Abstract: Introduction. Primary immune thrombocytopenia is a rare disease1. The incidence of ITP is not well estimated in Russia and worldwide. In adults it varies from 1,6 to 3,9/100 000 person-years2-3. The gender and age-associated results are discussed and differ in several investigations4-6. Study objectives: evaluation of the incidence of primary immune thrombocytopenia in adults in one region of Russia Patients and methods. The data source is the Registry of the patients with primary ITP in Russia. 272 adult patients: 77 males (28%) and 195 females (72%), age from 16 to 89 years (median 44 years) with ITP (ICD-10 code D69.3), newly diagnosed cases during the period from 12 Jan 2014 to 24 May 2016. Results. 221 (81%) cases were newly diagnosed in 12 regions of Russia in which registration was performed most actively - more than 5 cases for the duration of the study. But only one region was selected for the first evaluation of epidemiological characteristics because of the number of reasons. There is one hematological central clinic in this region in which diagnosis of ITP can be verified and patients with ITP are treated and monitored most properly. The early started and fully performed registration process can be regarded as covered most part of region population in this target region. 86 cases (27 male, 59 female) were registered in the target region. The gender-age distribution was following: male: age 〈 41 = 10 (37%), age 〈 41-60 = 7 (26%), age 〉 60 = 10 (37%); female: age 〈 29 = 10 (49%), age 〈 41-60 = 15 (25%), age 〉 60 = 15 (25%). The estimated incidence rate in the target region is shown in table 1. The estimated incidence rates in gender-age strata in the target region are demonstrated in table 2. Conclusion. Overall ITP incidence in one region of Russia is 3.20/100 000 person-years. It is compatible to the incidence in other European countries. Our data demonstrate the rise of incidence rate in males with age and its decrease with age in female population. Literature. 1) Rodeghiero F., Stasi R., Gernsheimer T., Michel M., Provan D., Arnold D.M., et al. Standardization of terminology, definitions and outcome criteria in immune thrombocytopenic purpura of adults and children: report from international working group. Blood. 2009; 113(11): 2386--93. doi: 10.1182/blood-2008-07-162503. 2) Terrell DR, Beebe LA, Vesely SK, Neas BR, Segal JB, George JN. The incidence of immune thrombocytopenic purpura in children and adults: A critical review of published reports. Am J Hematol. 2010; 85(3): 174-180. 3) Moulis G, Palmaro A, Montastruc J-L, Godeau B, Lapeyre-Mestre M, Sailler L. Epidemiology of incident immune thrombocytopenia: a natiowide population-based study in France. Blood. 2014; 124(22): 3308-3315. 4) Segal JB, Powe NR. Prevalence of immune thrombocytopenia: analyses of administrative data. J Thromb Haemost 2006; 4: 2377-83 5) Schoonen WM, Kucera G, Coelson J, et al. Epidemiology of immune thrombocytopenic purpura in the General Practise Research Database. Br J Haematol 2009; 145(2): 235-244. 6) Lisukov I.A., Maschan A.A., Shamardina A.V., Chagorova T.V., Davydkin I.L., Sycheva T.M., et al. Immune thrombocytopenia: clinical manifestations and response to therapy. Intermediate analysis of data of the Russian register of patients with primary immune thrombocytopenia and review of literature. Oncogematologiya. 2013; 2: 61--9]. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Abstract: Background. Ibrutinib became available for patients (pts) with relapsed/refractory (R/R) mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) in Russia in the end of 2015 based on the results of phase 2 study by M. Wang from MD Anderson Cancer Center (NEJM 2013, Blood 2015). However, pts in routine clinical practice tend to differ significantly from the patients selected for clinical trials, which may lead to poorer results in off study treated patients. Aim. To assess efficacy and toxicity of ibrutinib monotherapy in pts with R/R MCL in routine community clinical practice outside of clinical trials. Materials & Methods. We analyzed the charts of all pts with R/R MCL who started ibrutinib from April 2016 to July 2019 in 7 Moscow's hospitals. The following criteria were used to initiate ibrutinib monotherapy: the age 〉 18 years, confirmed MCL diagnosis with nuclear hyperexpression of cyclin D1 and/or presence of the t(11;14)(q13;q32); symptomatic relapse or failure to achieve at least PR with a prior regimen. Poor physical status, pancytopenia grade 3-4, infectious complications (except for life-threatening conditions), blastoid variant and the number of previous treatment lines were not regarded as contraindications to ibrutinib therapy. Patients with CNS involvement were excluded from this analysis. Ibrutinib was administered once a day at a dose of 560 mg until progression or intolerable toxicity. Response to therapy was assessed every 2-3 months utilizing CT scan, PET/CT and bone marrow examination were required to confirm CR. Results. 54 pts with R/R MCL received ibrutinib monotherapy between April 2016 and July 2019. 26 pts (48%) were refractory to a prior therapy. The median age was 68 years (range 40-81); 69% of pts were men; ECOG 〉 2 in 22% of pts. 15 pts (28%) underwent a repeated biopsy before starting ibrutinib. 23 pts (43%) had an aggressive variant of MCL: either blastoid morphology (13/54 at diagnosis and 5/54 after repeated biopsy) or classical morphology with Ki-67 〉 40% (4/54 at diagnosis and 1/54 after repeated biopsy). The median number of previous treatment lines was 2 (1-11). The response was evaluated in 53/54 pts. ORR was 81%, CR rate was 30% in the whole group. Pts with aggressive variants of MCL (group 1) had ORR of 65%, CR rate of 7%. In the group with classical morphology and Ki-67≤40% (group 2) ORR and CR rates were 93% and 47%. 2 pts with a response to therapy stopped ibrutinib early on their own accord, without signs of toxicity above gr.1. The median EFS for all pts was 394 days (95% CI: 261-526). In group 1 the median EFS was 173 days (95% CI: 112-234), in the group 2 the median EFS was 759 days (95% CI: 521-996, p 〈 0.0001). 27 pts (50%) died (25 deaths were MCL-related). The median OS for the entire population studied was 491 days (95% CI: 183-799). The median OS of pts after progression on ibrutinib was disappointingly short - 84 days (95% CI: 30-139). 21 pts (39%) remain on ibrutinib treatment for 10-1119 days (the median duration was 358 days). The most common complications were myalgia and muscle cramps (60%, all gr.1-2), diarrhea (gr.1-2 in 58% and gr.3 in 4%); hemorrhagic complications (65%, all gr. 1-2); skin, nail toxicity and a rash (15%, all gr.1-2) and arrhythmia (9%). Infections were reported in 30% of pts (gr.3 in 6%). Skin/nails toxicity developed mainly after 6 months of ibrutinib intake. In 14 (26 %) pts ibrutinib treatment had to be adjusted (dose reduction or treatment interruption for 3-10 days) due to toxicity and planned surgeries. 4 pts (9%) required dose reduction from 560 to 420 mg. None of ibrutinib recipients had to completely discontinue ibrutinib therapy due to complications (with exception of 2 patients who stopped taking ibrutinib on their own). None of the patients received alloSCT. Conclusion. These data on the use of ibrutinib in actual clinical practice are comparable with the results of international multicenter studies (PCYC-1104, SPARK, and RAY). Favorable toxicity profile and rather short time to antitumor response allow for ibrutinib administration in cases of poor performance status due to disease, low blood count, and even infectious complications. Ibrutinib monotherapy results in the durable disease control in 93% of patients with non-blastoid MCL with the median EFS 25 months, but only 65% with blastoid type with the median EFS 6 months. However, some adverse effects are manifested not earlier than after 6-month treatment, which calls for continuous monitoring, especially when preparing for surgeries. Figure Disclosures Vorobyev: AstraZeneca: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Sanofi: Consultancy. Ptushkin:JSC GENERIUM: Research Funding; Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc:: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy; Roche: Consultancy; AbbVie: Consultancy.

Abstract: Abstract 4445 Despite remarkable responses with imatinib in chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CML-CP), there remains a proportion of patients who are resistant or intolerant to imatinib treatment. Dasatinib is effective second-line treatment for this patient population. Importantly, without effective therapeutic intervention, these patients inevitably progress to advanced phases of disease, have a short survival and declined health outcomes. This emphasizes the importance of patient-reported outcome assessment in these patients. Comprehensive information about the results of dasatinib therapy both in terms of clinical and patient-reported outcomes will be helpful in evaluation of risks/benefits of treatment in this patient population. We aimed to study response rates as well as quality of life (QoL) parameters and symptom profile in imatinib-resistant or -intolerant CML-CP patients receiving dasatinib. 38 CML-CP patients resistant or -intolerant to imatinib were enrolled in the study (mean age - 50 years old, SD 14.5; range −22–79 years; male/female – 19/19). The median of disease duration was 5.7 years (1–13 years). The median duration of imatinib treatment - 39 months (5–101 months). 33 patients had resistance to imatinib treatment; 5 patients were intolerant to imatinib. Patients received dasatinib in the dose of 100 mg daily. Median follow-up was 12 months. For QoL assessment patients filled out the SF-36 and for symptom assessment – Comprehensive Symptom Profile in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Patients (CSP Leuk-CML). The CSP Leuk-CML is developed to assess profile of 47 symptoms specific for patients with CML. To compare patient population with normative data the sample from population norm (PN) database adjusted to age and gender was used. For comparisons Mann-Whitney test was used. Symptom severity and percentages of patients with symptoms at moderate-to-severe (ratings3 5) levels was evaluated. High rates of hematologic (complete, 90%) and cytogenetic (major, 85%; complete, 35%) response were observed for the majority of patients at 6 months from the start of therapy. During observation period two patients died (at 2 and 6 months after therapy initiation), one patient discontinued treatment due to significant thrombocytopenia at 2 months, and one patient discontinued treatment due to disease progression at 6 months after therapy initiation. At base-line patients experienced impaired QoL as compared to population norms: the values for the majority of SF-36 scales were significantly lower than in control group (p 〈 0.05). No QoL impairment was observed in 35% of patients. 25% of patients had either mild (Integral QoL index 〈 25% decrease from a PN) or moderate (25–50% decrease from a PN) QoL impairment; other 20% of patients - severe QoL impairment (50–75% decrease from a PN), and 20% of patients - critical QoL impairment ( 〉 75% decrease from a PN). At base-line the majority of patients (96%) experienced fatigue; a half of them suffered from moderate-to-severe fatigue. 75% of patients experienced at least one moderate-to-severe symptom; more than 40% had more than 7 moderate-to-severe symptoms. At 12 months after dasatinib treatment 47% of patients experienced no QoL impairment; the number of patients with severe or critical QoL impairment slightly decreased (25% and 10%, respectively). At 12 months after the start of therapy QoL treatment response in terms of stabilization or improvement was registered in the majority of patients (81%). In nearly all patients symptom severity did not change or became lower at different time-points of treatment as compared with base-line. The number of patients with moderate-to-severe symptoms decreased while treatment. Thus, treatment with dasatinib is beneficial for imatinib-resistant or -intolerant CML-CP patients both in terms of clinical and patient-reported outcomes. Desirable clinical and patient-reported outcomes were registered for the majority of patients. Comprehensive evaluation of the results of second-line treatment of CML-CP allows to assess the risks and benefits of therapy both from physician's and patient's perspective. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Abstract: Few treatments options are available for patients (pts) with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) who have previously been treated with lenalidomide (LEN) and bortezomib (BORT), and their prognosis is poor. Pomalidomide (POM) is a distinct IMiD® immunomodulatory agent with a mechanism of action consisting of direct anti-myeloma, stromal-support inhibitory, and immunomodulatory effects. In randomized phase 2 and 3 trials (MM-002 and MM-003), POM plus low-dose dexamethasone (POM+LoDEX) demonstrated marked efficacy in RRMM pts who had received multiple prior therapies, including LEN and BORT. This side-by-side analysis presents the most recent survival and safety data from these trials. Methods The MM-002 and MM-003 trials enrolled pts with ≥ 2 prior therapies, including LEN and BORT. In MM-002, pts received POM (4 mg/day on days 1–21 of each 28-day cycle) alone or in combination with LoDEX (40 mg/week). In MM-003, pts were randomized 2:1 to receive POM+LoDEX or high-dose DEX alone (HiDEX) (40 mg/days 1–4, 9–12, 17–20 in a 28-day cycle); HiDEX was chosen as the comparator to isolate the effects of POM, as at the time of trial design it was the standard salvage therapy for heavily pretreated pts. Thromboprophylaxis was required for all pts treated with POM and pts at high risk of developing venous thromboembolism. Data cutoff was February 1, 2013 for MM-002 and March 1, 2013 for MM-003. The primary endpoint in both trials was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), response rates, duration of response, and safety. Results In each study, pts had received a median of 5 prior therapies (range 1-17), and all pts had received prior LEN and BORT. In MM-002, 113 pts were treated with POM+LoDEX and 108 were treated with POM alone (60% of POM alone pts subsequently received DEX). A total of 79% of pts were LEN refractory; 62% were refractory to both LEN and BORT; and 35% had received LEN as their last prior therapy. With a median follow-up of 14.2 months (mos), median PFS was 4.2 mos, OS was 16.5 mos, and overall response rate (ORR, defined as at least a partial response) was 33% with POM+LoDEX (Table 1). In MM-003, 302 pts were treated with POM+LoDEX and 153 pts were treated with HiDEX (50% of HiDEX pts subsequently received POM). A total of 94% of pts were LEN refractory; 74% were both LEN and BORT refractory; and 29% had received LEN as their last prior therapy. Survival outcomes were similar in MM-003; with a median follow-up of 10 mos, median PFS was 4.0 mos, OS was 12.7 mos, and ORR was 31% with POM+LoDEX. In both trials, LEN as last prior therapy did not impact response, PFS, or OS vs the overall population. Commonly observed adverse events (AEs) are presented in Table 2 for pts treated with POM+LoDEX. Grade 3 and 4 neutropenia was 28% and 13% in MM-002, and 26% and 22% in MM-003 for the POM+LoDEX arms, respectively. AEs were generally manageable for POM+LoDEX in MM-002 and MM-003 with dose interruptions (67% for both) and reductions (29% and 26%, respectively), and standard supportive care, including growth factor support (46% and 43%), red blood cell transfusions (45% and 49%), platelet transfusions (14% and 20%), and anti-infective agents (89% in both trials). Rates of POM discontinuation due to treatment-related AEs were low (2–4% with POM+LoDEX). In MM-002 and MM-003, 49% and 51% of pts in the POM+LoDEX arms experienced neutropenia of any grade. With appropriate AE management, 9% and 23% had dose interruptions, 4% and 8% had dose reductions, and 1 pt in both MM-002 and MM-003 discontinued due to neutropenia. Febrile neutropenia developed in 3% and 10% of pts; 1% and 4% had dose interruptions, 0% and 2% had dose reductions, and no pts discontinued due to febrile neutropenia in the MM-002 and MM-003 studies, respectively. The majority of infections occurred in the absence of neutropenia of any grade (54% in MM-002 and 66% in MM-003). The rate of POM discontinuation due to infection was low (1% in MM-002 and 2% in MM-003). Conclusion In both the MM-002 and MM-003 trials, POM+LoDEX consistently extended PFS in advanced RRMM pts. PFS, OS, and ORR were not negatively impacted in patients who were refractory to LEN or BORT, even as last prior therapy. Both trials demonstrated that with dose modifications and supportive care POM was well tolerated, leading to few discontinuations. POM+LoDEX should be considered a standard of care for pts with advanced RRMM who have exhausted LEN and BORT. Disclosures: Siegel: Celgene Corporation: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Onyx: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Millennium: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Richardson:Millennium: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Johnson & Johnson: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene Corporation: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees. Dimopoulos:Celgene Corporation: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees. Chen:Celgene Corporation: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Song:Celgene Corporation: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Vij:Onyx: Consultancy, Research Funding; Millenium: Speakers Bureau; Celgene Corporation: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Bahlis:Celgene Corporation: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Baz:Millenium: Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Karyopharm: Research Funding; Sanofi: Research Funding; Celgene Corporation: Research Funding. Hofmeister:Celgene Corporation: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Weisel:Celgene Corporation: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Jagannath:Millennium: Honoraria; Celgene Corporation: Honoraria. Lonial:Millennium: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Sanofi: Consultancy; Onyx: Consultancy; Celgene Corporation: Consultancy. Delforge:Celgene Corporation: Honoraria. Talpaz:Ariad, Sanofi, Novartis: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Ariad, Novartis, BMS, Pfizer: Speakers Bureau; Ariad, BMS, Sanofi, INCYTE: Research Funding. Moreau:Celgene Corporation: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. San Miguel:Jansen, Celgene Corporation, Onyx, Novartis, Millenium: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees. Karlin:Janssen: Honoraria; Celgene Corporation: Consultancy, Expert board committee Other, Honoraria. Goldschmidt:Celgene Corporation, Janssen, Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Oriol:Celgene Corporation: Consultancy. Alegre:Janssen: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene Corporation: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Cavo:Millennium: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Onyx: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene Corporation: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees. Martinez-Lopez:Celgene Corporation: Honoraria, Research Funding. Lacy:Celgene Corporation: Research Funding. Chen:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Casey:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Sternas:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Zaki:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Jacques:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Anderson:Onyx: Consultancy, Equity Ownership; Gilead: Consultancy, Equity Ownership; sanofi aventis: Consultancy, Equity Ownership; Oncopep: Consultancy, Equity Ownership; Acetylon: Consultancy, Equity Ownership; Celgene Corporation: Consultancy, Equity Ownership.

Abstract: There is limited published data about the efficacy and safety of the second-line therapy with dasatinib in patients in chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CML-CP) in a “real world” patients setting outside clinical trials. In addition, comprehensive evaluation of benefits and risks of the treatment is worthwhile to better define treatment outcomes in this patients’ population. We aimed to study clinical and patient-reported outcomes as well as safety of dasatinib treatment in a “real world” setting within the context of its approved indication through the analysis of prospectively collected data in patients with imatinib resistance or intolerance receiving dasatinib as the second-line therapy. 75 CML-CP patients resistant or -intolerant to imatinib were enrolled in the prospective, multicenter, non-interventional study (mean age 51.3 years old, SD 15.4; range 22–83 years; male/female – 37/38). The median of disease duration was 5.0 years (0.75–17 years). 63 patients had resistance to imatinib; 12 patients were intolerant to imatinib; the median duration of imatinib treatment 40 months (3–121 months). All the patients received dasatinib as the second-line therapy (100 mg daily). Median follow-up was 12 months. For quality of life (QoL) and symptom assessment patients filled out the SF-36 and Comprehensive Symptom Profile in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Patients (CSP Leuk-CML), respectively, at base-line, in 1, 3, 6 months after treatment start and every 6 months thereafter. Comparison of QoL and symptom scores was conducted using t-test. QoL scores were analyzed using t-test, adjusting for sociodemographic and disease status. Mean symptom severity and percentage of patients with moderate-to-severe (ratings ³ 5) symptoms was evaluated. After 12 months of treatment 83% patients achieved or maintained complete hematologic response and 35 % – complete cytogenetic response. The twenty four-month progression free survival rate was 93% (95% CI; 84–97%). Four cases of pleural effusion events were registered: they were easily managed in 3 cases; one patient died at 1 month after treatment start due to accompanied infection complication. No severe hematological adverse effects were observed except two cases of grade III-IV neutropenia. Two patients were resistant to dasatinib. Two patients died of disease progression at 6 months of follow-up. At 12 months of dasatinib treatment QoL parameters were stable for 5 out of 8 scales; vitality, social functioning and mental health significantly improved as compared with base-line (p 〈 0.01). At 24 months of dasatinib treatment improvement of physical functioning, vitality, social functioning and mental health as compared with base-line was registered (p 〈 0.01); no worsening was observed for other QoL scales. Before treatment 75% of patients experienced at least one moderate-to-severe symptom; more than 40% had more than 7 moderate-to-severe symptoms. The majority of patients (96%) experienced fatigue; half of them suffered from moderate-to-severe fatigue. While treatment the number of patients with moderate-to-severe symptoms decreased. After 12 months of therapy only 25% of patients experienced moderate-to-severe fatigue. Before treatment 36% of patients exhibited critical or severe QoL impairment. Remarkably, in the subgroup of patients (44%) with critical or severe QoL impairment at base-line dramatic QoL improvement was observed: QoL index increased 3.4 fold (p 〈 0.01). Thus, our study on “real world” patient data confirms that dasatinib as second-line therapy in CML-CP patients is effective both in terms of clinical outcomes and patient-reported outcomes, as well as exhibits good tolerability. Comprehensive evaluation of the outcomes of the second-line treatment of CML-CP allows to assess the benefits and risks of therapy both from physician’s and patient’s perspective. Disclosures: Ionova: BMS: Research Funding. Nikitina:BMS: Research Funding. Gritsenko:BMS: Research Funding. Ivanova:BMS: Research Funding. Kuchma:BMS: Research Funding. Shnaider:BMS: Research Funding. Sannikova:BMS: Research Funding. Fedorenko:BMS: Research Funding. Kurbatova:BMS: Research Funding.

Abstract: Background. Carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (KRd) have been approved for the treatment of relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) based on ASPIRE clinical trial. Aim. Analysis of efficacy and safety of KRd in routine clinical practice. Materials and methods. The prospective analysis included patients with MM who received at least one line of previous therapy. The inclusion criteria were relapse/progression; refractoriness; lack of very good partial response (VGPR) and more after the first line of therapy. Since February 2016, we used KRd like in ASPIRE trial, since October 2019, carfilzomib has been used at a dose of 56 mg/m2 on days 1, 8 and 15. Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (autoHSCT), consolidation (KRd) and maintenance therapy (Rd) were regarded as one line of therapy. Results and discussion. We evaluated 77 patients with median age at the time of diagnosis is 55 (3072) years. For 56% (n=43) of patients KRd was applied as the second line (group 1), for 44% (n=34) as the third and more (group 2). In 23/43 patients from group 1, an early change in therapy was made due to insufficient effectiveness (after 24 courses of VCD or PAD). KRd served as a "bridge" to autoHSCT in 25 (32%) patients (21 of 25 in group 1). Another 7 patients underwent collection of autoHSC (all from group 1). The overall response rate (ORR) was 80.5%, with 33.8% complete response (CR) and 26% VGPR. ORR in group 1 was 98% versus 65.6% in group 2; 24-month overall survival (OS) was 70%, progression free survival (PFS) 49.8%. In group 1, 24-month OS was 85.6% versus 50.0% in group 2, 24-month PFS was 67.8% versus 25.5% (p=0.01). Conclusion. Our analysis confirmed the high efficiency of KRd in the treatment of RRMM in real-life practice. Early correction of therapy with insufficient effectiveness of the first line made it possible to implement the strategy of high-dose consolidation and autoHSCT in a larger percentage of patients with MM.

Abstract: Information about the efficacy and safety of the second-line therapy with dasatinib in patients in chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CML-CP) at long-term follow-up is limited. Evaluation of benefits and risks of the treatment in a “real-world” study both from physician’s and patient’s perspective is worthwhile to better define treatment outcomes in this patients’ population. We aimed to study clinical and patient-reported outcomes as well as safety of the second-line therapy by dasatinib in CML-CP patients with imatinib resistance or intolerance treatment at long-term follow-up. 75 CML-CP patients resistant or -intolerant to imatinib were enrolled in the prospective, multicenter, non-interventional study (mean age 51.3 years old, SD 15.4; range 22–83 years; male/female – 37/38). All the patients received dasatinib as the second-line therapy (100 mg daily). Clinical and patient-reported outcomes were evaluated at base-line, 12, 18 and 24 months after treatment start. Twenty six patients were analyzed through all study time-points. For quality of life (QoL) and symptom assessment all the patients filled out the SF-36 and Comprehensive Symptom Profile in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Patients (CSP Leuk-CML), respectively. Overall and progression-free survival rates as well as cumulative probability of achieving a complete cytogenetic response (CCgR) were calculated using Kaplan-Meier methods. To compare frequencies of CCgR χ2 criterion was applied. Comparison of QoL and symptom scores was conducted using t-test. QoL scores were analyzed using t-test, adjusting for sociodemographic and disease status. At 24 months of dasatinib treatment 94% patients achieved or maintained complete hematologic response and 69% – CCgR. The twenty four-month progression free survival rate was 79% (95% CI; 63.3–88%), overall survival rate – 93% (95% CI; 84–97%). One patient was resistant to dasatinib after 16 months of treatment. During the second year of dasatinib therapy one сase of pleural effusion (grade 3) was registered (at 18 months of treatment); other severe adverse effects (grade 4) were as follows: one patient – neutropenia (at 18 months), one patient – arthralgia/myalgia (at 18 months), one patient – memory loss (at 24 months), one patient – headache and hyperglycemia at 18 months and palpitations, alopecia, hyperglycemia at 24 months of treatment. At 24 months of dasatinib treatment improvement of QoL as compared with base-line was registered: Integral QoL index was significantly higher than at base-line (p 〈 0.02). At 24 months follow-up the proportion of patients with no QoL impairment was 56%; 18.7% patients exhibited severe/critical QoL impairment. It was shown that 56.4% patients with no/mild QoL impairment before dasatinib treatment (favorable group) achieved CCgR as compared with 28% patients with severe/critical QoL impairment (unfavorable group). Progression-free survival rate was 87% in the favorable group vs 60% in the unfavorable group. Cumulative probability of CCgR achievement was higher in the favorable group vs the unfavorable group – 75% vs 50% (log-rank test, p 〈 0.05). Thus, long-term outcomes of second-line therapy in CML-CP patients in a “real world” setting confirm that dasatinib treatment is effective both in terms of clinical outcomes and patient-reported outcomes, as well as exhibits good tolerability. At 24 months of treatment definite QoL improvement was registered. Patients with high QoL before second-line treatment have had better treatment outcomes at long-term follow-up. Comprehensive evaluation of the outcomes of the second-line treatment of CML-CP at long-term follow-up allows to assess the benefits and risks of therapy both from physician’s and patient’s perspective. Disclosures Ionova: BMS: Research Funding. Nikitina:BMS: Research Funding. Fedorenko:BMS: Research Funding. Gritsenko:BMS: Research Funding. Ivanova:BMS: Research Funding. Kuchma:BMS: Research Funding. Shnaider:BMS: Research Funding. Sannikova:BMS: Research Funding. Usacheva:BMS: Research Funding. Kurbatova:BMS: Research Funding.

Abstract: Despite advances in surgery and pharmacotherapy, there remains significant residual ischemic risk after coronary artery bypass grafting surgery. Methods: In REDUCE-IT (Reduction of Cardiovascular Events With Icosapent Ethyl–Intervention Trial), a multicenter, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial, statin-treated patients with controlled low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and mild to moderate hypertriglyceridemia were randomized to 4 g daily of icosapent ethyl or placebo. They experienced a 25% reduction in risk of a primary efficacy end point (composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, coronary revascularization, or hospitalization for unstable angina) and a 26% reduction in risk of a key secondary efficacy end point (composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke) when compared with placebo. The current analysis reports on the subgroup of patients from the trial with a history of coronary artery bypass grafting. Results: Of the 8179 patients randomized in REDUCE-IT, a total of 1837 (22.5%) had a history of coronary artery bypass grafting, with 897 patients randomized to icosapent ethyl and 940 to placebo. Baseline characteristics were similar between treatment groups. Randomization to icosapent ethyl was associated with a significant reduction in the primary end point (hazard ratio [HR], 0.76 [95% CI, 0.63–0.92] ; P =0.004), in the key secondary end point (HR, 0.69 [95% CI, 0.56–0.87]; P =0.001), and in total (first plus subsequent or recurrent) ischemic events (rate ratio, 0.64 [95% CI, 0.50–0.81]; P =0.0002) compared with placebo. This yielded an absolute risk reduction of 6.2% (95% CI, 2.3%–10.2%) in first events, with a number needed to treat of 16 (95% CI, 10–44) during a median follow-up time of 4.8 years. Safety findings were similar to the overall study: beyond an increased rate of atrial fibrillation/flutter requiring hospitalization for at least 24 hours (5.0% vs 3.1%; P =0.03) and a nonsignificant increase in bleeding, occurrences of adverse events were comparable between groups. Conclusions: In REDUCE-IT patients with a history of coronary artery bypass grafting, treatment with icosapent ethyl was associated with significant reductions in first and recurrent ischemic events. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT01492361.

Abstract: The last decade has seen a sharp increase in the number of scientific publications describing physiological and pathological functions of extracellular vesicles (EVs), a collective term covering various subtypes of cell‐released, membranous structures, called exosomes, microvesicles, microparticles, ectosomes, oncosomes, apoptotic bodies, and many other names. However, specific issues arise when working with these entities, whose size and amount often make them difficult to obtain as relatively pure preparations, and to characterize properly. The International Society for Extracellular Vesicles (ISEV) proposed Minimal Information for Studies of Extracellular Vesicles (“MISEV”) guidelines for the field in 2014. We now update these “MISEV2014” guidelines based on evolution of the collective knowledge in the last four years. An important point to consider is that ascribing a specific function to EVs in general, or to subtypes of EVs, requires reporting of specific information beyond mere description of function in a crude, potentially contaminated, and heterogeneous preparation. For example, claims that exosomes are endowed with exquisite and specific activities remain difficult to support experimentally, given our still limited knowledge of their specific molecular machineries of biogenesis and release, as compared with other biophysically similar EVs. The MISEV2018 guidelines include tables and outlines of suggested protocols and steps to follow to document specific EV‐associated functional activities. Finally, a checklist is provided with summaries of key points.