GLORIA

GEOMAR Library Ocean Research Information Access

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Springer Science and Business Media LLC ; 2018
    In:  Supportive Care in Cancer Vol. 26, No. 1 ( 2018-1), p. 251-260
    In: Supportive Care in Cancer, Springer Science and Business Media LLC, Vol. 26, No. 1 ( 2018-1), p. 251-260
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0941-4355 , 1433-7339
    Language: English
    Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
    Publication Date: 2018
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1463166-0
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) ; 2017
    In:  Journal of Clinical Oncology Vol. 35, No. 5_suppl ( 2017-02-10), p. 185-185
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 35, No. 5_suppl ( 2017-02-10), p. 185-185
    Abstract: 185 Background: Patients with advanced cancer and their caregivers may often accept shorter life expectancy to ensure higher quality of remaining months of life. Our objective was to elicit caregiver preferences for quality-adjusted survival associated with treatments for advanced melanoma using a discrete-choice experiment. Methods: Adults in Germany and Sweden caring for people with diagnoses of advanced melanoma completed a web-enabled, discrete-choice experiment. The survey presented caregivers with a series of 10 choice questions, each including three profiles – a pair of hypothetical melanoma treatments and standard of care. Each profile was defined by survival time (24 months, 12 months, 6 months), severity (mild, moderate, severe) of melanoma symptoms, nausea and vomiting, diarrhea, skin problems, and out-of-pocket cost. Treatment profile pairs in choice questions were based on an experimental design with known statistical properties. Standard of care was constant across all choice questions. Regression analysis related respondents’ choice to treatment characteristics and estimate preference weights in each country. Results: 188 respondents in Germany and 202 in Sweden completed the survey. Caregivers choices were consistent with accepting tradeoffs among efficacy, symptom severity, severity of toxicities and cost. Severity of melanoma symptoms was the most important outcome for Swedish caregivers and was approximately as important as survival time for German caregivers. German caregivers placed positive value on each additional month of survival regardless of symptom severity. In Sweden, additional months of survival were of positive value to caregivers except when melanoma symptoms were severe or patients experienced severe nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea concurrently. In all cases where additional months of survival had positive value, the incremental value of each additional month diminished as overall survival increased. Conclusions: Additional months of life with severe symptoms or toxicities may not be viewed as unambiguously good outcomes. Quality of survival is not only a key consideration, but may determine whether a given treatment for melanoma is considered better or worse than standard of care.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2017
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 32, No. 4_suppl ( 2014-02-01), p. 117-117
    Abstract: 117 Background: Limited treatments are available for patients with non-metastatic CRPC. Prophylactic treatment may be associated with adverse events (AE). We evaluated patient preferences for a medication delaying bone metastases (BM) with a risk of AE.Methods: UK and Swedish adults with CRPC at high risk for BM (on androgen-deprivation or hormone therapy for ≥ 3 yrs) completed an online discrete-choice experiment with 10 choice questions. Patients were asked if they would prefer to receive a hypothetical prophylactic medication (HPM) with a risk of osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ) to prevent BM or to decline HPM thus not receiving any treatment benefit or risk. HPMs were defined by delay in BM (0-23 months) and risk of ONJ (0-9%). The proportion of patients who chose HPM with different combinations of BM delay and ONJ risk was calculated. To further evaluate the impact of BM to patients, time tradeoff was used to assess patients’ willingness to trade off between life years with and without bone complications (i.e., skeletal-related events, including spinal cord compression, surgery or radiation to bone, and pathologic fracture).Results: A total of 201 UK patients and 200 Swedish patients completed the survey. As shown in the table, even a HPM with the lowest level of BM delay (5 months) and the highest level of ONJ risk (9%) was acceptable to the majority of patients in both countries. Furthermore, when asked about the tradeoff between life years with and without bone complications, 52% of UK patients and 26% of Swedish patients were willing to trade off 5 months of survival to avoid bone complications; nearly three-quarters of the patients were willing to trade off 3 months of survival to avoid bone complications. Conclusions: A majority of patients in the UK and Sweden were willing to take HPMs to delay BM, despite a treatment-related risk of ONJ and were willing to trade off 3 to 5 months of survival to avoid bone complications. [Table: see text]
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2014
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) ; 2012
    In:  Journal of Clinical Oncology Vol. 30, No. 15_suppl ( 2012-05-20), p. 4608-4608
    In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Vol. 30, No. 15_suppl ( 2012-05-20), p. 4608-4608
    Abstract: 4608 Background: Oral therapies (angiogenesis inhibitors and mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors) for renal cell carcinoma (RCC) have demonstrated significant improvements in progression-free survival but also possess toxicities. The objective of this study was to evaluate whether different toxicities of oral RCC therapies had equal importance to patients. Methods: US adults from the Kidney Cancer Association with a self-reported diagnosis of RCC completed a web-enabled survey. Respondents were asked to select the 3 most and 3 least troublesome toxicities from a list of 20 common RCC therapy toxicities. For each respondent, a value of 1 was assigned to each of the 3 most troublesome toxicities, a value of -1 was assigned to each of the 3 least troublesome toxicities, and a value of 0 was assigned to the remaining toxicities. A straight count method was applied to estimate the mean relative importance of each toxicity. Respondents also answered 10 treatment-choice questions, each of which included a pair of hypothetical RCC medication profiles described by survival, toxicities, and serious adverse events. Four toxicities including fatigue, mouth sores, hand-foot syndrome, and stomach problems were included in both exercises. Results: 264 of the 272 respondents completed the entire ranking exercise. Among the 20 toxicities, stomach problems was the most troublesome and was assigned an importance of 10. Changes in hair color was the least troublesome and was assigned an importance of 0. Patients ranked fatigue (8.2), mouth sores (7.7), hand-foot syndrome (6.6) by order of importance. When given choices among eliminating severe toxicities, fatigue was as important as stomach problems, both fatigue and stomach problems were more import than mouth sores, and mouth sores was more important than hand-foot syndrome; although not statistically significant. Conclusions: This statistical approach offers insight into those toxicities important to patients on chronic RCC therapies.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0732-183X , 1527-7755
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
    Publication Date: 2012
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2005181-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 5
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Oxford University Press (OUP) ; 2021
    In:  Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association Vol. 28, No. 6 ( 2021-06-12), p. 1117-1124
    In: Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, Oxford University Press (OUP), Vol. 28, No. 6 ( 2021-06-12), p. 1117-1124
    Abstract: Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly being proposed for use in medicine, including breast cancer screening (BCS). Little is known, however, about referring primary care providers’ (PCPs’) preferences for this technology. Methods We identified the most important attributes of AI BCS for ordering PCPs using qualitative interviews: sensitivity, specificity, radiologist involvement, understandability of AI decision-making, supporting evidence, and diversity of training data. We invited US-based PCPs to participate in an internet-based experiment designed to force participants to trade off among the attributes of hypothetical AI BCS products. Responses were analyzed with random parameters logit and latent class models to assess how different attributes affect the choice to recommend AI-enhanced screening. Results Ninety-one PCPs participated. Sensitivity was most important, and most PCPs viewed radiologist participation in mammography interpretation as important. Other important attributes were specificity, understandability of AI decision-making, and diversity of data. We identified 3 classes of respondents: “Sensitivity First” (41%) found sensitivity to be more than twice as important as other attributes; “Against AI Autonomy” (24%) wanted radiologists to confirm every image; “Uncertain Trade-Offs” (35%) viewed most attributes as having similar importance. A majority (76%) accepted the use of AI in a “triage” role that would allow it to filter out likely negatives without radiologist confirmation. Conclusions and Relevance Sensitivity was the most important attribute overall, but other key attributes should be addressed to produce clinically acceptable products. We also found that most PCPs accept the use of AI to make determinations about likely negative mammograms without radiologist confirmation.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1527-974X
    Language: English
    Publisher: Oxford University Press (OUP)
    Publication Date: 2021
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2018371-9
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 6
    In: Arthritis Research & Therapy, Springer Science and Business Media LLC, Vol. 20, No. 1 ( 2018-12)
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1478-6362
    Language: English
    Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
    Publication Date: 2018
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2041668-4
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 7
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    SAGE Publications ; 2010
    In:  Annals of Pharmacotherapy Vol. 44, No. 3 ( 2010-03), p. 479-488
    In: Annals of Pharmacotherapy, SAGE Publications, Vol. 44, No. 3 ( 2010-03), p. 479-488
    Abstract: Idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP) primarily is a disorder of adults characterized by autoantibody-induced platelet destruction and reduced platelet production, leading to a low peripheral blood platelet count. The long-term management of many patients with chronic ITP is unsatisfactory, largely due to the variable efficacy and risks of severe adverse effects associated with current treatment options. Objective: To estimate patients' benefit-risk preferences for treatments for ITP. Methods: Patients' adverse event risk tolerance and the levels of benefit required to offset possible risks were evaluated using choice-format conjoint analysis. Subjects chose between pairs of hypothetical treatment alternatives defined by probability of achieving safe platelet levels, need for corticosteroids, mode of administration, risk of rebound, risk of elevated liver enzyme levels, and risk of thromboembolism. Results: In this study, we demonstrate that patients have clear and measurable benefit-risk preferences that physicians should consider when discussing treatment options with their patients. Patients were willing to accept significant risks of adverse events in return for an increase in the probability of achieving safe platelet levels, to avoid corticosteroids, and for more convenient administration. Patients were willing to accept significant risks of rebound and elevated liver enzymes for improvements in outcomes. Conclusions: These results demonstrate that patients with ITP are willing to accept treatment-related risks in exchange for improvements in treatment efficacy and administration attributes and suggest the importance of considering a patient's benefit-risk preferences during discussions of therapeutic options.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1060-0280 , 1542-6270
    Language: English
    Publisher: SAGE Publications
    Publication Date: 2010
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2053518-1
    SSG: 15,3
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 8
    In: Current Medical Research and Opinion, Informa UK Limited, Vol. 30, No. 9 ( 2014-09-01), p. 1733-1741
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0300-7995 , 1473-4877
    Language: English
    Publisher: Informa UK Limited
    Publication Date: 2014
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2034331-0
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 9
    In: Vaccine, Elsevier BV, Vol. 36, No. 40 ( 2018-09), p. 6022-6029
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0264-410X
    Language: English
    Publisher: Elsevier BV
    Publication Date: 2018
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 1468474-3
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 10
    In: Patient Preference and Adherence, Informa UK Limited, Vol. Volume 14 ( 2020-06), p. 1049-1064
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1177-889X
    Language: English
    Publisher: Informa UK Limited
    Publication Date: 2020
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2455848-5
    Location Call Number Limitation Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...