Abstract: To compare races/ethnicities for characteristics, at type 1 diabetes diagnosis and during the first 3 years postdiagnosis, known to influence long-term health outcomes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS We analyzed 927 Pediatric Diabetes Consortium (PDC) participants & lt;19 years old (631 non-Hispanic white [NHW], 216 Hispanic, and 80 African American [AA] ) diagnosed with type 1 diabetes and followed for a median of 3.0 years (interquartile range 2.2–3.6). Demographic and clinical data were collected from medical records and patient/parent interviews. Partial remission period or “honeymoon” was defined as insulin dose–adjusted hemoglobin A1c (IDAA1c) ≤9.0%. We used logistic, linear, and multinomial regression models, as well as repeated-measures logistic and linear regression models. Models were adjusted for known confounders. RESULTS AA subjects, compared with NHW, at diagnosis, were in a higher age- and sex-adjusted BMI percentile (BMI%), had more advanced pubertal development, and had higher frequency of presentation in diabetic ketoacidosis, largely explained by socioeconomic factors. During the first 3 years, AA subjects were more likely to have hypertension and severe hypoglycemia events; had trajectories with higher hemoglobin A1c, BMI%, insulin doses, and IDAA1c; and were less likely to enter the partial remission period. Hispanics, compared with NHWs, had higher BMI% at diagnosis and over the three subsequent years. During the 3 years postdiagnosis, Hispanics had higher prevalence of dyslipidemia and maintained trajectories of higher insulin doses and IDAA1c. CONCLUSIONS Youth of minority race/ethnicity have increased markers of poor prognosis of type 1 diabetes at diagnosis and 3 years postdiagnosis, possibly contributing to higher risk of long-term diabetes complications compared with NHWs.

Abstract: Plasma epinephrine and norepinephrine concentrations were measured in five harbor seals, Phoca vitulina, during a control period, during a 6-min dive, and during a 30-min postdiving recovery period. Measurements were performed with and without prior glucose administration. Control epinephrine concentrations [189 +/- 118 (SD) pg/ml] and norepinephrine concentrations (340 +/- 191 pg/ml) were similar to resting values in humans. During diving there are dramatic increases in both epinephrine and norepinephrine concentrations, which returned to control values by 30 min of the postdiving recovery period. A similar pattern was found after glucose infusion. The increased catecholamines were not the primary mechanism responsible for arterial constriction during the dive. Persistent diving bradycardia suggests obliteration of the chronotropic effects of catecholamines during the dive. An unchanged stroke volume suggests obliteration of the inotropic effects of catecholamines during the dive. Catecholamines do not appear to be involved in postdiving hyperglycemia and hyperglucogenemia. Neither the regulatory role of increased catecholamines nor the physiological function of increased catecholamines was apparent from the studies. However, dramatic increases in plasma catecholamines during diving appear to be an important component of the hormonal response to prolonged diving in aquatic mammals.

Abstract: Objective. Docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) and arachidonic acid (ARA) are long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids found in breast milk and recently added to infant formulas. Their importance in infant nutrition was recognized by the rapid accretion of these fatty acids in the brain during the first postnatal year, reports of enhanced intellectual development in breastfed children, and recognition of the physiologic importance of DHA in visual and neural systems from studies in animal models. These considerations led to clinical trials to evaluate whether infant formulas that are supplemented with DHA or both DHA and ARA would enhance visual and cognitive development or whether conversion of linoleic acid and α-linolenic acid, the essential fatty acid precursors of ARA and DHA, respectively, at the levels found in infant formulas is sufficient to support adequately visual and cognitive development. Visual and cognitive development were not different with supplementation in some studies, whereas other studies reported benefits of adding DHA or both DHA and ARA to formula. One of the first trials with term infants that were fed formula supplemented with DHA or both DHA and ARA evaluated growth, visual acuity (Visual Evoked Potential; Acuity Card Procedure), mental and motor development (Bayley Scales of Infant Development), and early language development (MacArthur Communicative Developmental Inventories). Growth, visual acuity, and mental and motor development were not different among the 3 formula groups or between the breastfed and formula-fed infants in the first year of life. At 14 months of age, infants who were fed the formula with DHA but no ARA had lower vocabulary production and comprehension scores than infants who were fed the unsupplemented control formula or who were breastfed, respectively. The present follow-up study evaluated IQ, receptive and expressive vocabulary, visual-motor function, and visual acuity of children from the original trial when they reached 39 months of age. Methods. Infants were randomized within 1 week after birth and fed a control formula (n = 65), one containing DHA (n = 65), or one containing both ARA and DHA (n = 66) to 1 year of age. A comparison group (n = 80) was exclusively breastfed for at least 3 months after which the infants continued to be exclusively breastfed or were supplemented with and/or weaned to infant formula. At 39 months, standard tests of IQ (Stanford Binet IQ), receptive vocabulary (Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test-Revised), expressive vocabulary (mean length of utterance), visual-motor function (Beery Visual-Motor Index), and visual acuity (Acuity Card Procedure) were administered. Growth, red blood cell fatty acid levels, and morbidity also were evaluated. Results. Results were analyzed using analysis of variance or linear regression models. The regression model for IQ, receptive and expressive language, and the visual-motor index controlled for site, birth weight, sex, maternal education, maternal age, and the child’s age at testing. The regression model for visual acuity controlled for site only. A variable selection model also identified which of 22 potentially prognostic variables among different categories (feeding groups, the child and family demographics, indicators of illness since birth, and environment) were most influential for IQ and expressive vocabulary. A total of 157 (80%) of the 197 infants studied at 12 months participated in this follow-up study. Characteristics of the families were representative of US families with children up to 5 years of age, and there were no differences in the demographic or family characteristics among the randomized formula groups. As expected, the formula and breastfed groups differed in ethnicity, marital status, parental education, and the prevalence of smoking. Sex, ethnicity, gestational age at birth, and birth weight for those who participated at 39 months did not differ from those who did not. The 12-month Bayley mental and motor scores and 14-month vocabulary scores of the children who participated also were not different from those who did not. At 39 months, IQ, receptive and expressive language, visual-motor function, and visual acuity were not different among the 3 randomized formula groups or between the breastfed and formula groups. The adjusted means for the control, ARA+DHA, DHA, and breastfed groups were as follows: IQ scores, 104, 101, 100, 106; Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test, 99.2, 97.2, 95.1, 97.4; mean length of utterance, 3.64, 3.75, 3.93, 4.08; the visual-motor index, 2.26, 2.24, 2.05, 2.40; and visual acuity (cycles/degree), 30.4, 27.9, 27.5, 28.6, respectively. IQ was positively associated with female sex and maternal education and negatively associated with the number of siblings and exposure to cigarette smoking in utero and/or postnatally. Expressive language also was positively associated with maternal education and negatively associated with the average hours in child care per week and hospitalizations since birth but only when the breastfed group was included in the analysis. The associations between maternal education and child IQ scores are consistent with previous reports as are the associations between prenatal exposure to cigarette smoke and IQ and early language development. Approximately one third of the variance for IQ was explained by sex, maternal education, the number of siblings, and exposure to cigarette smoke. Growth achievement, red blood cell fatty acid levels, and morbidity did not differ among groups. Conclusions. We reported previously that infants who were fed an unsupplemented formula or one with DHA or with both DHA and ARA through 12 months or were breastfed showed no differences in mental and motor development, but those who were fed DHA without ARA had lower vocabulary scores on a standardized, parent-report instrument at 14 months of age when compared with infants who were fed the unsupplemented formula or who were breastfed. When the infants were reassessed at 39 months using age-appropriate tests of receptive and expressive language as well as IQ, visual-motor function and visual acuity, no differences among the formula groups or between the formula and breastfed groups were found. The 14-month observation thus may have been a transient effect of DHA (without ARA) supplementation on early vocabulary development or may have occurred by chance. The absence of differences in growth achievement adds to the evidence that DHA with or without ARA supports normal growth in full-term infants. In conclusion, adding both DHA and ARA when supplementing infant formulas with long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids supports visual and cognitive development through 39 months.

Abstract: To evaluate the effects of dietary intake of the long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids, arachidonic acid (AA), and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) on multiple indices of infant growth and development. Design. A double-masked, randomized, parallel trial was conducted with term infants fed formulas with or without AA+DHA for 1 year (N = 239). Reference groups of breastfed infants (N = 165) weaned to formulas with and without AA+DHA were also studied. Infants in the formula groups were randomized at ≤9 days of age to a control formula with no AA or DHA (n = 77) or 1 of 2 otherwise identical formulas containing AA+DHA (AA, 0.46% and DHA, 0.14% of total fatty acids) from either egg-derived triglyceride (egg-DTG [n=80]) or fish oil and fungal oil (fish/fungal [n = 82] ) at levels similar to the average in breast milk samples as measured in the reference group. All formulas contained 50% of energy from fat with the essential dietary fatty acids, linoleic acid (20% fatty acids) and α-linolenic acid (2% fatty acids). The main study outcomes were AA and DHA levels in plasma and red blood cells, and multiple measures of infant development at multiple ages from birth to 14 months: growth, visual acuity, information processing, general development, language, and temperament. Results. AA and DHA levels in plasma and red cells were higher in AA+DHA-supplemented groups than in the control formula group and comparable to those in reference groups. No developmental test results distinguished these groups. Expected differences in family demographics associated with breastfeeding were found, but no advantages to breastfeeding on any of the developmental outcome demonstrated. Conclusions. These findings do not support adding AA+DHA to formulas containing 10% energy as linoleic acid and 1% energy as α-linolenic acid to enhance growth, visual acuity, information processing, general development, language, or temperament in healthy, term infants during the first 14 months after birth.infant development, breast feeding, infant formula, long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids, docosahexaenoic acid.

Abstract: The effects of orexinergic peptides are diverse and are mediated by orexin-1 and orexin-2 receptors. Antagonists that target both receptors have been shown to promote sleep initiation and maintenance. Here, we investigated the role of the orexin-2 receptor in sleep regulation in a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, three-period crossover clinical trial using two doses (20 and 50 mg) of a highly selective orexin-2 receptor antagonist (2-SORA) (JNJ-48816274). We used a phase advance model of sleep disruption where sleep initiation is scheduled in the circadian wake maintenance zone. We assessed objective and subjective sleep parameters, pharmacokinetic profiles and residual effects on cognitive performance in 18 healthy male participants without sleep disorders. The phase advance model alone (placebo condition) resulted in disruption of sleep at the beginning of the sleep period compared to baseline sleep (scheduled at habitual time). Compared to placebo, both doses of JNJ-48816274 significantly increased total sleep time, REM sleep duration and sleep efficiency, and reduced latency to persistent sleep, sleep onset latency, and REM latency. All night EEG spectral power density for both NREM and REM sleep were unaffected by either dose. Participants reported significantly better quality of sleep and feeling more refreshed upon awakening following JNJ-48816274 compared to placebo. No significant residual effects on objective performance measures were observed and the compound was well tolerated. In conclusion, the selective orexin-2 receptor antagonist JNJ-48816274 rapidly induced sleep when sleep was scheduled earlier in the circadian cycle and improved self-reported sleep quality without impact on waking performance.