Abstract: Background: Inotuzumab ozogamicin (INO) is a humanized, anti-CD22 antibody conjugated to calicheamicin with FDA approval for treatment of adults with relapsed or refractory (r/r) B-acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL). While it is associated with favorable complete remission rates in r/r B-ALL patients (pts), hepatotoxicity both during treatment and with subsequent hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) remains a challenge. In general, venoocclusive disease (VOD) during HCT in pediatric pts is estimated at 10-20%. Following treatment with INO, however, up to 52% of pts undergoing HCT have been reported to develop VOD, of which 18% of cases were fatal (Bhojwani et al. 2019). Here we report our institutional HCT experience in pediatric pts with r/r B-ALL who underwent HCT following INO reinduction and our strategy of using defibrotide prophylaxis to reduce the risk of VOD. Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted for pts with r/r B-ALL who underwent HCT at our institution from December 2015 to January 2021. Clinical characteristics, laboratory parameters, and radiographic evaluations were reviewed. Patients who received ≥1 course of INO during reinduction were included in the INO group. Development of VOD was defined as a clinical diagnosis of VOD post-HCT based on either the Baltimore, Seattle, or European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) diagnostic criteria.Clinical characteristics were summarized. Time to VOD, graft versus host disease (GVHD), non-relapse mortality (NRM), and relapse were estimated under the competing risk setting, in which death without the event of interest was considered to be an absorbing competing risk. Results: Fifty-seven patients with relapsed or refractory B-ALL were transplanted between December 2015 and January 2021. Seventeen (30%) received at least 1 course (3 doses) of INO as part of their pre-HCT reinduction regimen. Fifty-five of 57 pts (97%), including all pts in the INO-group received a myeloablative regimen (51 total body irradiation/cyclophosphamide-based, 4 busulfan-based). Two patients in the non-INO group received a reduced-intensity regimen. Median time from last dose of INO to HCT (Day 0) was 34 days (range 24-71 days). Median number of INO doses received was 6 (range 3-9). Four patients had been transplanted previously, 1 in the INO group and 3 in the non-INO group. Two of these patients developed VOD during their current HCT, both from the non-INO group. Pts receiving INO were more likely to be transplanted in CR3 or higher, and to have required 3 regimens in reinduction to achieve that CR. Median follow-up was 20 months. Rates of VOD were similar between the INO (3 of 17, 18%) and non-INO (4 of 40, 10%) groups (p=0.4, Figure 1). All cases were severe or very severe by EBMT criteria. There was no VOD-related mortality in either group. Defibrotide prophylaxis was used in 82% (14 of 17) of pts in the INO group. Of the 3 patients in the INO group who developed VOD, 2 received defibrotide prophylaxis and 1 did not. Reasons to defer defibrotide prophylaxis included increased risk of CNS bleeding and provider preference. Defibrotide prophylaxis was used in 15% of pts in the non-INO group (6 of 40). In the non-INO group, 1 of 4 patients who developed VOD had received defibrotide prophylaxis. All pts received vitamin E and ursodiol per institutional practice. There were no treatment-related deaths in the INO group and no statistically significant differences were detected in (NRM) (0% vs 10%, p=0.25), median time to engraftment (24 vs 26.5 days, p=0.1), or GVHD (24% vs 55%, p=0.1) in the INO vs non-INO groups. Conclusions: HCT was well tolerated with low rates of VOD and NRM in pediatric pts following reinduction with INO. The results of ongoing prospective studies will provide further insight into the role of INO for reinduction of r/r B-ALL. In our cohort, rates of VOD were similar between pts who had and had not previously received INO, with the majority of pts in the INO group receiving defibrotide prophylaxis during HCT, suggesting that inotuzumab ozogamicin reinduction may safely be used with this approach. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Margossian: Cue Biopharma: Current Employment. Silverman: Takeda, Servier, Syndax, Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Neuberg: Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Madrigal Pharmaceuticals: Other: Stock ownership. OffLabel Disclosure: This study evaluates the safety of transplant following inotuzumab ozogamicin re-induction for children with B lymphoblastic leukemia.

Abstract: The majority of patients with chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) are steroid refractory (SR), creating a need for safe and effective therapies. Subcutaneous low-dose interleukin-2 (LD IL-2), which preferentially expands CD4+ regulatory T cells (Tregs), has been evaluated in 5 clinical trials at our center with partial responses (PR) in ∼50% of adults and 82% of children by week 8. We now report additional real-world experience with LD IL-2 in 15 children and young adults. We conducted a retrospective chart review of patients with SR-cGVHD at our center who received LD IL-2 from August 2016 to July 2022 not on a research trial. The median age at start of LD IL-2 was 10.4 years (range, 1.2-23.2 years) at a median of 234 days from cGVHD diagnosis (range, 11-542 days). Patients had a median of 2.5 (range, 1-3) active organs at LD IL-2 start and received a median of 3 (range, 1-5) prior therapies. The median duration of LD IL-2 therapy was 462 days (range, 8-1489 days). Most patients received 1 × 106 IU/m2 per day. There were no serious adverse effects. The overall response rate in 13 patients who received & gt;4 weeks of therapy was 85% (complete response, n = 5; PR, n = 6) with responses in diverse organs. Most patients significantly weaned corticosteroids. Tregs preferentially expanded with a median peak fold increase of 2.8 in the ratio of Tregs to CD4+ conventional T cells (range, 2.0-19.8) by 8 weeks on therapy. LD IL-2 is a well-tolerated, steroid-sparing agent with a high response rate in children and young adults with SR-cGVHD.

Abstract: Transplant-associated thrombotic microangiopathy (TA-TMA) is a well-recognized complication of hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). Diagnosis is challenging and in the absence of a tissue biopsy, TA-TMA is provisionally diagnosed by meeting clinical criteria. In this study, we describe the prevalence, outcomes, and risk factors for meeting 2 different diagnostic criteria for TA-TMA and for increased transplant-related mortality (TRM). In this retrospective study of 307 pediatric HCT patients, records were reviewed for the first 100 days after HCT. Patients who were diagnosed with TA-TMA by a provider during this time were included. In addition, the Cho et al criteria (2010) and Jodele et al (2014) TA-TMA criteria were applied retrospectively. Eight patients (2.6%) were diagnosed with TA-TMA by their provider. However, on retrospective review, 20% and 36% met the Cho and Jodele criteria for TA-TMA, respectively. Overall survival was significantly worse (P  & lt; .0001) and TRM was significantly higher in patients who met criteria for TA-TMA (MC-TA-TMA) (P  & lt; .0001). After controlling for comorbid conditions, MC-TA-TMA (hazard ratio [HR], 10.9; P = .0001) and grade 3/4 acute graft-versus-host-disease (aGVHD) (HR 3.5; P = .01) remained independently associated with increased TRM. Among allogeneic HCT recipients, features associated with an increased risk for MC-TA-TMA included ≥2 HCT, concurrent grade 3/4 aGVHD and concurrent infections. Among patients who MC-TA-TMA, LDH ≥2 times the upper limit of normal (P = .001), the need for ≥2 antihypertensive medications (P  & lt; .0001), and acute kidney injury (P = .003) were associated with significantly increased TRM.

Abstract: Introduction: The gut microbiome is a potentially modifiable factor in treatment related outcomes in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT). Prior studies have linked pre- or mid-treatment gut microbiome diversity with risk for treatment related morbidity and mortality. However, these studies have been limited by the inclusion of one or only a few institutions and the lack of longitudinal sampling with high quality metadata. These limitations complicate the interpretation of microbiome alterations over the course of HCT. Methods: To overcome these, we devised and implemented a large-scale biospecimen collection protocol in conjunction with BMT CTN 1703, a randomized, multicenter, Phase III trial of tacrolimus/methotrexate vs. post-transplant cyclophosphamide/tacrolimus/mycophenolate mofetil in reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) allogeneic HCT (NCT03959241). Patients enrolled on 1703 were optionally co-enrolled in the companion immune and microbiome profiling study, 1801 (MI-IMMUNE). This involved blood, urine and stool sampling before conditioning (PCON), then weekly starting on day 0 through day 77 (through day 84 for blood), and on days 98, 180, 270, 365 and 730. For all enrolled participants where the donor consented, residual donor cells were saved from the empty hematopoietic stem cell product bag for later analysis. Additionally, the protocol included one-time blood, urine and stool sample collection from consented matched related donors (MRDs) prior to stem cell collection. Starting with protocol version 4.0 on February 1, 2021, participation in 1801 stool collection was required for the first six out of eighteen sample collection timepoints. Participation in later stool and urine timepoint collections remained optional. Here we review the feasibility of creating a multi-institutional biobank. Additionally, we assess the success of our strategies by calculating sample collection compliance and standard deviation in compliance across centers for each timepoint. Results: On June 18, 2021, BMT CTN 1703/1801 closed to accrual with 431 patients enrolled on 1703; 323 patients from 36 centers were co-enrolled on 1801. 304 (94%) provided study samples, making this the largest prospective microbiome and immune profiling study in HCT patients to date. As of July 6, 2021, 3,683 blood, 2,668 urine, and 2,098 stool samples had been collected. Across the first 6 timepoints for all participating centers, blood, urine and stool sample collection averaged 93%, 82%, and 74% compliance, respectively. Of the 99 (30%) patients enrolled on 1801 with a MRD, 34 (34%) donors consented to sample collection. Sample collection compliance was lower for MRDs than for patients on the study with 76%, 74%, and 62% of expected blood, urine and stool samples collected, respectively, from this group. For stool collection exclusively, a median of 5 samples were collected per patient across the first 6 timepoints (median of 6 across all timepoints) with 93 (31%) of patients completing a full sample set through Day 28. 139 (46%) patients provided at least one sample after day 28; these represented 37% of the total samples collected to date. The PCON sample, which provides an important measure of pre-treatment gut microbiome diversity, had the third highest compliance with 74% of patients providing a sample. Surprisingly, Day 28 had the lowest compliance (66%) and highest standard deviation (37%) possibly because this timepoint often falls around the time of hospital discharge. Between PCON and day 28, the standard deviation between sites in the average collection compliance (24%) and number of samples collected per patient (1.1) was small indicating the successful adoption of stool collection across institutions. Table 1 summarizes sample collection statistics. Conclusion: Overall this study has resulted in a large, novel biobank of blood, urine and stool samples from patients undergoing RIC allogeneic HCT at 36 centers across the US. This will serve as a valuable resource for investigating the role of the gut microbiome in long term health outcomes following HCT. Although the results of 1801 are forthcoming given ongoing sample collection, the size and composition of the biobank to date clearly demonstrate the feasibility of implementing multi-institutional stool collection. This study represents a critical step towards the large-scale adoption of microbiome sampling as a diagnostic tool. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Chhabra: GSK: Honoraria. Clark: Kadmon: Consultancy. Horowitz: Mesoblast: Research Funding; Shire: Research Funding; Vertex: Research Funding; Stemcyte: Research Funding; Vor Biopharma: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Miltenyi Biotech: Research Funding; Kiadis: Research Funding; Sobi: Research Funding; Kite/Gilead: Research Funding; Pfizer, Inc: Research Funding; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Magenta: Consultancy, Research Funding; Medac: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; GlaxoSmithKline: Research Funding; Daiicho Sankyo: Research Funding; Xenikos: Research Funding; Omeros: Research Funding; Orca Biosystems: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Regeneron: Research Funding; Tscan: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; CSL Behring: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Gamida Cell: Research Funding; Chimerix: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; bluebird bio: Research Funding; Astellas: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; Allovir: Consultancy; Actinium: Research Funding; Sanofi: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding. Jenq: Microbiome DX: Consultancy; Merck: Consultancy; Prolacta: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Kaleido: Consultancy, Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Seres: Consultancy, Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; LisCure: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; MaaT Pharma: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Karius: Consultancy. Levine: Equillium Bio: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte: Consultancy, Research Funding; Kamada: Research Funding; Biogen: Research Funding; Omeros: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Symbio: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Talaris Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Viracor: Patents & Royalties: GVHD biomarker patent with royalties from Viracor; Mesoblast: Consultancy, Research Funding; X4 Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Murthy: CRISPR Therapeutics: Research Funding. Riches: ATARA Biotherapeutics: Other: Payment; BioIntelect: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Other: Payment. Sung: Merck: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Enterome: Research Funding; Seres: Research Funding; AVROBIO: Consultancy; Abbott Nutrition: Honoraria; Clasado: Other: Research Product; DSM: Other: Research Product. Al Malki: Neximmune: Consultancy; Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Consultancy; Rigel Pharma: Consultancy; Hansa Biopharma: Consultancy; CareDx: Consultancy. Rezvani: Kaleido: Other: One-time scientific advisory board; Nohla Therapeutics: Other: One-time scientific advisory board; Pharmacyclics-Abbvie: Research Funding; US Department of Justice: Consultancy. Bolaños-Meade: Incyte Corp: Consultancy. Holtan: Incyte: Consultancy, Research Funding; Generon: Consultancy. Saber: Govt. COI: Other. Hamadani: Sanofi, Genzyme, AstraZeneca, BeiGene: Speakers Bureau; Janssen, Incyte, ADC Therapeutics, Omeros, Morphosys, Kite: Consultancy; Takeda, Spectrum Pharmaceuticals and Astellas Pharma: Research Funding. Kean: Bluebird Bio: Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Patents & Royalties: From clinical trial data, Research Funding; Vertex: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Gilead: Research Funding; Regeneron: Research Funding; EMD Serono: Consultancy. Perales: Cidara: Honoraria; Servier: Honoraria; Incyte: Honoraria, Other; Equilium: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria, Other; Nektar Therapeutics: Honoraria, Other; NexImmune: Honoraria; MorphoSys: Honoraria; Omeros: Honoraria; Karyopharm: Honoraria; Sellas Life Sciences: Honoraria; Merck: Honoraria; Miltenyi Biotec: Honoraria, Other; Medigene: Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria; Kite/Gilead: Honoraria, Other; Celgene: Honoraria.

Abstract: The nuclear receptor (NR) subclass, retinoid X receptors (RXRs), exert immunomodulatory functions that control inflammation and metabolism via homodimers and heterodimers, with several other NRs, including retinoic acid receptors. IRX4204 is a novel, highly specific RXR agonist in clinical trials that potently and selectively activates RXR homodimers, but not heterodimers. In this study, in vivo IRX4204 compared favorably with FK506 in abrogating acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), which was associated with inhibiting allogeneic donor T-cell proliferation, reducing T-helper 1 differentiation, and promoting regulatory T-cell (Treg) generation. Recipient IRX4204 treatment reduced intestinal injury and decreased IFN-γ and TNF-α serum levels. Transcriptional analysis of donor T cells isolated from intestines of GVHD mice treated with IRX4204 revealed significant decreases in transcripts regulating proinflammatory pathways. In vitro, inducible Treg differentiation from naive CD4+ T cells was enhanced by IRX4204. In vivo, IRX4204 increased the conversion of donor Foxp3− T cells into peripheral Foxp3+ Tregs in GVHD mice. Using Foxp3 lineage-tracer mice in which both the origin and current FoxP3 expression of Tregs can be tracked, we demonstrated that IRX4204 supports Treg stability. Despite favoring Tregs and reducing Th1 differentiation, IRX4204-treated recipients maintained graft-versus-leukemia responses against both leukemia and lymphoma cells. Notably, IRX4204 reduced in vitro human T-cell proliferation and enhanced Treg generation in mixed lymphocyte reaction cultures. Collectively, these beneficial effects indicate that targeting RXRs with IRX4204 could be a novel approach to preventing acute GVHD in the clinic.

Abstract: Despite advances in the field, chronic graft-versus-host-disease (cGVHD) remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality following allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplant. Because treatment options remain limited, we tested efficacy of anticancer, chromatin-modifying enzyme inhibitors in a clinically relevant murine model of cGVHD with bronchiolitis obliterans (BO). We observed that the novel enhancer of zeste homolog 2 (EZH2) inhibitor JQ5 and the BET-bromodomain inhibitor JQ1 each improved pulmonary function; impaired the germinal center (GC) reaction, a prerequisite in cGVHD/BO pathogenesis; and JQ5 reduced EZH2-mediated H3K27me3 in donor T cells. Using conditional EZH2 knockout donor cells, we demonstrated that EZH2 is obligatory for the initiation of cGVHD/BO. In a sclerodermatous cGVHD model, JQ5 reduced the severity of cutaneous lesions. To determine how the 2 drugs could lead to the same physiological improvements while targeting unique epigenetic processes, we analyzed the transcriptomes of splenic GCB cells (GCBs) from transplanted mice treated with either drug. Multiple inflammatory and signaling pathways enriched in cGVHD/BO GCBs were reduced by each drug. GCBs from JQ5- but not JQ1-treated mice were enriched for proproliferative pathways also seen in GCBs from bone marrow-only transplanted mice, likely reflecting their underlying biology in the unperturbed state. In conjunction with in vivo data, these insights led us to conclude that epigenetic targeting of the GC is a viable clinical approach for the treatment of cGVHD, and that the EZH2 inhibitor JQ5 and the BET-bromodomain inhibitor JQ1 demonstrated clinical potential for EZH2i and BETi in patients with cGVHD/BO.