GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Elsevier BV ; 2016
    In:  Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Vol. 97, No. 12 ( 2016-12), p. e9-
    In: Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Elsevier BV, Vol. 97, No. 12 ( 2016-12), p. e9-
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0003-9993
    Language: English
    Publisher: Elsevier BV
    Publication Date: 2016
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2040858-4
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    In: The Cleft Palate Craniofacial Journal, SAGE Publications, Vol. 60, No. 11 ( 2023-11), p. 1505-1512
    Abstract: This case report explores clinical treatment efficacy in a Cantonese-speaking child with 22q11.2 Deletion Syndrome where diagnosis and management of velopharyngeal dysfunction can be considered late. All treatment sessions were undertaken via telepractice during the peak of the COVID-19 pandemic in Hong Kong. A hybrid of specialized cleft palate speech treatment techniques and traditional treatment approaches in Speech Sound Disorders were utilized. Treatment intensity components including dose, dose form, session duration, and total intervention duration were documented.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1055-6656 , 1545-1569
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: SAGE Publications
    Publication Date: 2023
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2030056-6
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    In: International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, Wiley, Vol. 56, No. 4 ( 2021-07), p. 754-767
    Abstract: The status of the velopharyngeal mechanism can be inferred from perceptual ratings of specified speech parameters. Several studies have proposed the measure of an overall velopharyngeal composite score based on these perceptual ratings and have reported good validity. The Cleft Audit Protocol for Speech—Augmented (CAPS‐A) is a validated and reliable perceptual framework for the assessment of cleft speech and velopharyngeal function used by all Regional Cleft Services in the UK and Ireland. An overall velopharyngeal composite summary score based on the CAPS‐A would serve as an important surgical outcome measure of speech. Aims To develop and validate a velopharyngeal composite summary score based on perceptual ratings made on the CAPS‐A (CAPS‐A VPC‐Sum) using data from a maxillary osteotomy (MO) study. Methods & Procedures There were two surgical groups: a cleft lip and palate (CLP) ( N = 20) group and a non‐CLP group ( N = 10), and a normal control group ( N = 20). Participants in groups 1 and 2 were seen for perceptual and instrumental assessments of speech and velopharyngeal function preoperatively (T1), 3 months (T2) and 12 months (T3) postoperatively. Perceptual speech data were collected and rated by independent listeners using CAPS‐A. Outcomes & Results Moderate to strong interrater reliability for perceptual data ( r s = 0.503–1.000, all p 〈 0.01) and strong to very strong reliability for videofluoroscopic measurements ( r s = 0.746–0.947) were found. Construct validity of the CAPS‐A VPC‐Sum was shown by an increase in postoperative scores for the CLP group only ϰ 2 (2) = 9.769, p = 0.008 and significant differences between the CLP and the other two groups at T2 and T3 using independent t ‐tests. Convergent and divergent validity was indicated by a positive moderate correlation with related parameters (e.g., hypernasality r s = 0.869, p 〈 0.01) and a weak correlation with unrelated parameters (e.g., amount of forward advancement r s = 0.160, p = 0.526). Criterion validity was found by a moderate correlation between closure ratio r s = –0.541, p = 0.020 and CAPS‐A VPC‐Sum. Conclusions & Implications A velopharyngeal composite score based on perceptually rated parameters serves as an important surgical speech outcome measure. The CAPS‐A VPC‐Sum is a useful, reliable and valid outcome measure of velopharyngeal function. There are added positive implications for other clinicians using geographically and language‐specific adapted versions of the CAPS‐A internationally. What this paper adds What is already known on this subject Velopharyngeal composite scores based on perceptually rated speech parameters have been shown to have both clinical and research utility, serving as a useful surgical outcome measure. However, such a composite score must be specifically validated on the perceptual speech framework upon which it is based, as there are differences in measurement methods and terminology across cleft speech perceptual frameworks internationally. What this paper adds to existing knowledge The CAPS‐A is a nationally used tool in the UK and Ireland for audit and research purposes with validated and adapted international versions. This paper reports on the validation of the derived velopharyngeal composite score measure based on the CAPS‐A and an English‐speaking sample, providing evidence of its validity through a speech osteotomy study. What are the potential or actual clinical implications of this work? This work provides CLP teams who use CAPS‐A with a validated surgical speech outcome measure of velopharyngeal function. It has positive implications also for adapted versions of the CAPS‐A internationally.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1368-2822 , 1460-6984
    URL: Issue
    Language: English
    Publisher: Wiley
    Publication Date: 2021
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1485082-5
    SSG: 5,2
    SSG: 7,11
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Elsevier BV ; 2002
    In:  International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology Vol. 63, No. 2 ( 2002-4), p. 137-147
    In: International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, Elsevier BV, Vol. 63, No. 2 ( 2002-4), p. 137-147
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0165-5876
    Language: English
    Publisher: Elsevier BV
    Publication Date: 2002
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2224872-9
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2009657-4
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 5
    In: Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica, S. Karger AG, Vol. 74, No. 4 ( 2022), p. 271-283
    Abstract: 〈 b 〉 〈 i 〉 Introduction: 〈 /i 〉 〈 /b 〉 Abnormal facial growth is a recognized outcome in cleft lip and palate (CLP), resulting in a concave profile and a class III occlusal status. Maxillary osteotomy (MO) is undertaken to correct this facial deformity, and the surgery can impact speech articulation, although the evidence remains limited and ill-defined for the CLP population. 〈 b 〉 〈 i 〉 Aims: 〈 /i 〉 〈 /b 〉 The aim of the study was to investigate the impact of MO on the production of the fricatives /f/ and /s/, using perceptual and acoustic analyses, and to explore the nature of speech changes. 〈 b 〉 〈 i 〉 Methods: 〈 /i 〉 〈 /b 〉 Twenty participants with CLP were seen 0–3 months pre-operatively (T1) and 3 months (T2) and 12 months (T3) after MO. A normal group ( 〈 i 〉 N 〈 /i 〉 = 20) was similarly recruited. Perceptual speech data was collected according to a validated framework and ratings made on audio and audio-video recordings (VIDRat). Spectral moments were centre of gravity (CG), standard deviation (SD), skewness (SK) and kurtosis (KU). Reliability studies were carried out for all speech analyses. 〈 b 〉 〈 i 〉 Results: 〈 /i 〉 〈 /b 〉 For the CLP group, VIDRat identified dentalization/interdentalization as the main type of pre-operative error for /s/ with a statistically significant improvement over time, χ 〈 sup 〉 2 〈 /sup 〉 (2) = 6.889, 〈 i 〉 p 〈 /i 〉 = 0.032. Effect sizes were medium between T1 and T3 ( 〈 i 〉 d 〈 /i 〉 = 0.631) and small between T2 and T3 ( 〈 i 〉 d 〈 /i 〉 = 0.194). For the acoustic data, effect sizes were similarly medium between T1 and T2 (e.g., SK, /f/ 〈 i 〉 d 〈 /i 〉 = 0.579, /s/ 〈 i 〉 d 〈 /i 〉 = 0.642) and small between T1 and T3 across all acoustic parameters. Independent 〈 i 〉 t 〈 /i 〉 tests showed mainly statistically significant differences between both groups at all time points with large effect sizes (e.g., T2 CG, 〈 i 〉 t 〈 /i 〉 = –4.571, 〈 i 〉 p 〈 /i 〉 & #x3c; 0.001, 〈 i 〉 d = 〈 /i 〉 1.581), indicating that /s/ was not normalized post-operatively. For /f/, differences tended to be at T1 with large effect sizes (e.g., CG, 〈 i 〉 t 〈 /i 〉 = –2.307, 〈 i 〉 p 〈 /i 〉 = 0.028, 〈 i 〉 d 〈 /i 〉 = 0.797), reflecting normalization. 〈 b 〉 〈 i 〉 Conclusions and Implications: 〈 /i 〉 〈 /b 〉 This is the first speech acoustic study on /f/ for individuals with CLP undergoing MO. The surgery has a positive impact on /f/ and /s/, which appear to stabilize 3 months post-operatively. Speech changes are an automatic and a direct consequence of the physical changes brought about by MO, effecting articulatory re-organization. The results of the study have direct clinical implications for the clinical care pathway for patients with CLP undergoing MO.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1021-7762 , 1421-9972
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: S. Karger AG
    Publication Date: 2022
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1482295-7
    SSG: 7,11
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...