In:
Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, Wiley, Vol. 31, No. 2 ( 2012-02), p. 417-426
Abstract:
The relative sensitivity and recovery potential of two aquatic macrophyte species, Lemna minor and Myriophyllum aquaticum , exposed to atrazine (concentration ranges 80–1,280 µg/L and 40–640 µg/L, respectively) were evaluated using slightly adapted standard protocol for Lemna spp.: relative growth rates (RGR) and yield of both plants were measured in 3‐d‐long intervals during the exposure and recovery phase. Myriophyllum aquaticum was also exposed to atrazine‐spiked sediment (0.1–3.7 µg/g) in a water‐free system. The results of M. aquaticum sediment contact tests showed that root‐ and shoot‐based growth parameters are equally sensitive endpoints. In the water (sediment‐free) test system, L. minor recovered after short (3 d) and longer exposure (7 d) to all atrazine concentrations after only a 5‐ to 6‐d‐long recovery phase. The recovery of M. aquaticum after short exposure was slower and less efficient: after 12 d of recovery phase the final biomass of plants exposed to 380 and 640 µg/L was below the initial values. The last interval RGR provides a good indication of plant recovery potential regardless of species growth strategy. If compared to L. minor , the difference in growth rate, sensitivity, lag phase, recovery potential from water‐column substances, and also suitability for studies investigating the effect of sediment‐bound pollutants advocates the use of M. aquaticum as an additional macrophyte species in risk assessment. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2012;31:417–426. © 2011 SETAC
Type of Medium:
Online Resource
ISSN:
0730-7268
,
1552-8618
Language:
English
Publisher:
Wiley
Publication Date:
2012
detail.hit.zdb_id:
2027441-5
SSG:
12
Permalink