg Thieme Verlag KG
    Publication Date: 2014
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    In: Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology, Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health), Vol. 36, No. 9 ( 2016-09), p. 2019-2027
    Abstract: Lipoprotein(a)-hyperlipoproteinemia (Lp(a)-HLP) along with progressive cardiovascular disease has been approved as indication for regular lipoprotein apheresis (LA) in Germany since 2008. We aimed to study the long-term preventive effect of LA and to assess hypothetical clinical correlations of apolipoprotein(a) (apo(a)) by analyzing genotypes and phenotypes. Approach and Results— This prospective observational multicenter study included 170 patients with Lp(a)-HLP and progressive cardiovascular disease (48.9 years median age at diagnosis) despite other cardiovascular risk factors, including low-density lipoprotein cholesterol had maximally been treated (mean baseline low-density lipoprotein cholesterol: measured, 2.56 mmol/L [98.9 mg/dL] and corrected, 1.72 mmol/L [66.3 mg/dL] ). Patients were prospectively investigated during a 5-year period about annual incidence rates of cardiovascular events. In addition, apo(a) isoforms and polymorphisms at the apo(a) gene ( LPA ) were characterized. One hundred fifty-four patients (90.6%) completed 5 years of follow-up. Mean Lp(a) concentration before commencing regular LA was 108.1 mg/dL. This was reduced by a single LA treatment by 68.1% on average. Significant decline of the mean annual cardiovascular event rate was observed from 0.58±0.53 2 years before regular LA to 0.11±0.15 thereafter ( P 〈 0.0001); 95.3% of patients expressed at least 1 small apo(a) isoform. Small apo(a) isoform (35.2%) carrying phenotypes were not tagged by single-nucleotide polymorphisms rs10455872 or rs3798220. Conclusions— Results of 5 years of prospective follow-up confirm that LA has a lasting effect on prevention of cardiovascular events in patients with Lp(a)-HLP. Patients clinically selected by progressive cardiovascular disease were characterized by a highly frequent expression of small apo(a) isoforms. Only Lp(a) concentration seemed to comprehensively reflect Lp(a)-associated cardiovascular risk, however.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1079-5642 , 1524-4636
    Language: English
    Publisher: Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
    Publication Date: 2016
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1494427-3
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    In: Circulation, Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health), Vol. 128, No. 24 ( 2013-12-17), p. 2567-2576
    Abstract: Lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) hyperlipoproteinemia is a major risk factor for cardiovascular disease, which is not affected by treatment of other cardiovascular risk factors. This study sought to assess the effect of chronic lipoprotein apheresis (LA) on the incidence of cardiovascular events in patients with progressive cardiovascular disease receiving maximally tolerated lipid-lowering treatment. Methods and Results— In a prospective observational multicenter study, 170 patients were investigated who commenced LA because of Lp(a)-hyperlipoproteinemia and progressive cardiovascular disease. Patients were characterized regarding plasma lipid status, lipid-lowering drug treatment, and variants at the LPA gene locus. The incidence rates of cardiovascular events 2 years before (y-2 and y-1) and prospectively 2 years during LA treatment (y+1, y+2) were compared. The mean age of patients was 51 years at the first cardiovascular event and 57 years at the first LA. Before LA, mean low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and Lp(a) were 2.56±1.04 mmol·L −1 (99.0±40.1 mg·dL −1 ) and Lp(a) 3.74±1.63 µmol·L −1 (104.9±45.7 mg·dL −1 ), respectively. Mean annual rates for major adverse coronary events declined from 0.41 for 2 years before LA to 0.09 for 2 years during LA ( P 〈 0.0001). Event rates including all vascular beds declined from 0.61 to 0.16 ( P 〈 0.0001). Analysis of single years revealed increasing major adverse coronary event rates from 0.30 to 0.54 ( P =0.001) for y-2 to y-1 before LA, decline to 0.14 from y-1 to y+1 ( P 〈 0.0001) and to 0.05 from y+1 to y+2 ( P =0.014). Conclusions— In patients with Lp(a)-hyperlipoproteinemia, progressive cardiovascular disease, and maximally tolerated lipid-lowering medication, LA effectively lowered the incidence rate of cardiovascular events. Clinical Trial Registration— URL: https://drks-neu.uniklinik-freiburg.de . Unique identifier: DRKS00003119.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0009-7322 , 1524-4539
    Language: English
    Publisher: Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
    Publication Date: 2013
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1466401-X
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 5
    In: European Neurology, S. Karger AG, Vol. 66, No. 4 ( 2011), p. 183-189
    Abstract: 〈 i 〉 Background/Aims: 〈 /i 〉 First-line treatment options for chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) are corticosteroids, intravenous immunoglobulin, and plasma exchange. In a significant number of patients, first-line therapy fails, and long-term maintenance treatment still remains a therapeutic challenge. Immunoadsorption (IA) may be an alternative to classical plasma exchange in the therapy of immune-mediated neurologic diseases. The aim of this investigation was to evaluate efficacy and safety of IA in patients with CIDP with unsatisfactory response to first-line treatment options. 〈 i 〉 Methods: 〈 /i 〉 CIDP patients received adjunct IA treatment using tryptophan-immune adsorbers. The inflammatory neuropathy cause and treatment disability (INCAT) score was used to grade disability and monitor treatment effects. 〈 i 〉 Results: 〈 /i 〉 In total, 14 CIDP patients were analyzed. Ten patients were treated in hospital. After one IA treatment series, the INCAT score decreased significantly in all 10 patients. Four of these 14 patients were treated in outpatient clinics using long-term maintenance IA with 1–2 treatments per week. In these 4 patients, effects of long-term maintenance IA resulted in an improvement of overall disability. In all patients, IA was safe, well tolerated, and no severe adverse effects occurred. 〈 i 〉 Conclusion: 〈 /i 〉 IA could be an effective and safe option for CIDP patients with unsatisfactory response to first-line treatment options and for long-term maintenance treatment.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0014-3022 , 1421-9913
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: S. Karger AG
    Publication Date: 2011
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1482237-4
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 6
    In: European Heart Journal, Oxford University Press (OUP), Vol. 37, No. 48 ( 2016-12-21), p. 3588-3595
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0195-668X , 1522-9645
    Language: English
    Publisher: Oxford University Press (OUP)
    Publication Date: 2016
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2001908-7
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 7
    In: Journal of Clinical Apheresis, Wiley, Vol. 34, No. 4 ( 2019-08), p. 423-433
    Abstract: Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibition with monoclonal antibodies has complemented the armamentarium of lipid‐lowering therapy (LLT) before the final step of commencing chronic lipoprotein apheresis (LA). Data are scarce on patients who, after escalation of LLT with PCSK9 antibodies, have commenced chronic LA or PCSK9 antibody treatment during ongoing long‐term LA. Patients and Methods In this study, a cohort of 110 patients with established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) due to hypercholesterolemia or concomitant lipoprotein(a)‐hyperlipoproteinemia, who received PCSK9 antibodies for the first time during routine care, were consecutively identified. Results Mean LDL‐C concentration prior to initiation of LA or PCSK9 antibody treatment was 5.3 ± 2.6 mmol/L (205 ± 102 mg/dL). Due to established ASCVD, the risk‐adjusted LDL‐C target value was 〈 1.8 mmol/L ( 〈 70 mg/dL) in all patients. Use of PCSK9 antibodies increased the proportion of patients attaining the LDL‐C target concentration by 41.8% overall. Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAE) associated with PCSK9 antibody medication were reported in 35 patients (31.8%). Discontinuation of PCSK9 antibody therapy due to TEAEs occurred in 25 patients (22.7%). Conclusion Finally, 55.5% of patients received a combination of PCSK9 antibody therapy and LA at individually optimized treatment frequencies resulting in an increase of target attainment in 54.1% of patients. About 18.1% of chronic LA patients terminated LA treatment in this real‐world study. The termination of long‐term LA therapy, which has hitherto prevented the progression of ASCVD, requires careful individual risk assessment and cannot be recommended by the general criteria of LDL‐C reduction.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0733-2459 , 1098-1101
    URL: Issue
    Language: English
    Publisher: Wiley
    Publication Date: 2019
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2001633-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...