GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    In: Psycho-Oncology, Wiley, Vol. 30, No. 9 ( 2021-09), p. 1502-1513
    Abstract: The COVID‐19 pandemic may reinforce psychosocial distress of neuro‐oncological patients. We aimed to (1) differentiate the burden caused by the pandemic versus the tumor and (2) establish topics relevant for brain tumor patients (BTPs) and caregivers. Methods Patients and caregivers were prospectively assessed from April 2020–July 2020 by a 10‐item comprising interview over the phone, including qualitative and quantitative questions. They were quantitatively evaluated i.a. by the distress thermometer (DT, score 1–10). The qualitative questions were analyzed using structured content analysis: The interview questions defined the main categories. Subcategories were derived by an inductive approach assessing the frequency of patients' and caregivers' answers. Results A total of 69 patients and 20 caregivers were interviewed; n  = 36 were female (49%), mean age was 53 years (range 32–81). Patients' disease‐related DT scores were higher than the COVID‐19‐related DT scores: the median of the disease‐related DT score was 7 (range 2–10) versus median of COVID‐19‐related distress: 5.0 (range 2–7). Caregivers perceived a higher burden due to the disease (DT median disease: 8; range 2–10 vs. DT pandemic: 3, range 0–10). A total of five main and 21 subcategories were elaborated, most frequently mentioned were “restrictions in public and private affairs” (28%), “changes in the psychological well‐being” (23%), “limited social interaction by contact restriction” (25%). Subcategories relevant for caregivers were similar to those of BTPs. Conclusion A considerable proportion of patients and caregivers still perceived the brain tumor disease as more burdensome than the pandemic. We established main and subcategories of interview items possibly of great relevance to patients during these difficult times, which could be implemented in the content‐related adaption of the psychosocial assessment.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1057-9249 , 1099-1611
    URL: Issue
    Language: English
    Publisher: Wiley
    Publication Date: 2021
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1495115-0
    SSG: 5,2
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    In: Trials, Springer Science and Business Media LLC, Vol. 21, No. 1 ( 2020-12)
    Abstract: Patients with high-grade gliomas (HGG) often suffer from high distress and require psychosocial support. However, due to neurological and neurocognitive deficits, adequate assessment of distress and support needs remains challenging in clinical practice. The objective of the present study is to investigate whether a systematic implementation of signaling questions into the routine outpatient consultation will be helpful to bridge this gap. Methods/design This is a multicenter cluster randomized study with two arms. Randomization is done on a cluster level with 13 hospitals providing regular neuro-oncological outpatient services conducted by neurologists and/or neurosurgeons. The intervention will include an assessment of psychosocial distress of patients in doctor–patient conversation compared to assessment of psychosocial distress via questionnaire (control, standard of care). In total, 616 HGG patients will be enrolled. The outcome will be the number of HGG patients with increased psychosocial distress who receive professional support from psychosocial services. Secondary endpoints are inter alia number of patients reporting psychosocial distress and unmet needs detected correctly by the respective method; quality of life; psychological well-being and burden of the patients before and after doctor–patient consultation; as well as the length of the doctor–patient consultation. Discussion Patients with HGG are confronted with an oncological diagnosis and at the same time with high symptom burden. This often leads to distress, which is not always adequately recognized and treated. So far, only a limited number of adequate instruments are available to assess HGG patient’s distress. Yet, an adequate care and support network might facilitate the course of the disease and tumor therapies for patients. Our hypothesis is that an assessment conducted directly by attending doctors and in which the doctors talk to patients with HGG will be more effective than an assessment via a questionnaire, leading to better identifying patients in need of support. This may lead to an improvement of health care in these patients. Further, this method might be implemented also in other brain tumor patients (e.g., patients with brain metastases). Trial registration German Clinical Trials Register, DRKS00018079 . Registered on 3rd September 2019.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1745-6215
    Language: English
    Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
    Publication Date: 2020
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2040523-6
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    In: Neuro-Oncology, Oxford University Press (OUP), Vol. 24, No. Supplement_7 ( 2022-11-14), p. vii246-vii246
    Abstract: Comprehensive genomic profiling and biomarker-based therapeutic strategies are currently used in clinical trials and in innovative health care systems including the center for personalized medicine network. Systematic assessments of patient-reported outcomes are warranted to gain insight into the perspective of patients and their relatives during biomarker-based therapies. In the present study, we focused on health-related quality of life (HRQoL), psychosocial situation, and physical symptoms in patients treated at the Center for Personalized Medicine Tübingen. First, we retrospectively evaluated symptom burden of n=265 (neuro-)oncological patients in the Molecular Tumor Board (MTB). Sixty percent of patients reported at least 1 neurological symptom, and psychosocial burden/unmet needs were high (overall 156/265; 59%, patients with malignant tumors n=86/106; 81%, Fisher’s exact, p & lt; 0.0001). We therefore developed an app by 14 expert rounds and pretesting including validated assessments of HRoL, symptom und psychological burden and tested it in a pilot study. We conducted a structured interview with users 3 months afterwards to assess the app’s usability and feasibility. The interview was transcribed and analyzed according to a qualitative content analysis. So far, a total of 10 patients and caregivers have been enrolled in this pilot study. They reported that (i) the app is compatible with their daily routine (median 9.3, range 0-10), that (ii) they are more aware of their health status, which was rated as positive, and that (iii) completing app-based questionnaires was easier compared to paper questionnaires. Two patients reported technical problems, which were resolved timely. The pilot study proved feasibility and acceptance of the app. The app might optimize symptom burden assessment, adapted to the patients’ profiles. The next step is to prospectively compare HRQoL before and after start of targeted therapy in a multicenter study.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1522-8517 , 1523-5866
    Language: English
    Publisher: Oxford University Press (OUP)
    Publication Date: 2022
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2094060-9
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    In: Neuro-Oncology, Oxford University Press (OUP), Vol. 23, No. Supplement_6 ( 2021-11-12), p. vi188-vi189
    Abstract: The COVID-19 pandemic may reinforce psychosocial distress of neuro-oncological patients. We aimed to 1) differentiate the burden caused by the pandemic vs. the tumor and 2) establish topics relevant for brain tumor patients (BTPs) and caregivers. METHODS Patients and caregivers were prospectively assessed from April 2020 – July 2020 by a 10-item comprising interview over the phone, including qualitative and quantitative questions. They were quantitatively evaluated i.a. by the Distress Thermometer (DT, score 1-10). The qualitative questions were analyzed using structured content analysis: The interview questions defined the main categories. Subcategories were derived by an inductive approach assessing the frequency of patients' and caregivers' answers. RESULTS A total of 69 patients and 20 caregivers were interviewed; n= 36 were female (49%), mean age was 53 years (range 32-81). Patients' disease-related DT scores were higher than the COVID-19-related DT scores: the median of the disease-related DT score was 7 (range 2-10) vs. median of COVID-19-related distress: 5.0 (range 2-7). Caregivers perceived a higher burden due to the disease (DT median disease: 8; range 2-10 vs. DT pandemic: 3, range 0-10). A total of 5 main and 21 subcategories were elaborated, most frequently mentioned were "restrictions in public and private affairs" (28%), "changes in the psychological well-being" (23%), "limited social interaction by contact restriction" (25%). Subcategories relevant for caregivers were similar to those of BTPs. CONCLUSION A considerable proportion of patients and caregivers still perceived the brain tumor disease as more burdensome than the pandemic. We established main and subcategories of interview items possibly of great relevance to patients during these difficult times, which could be implemented in the content-related adaption of the psychosocial assessment.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1522-8517 , 1523-5866
    Language: English
    Publisher: Oxford University Press (OUP)
    Publication Date: 2021
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2094060-9
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 5
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    MDPI AG ; 2020
    In:  International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health Vol. 17, No. 20 ( 2020-10-13), p. 7446-
    In: International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, MDPI AG, Vol. 17, No. 20 ( 2020-10-13), p. 7446-
    Abstract: Background: Work-related psychosocial stress can cause mental and physical illnesses resulting in high costs for the individual, the economy and society. Small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) employ the majority of the world’s workforce and often have fewer financial and human resources compared to larger businesses. The aim of this review is to summarize current knowledge on work-related stress in SMEs according to well-established guidelines categorizing psychosocial factors at work. Methods: A systematic database search was carried out in PubMed, PsycINFO, PSYNDEX and Business Source Premiere from March to June 2019, updated in January 2020. Data of included studies were analyzed and mapped into five themes: “work content and task”, “organization of work”, “social relations”, “working environment” and “new forms of work”. Results: After full-text screening, 45 out of 116 studies were included for data extraction. Studies were very heterogeneous and of varying quality, mostly applying a cross-sectional study design. Psychosocial factors in SMEs have been researched with a focus on the work patterns “work organization” and “work content and task”. Conclusions: This review underlines the need for more and better quality research of psychosocial factors in SMEs, particularly in relation to ongoing and new challenges in the workplace, including stressors related to the process of digitalization or the development of safe working conditions during the emerge of new infectious diseases.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1660-4601
    Language: English
    Publisher: MDPI AG
    Publication Date: 2020
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2175195-X
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...