GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
Material
Language
  • 1
    In: JAMA Neurology, American Medical Association (AMA), Vol. 80, No. 9 ( 2023-09-01), p. 929-
    Abstract: Sex differences are established in associations between apolipoprotein E ( APOE ) ε4 and cognitive impairment in Alzheimer disease (AD). However, it is unclear whether sex-specific cognitive consequences of APOE are consistent across races and extend to the APOE ε2 allele. Objective To investigate whether sex and race modify APOE ε4 and ε2 associations with cognition. Design, Setting, and Participants This genetic association study included longitudinal cognitive data from 4 AD and cognitive aging cohorts. Participants were older than 60 years and self-identified as non-Hispanic White or non-Hispanic Black (hereafter, White and Black). Data were previously collected across multiple US locations from 1994 to 2018. Secondary analyses began December 2021 and ended September 2022. Main Outcomes and Measures Harmonized composite scores for memory, executive function, and language were generated using psychometric approaches. Linear regression assessed interactions between APOE ε4 or APOE ε2 and sex on baseline cognitive scores, while linear mixed-effect models assessed interactions on cognitive trajectories. The intersectional effect of race was modeled using an APOE  × sex × race interaction term, assessing whether APOE  × sex interactions differed by race. Models were adjusted for age at baseline and corrected for multiple comparisons. Results Of 32 427 participants who met inclusion criteria, there were 19 007 females (59%), 4453 Black individuals (14%), and 27 974 White individuals (86%); the mean (SD) age at baseline was 74 years (7.9). At baseline, 6048 individuals (19%) had AD, 4398 (14%) were APOE ε2 carriers, and 12 538 (38%) were APOE ε4 carriers. Participants missing APOE status were excluded (n = 9266). For APOE ε4, a robust sex interaction was observed on baseline memory (β = −0.071, SE = 0.014; P  = 9.6 × 10 −7 ), whereby the APOE ε4 negative effect was stronger in females compared with males and did not significantly differ among races. Contrastingly, despite the large sample size, no APOE ε2 × sex interactions on cognition were observed among all participants. When testing for intersectional effects of sex, APOE ε2, and race, an interaction was revealed on baseline executive function among individuals who were cognitively unimpaired (β = −0.165, SE = 0.066; P  = .01), whereby the APOE ε2 protective effect was female-specific among White individuals but male-specific among Black individuals. Conclusions and Relevance In this study, while race did not modify sex differences in APOE ε4, the APOE ε2 protective effect could vary by race and sex. Although female sex enhanced ε4-associated risk, there was no comparable sex difference in ε2, suggesting biological pathways underlying ε4-associated risk are distinct from ε2 and likely intersect with age-related changes in sex biology.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 2168-6149
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Medical Association (AMA)
    Publication Date: 2023
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2702023-X
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    In: Acta Neuropathologica, Springer Science and Business Media LLC, Vol. 136, No. 6 ( 2018-12), p. 857-872
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0001-6322 , 1432-0533
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
    Publication Date: 2018
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1458410-4
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1079-0
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    In: Alzheimer's & Dementia, Wiley, Vol. 18, No. S3 ( 2022-12)
    Abstract: Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is more prevalent in women than men, and robust evidence shows sex differences in the biological response to the AD neuropathological cascade. However, there is a lack of large‐scale genetic studies on sex‐specific genetic predictors of AD‐related cognitive outcomes. Thus, we sought to elucidate the sex‐specific genetic etiology of memory, executive function, and language performance. Method This study included six cohorts of cognitive aging (N males =7,267, N females =9,518). We applied psychometric approaches to build harmonized memory, executive function, and language composite scores. Next, for all domains, we calculated slopes from the cognitive scores (two or more timepoints) with linear mixed effects models. Then we performed sex‐stratified and sex‐interaction GWAS on these phenotypes, covarying for baseline age and the first three genetic principal components. We meta‐analyzed across cohorts with a fixed‐effects model. Sensitivity analyses for all models restricted the sample to cognitively unimpaired individuals. Result In addition to well‐established associations with cognition at the APOE locus, we identified three genetic loci that showed sex‐specific effects with cognition. A chromosome 16 locus (rs114106271), a splicing‐quantitative trait locus for RP11‐152O14.4 and LINC02180 in the testis (GTEx), associated with baseline memory performance in men (β=0.13, P=2.40×10‐8; P Interaction =8.96×10‐6; Figures 1‐2) but not in women (β=‐0.01, P=0.76). A chromosome 14 locus (rs34074573), an expression‐quantitative trait locus (GTEx) for HOMEZ (a homeobox gene), and for BCL2L2 (a previously reported AD risk gene), associated with longitudinal memory performance in men (β=‐0.01, P=4.15×10‐8; P Interaction =5.83×10‐7; Figures 3‐4) but not in women (β=0.001, P=0.09). Finally, a chromosome 6 locus (rs9382966) associated with longitudinal language performance in men with near genome‐wide significance (β=‐0.004, P=6.29×10‐8; P Interaction =2.01×10‐4) but not in women (β=‐0.0003, P=0.61). Conclusion Our results highlight some key sex differences in the genetic architecture of cognitive outcomes. Findings further suggest that some sex‐specific genetic predictors have domain‐specific associations, providing an exciting opportunity to better understand the molecular basis of memory, executive function, and language through genomic analysis. Although our findings need to be replicated, our GWAS analyses highlight the contribution of sex‐specific genetic predictors beyond the APOE locus in conferring risk for late‐life cognitive decline.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1552-5260 , 1552-5279
    URL: Issue
    Language: English
    Publisher: Wiley
    Publication Date: 2022
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2211627-8
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2201940-6
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    In: Alzheimer's & Dementia, Wiley, Vol. 19, No. S12 ( 2023-12)
    Abstract: Memory performance can serve as a strong endophenotype for Alzheimer’s disease (AD) that changes early and continues to decline with disease progression. Yet, the genetic architecture of memory is not well characterized in older adults. Here, we build on existing memory GWAS studies by performing predicted gene expression analysis (PrediXcan) among older (60+) individuals from four cohorts of aging and investigate specific gene‐tissue drivers of genetically regulated gene expression associated with memory performance. Method Tissue‐specific (49 tissues, 5455 genes) PrediXcan models were built following the method described in Gamazon et al. (Nature Genetics 2015) leveraging model weights derived in GTEx (v8 release, build 38). Baseline and longitudinal memory scores were harmonized leveraging cognitive item‐level data on 19,707 non‐Hispanic White participants from four cohort studies of aging and AD (mean age 75.6±7.7, 55% female) using confirmatory factor analyses models. PrediXcan analyses were run adjusting for age at baseline, sex, and 5 population PCs and then meta‐analyzed using a fixed effects model. Correction for multiple comparisons accounting for all gene‐tissue combinations (267,267) was completed with the false discovery rate procedure (fdr‐p 〈 0.05). Sensitivity analyses excluded all non‐AD dementia and other comorbid conditions (N = 16,373; 57% females). Result As expected, several signals emerged from chromosome 19, including 48 gene‐tissue combinations near the APOE locus. Outside of APOE, we identified 20 gene‐tissue combinations from 17 known AD loci and three novel loci: higher predicted PUS7 expression in the caudate (β = ‐0.018, p = 0.034) and higher RP11‐18C3.1 expression in colon (β = ‐0.0165, fdr‐p = 0.034) related to faster cognitive decline, while higher predicted LRRC25 in the nucleus accumbens related to slower cognitive decline (β = 0.009, fdr‐p = 0.015). These signals remain comparable in sensitivity analysis. Conclusion We identified multiple candidates for future mechanistic analysis. LRRC25 is a particularly interesting candidate that is differentially expressed in the AD brain, regulates autophagy in myeloid cells, and is in a co‐expression network with other known AD genes in the immune pathway like MS4A4A ( https://agora.adknowledgeportal.org/ ). Future work will test for replication of these effects and deconvolve genetically‐regulated versus measured gene expression effects in the AD brain.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1552-5260 , 1552-5279
    URL: Issue
    Language: English
    Publisher: Wiley
    Publication Date: 2023
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2211627-8
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2201940-6
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 5
    In: Alzheimer's & Dementia, Wiley, Vol. 19, No. S12 ( 2023-12)
    Abstract: Apolipoprotein E4 (APOE4) is common in the population yet is the strongest genetic risk factor for late‐onset Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Here, we sought to identify genetic effects that differ by APOE4 genotype leveraging stratified and APOE interaction analyses. We hypothesized that we could identify novel genetic associations with longitudinal cognitive decline across three neuropsychological domains (memory, executive function, and language) that differ by APOE4 status. We leveraged a large, multi‐ancestry harmonized cognitive dataset (Nparticipants ∼ 23,000) from the AD Sequencing Project Phenotype Harmonization Consortium including more than 50,000 total longitudinal measures of cognition. Method This study included data from four cohort studies of aging and AD (NNHW = 20,117, NNHB = 2,631, Nobs = 22,748, 39% APOE4 carriers, 16% AD cases). Memory, executive function, and language composite scores were harmonized leveraging latent variable modeling. APOE4‐ stratified GWAS were performed on these phenotypes, controlled for age at baseline, sex, and genetic ancestry. APOE4 interaction models were leveraged to test for statistical differences based on markers identified in stratified discovery analyses. Post‐GWAS included gene tests with MAGMA and genetic correlation analyses with GNOVA. Result Among NHW, we identified an APOE4pos‐specific locus on chromosome 1 (rs7537669, βE4pos = ‐0.12, pE4pos = 2.2E‐08, βE4neg = ‐0.01, pE4neg = 0.17). This variant is with a strong eQTL for CD46, a regulatory element of the complement system. Among APOEneg NHW, we found TXNRD3 was associated with memory and a negative genetic correlation between amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and memory performance that was not observed in APOE4pos individuals. Finally, we observed an APOE4neg association between CRELD and executive function among NHB individuals. Conclusion In the largest APOE4‐stratified GWAS of multi‐domain cognitive performance, we identified a number of novel genetic loci and genetic correlations that appear to act in an APOE4‐stratified manner. Given the known heterogeneity in clinical progression, age‐related risk, and response to therapeutics that has been reported, it will be important to disentangle molecular pathways that differ by APOE genotype to move towards precision interventions.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1552-5260 , 1552-5279
    URL: Issue
    Language: English
    Publisher: Wiley
    Publication Date: 2023
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2211627-8
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2201940-6
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 6
    In: Alzheimer's & Dementia, Wiley, Vol. 14, No. 7S_Part_6 ( 2018-07)
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1552-5260 , 1552-5279
    Language: English
    Publisher: Wiley
    Publication Date: 2018
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2211627-8
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2201940-6
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 7
    In: Alzheimer's & Dementia, Wiley, Vol. 20, No. 2 ( 2024-02), p. 1250-1267
    Abstract: Women demonstrate a memory advantage when cognitively healthy yet lose this advantage to men in Alzheimer's disease. However, the genetic underpinnings of this sex difference in memory performance remain unclear. METHODS We conducted the largest sex‐aware genetic study on late‐life memory to date ( N males  = 11,942; N females  = 15,641). Leveraging harmonized memory composite scores from four cohorts of cognitive aging and AD, we performed sex‐stratified and sex‐interaction genome‐wide association studies in 24,216 non‐Hispanic White and 3367 non‐Hispanic Black participants. RESULTS We identified three sex‐specific loci (rs67099044— CBLN2 , rs719070— SCHIP1/IQCJ‐SCHIP) , including an X‐chromosome locus (rs5935633— EGL6/TCEANC/OFD1 ), that associated with memory. Additionally, we identified heparan sulfate signaling as a sex‐specific pathway and found sex‐specific genetic correlations between memory and cardiovascular, immune, and education traits. DISCUSSION This study showed memory is highly and comparably heritable across sexes, as well as highlighted novel sex‐specific genes, pathways, and genetic correlations that related to late‐life memory. Highlights Demonstrated the heritable component of late‐life memory is similar across sexes. Identified two genetic loci with a sex‐interaction with baseline memory. Identified an X‐chromosome locus associated with memory decline in females. Highlighted sex‐specific candidate genes and pathways associated with memory. Revealed sex‐specific shared genetic architecture between memory and complex traits.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1552-5260 , 1552-5279
    URL: Issue
    Language: English
    Publisher: Wiley
    Publication Date: 2024
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2211627-8
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2201940-6
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 8
    In: Alzheimer's & Dementia, Wiley, Vol. 20, No. 2 ( 2024-02), p. 1268-1283
    Abstract: Although large‐scale genome‐wide association studies (GWAS) have been conducted on AD, few have been conducted on continuous measures of memory performance and memory decline. METHODS We conducted a cross‐ancestry GWAS on memory performance (in 27,633 participants) and memory decline (in 22,365 participants; 129,201 observations) by leveraging harmonized cognitive data from four aging cohorts. RESULTS We found high heritability for two ancestry backgrounds. Further, we found a novel ancestry locus for memory decline on chromosome 4 (rs6848524) and three loci in the non‐Hispanic Black ancestry group for memory performance on chromosomes 2 (rs111471504), 7 (rs4142249), and 15 (rs74381744). In our gene‐level analysis, we found novel genes for memory decline on chromosomes 1 ( SLC25A44 ), 11 ( BSX ), and 15 ( DPP8 ). Memory performance and memory decline shared genetic architecture with AD‐related traits, neuropsychiatric traits, and autoimmune traits. DISCUSSION We discovered several novel loci, genes, and genetic correlations associated with late‐life memory performance and decline. Highlights Late‐life memory has high heritability that is similar across ancestries. We discovered four novel variants associated with late‐life memory. We identified four novel genes associated with late‐life memory. Late‐life memory shares genetic architecture with psychiatric/autoimmune traits.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1552-5260 , 1552-5279
    URL: Issue
    Language: English
    Publisher: Wiley
    Publication Date: 2024
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2211627-8
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2201940-6
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 9
    In: Alzheimer's & Dementia, Wiley, Vol. 19, No. S12 ( 2023-12)
    Abstract: Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is clinically characterized by disabling cognitive impairment, though substantial variability in cognitive symptoms and trajectories is observed in AD individuals. However, genetic predictors of domain‐specific cognitive performance remain undiscovered. We investigated cross‐sectional and longitudinal genetic architecture of harmonized memory, executive function, and language scores within and across ancestry groups. Method Using data from 7 cohorts of cognitive aging and AD, individuals 〉 60 years at baseline were included (mean age at baseline = 71.2). Cognitive scores for memory, executive function, and language were harmonized using latent variable models. Slopes for cognitive scores were calculated for each domain with linear mixed‐effects models. GWAS was performed on each cognitive domain for individual cohorts, both at baseline and longitudinally. Models covaried for baseline age, sex, and the first three genetic principal components. Individual models were assessed among non‐Hispanic Whites (NHW) (N = 26,455), non‐Hispanic Blacks (NHB) (N = 3,410), and cross‐ancestry (NHW + NHB) (N = 29,865). Results were meta‐analyzed across cohorts. Result We identified six genetic loci showing a genome‐wide significant effect on cognition, in addition to well‐established associations between cognition and APOE: three loci in NHW, one locus in NHB, and two loci in cross‐ancestry results. In NHW, a chromosome 2 locus (rs6733839) near BIN1, a previously reported AD risk gene, was associated with longitudinal memory performance (MAF = 0.40, p = 3.36E‐08). Additionally, in NHW, two chromosome 2 loci (rs2940785 and rs2972059) were associated with memory decline (MAF = 0.05, = 3.92E‐09; MAF = 0.05, p = 5.06E‐09, respectively). Despite the small sample size, a chromosome 10 locus (rs77595416) was associated with longitudinal executive function in NHB (MAF = 0.01, p = 7.68E‐09). When analyzing cross‐ancestry results, two chromosome 2 loci near BIN1 (rs4663105 and rs6733839) were associated with memory decline (MAF = 0.44, p = 2.65E‐08; MAF = 0.40, p = 9.48E‐10, respectively). Conclusion We elucidate novel and replicate known genetic predictors of domain‐specific cognition in older adults. Furthermore, we show that genetic architecture of multiple cognitive domains in older adults differs by ancestry, highlighting SNPs observed in longitudinal memory (NHW and cross‐ancestry) and executive function (NHB). While replication is warranted, our results underscore the contribution of genetic predictors beyond APOE to cognitive decline and suggest the importance of ancestry‐specific analyses of cognition.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1552-5260 , 1552-5279
    URL: Issue
    Language: English
    Publisher: Wiley
    Publication Date: 2023
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2211627-8
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2201940-6
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 10
    In: Alzheimer's & Dementia, Wiley, Vol. 18, No. S3 ( 2022-12)
    Abstract: Two‐thirds of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) patients are women and there are well‐established sex differences in the association between APOE and cognitive impairment in AD. However, it is not clear whether sex‐specific cognitive consequences of APOE emerge across all cognitive domains or in a domain‐specific manner. Method Data were obtained from 38,386 participants in four longitudinal studies of aging and AD. The average age of participants at baseline was 75±8 years (10% AD, 42% male, 12% African American [AA], 12% APOE ‐ε2 carriers, and 36% APOE ‐ε4 carriers). Based on detailed neuropsychological exams, harmonized composite scores for memory, executive function, and language were generated using latent variable modeling. Linear regression assessed APOE *sex interactions on each baseline cognitive domain score. Mixed‐effects regression models assessed sex interactions with APOE on cognitive trajectories, including fixed and random effects for both the intercept and the slope (years from baseline). All models adjusted for age at baseline, sex, and race/ethnicity. Exploratory analyses of the potential effect of race/ethnicity were also performed using an APOE *sex*race interaction term in the model. Result As expected, APOE ‐ε4 was associated with worse cognitive performance, and APOE ‐ε2 was associated with better performance in all domains, both at baseline and longitudinally (p 〈 0.001). At baseline, we observed a significant sex* APOE ‐ε4 interaction on memory (β=‐0.06, p 〈 0.001) and significant sex* APOE ‐ε2 interaction on memory (β=0.05, p=0.03). In both cases, the association between APOE and memory was significantly stronger in females compared to males. Notably, despite the large sample size, no interactions were observed in the two other cognitive domains or in the longitudinal analysis. Additionally, we observed a significant interaction between sex* APOE ‐ε2*race on baseline memory (β=‐0.19, p=0.02), whereby the APOE ‐ε2*sex interaction was significant in non‐Hispanic whites (β=0.06, p 〈 0.01) but not in AA (β=‐0.11, p=0.10). Conclusion We provide new evidence that the sex difference in APOE in cognition is most pronounced in relation to memory performance and is particularly driven by differences in baseline performance rather than trajectories of performance over time. Future work will examine intersections with clinical diagnosis to better differentiate sex differences in APOE associations in the context of normal aging and neurodegenerative disease.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1552-5260 , 1552-5279
    URL: Issue
    Language: English
    Publisher: Wiley
    Publication Date: 2022
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2211627-8
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2201940-6
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...