GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 33, No. 3_suppl ( 2015-01-20), p. TPS790-TPS790
    Abstract: TPS790 Background: BRAF V600 mutations are associated with inferior survival and objective responses to the mutated BRAF inhibitor vemurafenib in patients with mCRC. Blockade of BRAF V600 by vemurafenib causes feedback upregulation of EGFR, whose signaling activities can be impeded by cetuximab. In murine models of BRAF V600 mCRC, the addition of irinotecan to vemurafenib and cetuximab leads to greater anti-tumor activity. Recent phase I studies with the combination of BRAF and EGFR inhibition resulted in response rates substantially higher than either agent alone, with objective responses in 4 of 8 BRAF V600 mCRC patients treated with vemurafenib, cetuximab, and irinotecan. Methods: The SWOG 1406 trial (NCT 02164916) is a randomized phase II study of irinotecan (180 mg/m 2 IV every 14 days) and cetuximab (500 mg/m 2 IV every 14 days) with or without vemurafenib (960 mg PO twice daily). Eligible adult patients have histologically confirmed colorectal adenocarcinoma with metastatic disease. Tumors must have a BRAF V600 mutation and be wild-type for KRAS and NRAS. BRAF testing may be conducted using any CLIA-compliant lab. Alternatively, screening can be provided through a central lab. Patients must have received one or two prior systemic regimens for unresectable locally advanced or metastatic disease and must not have received anti-EGFR agents. Prior treatment with irinotecan is allowed. Patients randomized to the control arm may crossover to the experimental arm at progression. Target enrollment is 78 patients. The primary endpoint is PFS. Optional participation in a co-clinical trial will be offered in selected sites whereby patients’ biopsies will be used to establish patient-derived xenografts to study correlations between patient and PDX with respect to treatment responses and mechanisms of treatment resistance. This trial has support from all adult cooperative groups and utilizes the Central IRB to facilitate study initiation. Conclusions: mCRC patients harboring BRAF V600E mutations may benefit from EGFR and BRAF blockade. We encourage screening for the BRAF mutation early in the course of metastatic disease therapy and for second line therapy on this trial. Clinical trial information: NCT 02164916.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2015
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 35, No. 4_suppl ( 2017-02-01), p. 520-520
    Abstract: 520 Background: BRAF V600 mutations are associated with rare objective responses to the mutated BRAF inhibitor vemurafenib in patients with mCRC. Blockade of BRAF V600 by vemurafenib causes feedback upregulation of EGFR, whose signaling activities can be impeded by cetuximab. In murine models of BRAF V600 mCRC, the combination of irinotecan, cetuximab, and vemurafenib leads to greater anti-tumor activity, as suggested by a prior Phase 1B study. Methods: Patients (pts) with BRAF V600 mutated and extended RAS wild-type mCRC were randomized to irinotecan (180 mg/m 2 IV every 14 days) and cetuximab (500 mg/m 2 IV every 14 days) with or without vemurafenib (960 mg PO twice daily). Patients had received 1 or 2 prior regimens, with no prior anti-EGFR agents, although prior irinotecan was allowed. Crossover from the control arm to the experimental arm was allowed after documented progression. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS, investigator assessed), with 90% power to detect a HR of 0.5, with two-sided type 1 error of 5%. Results: 106 patients were enrolled (54 in the experimental arm) from 12/2014 to 4/2016, with ECOG PS ≤ 1. Median age of 62 years, 59% female, and prior irinotecan therapy in 39%. PFS was improved with the addition of vemurafenib (HR = 0.42, 95% confidence interval [CI] of 0.26 to 0.66, P 〈 0.001) with median PFS of 4.4 (95% CI: 3.6 – 5.7) months vs 2.0 (95% CI: 1.8 – 2.1). Response rate was 16% vs 4% (P = 0.09), with disease control rate of 67% vs 22% (P 〈 0.001). Grade 3/4 adverse events higher in the experimental arm included neutropenia (28% vs 7%), anemia (13% vs 0%), and nausea (15% vs 0%). There was no increase in skin toxicity or fatigue. No new safety signal was observed. Approximately 50% of patients in the control aim crossed over at the time of progression. Overall survival and efficacy at cross-over data remain immature. Conclusions: The addition of vemurafenib to the combination of cetuximab and irinotecan resulted in a prolongation of progression-free survival and a higher disease control rate, indicating that simultaneous EGFR and BRAF inhibition is effective in BRAF V600 mutated CRC. Clinical trial information: NCT02164916.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2017
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...