GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
Material
Language
  • 1
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 124, No. 21 ( 2014-12-06), p. 3662-3662
    Abstract: Introduction Intensive “pediatric oriented” treatment with heavy cytostatic load, incorporation of allogeneic HSCT is now considered a backbone approach in adult ALL therapy. Highly myelosuppressive treatment is more toxic and less reproducible, so RALL has initiated non-intensive but non- interruptive protocol “ALL-2009”and started a prospective multicenter trial for adult Ph-negative ALL based on: 1) the replacement of prednisolone (Pdn) 60 mg/m2 with dexamethazone (Dexa) 10 mg/m2 if blast cells are 〉 25% in bone marrow after 7 days of prephase; 2) de-intensified but non-interruptive treatment with doses modification according to the myelosuppression with total treatment duration of 127 weeks; 3) prolonged implication of L-asparaginase (total proposed dose 590.000 IU/m2); 4) autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) after non-myeloablative BEAM conditioning followed by prolonged maintenance – for T-cell ALL patients. Allo-BMT was an option for high risk patients with sibling donors. The study is registered on the ClinicalTrials.gov public site; NCT01193933. Methods and patients From Jan 2009, till June 2014, 30 centers enrolled 250 pts: median age 30 years (15-60 years), 115f/135 m; in 2,4% phenotype was unknown (n=6), B-lineage ALL - 63,2% (n=158), T-lineage ALL - 34% (n=85), biphenotypic - 0,4% (n=1). Cytogenetics was available in 62,4% of patients (n=156) and 41% of them (n=64) had normal karyotype (NK). 25,2% of patients (n=63) were in the standard risk (SR) group (WBC 〈 30 for B-lineage, 〈 100 for T-lineage; EGIL BII-III, T-III; LDH 〈 2N; no late CR; t(4;11)-negative), 59,2% (n=148) - in the high risk (HR) group (WBC 〉 30 for B-lineage, 〉 100 for T-lineage; EGIL BI, T-I-II-IV; LDH 〉 2N; late CR; t(4;11)-positive), 39 patients were not qualified by risk group. The analysis was performed in June 2014. The median time of follow-up was 26,1 mo. Results Prednisolone was replaced with dexamethazone after prephase in 68,1% of patients (135 of 198). The portion of non-responders to PRD in SR and HR groups was 54% and 67%, respectively (p=0,06). CR rate in 228 available for analysis patients was 87% (n=198), induction death occurred in 10,5% (n=24), resistance was registered in 2,5% (n=6). The majority of CR patients (91%) achieved it after prephase (7,1%, n=16) and the 1st phase of induction (83,9%, n=164). Late responders constituted 9% (n=18). None of those factors (PRD sensitivity, initial risk group, immunophenotype, late response) influenced overall (OS) or disease-free survival (DFS). OS rate in older ALL patients ( 〉 30) was substantially less than in younger ones (52,7% vs 73,6%, p=0,0009). DFS was comparable - 61,2% vs 71,5%, p=0,1. 24 of 75 (32%) CR T-ALL patients underwent autologous BMT after BEAM conditioning at a median time of 6 mo from CR and proceeded to further maintenance. No relapses were registered in this group so far. Allogeneic BMT was performed only in 14 patients (Ò-ALL-7, B-ALL-7) on the protocol. Totally 47 patients (20,6%) relapsed (16 with T-lineage, 31 with B-lineage ALL). At 48 mo OS for the whole group constituted - 65,6%, DFS - 69,3%. OS and DFS differed in B-ALL patients with NK in comparison with abnormal karyotype: 80% vs 57%,(p=0,01) and 81% vs 61%, respectively (p=0,02), but not in T-ALL patients. Conclusions Our data demonstrate that the proposed treatment approach is rather effective and reproducible. OS and DFS did not depend on various common risk factors (initial risk group, WBC, LDH, immunophenotype, late response, PRD resistance). The only independent risk factor for OS was age ( 〉 30 y). In B-cell ALL abnormal karyotype became an independent adverse risk factor for OS, DFS, relapse incidence. Fig.1 Overall survival (A) according to age in the whole cohort and disease-free survival (B) in B-cell ALL according to karyotype Table 1 (A) OS in different age groups (B) DFS in B-cell ALL Figure Figure. (A) OS in different age groups Figure Figure. (B) DFS in B-cell ALL Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2014
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    In: Clinical Lymphoma Myeloma and Leukemia, Elsevier BV, Vol. 20, No. 6 ( 2020-06), p. e328-e335
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 2152-2650
    Language: English
    Publisher: Elsevier BV
    Publication Date: 2020
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2540998-0
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2193618-3
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 120, No. 21 ( 2012-11-16), p. 4431-4431
    Abstract: Abstract 4431 The European Treatment Outcome Study (EUTOS) is register based international investigation started in June 2007. [1] The aim is to study the epidemiology of CML and to gain insight into the ‘real world’ treatment of patients with CML. Population base section (EUTOS-PBS) is the prospective study directed mostly to epidemiology aims. Russian part of the EUTOS-PBS registry collect data of newly diagnosed patients lived in 7 large regions of about 10 millions of population totally. EUTOS-PBS inclusion criteria are following: newly diagnosed CML (Ph +/BCR-ABL) started form 1st October 2009, age: older than 18. Russian CML group includes additional protocol for collection data for patients with clinical symptoms of CML. These patients are included into the roster table and after laboratory confirmation are enrolled into the main phase of the study. Thus, 174 patients were included in pre-phase, 142 (82%) had the diagnosis of CML which was confirmed by cytogenetic/molecular-genetic tests (Ph +/BCR-ABL +), 32 (18%) was not confirmed as CML. Among them 87% (n = 20) - have other Ph–negative chronic myeloproliferative diseases, and also acute leukemia (n = 1), cancer (n = 1), chronic inflammatory processes (n = 1). 142 patients with CML are 73 men, 69 women have the age from 18 to 82 (Me 49) years. 136 (96%) of patients are in the chronic phase, 6 (4%) -in the phase of acceleration, nobody in a blast ñrisis. The standard frequency analysis with adjustment to the standard population of WHO was carried out to estimate distribution. The results was presented in the table 1. As shown registered morbidity in 6 regions is not varied so much: source incidence is 0,58 (0,44–0,69); standardized on WHO incidence is: 0,7 (0,57 – 0,85); per 100 thousands per year. Estimated registered morbidity of CML in Russian regions are in 1.5–2 times less, than published morbidity in western countries. The analysis of the incidence in age stratums (table 2) shows that there is no much growth of age morbidity as expected. It obviously points to low detectability of new CML incidents in senior age categories (are more senior 60 years). This fact is probably the main reason of low total registered morbidity. Tabl.1. Incidence rate of new CML cases in 6 regions of Russia Region population (mln.) N CML for 100000. in year Standard of WHO Mordovia Republic 0.87 14 0.69 0.85 Kirov region 1.46 18 0.53 0.6 Perm territory 2.77 45 0.68 0.8 Bryansk region 1.35 17 0.53 0.65 Irkutsk region 2.55 36 0.56 0.68 Zabaikal's territory 1.36 12 0.44 0.57 Total 10.13 142 0.58 0.7 Table 2.CML incidence in age groups Age groups Male Female Maleandfemale 18–29 0.65 0.57 0.61 30–39 0.86 0.39 0.62 40–49 0.50 0.57 0.54 Conclusion: The CML incidence in Russia regions is underestimated. The main reason is an insufficient CML diagnostic screening in the senior age groups of population. References. 1. http://www.eutos.org/content/registry/documents/documents/e940/infoboxContent941/CML-Registry_February09.pdf Disclosures: Vinogradova: BMS: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Chelysheva:Novartis Pharma: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bristol Myers Squibb: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; MSD: Speakers Bureau. Senderova:Novartis: Consultancy. Turkina:Novartis Pharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bristol Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2012
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    In: Leukemia Research, Elsevier BV, Vol. 104 ( 2021-05), p. 106536-
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0145-2126
    Language: English
    Publisher: Elsevier BV
    Publication Date: 2021
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2008028-1
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 5
    In: Clinical Lymphoma Myeloma and Leukemia, Elsevier BV, Vol. 23, No. 8 ( 2023-08), p. 589-598
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 2152-2650
    Language: English
    Publisher: Elsevier BV
    Publication Date: 2023
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2540998-0
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2193618-3
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 6
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 124, No. 21 ( 2014-12-06), p. 2967-2967
    Abstract: Introduction: Detection of bone marrow involvement (BM) is a factor of poor prognosis for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), since DLBCL BM is characterized by aggressive course and low response level to standard chemotherapy (CT), and 5-year overall survival (OS) rate for this group is less than 30% after ÑHOP-like CT. Intensification of therapy in this group of patients can improve the results, except patients with bone marrow involvement at diagnosis. Bone marrow involvement is a poor prognostic factor for patients treated with high-dose chemotherapy. Bone marrow involvement in DLBCL by histology is detected in 10-30% patients. The importance of B-cell clonality examination in bone marrow as prognostic and staging factor has not been described in the literature. Aim: To evaluate the significance of the immunoglobulin heavy chain gene rearrangement analysis performed by PCR for identification of the bone marrow involvement frequency and its value for staging and prognosis in patients with de novo DLBCL treated with high-dose chemotherapy (HDC). Patients and methods: We performed a pilot prospective trial, including 175 consecutive adult patients (median age 45 years, range 18–67) with newly diagnosed DLBCL who were enrolled in HDC protocol (mNHL-BFM-90 program or scheme R-EPOCH/R-HMA) since June 2007 till July 2014. Their clinical characteristics included such factors as IPI and phenotype DLBCL by immunohistochemical study. Out of the 175 patients, 85 had a GCB phenotype and 90 - non-GCB; 36 patients (20%) had low IPI risk, 40 patients (23%) had low-intermediate, 38 patients (22%) had high-intermediate, 61 patients (35%) had high risk. B-cell clonality was evaluated using PCR amplification by IGH (FR1, FR2, FR3) and IGK (Vκ-Jκ, Vκ/intron-Kde) gene rearrangements with multiplex BIOMED-2 primer sets and subsequent fragment analysis using ABI PRISM 3130 Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems).In 105 of 175 patients the study by BIOMED-2 multiplex polymerase chain reaction protocol of B-cell clonality of bone marrow was fulfilled. Statistical analysis was done using JMP ver. 10.0 (SAS, Cary, NC). Results: Histological and immunohistochemical studies validated bone marrow involvement in 19 patients (10.8%), including: concordant in - 12 patients (63%), and discordant - in 7 patients (37%). In 14 of these patients the B-cell clonality detection was performed and confirmed immunoglobulin (IG) heavy chain gene rearrangement in all cases. In 26 out of 105 patients, bone marrow involvement (24.7%) was revealed: in 14 patients bone marrow involvement was identified by histological examination and in 12 patients only by clonality of bone marrow. 12 patients with only B-cell clonality in bone marrow were classified by IPI: 4 (33%) patients had high IPI, 6 (50%) patients - high-intermediate IPI and low-intermediate IPI - 2 (17%) patients. So, in 17% patients had to change the risk group according to bone marrow involvement. Thus, 31 patients with bone marrow involvement signs were identified. Univariate analysis of the entire cohort (n = 175) revealed that both IPI and phenotype were not of prognostic significance (p 〉 0.05). In multivariate analysis, detection of B-cell clonality in bone marrow was an independent predictor of OS and relapse-free survival (RFS) (p 〈 0.005). (Fig.1-2). OS, RFS in patients with histological detection bone marrow involvement and with only B-cell clonality in the bone marrow did not differ. Conclusion:Detection of B-cell clonality in the bone marrow seems to be an independent predictor of outcome in de novo DLBCL pts, treated with high-dose chemotherapy, while IPI and phenotype DLBCL cannot be considered as risk factors for this group of pts. It seems to be reasonable to include the detection of B-cell clonality in the bone marrow in primary diagnostics of the DLBCL for staging and predicting response in HDC. Figure 1 Figure 1. Figure 2 Figure 2. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2014
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 7
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 120, No. 21 ( 2012-11-16), p. 2572-2572
    Abstract: Abstract 2572 Adult ALL regardless recent advantages in adolescents and young adults is still considered to be a therapeutical problem. So called “a pediatric-like approach” applied in adult ALL is reported to be more reasonable even in the older adults (up to 55 y). RALL has initiated a prospective multicenter trial for adult Ph-neg ALL based on: 1) evaluation of b/m blast clearance after 7 days of Prednisolone (PRD) prephase and its substitution by Dexamethasone (DEXA) if b/m blast count was 〉 25%; 2) continuous 2,5 years treatment schedule with prolonged L-asparaginase (Σ=590.000 IU); 3) evaluation of the impact of the late intensification (2 courses of HD of methotrexate and ARA-C) on MRD clearance. The study is registered on the ClinicalTrials.gov public site; NCT01193933. From Nov, 2008, till June, 2012, 24 centers enrolled 173 pts: median age 28 y (15–55), 71f/101m, 112 (64,7%) = B-lin, 54 (31,2%) = T-lin, 1 pt -undifferentiated AL (0,6%), 6 - uknown phenotype (3,5%), median LDH=848 ME (72–13061), median L=13,5 (0,6–556*109/l). Cytogenetics was evaluable in 58,3% of pts (n=101) and 46,5% of them (n=47) had normal karyotype (NK). Initial risk group was evaluated in 154 pts among whom 46 patients (29,9%) were in the standard risk (SR) group (WBC 〈 30 for B-Lin, 〈 100 for T-Lin, EGIL BII-III, T-III; LDH 〈 2N, No late CR, t(4;11)-negative), 109 (60,1%) - in the high risk (HR) group (WBC 〉 30 for B-Lin, 〉 100 for T-Lin, EGIL BI, T-I-II-IV; LDH 〉 2N, No late CR, t(4;11)-positive). 19/173 pts (11%) were not qualified. The analysis was performed in June, 2012. +8 day b/m blast count was reported in 149 pts and b/m blasts less than 25% were detected in 36,2% of pts. The portion of PRD non-responders was statistically different in SR and HR groups: 24/45 (53,3%) and 68/101 (67,3%) (p=0,01), confirming the initial risk groups identification. Induction results were obtained in 150 pts, and CR rate was identical in both risk groups (SR=86,9%; HR=84,1%) with total 12 induction deaths (8,0%) and 6 resistant leukemias (4,0%). With a median follow-up of 12 mo (1–36 mo) death in CR was reported in 9/132 (6,8%) pts. OS at 36 mo was 58,6%, DFS-68,3%. MRD analysis for clonal IgH and TCR rearrangements was carried out in 25 pts. And as in our previous studies (ASH 2006, abstr 2294) the clearance was slow with only 41,6% pts negative for MRD at day +133 (4mo) of the protocol. Two late intensification courses (day +157 = 5 mo) increased MRD negativity only up to 50%. Such slow MRD clearance did not correspond to higher relapse rate so far. Age, WBC, immunophenotype, LDH, risk group, +8 day b/m blast count, time to CR, time without treatment ( 〈 〉 8days), L-asparaginase cessation did not influence survival. OS and DFS differed in pts with NK vs all other abnormalities: 87,4% vs 57,9% (p=0,002) and 88,9% vs 66,5%, respectively (p=0,02). So, our data demonstrated that ALL-2009 protocol provided 58% 3-years overall survival and 68,3% DFS. In adult Ph-neg ALL normal karyotype predicts better survival. The MRD clearance is very slow while on this protocol. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2012
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 8
    In: Journal of Materials Chemistry C, Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC), Vol. 7, No. 23 ( 2019), p. 6889-6894
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 2050-7526 , 2050-7534
    Language: English
    Publisher: Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
    Publication Date: 2019
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2702245-6
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 9
    In: New Journal of Chemistry, Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC), Vol. 39, No. 2 ( 2015), p. 1022-1030
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1144-0546 , 1369-9261
    Language: English
    Publisher: Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
    Publication Date: 2015
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1472933-7
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 10
    In: Blood, American Society of Hematology, Vol. 116, No. 21 ( 2010-11-19), p. 4333-4333
    Abstract: Abstract 4333 Adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) differs from pediatric ALL by higher frequency of unfavorable biological features including cytogenetics (often t(9;22), rare t(12;21)), slower molecular response (MRD negativity is lower at day near +30 in adults - 47% vs 80%; Bruggemmann, Blood, 2006; Borowitz, Blood, 2010), more toxicity followed by less complience, all this translating in less efficacy. Another very important, early and simple predictor of antileukamia effect in ALL is prednisolone (PRD) sensitivity, that is to say tumor clearance within one week of prephase. It's a well documented fact in childhood ALL, but scarcely characterized in adults. 35% of adults with ALL are considered to be resistant to PRDN compaired to 10% children after evaluation of PB blast count on day +8 (Annino, Blood, 2002; Shrappe, Leukemia 2002), but few data exists about bone marrow blasts clearance. We initiated a prospective multicenter trial for Ph-negative ALL under the age of 55 based on: 1.evaluation of blast clearance in b/m after 7 days of PRD and its substitution by dexamethazone (DEXA) if blast count was 25% and more. 2. “no interruptions” protocol with 8 weeks induction and 5 consolidation phases followed by 2-years maintenance. 3. prolonged L-asparaginase application at 10.000 IU weekly in induction, once in two weeks in consolidations, twice a month in maintenance (total proposed dose 560.000 IU). The study started in April, 2009. 20 participating centers enrolled 77 patients (median age 27y (16-55), 44f, 33m, 61,5%=B-lin, 38,6%=T-lin; 41% with normal karyotype (NK)). 30,7% of patients were in the standrad risk (SR) group (WBC 〈 30 for B-Lin, 〈 100 for T-Lin, EGIL BII-III, T-III; LDH 〈 2N, No late CR, t(4;11)-), 69,3% - in the high risk (HR) group (WBC 〉 30 for B-Lin, 〉 100 for T-Lin, EGIL BI, T-I-II-IV; LDH 〉 2N, No late CR, t(4;11)+). The analysis was performed in June, 2010, and comprised 70 pts. The data on the day +8 b/m count was reported in 67 pts: 70% of them had b/m blasts 25% and more, thus were considered as non-responders to PRD (60 mg/m2) and were switched to DEXA (10 mg/m2). It's worth to note that the proportion of non-responders to PRD was almost equal in the SR and HR groups: 12 of 20 (60%) in SR and 35 of 47 (74,5%). CR rate was high in both risk groups (SR=95,5%; HR=89,4%) and immunological subsets (B=91,4%;T=91,6%). For the whole group of analysed patients (n=70) there were 5 induction deaths (7,1%) and 1 resistant leukemia (1,4%). Median of days without treatment during induction period was 8 days (0-56). Death in remission was reported in 2 of 64 CR pts (3,1%). Relapses occurred in 4/64 (4,2%). Within the short period of follow-up (14 mo) the probability of OS for 70 patients constituted 78,8%, DFS – 76,7%, continuous CR – 81,2%. The difference in DFS between PRD responders and non-responders was at borderline: 63,3% vs 93,8% (p=0,1), and statistically proved in pts with NK vs all other abnormalities: 100% vs 72% (p=0,03). Age, WBC, immunophenotype, risk group, time without treatment did not influence survival. We concluded that in adult Ph-negative ALL the proportion of non-responders to PRD is very high (70%), thus providing much poorer results than in children; sensitivity to PRD may still be used as very simple discriminative marker of unfavorable prognosis. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0006-4971 , 1528-0020
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Hematology
    Publication Date: 2010
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468538-3
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 80069-7
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...