In:
Astronomy & Astrophysics, EDP Sciences, Vol. 599 ( 2017-3), p. A79-
Abstract:
Peak statistics in weak-lensing maps access the non-Gaussian information contained in the large-scale distribution of matter in the Universe. They are therefore a promising complementary probe to two-point and higher-order statistics to constrain our cosmological models. Next-generation galaxy surveys, with their advanced optics and large areas, will measure the cosmic weak-lensing signal with unprecedented precision. To prepare for these anticipated data sets, we assess the constraining power of peak counts in a simulated Euclid -like survey on the cosmological parameters Ω m , σ 8 , and w 0 de . In particular, we study how C amelus , a fast stochastic model for predicting peaks, can be applied to such large surveys. The algorithm avoids the need for time-costly N -body simulations, and its stochastic approach provides full PDF information of observables. Considering peaks with a signal-to-noise ratio ≥ 1, we measure the abundance histogram in a mock shear catalogue of approximately 5000 deg 2 using a multiscale mass-map filtering technique. We constrain the parameters of the mock survey using C amelus combined with approximate Bayesian computation, a robust likelihood-free inference algorithm. Peak statistics yield a tight but significantly biased constraint in the σ 8 –Ω m plane, as measured by the width ΔΣ 8 of the 1 σ contour. We find Σ 8 = σ 8 (Ω m / 0.27) α = 0.77 -0.05 +0.06 with α = 0.75 for a flat ΛCDM model. The strong bias indicates the need to better understand and control the model systematics before applying it to a real survey of this size or larger. We perform a calibration of the model and compare results to those from the two-point correlation functions ξ ± measured on the same field. We calibrate the ξ ± result as well, since its contours are also biased, although not as severely as for peaks. In this case, we find for peaks Σ 8 = 0.76 -0.03 +0.02 with α = 0.65, while for the combined ξ + and ξ − statistics the values are Σ 8 = 0.76 -0.01 +0.02 and α = 0.70. We conclude that the constraining power can therefore be comparable between the two weak-lensing observables in large-field surveys. Furthermore, the tilt in the σ 8 –Ω m degeneracy direction for peaks with respect to that of ξ ± suggests that a combined analysis would yield tighter constraints than either measure alone. As expected, w 0 de cannot be well constrained without a tomographic analysis, but its degeneracy directions with the other two varied parameters are still clear for both peaks and ξ ± .
Type of Medium:
Online Resource
ISSN:
0004-6361
,
1432-0746
DOI:
10.1051/0004-6361/201629928
Language:
English
Publisher:
EDP Sciences
Publication Date:
2017
detail.hit.zdb_id:
1458466-9
SSG:
16,12
Permalink
