Abstract: e13560 Background: Glioblastoma is the most common primary malignant brain tumor with a poor prognosis. CD317 (HM1.24) is a transmembrane protein and may exist in differently spliced variants. It is highly expressed on plasma cells in multiple myeloma, as well as in certain solid tumor types. While several antibody drug conjugates are already in clinical practice, small immunotoxins with a different intracellular mode of action are only established in hairy cell leukemia. The immunotoxin HM1.24-ETA’ protein is a CD317 single chain Fv (scFv) antibody fused to a truncated version of Pseudomonas aeruginosa exotoxin A (ETA’). Methods: In vivo CD317 mRNA expression in human glioma of different grades and survival probabilities of glioblastoma patients based on CD317 mRNA expression were analyzed using the database of the Cancer Genome Atlas network (TCGA). CD317 protein expression was analyzed by immunohistochemistry in a human tissue microarray (TMA). In vitro CD317 mRNA expression was assessed by RT-PCR and CD317 protein levels by flow cytometry in several human glioblastoma cell lines. A cytotoxicity assay after treatment with HM1.24-ETA’ immunotoxin was performed in human glioblastoma cell lines. Results: Data on mRNA expression from the TCGA database demonstrated, that CD317 was upregulated in human glioblastomas compared to lower grade gliomas. In the group of glioblastoma patients increased CD317 mRNA expression was associated with decreased probability of survival ( p 〈 0.001). CD317 protein levels correlated directly with the tumor grade of astrocytic gliomas in the TMA. CD317 was expressed heterogeneously on mRNA and protein levels in the tested cell-lines in vitro. HM1.24-ETA’ induced cytotoxicity in CD317-positive glioblastoma cells in a concentration-dependent manner. Animal experiments currently performed suggest activity in glioblastoma xenografted mice. Conclusions: These data highlight CD317 as an interesting target antigen and HM1.24-ETA’ immunotoxin as a strategy for immunotherapy of glioblastoma patients.

Abstract: Abstract 131 Introduction. Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) after cytoreductive induction is considered standard of care for younger patients (pts) with multiple myeloma (MM). The previous standard of induction, the Vincristin-Adriamycin-Dexamethasone (VAD) combination, achieves inferior results compared with induction regimens which combine the proteasome inhibitor Velcade (V = Bortezomib) with Dexamethasone (D)(=VD) and a cytostatic drug such as Doxorubicin (PAD = VD plus Doxorubicin). Velcade-based induction therapy was shown to translate into better myeloma control after high dose melphalan and to lead to prolonged progression-free survival. In order to find a more efficacious and safer drug combination for induction therapy in MM, we tested the combination of Velcade with Cyclophosphamide and Dexamethasone (VCD). Methods. This trial was designed as an open, prospective, multi-center, uncontrolled, combined phase II/III study. As previously reported (Kropff M et al., Ann Hematol 2009), in the first 30 pts the optimal dose of iv Cyclophosphamide in combination with V and D was defined as 900 mg/m2 on d1. Between 03/2006 and 03/2009 we enrolled an additional 370 pts up to 60 years of age with untreated MM to receive three 3-week cycles of induction treatment with V 1.3 mg/m2 iv d1,4,8,11; D 40 mg/d orally d1,2,4,5,8,9,11,12; and C 900mg/m2 iv d1 before scheduled high dose melphalan and ASCT. The primary endpoint of the study is response rate on day 63 after 3 cycles of VCD according to EBMT and IMWG criteria. Results. Final data from 400 pts from 39 German centers will be presented at the meeting. In the currently evaluable 300 pts (mean age 52.3 years; 1.7% stage I, 21.3% stage II, 77.0% stage III) molecular cytogenetic analysis showed a prevalence of 13q- in 38%, of t[4;14] in 13% and of 17p- in 12% of pts (no changes in 35%). All 300 pts (88.3% of whom completed three cycles) were included in the intent-to-treat analysis. Overall response rate (ORR = CR+PR) was 84%, with 10% CR and 74% PR, 5.7% MR, 7.3% NC and 2.3% PD. The negative prognostic impact of 13q- or t[4;14] was abrogated (ORR normal 87.3%, 13q- 83.7%, t[4;14] 90.0%), the unfavorable influence of p53 loss in the 17p- subgroup was still detectable (ORR 69.2%) but this did not reach statistical significance. VGPR rates will be reported at the meeting. Serious adverse events were documented in 78/300 (26.0%) patients. Death rate was remarkably low (1.3%, of which one was not related to the trial medication). 155/300 (52%) of pts experienced grade 3/4 non-serious AEs and of these leucopenia (93/300 pts= 31%), thrombocytopenia (7%), neutropenia (6%), anaemia (5%) were the most frequent events. 80 AEs grade 3 or 4 and 45 SAEs were of infectious origin and occurred in 47/300 pts. 80/130 SAEs (61.5%) were at least possibly related to Velcade. 101/300 pts (34%) developed episodes of peripheral neuropathy. PNP was grade 1 in 62/300 pt (20.7%), grade 2 in 31/300 pt (10.3%) and grade 3 in 7/300 pts (2.3%). Conclusion. This analysis demonstrates that proteasome inhibition by Velcade in combination with Dexamethasone and iv Cyclophosphamide (VCD) is an induction regimen for newly diagnosed MM which is highly effective in a short period of time, has a rather low toxicity profile and is feasible for administration in an outpatient setting. Based on these characteristics, VCD qualifies to become a new standard for MM induction therapy. Disclosures: Einsele: OrthioBiotech: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Off Label Use: Bortezomib is licensed as monotherapy for use in relapsed/refractory MM and in combination with melphalan/Prednisone in the first-line treatment of MM pts ineligible for HD-MEL and ASCT. . Liebisch:OrthoBiotech: Consultancy, Honoraria. Langer:OrthoBiotech: Consultancy. Kropff:OrthoBiotech: Consultancy, Honoraria. Kröger:OrthoBiotech: Honoraria. Ostermann:OrthoBiotech: Honoraria. Mügge:OrthoBiotech: Honoraria. Wolf:OrthoBiotech: Honoraria. Gramatzki:OrthoBiotech: Consultancy, Honoraria. Maschmeyer:OrthoBiotech: Travel Grant. Sezer:OrthoBiotech: Consultancy, Honoraria. Heidemann:OrthoBiotech: Honoraria. Jäger:OrthoBiotech: Honoraria. Dechow:Celgene: Research Funding. Simon:OrthoBiotech: Honoraria. Straka:OrthoBiotech: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Fingerle-Rowson:orthoBiotech: Employment. Knop:OrthoBiotech: Honoraria.

Abstract: To evaluate the role of a second allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT2) given for relapsed acute leukemia (AL) after related or unrelated first hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT1) and to analyze the role of donor change for HSCT2 in both settings. Patients and Methods We performed a retrospective registry study on 179 HSCT2s given for relapse after HSCT1 from matched related donors (n = 75) or unrelated donors (n = 104), using identical or alternative donors for HSCT2. Separate analyses were performed according to donor at HSCT1. Results Independent of donor, 74% of patients achieved complete remission after HSCT2, and half of these patients experienced relapse again. Overall survival (OS) at 2 years was 25% ± 4% (39% ± 7% after related HSCT2; 19% ± 4% after unrelated HSCT2). Long-term survivors were observed even after two unrelated HSCT2s. Multivariate analysis for OS from HSCT2 confirmed established risk factors (remission duration after HSCT1: hazard ratio [HR], 2.37; 95% CI, 1.61 to 3.46; P 〈 .001; stage at HSCT2: HR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.34 to 0.83; P = .006). Outcome of HSCT2 was better after related HSCT1 than after unrelated HSCT1 (2-year OS: 37% ± 6% v 16% ± 4%, respectively; HR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.47 to 0.98; P = .042, multivariate Cox regression). After both related and unrelated HSCT1, selecting a new donor for HSCT2 did not result in a relevant improvement in OS compared with HSCT2 from the original donor; however, donor change was not detrimental either. Conclusion After relapse from allogeneic HSCT1, HSCT2 can induce 2-year OS in approximately 25% of patients. Unrelated HSCT2 is feasible after related and unrelated HSCT1. Donor change for HSCT2 is a valid option. However, a clear advantage in terms of OS could not be demonstrated.

Abstract: A post hoc analysis of two phase III trials was carried out to explore the influence of age and treatment factors on the effect of bortezomib consolidation on progression‐free survival (PFS) post autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). Methods Patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma were assigned to one of two trials (ClinicalTrials.gov IDs: NCT00416273, NCT00416208), which were conducted in parallel, based on age (18‐60 or 61‐75 years, respectively). Following induction and ASCT, patients were randomized 1:1 to four 35‐day cycles of bortezomib consolidation (1.6 mg/m 2 IV on days 1, 8, 15, 22) or observation only. Results Median PFS with bortezomib consolidation vs observation was 33.6 vs 29.0 months ( P  = 0.3599) in patients aged 18‐60 years (n = 202), and 33.4 vs 26.4 months ( P  = 0.0073) in patients aged 61‐75 years (n = 155), respectively. Bortezomib consolidation post‐ASCT appeared to equalize outcomes between older and younger patients who received prior treatment of differing intensity. This suggests that the effect of consolidation may be relative and may depend on the composition and intensity of induction and high‐dose therapy. Conclusion Older patients receiving less intensive prior treatment could experience a larger PFS benefit from bortezomib consolidation.

Abstract: Background High-dose therapy (HDT) with autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is the established standard-of-care for patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) who are young and/or fit. The number of older patients receiving HDT-ASCT is increasing, although they often receive lower-intensity treatment. Novel agent-based consolidation therapy can be used to improve responses following ASCT and prolong progression-free survival (PFS). The proteasome inhibitor bortezomib, given as post-ASCT consolidation therapy, resulted in an improved PFS compared with observation alone (median 33.6 vs 27.8 months, adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0.70, p=0.0058) in a combined analysis of two phase 3 trials (MMY3012 [DSMM XIb; NCT00416273] and MMY3013 [DSMM X; NCT00416208]; JCO 2015;33:8511). These studies enrolled 222 patients aged ≤60 years and 158 aged 〉 60 years. In this post-hoc analysis we investigated the effect of age and related treatment factors on PFS in more detail. Methods In both trials, 371 patients were randomized 1:1 following ASCT to receive four 35-day cycles of bortezomib consolidation (n=186; bortezomib 1.6 mg/m2 IV administered on days 1, 8, 15, and 22) or observation (n=185; no treatment). The primary endpoint was PFS from the start of induction chemotherapy. Response and progression were assessed at the start of each bortezomib cycle and at the end-of-treatment/observation visit (week 25), as well as during the follow-up period of 30-60 months. Patient characteristics and treatments were compared between trials; PFS following randomization was assessed separately for each study. Univariate, bivariate, and multivariate Cox regressions were conducted to evaluate the impact of treatment group, age (≤60 vs 〉 60 years), single vs tandem ASCT, melphalan conditioning dose (MEL 〈 200 vs 200 mg/m2), bortezomib exposure during induction (exposed vs naïve), post-ASCT response (partial response vs ≥very good partial response [VGPR]), and cytogenetics on PFS. Results A number of relevant factors were different between age groups (median age in ≤60 group 53 years vs 66 years in 〉 60 group), including the HDT regimen received (MEL100 7% vs 10%; MEL140 3% vs 59%; MEL200 88% vs 31%). The rate of double transplantation was similar for the younger and older cohorts (55% vs 59%), likely due to the older patients receiving age-adjusted high-dose melphalan with a lower toxicity, allowing a similar rate of double transplantation as younger patients receiving MEL200. Among the 357 patients included in these analyses, median PFS from start of induction was 33.6 vs 27.8 months with bortezomib consolidation vs observation (log-rank p=0.0243). Median PFS for bortezomib vs observation was 33.6 vs 29.0 months (HR 0.86; p=0.3599) in the younger cohort and 33.4 vs 26.4 months (HR 0.60; p=0.0073) in the older cohort. PFS for older patients who received bortezomib consolidation was very similar to PFS in younger patients (p=0.861); survival curves were superimposable despite the older patients having received less intensive pretreatment. Univariate analysis demonstrated that treatment group (bortezomib vs observation) had an effect on PFS (HR 0.75; exploratory p-value 〈 0.05), as did age ( 〉 60 vs ≤60 years; HR 1.30), melphalan dose (200 vs 〈 200 mg/m2; HR 0.74), single vs tandem ASCT (HR 1.35), and cytogenetics (high-risk vs no change; HR 2.62). On bivariate analysis of treatment group plus other covariates, the PFS benefit of bortezomib consolidation vs observation remained consistent (HR 0.71-0.76) across analyses with other covariates. On multivariate Cox regression analysis (Table), bortezomib consolidation (HR 0.72), prior bortezomib during induction (HR 0.69), ≥VGPR post-ASCT (HR 0.76), high-risk cytogenetics (HR 2.58), and single vs tandem ASCT (HR 1.54) were independent prognostic factors for PFS. Conclusions For patients with NDMM, bortezomib consolidation post-ASCT appeared to equalize the outcome for older patients who had received less intensive pretreatment than younger patients prior to randomization. A consistent PFS benefit was demonstrated with bortezomib consolidation vs observation in the context of other prognostic factors. In a multivariate analysis, the use of tandem transplantation retained independent prognostic relevance, whereas MEL200 as first HDT did not. Table. Table. Disclosures Straka: Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel/Accommodation/Expenses, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Onyx: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel/Accommodation/Expenses; Chugai: Research Funding. Knop:Takeda: Consultancy. Vogel:Janssen-Cilag GmbH: Employment. Kropff:Celgene: Consultancy, Other: Travel/Accommodation/Expenses, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Other: Travel/Accommodation/Expenses, Speakers Bureau; Onyx: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Metzner:Amgen: Consultancy; Sanofi: Consultancy; Celgene: Other: Travel/Accommodation/Expenses; Takeda: Other: Travel/Accommodation/Expenses. Langer:Celgene: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy. Sayer:Riemser Pharma: Consultancy. Bassermann:Celgene: Other: Travel/Accommodation/Expenses. Gramatzki:Janssen: Other: Travel/Accommodation/Expenses, Research Funding. Rösler:Janssen: Consultancy, Other: Travel/Accommodation/Expenses. Engelhardt:MSD: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel/Accommodation/Expenses , Research Funding. Fischer:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria. Einsele:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel/Accommodation/Expenses , Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel/Accommodation/Expenses , Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Other: Travel/Accommodation/Expenses , Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau.

Abstract: We present an analysis of prognostic factors derived from a trial in patients with acute myeloid leukemia older than 60 years. The AML96 trial included 909 patients with a median age of 67 years (range, 61-87 years). Treatment included cytarabine-based induction therapy followed by 1 consolidation. The median follow-up time for all patients is 68 months (5.7 years). A total of 454 of all 909 patients reached a complete remission (50%). Five-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival were 9.7% and 14%, respectively. Multivariate analyses revealed that karyotype, age, NPM1 mutation status, white blood cell count, lactate dehydrogenase, and CD34 expression were of independent prognostic significance for OS. On the basis of the multivariate Cox model, an additive risk score was developed that allowed the subdivision of the largest group of patients with an intermediate-risk karyotype into 2 groups. We are, therefore, able to distinguish 4 prognostic groups: favorable risk, good intermediate risk, adverse intermediate risk, and high risk. The corresponding 3-year OS rates were 39.5%, 30%, 10.6%, and 3.3%, respectively. The risk model allows further stratification of patients with intermediate-risk karyotype into 2 prognostic groups with implications for the therapeutic strategy. This study was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT00180115.

Abstract: Abstract 3328 Poster Board III-216 Introduction Relapse is a major cause of treatment failure after alloSCT against acute leukaemia, and no standard treatment has been established in this challenging situation. The introduction of reduced conditioning regimens, and the broader availability of alternative donors have increased the possibilities to perform a second alloSCT as salvage treatment, using different preparative regimen and/or different stem cell donors. Methods To evaluate the role of a second alloSCT (tx2) for the treatment of relapse after first alloSCT (tx1), we performed a nationwide retrospective analysis based on the German registry for stem cell transplantation (DRST). Datasets were completed by the reporting centres on request, following a specifically designed questionnaire. Results 212 patients (69% AML, 31% ALL), from 23 centres were included. Median age at tx1 was 37y. Donor at tx1 were HLA identical siblings (41%), matched unrelated (39%), mismatched family or unrelated (17%) or syngeneic donors (3%). Conditioning intensity at tx1 was standard (SIC, 62%), intermediate (intC, 25%) or reduced (RIC, 13%). Median remission after tx1 was 7 months, median time from relapse to tx2 was 74d. At tx2, patients were aplastic (4%), in CR (20%) or showed active disease (76%). In 59%, the same donor was used for tx1 and tx2, whereas a different donor was chosen in 41%. Conditioning at tx1/tx2 were SIC/SIC (14%), intC/intC (10%), (RIC/RIC (10%), less intensive at tx2 (mostly intC or RIC after SIC, 58%), or more intensive at tx2 (SIC after RIC or intC, 8%). Following tx2, CR was achieved in 56% of patients, out of which 81% relapsed again. Hence, leukemia was the most frequent cause of death. With a median FU of 23 months after tx2, median OS after tx2 is 117d. In a univariate analysis (log rank), OS after tx2 depended on stage at tx1 (CR vs. active disease, p 〈 .001), stage at tx2 (CR vs. aplastic/active disease, p=.011) and duration of remission after tx1 ( 〈 =6m (1y OS 5%) vs. 6-12m (15%) vs. 〉 12m (31%), p 〈 .001). No significant difference was observed regarding age ( median), AML vs. ALL, family versus unrelated donor, or time point of alloSCT (2002). Shift to an alternative donor did not improve the results either. In a multivariate analysis (Cox Regression Model), time of remission after tx1 was the only significant factor for OS (p 〈 .001, hazard ratio .51, 95%CI .49-.74). Conclusion Survival of acute leukemia after second allogeneic SCT is determined by the duration of remission after tx1. Using an alternative donor for tx2 did not improve the results in our series. Further analysis is required to evaluate the role of RIC regimen for tx2. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.