GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

X

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Anatomic segmentectomy versus lobectomy for clinical stage I non-small cell lung cancer: A propensity-matched analysis.
    American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) ; 2012
    In:  Journal of Clinical Oncology Vol. 30, No. 15_suppl ( 2012-05-20), p. 7071-7071
    Details
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 30, No. 15_suppl ( 2012-05-20), p. 7071-7071
    Abstract: 7071 Background: Although anatomic segmentectomy is considered a “compromised” procedure by many surgeons, new information from several retrospective, single-institution series has countered negative premises regarding tumor recurrence and patient survival. The primary objective of this study was to utilize propensity score matching to compare outcomes following these anatomic resection approaches for stage I NSCLC. Methods: Patients undergoing lobectomy (n=392) vs. segmentectomy (n=793) for clinical stage I NSCLC were matched 1:1 using a propensity score that accounted for the potential confounding effects of pre-operative patient variables. Matching based on propensity scores produced 312 patients in each group. Primary outcome variables included recurrence-free and overall survival. Factors affecting survival were assessed by proportional hazards (Cox) regression and Kaplan-Meier survival function estimates. Results: Peri-operative mortality was 1.2% in the segmentectomy group and 2.5% in the lobectomy group (p=0.38). Ninety-day mortality was 2.6% and 4.8% (p=0.20), respectively. At a mean follow-up of 5.4 years, no differences were noted in locoregional (5.5% vs. 5.1%, p=1.00), distant (14.8% vs. 11.6%, p=0.29) or overall recurrence rates (20.2% vs. 16.7%, p=0.30) when comparing segmentectomy with lobectomy. Furthermore, no significant differences were noted in time to recurrence (p=0.415) or overall survival (p=0.258) when comparing the matched groups. Five year freedom from recurrence (95% CI) was: Segment 0.70 [95% CI: (0.63, 0.78) vs. Lobe 0.71 [95% CI: 0.64, 0.78]. Overall survival (95% CI) was: Segment 0.54 [95% CI: (0.47, 0.51) vs. Lobe 0.60 [95% CI: 0.54, 0.67] . Segmentectomy was not found to be an independent predictor of recurrence (HR: 1.11, 95% CI: 0.87, 1.40) or overall survival (HR = 1.17, 95% CI: 0.89.1.52). Conclusions: In this large propensity-matched comparison, anatomic segmentectomy is associated with similar time to recurrence and overall survival rates when compared to lobectomy for clinical stage I NSCLC. These results will need further validation by prospective, randomized trials (CALGB 140503).
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    URL: Article
    DOI: 10.1200/jco.2012.30.15_suppl.7071
    RVK:
    XA 52760
    RVK:
    XA 10000
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2012
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
    Online Resource
  • 2
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Factors impacting oncologic outcomes after sublobar pulmonary resection: Results from ACOSOG Z4032 (Alliance), a randomized trial for high-risk operable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
    American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) ; 2013
    In:  Journal of Clinical Oncology Vol. 31, No. 15_suppl ( 2013-05-20), p. 7524-7524
    Details
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 31, No. 15_suppl ( 2013-05-20), p. 7524-7524
    Abstract: 7524 Background: A multicenter study (Z4032) compared sublobar resection (SR) to sublobar resection with brachytherapy (SRB) for stage I NSCLC. Local recurrence (LR) and overall survival (OS) rates at 3-years (3-yr) were similar between arms (see abstract 113613). This analysis combines arms, and evaluates the effect of factors previously reported to impact oncological outcomes after SR. Methods: 213 patients (pts) were evaluable for analysis. LR was defined as recurrence at the staple line (local progression), same lobe away from the staple line, or within hilar nodes. Factors assessed for impact on 3-yr outcomes were: resection type (wedge/segmentectomy), margin size ( 〈 1cm /≥1cm), margin:tumor ratio ( 〈 1/ ≥1), tumor size (≤2cm/ 〉 2cm) and staple line cytology (+/-). Results: LR occurred in 27/213 (12.6%) pts and included local progression in 12/213 (5.6%). OS rate at 3-yr was 152/213 (71.4%). Trends favored the use of segmentectomy, margin:tumor ratio≥1, tumor size ≤2cm and negative staple line cytology; no factor reached statistical significance at 3-yr. The only factor significantly (p=0.02) associated with decreased 3-yr LR was margin size ≥1cm (8.3%) compared to margin 〈 1cm (19.3%). Conclusions: SR is a good option for high-risk pts with NSCLC. The 3-yr OS rate of 71.4% and local progression rate of 5.6% are useful benchmarks to compare to other therapies. A resection margin of at least 1 cm is desirable. Clinical trial information: NCT00107172. [Table: see text]
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    URL: Article
    DOI: 10.1200/jco.2013.31.15_suppl.7524
    RVK:
    XA 52760
    RVK:
    XA 10000
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2013
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
    Online Resource
  • 3
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Impact of brachytherapy on local recurrence after sublobar resection: Results from ACOSOG Z4032 (Alliance), a phase III randomized trial for high-risk operable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
    American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) ; 2013
    In:  Journal of Clinical Oncology Vol. 31, No. 15_suppl ( 2013-05-20), p. 7502-7502
    Details
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 31, No. 15_suppl ( 2013-05-20), p. 7502-7502
    Abstract: 7502 Background: Prior studies suggest that adjuvant brachytherapy reduces local recurrence (LR) after sublobar resection (SR) for NSCLC. A multicenter randomized study was undertaken in patients (pts) with stage I NSCLC ≤3cm comparing SR to SR with brachytherapy (SRB). Methods: High-risk operable patients with NSCLC were randomized to SR or SRB. Brachytherapy involved placement of I 125 seeds incorporated into Vicryl sutures or into Vicryl mesh placed over the staple line. Wedge or segmental resection was allowed. The primary endpoint was time to local recurrence (LR) defined as recurrence within the primary tumor lobe at the staple line (local progression), away from the staple line or within hilar nodes. The trial was designed to have 90% power to detect a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.315 in favor of the SRB arm using a one-sided α of 0.05 with a sample size of 100 eligible pts per arm. Follow-up CT scans were obtained serially for 36 months. Results: 224 pts were randomized; 213 (109 SR,104 SRB) were eligible. Median (range) age was 71 (49-87) yrs; 94 (44%) were male. No differences were found in baseline characteristics. Adverse events, previously reported, were not different between arms. Median (range) follow-up was 4.06 (0.04, 5.0) yrs. There was no difference between arms in time to LR (HR = 0.87; 5% CI: 0.41, 1.86, p=0.72) or to LR or death (LRD) (HR = 0.81, 95% CI: 0.50, 1.32, p=0.40). There was no difference between arms in pattern of LR (table). In subgroups of pts with potentially compromised surgical margin (margin 〈 1cm; margin:tumor ratio 〈 1; positive staple line cytology) SRB did not reduce LR or LRD at 3-yrs. Overall 3-yr survival was similar for SR (71%) and SRB (72%) (p=0.81). Conclusions: LR remains a concern after sublobar resection. However, local progression at the staple line was low. This trial demonstrated that adjuvant brachytherapy does not impact oncologic outcomes. Clinical trial information: NCT00107172. [Table: see text]
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    URL: Article
    DOI: 10.1200/jco.2013.31.15_suppl.7502
    RVK:
    XA 52760
    RVK:
    XA 10000
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2013
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
    Online Resource
  • 4
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Has the paradigm changed away from lobectomy for stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)? Anatomic segmentectomy: Surgery’s answer to image-guided ablation/radiation therapy for the small peripheral lung lesion.
    American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) ; 2013
    In:  Journal of Clinical Oncology Vol. 31, No. 15_suppl ( 2013-05-20), p. 7577-7577
    Details
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 31, No. 15_suppl ( 2013-05-20), p. 7577-7577
    Abstract: 7577 Background: Lobectomy has been the “gold standard” for stage I NSCLC management. Image guided ablation/radiation therapy approaches are now being touted as alternatives to surgery despite concerns regarding diagnosis, pathologic staging, local control, and delayed toxicities. We evaluated the diagnostic utility and oncologic efficacy of lung sparing, anatomic segmentectomy for indeterminate pulmonary nodules and clinical stage I NSCLC. Methods: Retrospective review of 1,005 anatomic segmentectomies from 2002-2012 for indeterminate pulmonary nodules and clinical stage I NSCLC. Outcome variables included perioperative data, morbidity and mortality. Survival was assessed with the Kaplan-Maier method. Results: Mean age was 66.7 years. Median lesion size was 1.9 cm. VATS was employed in 62.8% of cases. Median operative time and blood loss was 112 minutes and 80 ml, respectively. Median hospital stay was 5 days. Major complications occurred in 12.7%. Thirty-day mortality was 1.0%. Of these, NSCLC was identified in 71.6%, metastases in 8.7%, and other benign conditions in 19.7%. Among patients with clinical stage I NSCLC, clinical: pathological upstaging was seen in 34.5%. Local recurrence rate was 5.2% and five-year freedom from any recurrence was 69%, equivalent to lobectomy in our experience. Conclusions: Anatomic segmentectomy is a valuable primary surgical approach today. In this era of competing image-guided ablation modalities, anatomic segmentectomy provides safety, diagnostic accuracy and adherence to oncologic surgical principles including completeness of resection with adequate surgical margins, systematic nodal staging improving pathologic accuracy, and tissue for pharmacogenomic assessment to guide individualized adjuvant therapy.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    URL: Article
    DOI: 10.1200/jco.2013.31.15_suppl.7577
    RVK:
    XA 52760
    RVK:
    XA 10000
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2013
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
    Online Resource
  • 5
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Factors influencing recurrence following anatomic lung resection for non-small cell lung cancer.
    American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) ; 2012
    In:  Journal of Clinical Oncology Vol. 30, No. 15_suppl ( 2012-05-20), p. 7074-7074
    Details
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 30, No. 15_suppl ( 2012-05-20), p. 7074-7074
    Abstract: 7074 Background: Anatomic lung resection provides the patient with the best chance for cure in the setting of early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Despite complete (R0) resection, up to 20-30% of patients will develop recurrent disease. In the current study, we analyze the impact of surgical and pathologic variables upon recurrence patterns following anatomic lung resection for clinical stage I NSCLC. Methods: A total of 1,192 patients (394 segmentectomies, 805 lobectomies) with clinical stage I NSCLC were evaluated. The primary outcome variable was recurrence. Multivariate analysis was performed based upon clinical (age, gender, comorbidities), surgical (operation, approach, surgical margin) and pathological (pleural invasion, tumor size and histology) variables. Predictors of recurrence were identified by proportional hazards regression. Differences in recurrence patterns between groups are illustrated by log rank tests applied to Kaplan-Maier estimates. Results: A total of 243 recurrences (20.3%) were recorded at a mean follow-up of 35.6 months (71 locoregional, 172 distant). There was no significant difference in recurrence patterns when comparing segmentectomy and lobectomy. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that a margin:tumor ratio 〈 1, angiolymphatic invasion and the presence of only mild-moderate tumor inflammation were predictors of recurrence risk. Conclusions: Recurrence following anatomic lung resection is influenced predominantly by pathological variables (tumor size, angiolymphatic invasion, tumor inflammation). Optimization of surgical margin in relation to tumor size may improve outcomes. Extent of resection (segmentectomy vs. lobectomy) does not appear to have an impact on recurrence-free survival when adequate margins are obtained. These data have implications regarding the potential use of adjuvant therapy in selected Stage I patients at high risk for recurrence. [Table: see text]
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    URL: Article
    DOI: 10.1200/jco.2012.30.15_suppl.7074
    RVK:
    XA 52760
    RVK:
    XA 10000
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2012
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
    Online Resource
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...