GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 33, No. 34 ( 2015-12-01), p. 4032-4038
    Abstract: BRAF V600E mutation is seen in 5% to 8% of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) and is associated with poor prognosis. Vemurafenib, an oral BRAF V600 inhibitor, has pronounced activity in patients with metastatic melanoma, but its activity in patients with BRAF V600E–positive metastatic CRC was unknown. Patients and Methods In this multi-institutional, open-label study, patients with metastatic CRC with BRAF V600 mutations were recruited to an expansion cohort at the previously determined maximum-tolerated dose of 960 mg orally twice a day. Results Twenty-one patients were enrolled, of whom 20 had received at least one prior metastatic chemotherapy regimen. Grade 3 toxicities included keratoacanthomas, rash, fatigue, and arthralgia. Of the 21 patients treated, one patient had a confirmed partial response (5%; 95% CI, 1% to 24%) and seven other patients had stable disease by RECIST criteria. Median progression-free survival was 2.1 months. Patterns of concurrent mutations, microsatellite instability status, CpG island methylation status, PTEN loss, EGFR expression, and copy number alterations were not associated with clinical benefit. In contrast to prior expectations, concurrent KRAS and NRAS mutations were detected at low allele frequency in a subset of the patients' tumors (median, 0.21% allele frequency) and were apparent mechanisms of acquired resistance in vemurafenib-sensitive patient-derived xenograft models. Conclusion In marked contrast to the results seen in patients with BRAF V600E–mutant melanoma, single-agent vemurafenib did not show meaningful clinical activity in patients with BRAF V600E mutant CRC. Combination strategies are now under development and may be informed by the presence of intratumor heterogeneity of KRAS and NRAS mutations.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2015
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 604914-X
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    In: Academic Radiology, Elsevier BV, Vol. 28 ( 2021-11), p. S210-S217
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1076-6332
    Language: English
    Publisher: Elsevier BV
    Publication Date: 2021
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1355509-1
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    In: Cancer Research, American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), Vol. 80, No. 4_Supplement ( 2020-02-15), p. P3-09-19-P3-09-19
    Abstract: Background Talimogene laherparepvec (T-VEC) is a genetically modified, oncolytic herpes simplex virus type 1 designed to selectively replicate within tumors and to produce granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor to enhance systemic antitumor immune responses. The safety and efficacy of T-VEC in treatment of advanced melanoma has been demonstrated as monotherapy and in combination with the checkpoint inhibitors (CPI) pembrolizumab and ipilimumab. Additionally, T-VEC monotherapy has demonstrated tolerable safety for intrahepatic injection (Hecht GICS 2018). Atezolizumab (atezo) is a humanized monoclonal antibody that promotes antitumor immunity by targeting programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1) and is approved for metastatic triple negative breast cancer (mTNBC). We hypothesize that T-VEC in combination with a CPI may be effective in mTNBC and CRC in addition to melanoma. This phase 1b, multicenter study (clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT03256344) evaluates the safety of intrahepatic injection of T-VEC in combination with intravenous (IV) atezo in patients (pts) with mTNBC or colorectal cancer (CRC) with liver metastases (LMs). Here we report early safety data in the TNBC cohort. Methods Key eligibility criteria included age ≥ 18 years, confirmed diagnosis of TNBC or CRC with LMs, ECOG PS 0/1, adequate organ function, disease progression during or after ≥ 1 prior standard-of-care systemic therapy for metastatic disease, and ≥ 1 measurable LM suitable for injection. T-VEC (≤ 4mL) was injected by image-guided intralesional injection: 106 PFU/mL day 1, 108 PFU/mL every 21 days thereafter; atezo 1,200 mg IV was given on day 1 and every 21 days thereafter. The primary objective of this study is to evaluate incidence of dose limiting toxicity (DLT) for safety of T-VEC injection into LMs in combination with IV atezo, by tumor type. The DLT analysis set included DLT-evaluable pts who were on treatment for at least 6 weeks from the initial dose of study treatment and received at least 2 doses of T-VEC and 2 doses of atezo in combination or have a DLT during the DLT evaluation period. Key secondary objectives include objective response rate, durable response rate, progression-free survival, and overall survival of the combination therapy, by tumor type. Results Thirty-two pts were enrolled in two parallel cohorts (8 TNBC, 24 CRC). Of the 8 TNBC pts, 4 were evaluable for DLT at the time of this analysis. Of the 4 pts that were not DLT-evaluable, 1 never received study drug, 1 received atezo monotherapy, and 2 received intrahepatic T-VEC and IV atezo but stopped study drugs for unconfirmed progression before the DLT evaluation period was completed. No DLTs were reported in the TNBC cohort. In the 7 TNBC pts who received at least one dose of the study drug, the most common treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) in terms of the subject incidence were pyrexia (71.4%), chills (42.9%), and rash (42.9%). In the 7 TNBC pts who received at least one dose of study drug, T-VEC related AEs in more than one pt were pyrexia (n=3) and chills (n=2). Atezo related AEs in more than one pt were pyrexia (n=5), chills and rash (n=3 each), and fatigue, arthralgia, pain, and pruritus (n=2 each). Study drug-related serious adverse events (SAEs) occurred in 3 (42.9%) pts, including Grade (G) 3 hypersensitivity related to atezo, G3 orthostatic hypotension related to T-VEC and atezo, and G1 pyrexia related to T-VEC and atezo. Procedure-related SAEs occurred in 1 (14.3%) pt, of G3 hepatic hematoma and G3 abdominal infection, but these were not related to the study drugs. One confirmed partial response in the TNBC cohort has been seen thus far. Conclusion T-VEC intrahepatic injection in combination with IV atezo at standard doses has thus far been demonstrated as feasible and tolerable with no DLTs observed in the TNBC cohort to date. Citation Format: Joel Randolph Hecht, Arlene Chan, Jean-Francois Baurain, Miguel Martin, Federico Longo-Munoz, Kevin Kalinsky, Steven Raman, Chunxu Liu, Edward Cha, Emily Chan. Preliminary safety data of intrahepatic talimogene laherparepvec and intravenous atezolizumab in patients with triple negative breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-09-19.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0008-5472 , 1538-7445
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
    Publication Date: 2020
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2036785-5
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1432-1
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    In: Cancer Research, American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), Vol. 84, No. 7_Supplement ( 2024-04-05), p. CT275-CT275
    Abstract: Background: Chemotherapy in combination with bevacizumab (Bev) has been a standard first-line treatment for RAS-mutated mCRC patients for the last 2 decades. The prognosis of these patients remains poor. Onvansertib is an orally available, highly potent, and selective inhibitor of Polo-like kinase 1 (PLK1), currently in clinical development. In a Phase 1b/2 study, onvansertib in combination with FOLFIRI + Bev demonstrated safety and promising efficacy in the second-line treatment of KRAS-mutated mCRC patients (NCT03829410). A subgroup analysis showed that patients not exposed to Bev (Bev-naïve) in the first-line setting had superior clinical benefit compared to Bev-exposed patients. Based on this data, we propose to investigate the combination of onvansertib with SoC (chemo + Bev) in the first-line treatment of RAS-mutated, Bev-naïve mCRC patients. Methods: This exploratory Phase 2, open-label, randomized study is designed to assess the safety, efficacy, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of 2 doses of onvansertib (20 mg and 30 mg) in combination with SoC (FOLFIRI + Bev or FOLFOX + Bev) versus SoC alone in patients with RAS-mutated metastatic and unresectable CRC in the first-line setting. Eligible participants must have histologically confirmed mCRC, KRAS or NRAS mutation, no previous systemic therapy in the metastatic setting, ECOG performance status of 0 or 1, measurable disease as defined per RECIST v1.1. Exclusion criteria include patients with BRAF-V600 mutations or microsatellite instability high/deficient mismatch repair, prior treatment with a VEGF inhibitor, previous oxaliplatin treatment within 12 months prior to randomization. The primary endpoint is objective response as determined according to RECIST v1.1 by an independent central review. Key secondary endpoints include progression-free survival and duration of response per independent central review. The study will enroll approximately 90 patients. Each patient will be randomized to be treated with onvansertib (20 mg or 30 mg) + SoC or SoC alone. The enrollment period for this study is approximately 12 months. Patients will be followed for overall survival for up to 1 year after the end of treatment. Trial is open and recruiting as of November 2023. This trial is registered as NCT06106308. Citation Format: Heinz-Josef Lenz, Benjamin Kuritzky, Anu Thummala, Stephan Kendall, Ravindranath Patel, Sreenivasa R. Chandana, Alisha H. Bent, Nancy Sherman, Ramanand Arun Subramanian, Fairooz Kabbinavar, Joel Randolph Hecht. A phase 2, randomized, open-label study of onvansertib in combination with standard-of-care (SoC) versus SoC alone for first-line treatment of RAS-mutant metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 2 (Late-Breaking, Clinical Trial, and Invited Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(7_Suppl):Abstract nr CT275.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1538-7445
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
    Publication Date: 2024
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2036785-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 5
    In: JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute, Oxford University Press (OUP), Vol. 110, No. 6 ( 2018-06-01), p. 638-648
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0027-8874 , 1460-2105
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: Oxford University Press (OUP)
    Publication Date: 2018
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2992-0
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1465951-7
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 6
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Oxford University Press (OUP) ; 2003
    In:  European Journal of Surgery Vol. 164, No. S12 ( 2003-11-27), p. 104-110
    In: European Journal of Surgery, Oxford University Press (OUP), Vol. 164, No. S12 ( 2003-11-27), p. 104-110
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1102-4151 , 1741-9271
    Language: English
    Publisher: Oxford University Press (OUP)
    Publication Date: 2003
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1065288-7
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1492632-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 7
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) ; 2024
    In:  Cancer Research Vol. 84, No. 7_Supplement ( 2024-04-05), p. CT078-CT078
    In: Cancer Research, American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), Vol. 84, No. 7_Supplement ( 2024-04-05), p. CT078-CT078
    Abstract: Background: Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is a cell surface receptor expressed in a variety of solid tumors. Gamma delta (γδ)-T cells represent a conserved T cell subset that can induce cell death in a wide range of malignancies. The presence of γ9δ2-T cells in solid tumors strongly correlates with better patient survival (Gentles 2015; Tosolini 2017). In addition to direct, potent killing by release of cytotoxic molecules, activated γ9δ2-T cells process and present antigen and contribute to a cascade response resulting in downstream activation of innate and adaptive immune cells to mediate further tumor cell killing (Brandes 2005; Devilder 2006; Vantourout 2013). Novel approaches that improve targeting and activation of γ9δ2-T cells may lead to the development of effective and safe cancer treatments. SGN-EGFRd2 is an investigational, bispecific humanized heavy chain-only antibody (HcAb). Advantages of HcAbs include their small size, high solubility, high stability, and excellent tissue penetration in vivo (Bannas 2017). SGN-EGFRd2 simultaneously binds EGFR and the γ9δ2-T cell receptor, resulting in the conditional activation of γ9δ2-T cells. Importantly, full activation of γ9δ2-T cells requires a secondary phosphoantigen stress signal present only in malignant and certain infected cells (Deseke 2020; Herrmann 2020; Rigau 2020; Vantourout 2013), but not normal healthy cells, conferring preferential tumor-directed cytotoxicity. The proposed cytotoxic mechanism of action is independent of KRAS and BRAF mutations (King 2023) known to confer resistance to approved anti-EGFR therapies in colorectal cancer (CRC). This first-in-human study is evaluating the safety, tolerability, and antitumor activity of SGN-EGFRd2 in patients with advanced solid tumors. Methods: SGNEGFRd2-001 (NCT05983133) is an open-label, multicenter, phase 1, dose escalation and expansion study evaluating SGN-EGFRd2 monotherapy in patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) CRC, head and neck squamous cell cancer, non-small cell lung cancer, and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma in 3 parts: dose escalation (Part A; n ~ 75), dose optimization (Part B; optional; up to n = 40), and dose expansion (Part C; up to n = 160). Patients must have R/R disease, or be intolerant to standard of care therapies, with no appropriate standard therapy available. Patients must have measurable disease per RECIST v1.1, an ECOG performance status of 0 or 1, and adequate organ function. Patients are eligible regardless of tumor EGFR expression or EGFR/KRAS/BRAF mutation status. Patients will receive SGN-EGFRd2 as an intravenous infusion. Primary study objectives are safety and tolerability, maximum tolerated dose, and recommended dose and schedule. Secondary objectives include pharmacokinetics, immunogenicity, and antitumor activity. Tumor samples will be analyzed for exploratory biomarkers. Accrual is ongoing in the US. Additional sites in Europe and Canada are planned. Citation Format: Hirva Mamdani, Joel Randolph Hecht, Rachel E. Sanborn, Maria Corinna Palanca-Wessels, Mingjin Yan, Martin Gutierrez, David L. Bajor. Phase 1 study of SGN-EGFRd2 in solid tumors (SGNEGFRd2-001) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 2 (Late-Breaking, Clinical Trial, and Invited Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(7_Suppl):Abstract nr CT078.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1538-7445
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
    Publication Date: 2024
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2036785-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 8
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Informa UK Limited ; 2019
    In:  Immunotherapy Vol. 11, No. 8 ( 2019-06), p. 705-723
    In: Immunotherapy, Informa UK Limited, Vol. 11, No. 8 ( 2019-06), p. 705-723
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1750-743X , 1750-7448
    Language: English
    Publisher: Informa UK Limited
    Publication Date: 2019
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2495964-9
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 9
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 28, No. 27 ( 2010-09-20), p. 4240-4246
    Abstract: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of IMC-A12, a human monoclonal antibody (mAb) that blocks insulin-like growth factor receptor-1 (IGF-1R), as monotherapy or in combination with cetuximab in patients with metastatic refractory anti–epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mAb colorectal cancer. Methods A randomized, phase II study was performed in which patients in arm A received IMC-A12 10 mg/kg intravenously (IV) every 2 weeks, while patients in arm B received this same dose of IMC-A12 plus cetuximab 500 mg/m 2 IV every 2 weeks. Subsequently, arm C (same combination treatment as arm B) was added to include patients who had disease control on a prior anti-EGFR mAb and wild-type KRAS tumors. Archived pretreatment tumor tissue was obtained when possible for KRAS, PIK3CA, and BRAF genotyping, and immunohistochemistry was obtained for pAKT as well as IGF-1R. Results Overall, 64 patients were treated (median age, 61 years; range, 40 to 84 years): 23 patients in arm A, 21 in arm B, and 20 in arm C. No antitumor activity was seen in the 23 patients treated with IMC-A12 monotherapy. Of the 21 patients randomly assigned to IMC-A12 plus cetuximab, one patient (with KRAS wild type) achieved a partial response, with disease control lasting 6.5 months. Arm C (all patients with KRAS wild type), however, showed no additional antitumor activity. Serious adverse events thought possibly related to IMC-A12 included a grade 2 infusion-related reaction (2%; one of 64 patients), thrombocytopenia (2%; one of 64 patients), grade 3 hyperglycemia (2%; one of 64 patients), and grade 1 pyrexia (2%, one of 64 patients). Conclusion IMC-A12 alone or in combination with cetuximab was insufficient to warrant additional study in patients with colorectal cancer refractory to EGFR inhibitors.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2010
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 604914-X
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 10
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 33, No. 1 ( 2015-01-01), p. 22-28
    Abstract: Progression-free survival (PFS) has previously been established as a surrogate for overall survival (OS) for first-line metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Because mCRC treatment has advanced in the last decade with extended OS, this surrogacy requires re-examination. Methods Individual patient data from 16,762 patients were available from 22 first-line mCRC studies conducted from 1997 to 2006; 12 of those studies tested antiangiogenic and/or anti–epidermal growth factor receptor agents. The relationship between PFS (first event of progression or death) and OS was evaluated by using R 2 statistics (the closer the value is to 1, the stronger the correlation) from weighted least squares regression of trial-specific hazard ratios estimated by using Cox and Copula models. Results Forty-four percent of patients received a regimen that included biologic agents. Median first-line PFS was 8.3 months, and median OS was 18.2 months. The correlation between PFS and OS was modest (R 2 , 0.45 to 0.69). Analyses limited to trials that tested treatments with biologic agents, nonstrategy trials, or superiority trials did not improve surrogacy. Conclusion In modern mCRC trials, in which survival after the first progression exceeds time to first progression, a positive but modest correlation was observed between OS and PFS at both the patient and trial levels. This finding demonstrates the substantial variability in OS introduced by the number of lines of therapy and types of effective subsequent treatments and the associated challenge to the use of OS as an end point to assess the benefit attributable to a single line of therapy. PFS remains an appropriate primary end point for first-line mCRC trials to detect the direct treatment effect of new agents.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2015
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 604914-X
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...